AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i. Neither processor has any benchmark scores listed, and the average benchmark score for both parts is zero. The wins counter shows zero for each processor as well. Without measured performance data, direct numerical comparisons between these two CPUs cannot be drawn from the database.

The lack of benchmark entries does not diminish the value of the specification comparison. The recorded data still provides a clear view of what each processor offers in terms of core counts, clock speeds, memory support, and other architectural attributes. These differences establish the expected performance envelope for each part, even if the database has not yet captured workload-specific results.

Both processors sit at the 50th percentile among all CPUs in the database. This percentile ranking reflects the absence of benchmark scores rather than a measured mid-pack position. The percentile field is populated, but it does not indicate relative performance because no scores exist to rank.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i target different segments within the mobile market, and the recorded data supports distinct use cases for each.

The Ryzen 3 110 uses a 4-core, 8-thread configuration with a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Ryzen AI Embedded P174i doubles the core count with 10 cores and 20 threads, runs a lower base clock of 2.00 GHz, but boosts significantly higher to 5.00 GHz. The core and thread advantage for the P174i is substantial. For heavily threaded workloads, the P174i has 150% more cores and 150% more threads than the Ryzen 3 110. The higher boost clock of the P174i also gives it a 0.70 GHz advantage in single-thread or lightly threaded scenarios where boost frequencies matter most.

The Ryzen 3 110 compensates with a higher base clock. Its 3.00 GHz base is 1.00 GHz higher than the P174i's base clock. Sustained all-core workloads that run at base frequencies would favor the Ryzen 3 110, provided the workload fits within its 4-core limit. However, the P174i's 10 cores would likely handle those same workloads with more parallelism, even at lower base clocks.

Both processors share a 28 W TDP. The power envelope is identical, but the P174i delivers that power across 10 cores versus 4 cores. The per-core power allocation is therefore lower for the P174i, which explains its reduced base clock. The Ryzen 3 110 can dedicate more power per core at base frequency, which suits workloads that depend on a few fast cores.

The data indicates that the P174i is the stronger processor for multi-threaded tasks and for workloads that benefit from high boost frequencies. The Ryzen 3 110 is the choice for scenarios constrained to four cores where sustained base clock speed matters more than core count. The P174i's newer architecture and larger cache also suggest better performance per clock, though the database does not include direct IPC measurements.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i boosts to 5.00 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i support ECC memory.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: Both processors have a TDP of 28 W.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 16 MB of L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What integrated graphics do these processors use?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses Radeon 660M graphics. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses Radeon 880M graphics.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields. The core count differs: the Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores, the P174i has 10 cores. Thread counts follow at 8 versus 20. Base clocks differ by 1.00 GHz, with the Ryzen 3 110 at 3.00 GHz and the P174i at 2.00 GHz. Boost clocks also differ, with the P174i reaching 5.00 GHz versus 4.30 GHz for the Ryzen 3 110.

The socket types differ. The Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the P174i uses AMD Socket FP8. These sockets are not interchangeable, which determines motherboard compatibility. The process node differs as well: the Ryzen 3 110 is built on a 6 nm process, the P174i on a 4 nm process. Both are fabricated by TSMC. Die size shows a difference, with the Ryzen 3 110 at 210 mm² and the P174i at 233 mm².

Memory support differs in type and bandwidth. The Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 with a memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The P174i supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. PCIe lane counts differ: the Ryzen 3 110 provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes, the P174i provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes. Both are CPU-only lane counts.

The integrated graphics differ. The Ryzen 3 110 includes Radeon 660M, while the P174i includes Radeon 880M. Both are active production parts. Neither has a launch MSRP recorded in the database. The Ryzen 3 110 has a part number of 100-000000549(FP7r2), while the P174i's part number is listed as unknown.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two processors is significant. The Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename. The P174i uses the Gorgon Point codename with a generation string of Zen 5 / Zen 5c. This represents two full architecture generations of difference, with Zen 5 being a newer design than Zen 3+.

The cache hierarchy scales with the core count. The Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The P174i has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The per-core L1 and L2 cache sizes are larger on the P174i, which indicates a more capable core design. The total L3 cache is double that of the Ryzen 3 110, which helps with data sharing across the 10 cores.

The process node difference matters for power efficiency and density. The 4 nm process of the P174i is smaller than the 6 nm process of the Ryzen 3 110. The die size of the P174i is 233 mm², which is 23 mm² larger than the Ryzen 3 110's 210 mm² die. The larger die on a smaller node means the P174i packs substantially more transistors, consistent with its higher core count and larger caches.

The release dates differ. The Ryzen 3 110 has a release date of September 30, 2025. The P174i has a release date of February 28, 2026. The P174i is the newer product by roughly five months. Both are listed as active in production.

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported according to the recorded data. The P174i's memory support includes LPDDR5X in addition to DDR5, which the Ryzen 3 110 does not list. The higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s on the P174i reflects the broader memory options and the newer memory controller.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 wins in scenarios that favor higher base clocks and fewer cores. The 3.00 GHz base clock is 1.00 GHz higher than the P174i's base. Workloads that run at base frequency, such as sustained lightly threaded tasks that do not trigger boost behavior, benefit from this advantage. The 28 W TDP across 4 cores means each core receives more power at base, which supports higher sustained frequencies. The Ryzen 3 110 also has the advantage of a smaller die at 210 mm² versus 233 mm², which may translate to lower manufacturing cost per unit, though the database does not include pricing data.

The Ryzen 3 110's PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes exceeds the P174i's 16 lanes. For systems that require more PCIe connectivity from the CPU, such as multiple NVMe drives or additional expansion devices, the Ryzen 3 110 provides more lanes. The 8 MB of L3 cache is smaller, but for a 4-core processor it provides 2 MB per core, which is adequate for many single-threaded and lightly threaded workloads.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i wins in multi-threaded performance scenarios. The 10 cores and 20 threads provide 150% more parallelism than the Ryzen 3 110. The 16 MB of L3 cache is double the Ryzen 3 110's capacity, which improves data locality for thread-heavy workloads. The 5.00 GHz boost clock is 0.70 GHz higher, giving the P174i an advantage in bursty single-threaded tasks that hit boost frequencies. The newer Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture is two generations ahead of Zen 3+, which typically delivers higher instructions per clock, though the database does not include IPC measurements.

The P174i's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s exceeds the Ryzen 3 110's 76.8 GB/s by 12.8 GB/s. Memory-intensive workloads, such as large data sets or integrated graphics tasks that share system memory, benefit from this higher bandwidth. The support for LPDDR5X gives the P174i more flexibility in memory selection for embedded or mobile designs. The Radeon 880M integrated graphics is a newer GPU design than the Radeon 660M, which suggests better graphics performance, though the database does not include graphics benchmarks.

The P174i's 4 nm process node provides a density advantage. The larger 233 mm² die contains 10 cores plus larger caches, and the smaller node allows for more efficient power delivery. The P174i also has larger per-core L1 and L2 caches, which supports its higher boost clock and newer architecture. For embedded AI workloads, the P174i's naming and generation indicate a focus on AI-related processing, and the higher core count provides the parallel compute resources that AI inference workloads typically require.

The Ryzen 3 110 is the better fit for systems constrained to 4 cores where base clock speed is the priority. The P174i is the better fit for multi-threaded, memory-heavy, or AI-oriented workloads where core count, cache size, and memory bandwidth dominate. The identical 28 W TDP means both fit in the same power envelope, but the P174i delivers more total compute capability within that envelope. The Ryzen 3 110 is the more specialized part for low-core-count, high-base-clock scenarios.