AMD

AMD EPYC 9375F

AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores

32
Cores
64
Threads
4.8
GHz Boost
320W
TDP
ECC Memory

At a Glance

AMD
Cores / Threads 32C / 64T
Boost Clock 4.8 GHz
Base Clock 3.85 GHz
L3 Cache 256 MB (shared)
TDP 320W
Architecture Zen 5
Socket AMD Socket SP5
nm
Process 4 nm
Released Oct 2024

AMD EPYC 9375F Specifications

EPYC 9375F Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The AMD EPYC 9375F features 32 physical cores and 64 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
32
Threads
64
SMP CPUs
2

EPYC 9375F Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in EPYC 9375F benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The EPYC 9375F by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
3.85 GHz
Boost Clock
4.8 GHz
Multiplier
38.5x

AMD's EPYC 9375F Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the EPYC 9375F processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The EPYC 9375F's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
80 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)

Zen 5 Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The AMD EPYC 9375F is built on AMD's 4 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in EPYC 9375F incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
Zen 5
Codename
Turin
Process Node
4 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Transistors
66,520 million
Die Size
8x 70.6 mm²
Generation
EPYC (Zen 5 (Turin))

Zen 5 Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The EPYC 9375F by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
AVX-512
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2

Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The AMD EPYC 9375F has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 320W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
320W
Configurable TDP
320-400 W

AMD Socket SP5 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The EPYC 9375F uses the AMD Socket SP5 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
AMD Socket SP5
PCIe
Gen 5, 128 Lanes(CPU only)
Package
FC-LGA6096
DDR5

AMD Socket SP5 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the EPYC 9375F define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the EPYC 9375F determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Type
DDR5
Memory Bus
Twelve-channel
Memory Bandwidth
576.0 GB/s
ECC Memory
Supported

Product Information

Release and pricing details

The AMD EPYC 9375F is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the EPYC 9375F by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.

Manufacturer
AMD
Release Date
Oct 2024
Launch Price
$5306
Market
Server/Workstation
Status
Active
Part Number
100-000001197

About AMD EPYC 9375F

The AMD EPYC 9375F is a 32-core, 64-thread server/workstation processor built on the Zen 5 architecture (codename Turin) and manufactured on TSMC's 4 nm process. It runs at a base clock of 3.85 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz, with a 256 MB shared L3 cache. In the benchmark database, it sits in the 99th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 162497. That score places it in a tight cluster with its nearest rivals, where the largest gap is just 5.4%. The processor is designed for high-throughput environments, but its strong single-thread scores also make it responsive for mixed workloads.

Who Should Consider It

The benchmark results indicate a processor aimed squarely at multi-threaded, compute-intensive tasks. The Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 81402 and Passmark multithread score of 95768 are strong indicators for workloads that scale across many cores, such as 3D rendering, scientific simulation, and video encoding. The Passmark integer math score of 387901 and data compression score of 1496149 further suggest excellent performance in database operations, file servers, and data analytics. For cryptographic and vectorized workloads, the encryption score of 73634 and extended instructions score of 128296 show that the EPYC 9375F can handle secure transactions and SIMD-heavy code without bottlenecks. The floating-point math score of 260392 also supports computational fluid dynamics and machine learning inference. The single-thread performance is not neglected: a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 11492 and a Passmark single-thread score of 3762 mean that interactive sessions, latency-sensitive queries, and lightly threaded applications will run smoothly. This makes the processor suitable for mixed enterprise environments where a single server must handle both batch processing and real-time requests. It is less appropriate for typical consumer gaming or desktop use—the lack of integrated graphics and the server-oriented SP5 platform target workstations and data centers rather than home builds. The physics score of 9019 and random string sorting score of 161091 round out a profile that is versatile but clearly optimized for server and workstation duty.

Platform and Compatibility

The EPYC 9375F uses the AMD Socket SP5, which is the foundation for EPYC server platforms. It supports DDR5 memory across a twelve-channel bus, delivering a memory bandwidth of 576.0 GB/s, and includes ECC memory support for error correction in mission-critical applications. The PCIe connectivity is extensive: Gen 5 with 128 lanes available from the CPU. This allows for multiple high-speed NVMe drives, accelerators, and network cards without a separate chipset. The processor has no integrated graphics, so a discrete GPU or a server management controller is required for display output. The launch MSRP is $5306. It is an active production part, released on 2024-10-09, and belongs to the EPYC Zen 5 (Turin) generation. The process node is 4 nm at TSMC, with a die composed of 8 chiplets each 70.6 mm², totaling 66,520 million transistors. The twelve-channel memory architecture is a key differentiator from desktop platforms, providing the bandwidth necessary to feed 32 cores and 64 threads under sustained load. The 128 PCIe lanes are particularly valuable for GPU compute clusters or storage arrays. The part is not multiplier-unlocked, indicating it is intended for fixed-clock server operation rather than overclocking. The large 256 MB shared L3 cache helps reduce memory latency and improve data locality in multi-threaded workloads. The platform is designed for density and reliability, with ECC memory and server-grade power delivery.

Benchmark Performance

The average benchmark score of 162497 places the EPYC 9375F in a competitive field. It is 0.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7663, 1% ahead of the AMD EPYC 9355P, but 3.2% behind the AMD EPYC 7C13 and 5.4% behind the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. These deltas are small, meaning the 9375F is essentially at parity with its nearest rivals in overall performance. Looking at specific benchmarks, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 81402 is a strong indicator of sustained all-core performance. The single-core score of 11492 shows that the Zen 5 architecture delivers high instructions-per-clock. In Passmark, the multithread score of 95768 and integer math score of 387901 are particularly high, while the floating-point math score of 260392 also contributes. The data compression score of 1496149 is a standout, suggesting excellent throughput for archive and storage workloads. The encryption score of 73634 and extended instructions score of 128296 indicate strong cryptographic and SIMD performance. The physics score of 9019 and random string sorting score of 161091 round out the profile. The 99th percentile ranking confirms that this processor outperforms the vast majority of CPUs in the database. The small deltas to rivals mean that purchasing decisions may hinge on platform features or price, but the raw performance is competitive. The Cinebench R15 and R20 scores—8205 multi-core and 34188 multi-core, respectively—show consistent scaling across benchmark versions, while single-core scores of 1158 (R15) and 4826 (R20) reinforce the strong per-core capability.

FAQ

Q: What socket does the AMD EPYC 9375F use?

A: It uses AMD Socket SP5.

Q: How many cores and threads does it have?

A: It has 32 cores and 64 threads.

Q: What is the memory configuration?

A: It supports DDR5 memory with a twelve-channel bus, providing 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, and includes ECC support.

Q: Does it have integrated graphics?

A: No, it has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the TDP?

A: The TDP is 320 watts.

Q: What is the launch MSRP?

A: The launch MSRP is $5306.

Q: What PCIe version and lane count does it support?

A: It supports PCIe Gen 5 with 128 lanes from the CPU.

Power and Thermals

The EPYC 9375F has a TDP of 320 watts, which is high and typical for a 32-core server processor. This TDP class requires a robust cooling solution—typically a large air cooler or a liquid cooling loop designed for server sockets. The 4 nm process helps manage power efficiency, but the high core count and boost clock of 4.80 GHz still demand substantial thermal dissipation. The data does not include any thermal or power measurements beyond the TDP, so the implication is that the platform must be designed for 320W operation. In a server chassis, this usually means high-static-pressure fans and adequate airflow. The lack of an integrated GPU reduces overall power draw slightly, but the CPU itself is a major power consumer. For workstation builds, users should ensure their power supply and motherboard VRM can handle the 320W TDP. The boost clock of 4.80 GHz is a peak value; sustained all-core loads will likely run at lower frequencies depending on cooling and power limits. The 8-chiplet design (8x 70.6 mm²) may spread heat across the package, but the overall thermal management remains a key consideration. The 256 MB shared L3 cache, while beneficial for performance, also adds to the thermal footprint. The processor's active production status suggests that cooling solutions are available from server OEMs and aftermarket vendors, but the 320W envelope is a firm constraint.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The EPYC 9375F demonstrates a balanced profile between single-thread and multi-thread performance. The Cinebench R23 single-core score of 11492 is high, reflecting the Zen 5 architecture's strong IPC. The Passmark single-thread score of 3762 confirms this. Meanwhile, the multi-core scores are much higher: R23 multi-core 81402 and Passmark multithread 95768. The ratio between multi-thread and single-thread scores indicates excellent scaling across 32 cores. For real workloads, this means that applications with a mix of lightly and heavily threaded tasks will perform well. For example, a database server handling many short queries (single-threaded) will benefit from the high per-core speed, while batch processing (multi-threaded) will leverage the full core count. The data compression score of 1496149 and integer math score of 387901 are multi-threaded workloads that show the chip's ability to sustain high throughput. The single-thread performance also matters for latency-sensitive operations, such as network packet processing or interactive sessions. The 256 MB shared L3 cache helps keep frequently accessed data close to the cores, further improving both single and multi-threaded performance. The Cinebench R15 and R20 single-core scores—1158 and 4826, respectively—are consistent with the R23 result, indicating that the per-core performance is stable across benchmark generations. The Passmark single-thread score of 3762 is notably high for a server processor, suggesting that the EPYC 9375F does not compromise on single-thread responsiveness even with 32 cores. Overall, the split suggests a processor that is not just a many-core brute but also a capable per-core performer, making it versatile for diverse server and workstation workloads.

Detailed benchmark scores and charts for the AMD EPYC 9375F are below.

Benchmark Scores

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource

Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how AMD EPYC 9375F performs in parallel rendering workloads.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore #34 of 1967
8,205
55%
Max: 14,978

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how AMD EPYC 9375F handles tasks that can't be parallelized.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore #29 of 1400
1,158
55%
Max: 2,114

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource

Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on AMD EPYC 9375F. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors. Content creators and 3D artists use this benchmark to estimate real-world render performance.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore #34 of 1786
34,188
55%
Max: 62,412
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of AMD EPYC 9375F. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs. Single-thread performance remains critical for gaming and applications with serial bottlenecks.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore #29 of 1776
4,826
55%
Max: 8,811

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource

Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of AMD EPYC 9375F after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss. Professional users rely on R23 scores to predict real-world rendering performance under sustained workloads.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore #34 of 1938
81,402
55%
Max: 148,601
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how AMD EPYC 9375F maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance. This score is particularly important for understanding real-world responsiveness beyond initial boost behavior.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore #27 of 1923
11,492
55%
Max: 20,979
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_data_compressionSource

Data compression measures how fast AMD EPYC 9375F can compress and decompress files. This is important for archiving, backup software, and file transfer applications. Higher scores mean faster ZIP, RAR, and backup operations. Software distribution and cloud storage services benefit from efficient compression performance.

passmark_data_compression #38 of 696
1,496,149
26%
Max: 5,679,990
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
5,679,990
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
4,680,013
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
4,517,407
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
3,929,890

Nearby Performers

#33 Intel Xeon 678X
1,690,896
#35 AMD EPYC 7763
1,628,973
#36 AMD EPYC 7C13
1,562,251
#37 Intel Xeon 6740P
1,537,129
#39 AMD EPYC 7663
1,447,020
#40 AMD EPYC 9355P
1,429,976
#41 AMD EPYC 8434P
1,412,835
#42 Intel Xeon 676X
1,355,807
#43 Intel Xeon 6745P
1,352,801

passmark_data_encryptionSource

Data encryption tests how fast AMD EPYC 9375F can encrypt information using AES and other algorithms. This is critical for security applications, VPNs, and secure communications. Modern CPUs with AES-NI hardware acceleration score significantly higher.

passmark_data_encryption #45 of 696
73,634
21%
Max: 348,449
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
348,449
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
296,808
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
284,927
#4 AMD EPYC 9754
231,891
#5 AMD EPYC 9745
229,447

passmark_extended_instructionsSource

Extended instructions tests AMD EPYC 9375F performance using SSE and AVX instruction sets. These specialized instructions accelerate multimedia, scientific, and AI workloads. Video encoding and image processing heavily utilize SIMD capabilities. Machine learning inference and scientific computing also benefit from strong SIMD performance.

passmark_extended_instructions #31 of 696
128,296
33%
Max: 383,298
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_find_prime_numbersSource

Find prime numbers tests AMD EPYC 9375F ability to identify primes through intensive calculations. This is a pure computational benchmark that stresses CPU arithmetic units without memory bottlenecks.

passmark_find_prime_numbers #10 of 696
1,397
58%
Max: 2,422
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_floating_point_mathSource

Floating point math measures how AMD EPYC 9375F handles decimal calculations critical for scientific computing and 3D rendering. This affects performance in CAD and physics simulations. Game physics engines also rely heavily on floating point operations. Scientific and engineering applications benefit significantly from higher floating point scores.

passmark_floating_point_math #42 of 696
260,392
23%
Max: 1,153,453
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,153,453
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
978,377
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
922,900
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
761,219

passmark_integer_mathSource

Integer math tests how fast AMD EPYC 9375F processes whole number calculations essential for database operations and compression algorithms. This is fundamental to general computing performance. Encryption and data processing heavily rely on integer operations.

passmark_integer_math #41 of 696
387,901
20%
Max: 1,926,069
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,926,069
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
1,687,531
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
1,549,946
#4 AMD EPYC 9655P
1,225,251
#5 AMD EPYC 9745
1,224,315

passmark_multithreadSource

PassMark multi-thread tests AMD EPYC 9375F across integer math, floating point, compression, and encryption using all cores. This provides an overall multi-threaded CPU performance score. The combined result reflects general-purpose parallel computing capability.

passmark_multithread #31 of 696
95,768
56%
Max: 171,200
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#2 AMD EPYC 9755
166,328
#3 AMD EPYC 9965
160,542
#4 AMD EPYC 9655P
160,490
#5 AMD EPYC 9655
156,110

passmark_physicsSource

Physics tests how AMD EPYC 9375F handles physics simulations used in games and engineering software. This measures performance in calculating object interactions and movements. Games with complex physics benefit from higher scores. Engineering applications like structural analysis and fluid dynamics also rely on physics computation.

passmark_physics #30 of 696
9,019
32%
Max: 27,806
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9755
27,806
#2 AMD EPYC 9655
25,947
#3 AMD EPYC 9655P
25,847
#4 Intel Xeon 6960P
24,937
#5 AMD EPYC 9684X
24,686

passmark_random_string_sortingSource

Random string sorting measures how fast AMD EPYC 9375F can organize text data. This is important for database operations, search indexing, and data processing applications. Applications that process large amounts of text benefit from higher scores. Database servers and search engines rely heavily on efficient string manipulation.

passmark_random_string_sorting #38 of 696
161,091
25%
Max: 633,030
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
633,030
#2 AMD EPYC 9755
571,185
#3 AMD EPYC 9845
538,060
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
468,975
#5 AMD EPYC 9655P
451,824

passmark_single_threadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of AMD EPYC 9375F across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications.

passmark_single_thread #254 of 696
3,762
74%
Max: 5,087

passmark_singlethreadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of AMD EPYC 9375F across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications. Higher scores mean better system responsiveness in everyday use.

passmark_singlethread #255 of 696
3,762
74%
Max: 5,087

Compare with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs