AMD EPYC 9375F
AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores
At a Glance
AMDAMD EPYC 9375F Specifications
EPYC 9375F Core Configuration
Processing cores and threading
The AMD EPYC 9375F features 32 physical cores and 64 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.
EPYC 9375F Clock Speeds
Base and boost frequencies
Clock speed is a critical factor in EPYC 9375F benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The EPYC 9375F by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.
AMD's EPYC 9375F Cache Hierarchy
L1, L2, L3 cache sizes
Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the EPYC 9375F processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The EPYC 9375F's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.
Zen 5 Architecture & Process
Manufacturing and design details
The AMD EPYC 9375F is built on AMD's 4 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in EPYC 9375F incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.
Zen 5 Instruction Set Features
Supported CPU instructions and extensions
The EPYC 9375F by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.
Power & Thermal
TDP and power specifications
The AMD EPYC 9375F has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 320W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.
AMD Socket SP5 Platform & Socket
Compatibility information
The EPYC 9375F uses the AMD Socket SP5 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.
AMD Socket SP5 Memory Support
RAM compatibility and speeds
Memory support specifications for the EPYC 9375F define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the EPYC 9375F determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.
Product Information
Release and pricing details
The AMD EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the EPYC 9375F by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.
About AMD EPYC 9375F
The AMD EPYC 9375F is a 32-core, 64-thread server/workstation processor built on the Zen 5 architecture (codename Turin) and manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It runs at a base clock of 3.85 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 256 MB shared L3 cache. In the benchmark database, it sits in the 99th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 162497. That score places it in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals, where the largest gap is just 5.4%. The processor is designed for high-throughput environments, but its strong single-thread scores also make it responsive for mixed workloads.
Who Should Consider It
The benchmark results indicate a processor aimed squarely at multi-threaded, compute-intensive tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 81402 and Passmark multithread score of 95768 are strong indicators for workloads that scale across many cores, such as 3D rendering, scientific simulation, and video encoding. The Passmark integer math score of 387901 and data compression score of 1496149 further suggest excellent performance in database operations, file servers, and data analytics. For cryptographic and vectorized workloads, the encryption score of 73634 and extended instructions score of 128296 show that the EPYC 9375F can handle secure transactions and SIMD-heavy code without bottlenecks. The floating-point math score of 260392 also supports computational fluid dynamics and machine learning inference. The single-thread performance is not neglected: a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 11492 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3762 mean that interactive sessions, latency-sensitive queries, and lightly threaded applications will run smoothly. This makes the processor suitable for mixed enterprise environments where a single server must handle both batch processing and real-time requests. It is less appropriate for typical consumer gaming or desktop use—the lack of integrated graphics and the server-oriented SP5 platform target workstations and data centers rather than home builds. The physics score of 9019 and random string sorting score of 161091 round out a profile that is versatile but clearly optimized for server and workstation duty.
Platform and Compatibility
The EPYC 9375F uses the AMD Socket SP5, which is the foundation for EPYC server platforms. It supports DDR5 memory across a twelve-channel bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support for error correction in mission-critical applications. The PCIe connectivity is extensive: Gen 5 with 128 lanes available from the CPU. This allows for multiple high-speed NVMe drives, accelerators, and network cards without a separate chipset. The processor has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU or a server management controller is required for display output. The launch MSRP is $5306. It is an active production part, released on 2024-10-09, and belongs to the EPYC Zen 5 (Turin) generation. The process node is 4 nm at TSMC, with a die composed of 8 chiplets each 70.6 mm², totaling 66,520 million transistors. The twelve-channel memory architecture is a key differentiator from desktop platforms, providing the bandwidth necessary to feed 32 cores and 64 threads under sustained load. The 128 PCIe lanes are particularly valuable for GPU compute clusters or storage arrays. The part is not multiplier-unlocked, indicating it is intended for fixed-clock server operation rather than overclocking. The large 256 MB shared L3 cache helps reduce memory latency and improve data locality in multi-threaded workloads. The platform is designed for density and reliability, with ECC memory and server-grade power delivery.
Benchmark Performance
The average benchmark score of 162497 places the EPYC 9375F in a competitive field. It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7663, 1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9355P, but 3.2% behind the AMD EPYC 7C13 and 5.4% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. These deltas are small, meaning the 9375F is essentially at parity with its nearest rivals in overall performance. Looking at specific benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 81402 is a strong indicator of sustained all-core performance. The single-core score of 11492 shows that the Zen 5 architecture delivers high instructions-per-clock. In Passmark, the multithread score of 95768 and integer math score of 387901 are particularly high, while the floating-point math score of 260392 also contributes. The data compression score of 1496149 is a standout, suggesting excellent throughput for archive and storage workloads. The encryption score of 73634 and extended instructions score of 128296 indicate strong cryptographic and SIMD performance. The physics score of 9019 and random string sorting score of 161091 round out the profile. The 99th percentile ranking confirms that this processor outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database. The small deltas to rivals mean that purchasing decisions may hinge on platform features or price, but the raw performance is competitive. The Cinebench R15 and R20 scores—8205 multi-core and 34188 multi-core, respectively—show consistent scaling across benchmark versions, while single-core scores of 1158 (R15) and 4826 (R20) reinforce the strong per-core capability.
FAQ
Q: What socket does the AMD EPYC 9375F use?
A: It uses AMD Socket SP5.
Q: How many cores and threads does it have?
A: It has 32 cores and 64 threads.
Q: What is the memory configuration?
A: It supports DDR5 memory with a twelve-channel bus, providing 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, and includes ECC support.
Q: Does it have integrated graphics?
A: No, it has no integrated graphics.
Q: What is the TDP?
A: The TDP is 320 watts.
Q: What is the launch MSRP?
A: The launch MSRP is $5306.
Q: What PCIe version and lane count does it support?
A: It supports PCIe Gen 5 with 128 lanes from the CPU.
Power and Thermals
The EPYC 9375F has a TDP of 320 watts, which is high and typical for a 32-core server processor. This TDP class requires a robust cooling solution—typically a large air cooler or a liquid cooling loop designed for server sockets. The 4 nm process helps manage power efficiency, but the high core count and boost clock of 4.80 GHz still demand substantial thermal dissipation. The data does not include any thermal or power measurements beyond the TDP, so the implication is that the platform must be designed for 320W operation. In a server chassis, this usually means high-static-pressure fans and adequate airflow. The lack of an integrated GPU reduces overall power draw slightly, but the CPU itself is a major power consumer. For workstation builds, users should ensure their power supply and motherboard VRM can handle the 320W TDP. The boost clock of 4.80 GHz is a peak value; sustained all-core loads will likely run at lower frequencies depending on cooling and power limits. The 8-chiplet design (8x 70.6 mm²) may spread heat across the package, but the overall thermal management remains a key consideration. The 256 MB shared L3 cache, while beneficial for performance, also adds to the thermal footprint. The processor's active production status suggests that cooling solutions are available from server OEMs and aftermarket vendors, but the 320W envelope is a firm constraint.
Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior
The EPYC 9375F demonstrates a balanced profile between single-thread and multi-thread performance. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 11492 is high, reflecting the Zen 5 architecture's strong IPC. The Passmark single-thread score of 3762 confirms this. Meanwhile, the multi-core scores are much higher: R23 multi-core 81402 and Passmark multithread 95768. The ratio between multi-thread and single-thread scores indicates excellent scaling across 32 cores. For real workloads, this means that applications with a mix of lightly and heavily threaded tasks will perform well. For example, a database server handling many short queries (single-threaded) will benefit from the high per-core speed, while batch processing (multi-threaded) will leverage the full core count. The data compression score of 1496149 and integer math score of 387901 are multi-threaded workloads that show the chip's ability to sustain high throughput. The single-thread performance also matters for latency-sensitive operations, such as network packet processing or interactive sessions. The 256 MB shared L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, further improving both single and multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R15 and R20 single-core scores—1158 and 4826, respectively—are consistent with the R23 result, indicating that the per-core performance is stable across benchmark generations. The Passmark single-thread score of 3762 is notably high for a server processor, suggesting that the EPYC 9375F does not compromise on single-thread responsiveness even with 32 cores. Overall, the split suggests a processor that is not just a many-core brute but also a capable per-core performer, making it versatile for diverse server and workstation workloads.
Detailed benchmark scores and charts for the AMD EPYC 9375F are below.
Benchmark Scores
cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource
Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how AMD EPYC 9375F performs in parallel rendering workloads.
cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how AMD EPYC 9375F handles tasks that can't be parallelized.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource
Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on AMD EPYC 9375F. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors. Content creators and 3D artists use this benchmark to estimate real-world render performance.
cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of AMD EPYC 9375F. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs. Single-thread performance remains critical for gaming and applications with serial bottlenecks.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource
Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of AMD EPYC 9375F after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss. Professional users rely on R23 scores to predict real-world rendering performance under sustained workloads.
cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource
Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how AMD EPYC 9375F maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance. This score is particularly important for understanding real-world responsiveness beyond initial boost behavior.
passmark_data_compressionSource
Data compression measures how fast AMD EPYC 9375F can compress and decompress files. This is important for archiving, backup software, and file transfer applications. Higher scores mean faster ZIP, RAR, and backup operations. Software distribution and cloud storage services benefit from efficient compression performance.
passmark_data_encryptionSource
Data encryption tests how fast AMD EPYC 9375F can encrypt information using AES and other algorithms. This is critical for security applications, VPNs, and secure communications. Modern CPUs with AES-NI hardware acceleration score significantly higher.
passmark_extended_instructionsSource
Extended instructions tests AMD EPYC 9375F performance using SSE and AVX instruction sets. These specialized instructions accelerate multimedia, scientific, and AI workloads. Video encoding and image processing heavily utilize SIMD capabilities. Machine learning inference and scientific computing also benefit from strong SIMD performance.
passmark_find_prime_numbersSource
Find prime numbers tests AMD EPYC 9375F ability to identify primes through intensive calculations. This is a pure computational benchmark that stresses CPU arithmetic units without memory bottlenecks.
passmark_floating_point_mathSource
Floating point math measures how AMD EPYC 9375F handles decimal calculations critical for scientific computing and 3D rendering. This affects performance in CAD and physics simulations. Game physics engines also rely heavily on floating point operations. Scientific and engineering applications benefit significantly from higher floating point scores.
passmark_integer_mathSource
Integer math tests how fast AMD EPYC 9375F processes whole number calculations essential for database operations and compression algorithms. This is fundamental to general computing performance. Encryption and data processing heavily rely on integer operations.
passmark_multithreadSource
PassMark multi-thread tests AMD EPYC 9375F across integer math, floating point, compression, and encryption using all cores. This provides an overall multi-threaded CPU performance score. The combined result reflects general-purpose parallel computing capability.
passmark_physicsSource
Physics tests how AMD EPYC 9375F handles physics simulations used in games and engineering software. This measures performance in calculating object interactions and movements. Games with complex physics benefit from higher scores. Engineering applications like structural analysis and fluid dynamics also rely on physics computation.
passmark_random_string_sortingSource
Random string sorting measures how fast AMD EPYC 9375F can organize text data. This is important for database operations, search indexing, and data processing applications. Applications that process large amounts of text benefit from higher scores. Database servers and search engines rely heavily on efficient string manipulation.
passmark_single_threadSource
PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of AMD EPYC 9375F across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications.
passmark_singlethreadSource
PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of AMD EPYC 9375F across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications. Higher scores mean better system responsiveness in everyday use.
Compare with Other CPUs
Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.
Browse CPUs