AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i5-14400T Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Intel Core i5-14400T is the only processor in this comparison with recorded benchmark data. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no benchmark scores in the database, so direct numerical comparisons cannot be made. The Intel part's average benchmark score is 27166, which places it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs tracked. Its nearest rivals show a tightly clustered field: the Intel Core i9-9900K scores 27097, which is 0.3% behind, and the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G scores 27051, 0.4% behind. The Intel Core i7-13700H sits 0.7% ahead at 27355, and the AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G is 0.8% ahead at 27382.

Looking at the Intel chip's individual workload results, multi-threaded performance is substantial. Cinebench R23 multicore reaches 17189, while Cinebench R20 multicore scores 7219 and Cinebench R15 multicore hits 1732. PassMark multithread reports 20223, and integer math scores 65667. Floating point math is lower at 49139, and extended instructions land at 14562. Data compression produces 235636, while data encryption is far lower at 13244. Physics simulation records 1244, and random string sorting reaches 25181.

Single-thread results are notably strong for a 35 TDP part. Cinebench R23 singlecore scores 2426, Cinebench R20 singlecore reaches 1018, and Cinebench R15 singlecore records 244. PassMark single thread reports 3512, with the same value appearing under both the single_thread and singlethread test names. The find prime numbers test is a weak point at 73, indicating that this workload does not favor the processor's architecture.

The absence of AMD benchmark data means the comparison is limited to specifications and architectural characteristics. The database shows no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors, and neither wins nor losses are recorded for either side. The AMD part's percentile ranking is 50, and its average benchmark score is 0, which reflects the lack of measurements rather than actual performance. The Intel part's 79th percentile ranking, by contrast, is derived from real test results across multiple suites.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different design philosophies. AMD's Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process node and has a die size of 233 mm². Intel's Core i5-14400T uses Raptor Lake architecture, specifically Raptor Lake-R, part of the Core 14th Gen series built on a 10 nm process at Intel's own foundry. Its die size is 215 mm², smaller than the AMD chip's physical footprint.

Both processors have 10 cores, but thread counts differ. The AMD part supports 20 threads, indicating simultaneous multithreading across all cores. The Intel part supports 16 threads, meaning not all cores have hyper-threading enabled. This is a structural difference that affects multi-threaded workload handling.

Cache hierarchies also diverge. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD processor has 1 MB of L2 per core, while Intel provides 1.25 MB per core. L3 cache favors Intel on total capacity: the AMD chip has 16 MB, while Intel has 20 MB shared. The Intel part's L2 per core is 25% larger, and its L3 pool is 4 MB larger overall.

Memory support shows a clear generation gap. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a dual-channel bus and a rated memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 over a dual-channel bus, but the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure for the Intel part. Both processors support ECC memory, which suits embedded and workstation environments.

PCIe connectivity differs in generation and lane count. AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU, offering newer signaling technology for connected devices. Integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses a Radeon 880M, while Intel uses UHD Graphics 730.

Clock speeds favor AMD. The base clock is 2.00 GHz versus 1.50 GHz for Intel, and the boost clock is 5.00 GHz versus 4.50 GHz. The AMD part's boost advantage of 500 MHz could matter in lightly threaded workloads, though no benchmark data confirms this. The Intel part's lower base clock is paired with a higher TDP of 35 watts, while AMD's TDP is 28 watts. The AMD part draws less power on paper while offering higher clock ceilings.

Socket and platform targets differ completely. AMD uses Socket FP8, which is a mobile-oriented package. Intel uses Socket 1700, a desktop platform. The AMD processor is classified as a mobile market segment part, while Intel's is desktop. Production status for both is listed as active. The AMD release date is 2026-02-28, while Intel's is 2024-01-07. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $221. The AMD part has no launch MSRP in the database.

The Verdict

The recorded data supports the Intel Core i5-14400T as the measured performer in this pairing. Its average benchmark score of 27166 and 79th percentile ranking come from real test results across Cinebench and PassMark suites. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no benchmark scores in the database, so its actual performance cannot be verified through the available measurements.

The AMD part's specifications suggest it is designed for a different role. Its 28 watt TDP, mobile socket, and 4 nm process point to an embedded or low-power mobile deployment rather than a desktop workstation. The Intel part's 35 watt TDP, Socket 1700, and desktop classification indicate a conventional desktop platform with measured multi-threaded capability.

Intel wins on measured performance, PCIe generation, L2 cache per core, and L3 cache capacity. AMD wins on process node, memory bandwidth rating, boost clock, thread count, and power efficiency on paper. The Intel part's nearest rivals include both desktop and mobile chips within a narrow 1.5% band, suggesting its performance class is well established. The AMD part's percentile of 50 with no scores is a placeholder, not a verdict.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ on nearly every measurable specification except core count and L1 cache per core.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i | Intel Core i5-14400T |

|---|---|---|

| Threads | 20 | 16 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 1.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 4.50 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 35 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 233 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 16 MB | 20 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | None listed | $221 |

| Part number | unknown | SRN3N |

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. Both support ECC memory. Both use a dual-channel memory bus. Both are listed as active production parts.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 20 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14400T has 16 threads. Both have 10 cores.

Q: What is the Intel Core i5-14400T's average benchmark score?

A: The Intel part's average benchmark score is 27166, placing it at the 79th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i have any benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmark entries for the AMD part, and its average benchmark score is 0 with a 50th percentile ranking.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is limited to PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD part has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel part has a TDP of 35 watts.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400T has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 16 MB of L3 cache.

Q: What is the launch MSRP of the Intel Core i5-14400T?

A: The launch MSRP is $221. The AMD part has no launch MSRP listed in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14400T wins in every measured performance category because it is the only processor with recorded benchmarks. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17189, PassMark multithread score of 20223, and integer math score of 65667 demonstrate strong multi-threaded capability. Single-thread performance is also solid, with Cinebench R23 singlecore at 2426 and PassMark single thread at 3512. The 79th percentile ranking and the tight cluster of nearest rivals, all within 0.8% of its average score, confirm that the Intel part sits in a well-populated performance tier.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i wins on architectural efficiency indicators. The 4 nm TSMC process gives it a smaller transistor geometry than Intel's 10 nm node. The 28 watt TDP is 7 watts lower than Intel's 35 watt figure. The boost clock of 5.00 GHz is 500 MHz higher. The memory bandwidth rating of 89.6 GB/s is listed, whereas Intel's memory bandwidth is not recorded. These specifications suggest the AMD part is engineered for power-sensitive embedded deployments, but the database contains no measurements to confirm how those specifications translate into performance.

For desktop workloads where measured results matter, the Intel Core i5-14400T is the only processor in this comparison with evidence in the database. For embedded applications where power draw, process node, and memory bandwidth are primary selection criteria, the AMD part offers the more modern specification sheet. The absence of AMD benchmark data leaves its actual performance unverified.