AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison

AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core i5-14401TE

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 and Intel Core i5-14401TE occupy different positions in the processor landscape, with the Ryzen 3 110 built as a 4-core, 8-thread mobile part on a 6 nm process, while the Core i5-14401TE is a 6-core, 12-thread desktop processor on a 10 nm node. The recorded data shows no direct benchmark scores for either chip, and the nearest rival comparisons are empty, so the analysis relies entirely on the architectural and specification differences documented in the database. The Ryzen 3 110 targets efficiency with a 28 W TDP and a 3.00 GHz base clock, whereas the Core i5-14401TE operates at a 45 W TDP with a lower 2.00 GHz base clock but a higher 4.50 GHz boost clock. These figures indicate that the Intel part is designed for sustained multi-threaded workloads, while the AMD part favors power-constrained mobile environments.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark data between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core i5-14401TE is empty, meaning the database contains no direct comparative scores for these two processors. The wins fields reflect this absence, with winsA set to 0 and winsB set to 0, confirming that neither chip has a recorded victory in any benchmark category. The average benchmark score for both processors is 0, and the percentile versus all CPUs is 50 for each, placing them at the median of the database without any performance differentiation from measured tests.

Without recorded benchmark results, the performance comparison must derive from the clock speed and core configuration data. The Intel Core i5-14401TE offers a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, which is 0.20 GHz higher than the Ryzen 3 110's boost clock of 4.30 GHz. This gives the Intel processor a nominal single-thread advantage in peak clock capability, assuming thermal and power limits allow the boost to be sustained. The AMD part counters with a base clock of 3.00 GHz, which is 1.00 GHz higher than the Intel's 2.00 GHz base clock, indicating that the Ryzen 3 110 maintains a higher clock speed under sustained all-core loads at its default power envelope.

The core and thread counts present a clearer separation. The Intel Core i5-14401TE provides 6 cores and 12 threads, which is 2 cores and 4 threads more than the AMD Ryzen 3 110's 4 cores and 8 threads. In multi-threaded workloads that scale beyond 8 threads, the Intel processor has a structural advantage, as it can process more concurrent tasks with its additional physical and logical cores. The Ryzen 3 110, however, uses a smaller 6 nm process node compared to Intel's 10 nm node, which typically allows for lower power consumption per unit of performance, a factor reflected in its 28 W TDP versus the Intel's 45 W TDP.

The memory bandwidth figures also differ, with the AMD Ryzen 3 110 supporting 76.8 GB/s of memory bandwidth, a recorded value, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has no memory bandwidth figure listed in the database. This absence of data for the Intel part prevents a direct bandwidth comparison, but the AMD's recorded 76.8 GB/s indicates a specific memory throughput capability for the Ryzen 3 110. The Intel processor instead supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory types, whereas the AMD part supports only DDR5, which gives the Intel chip flexibility in memory platform selection.

Architecture Differences

The architectural split between these processors is substantial, starting with the process node and foundry. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE uses a 10 nm process built by Intel. This node difference influences power efficiency and transistor density, with the smaller AMD node typically enabling lower operating voltages and reduced heat output for a given workload. The die sizes are close, with the AMD part at 210 mm² and the Intel part at 215 mm², a difference of 5 mm² that does not suggest a major physical size gap between the two designs.

The core architectures diverge completely. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, which is a mobile-oriented design. The Intel Core i5-14401TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, which is part of the Core 14th Gen series and represents a desktop refresh of the Raptor Lake design. The generations reflect this, with the AMD part listed as Ryzen 3 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)) and the Intel part as Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh).

Cache configurations show notable differences. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. This means the Intel processor offers more L1 cache per core by 16 KB, more L2 cache per core by 0.75 MB, and more total L3 cache by 12 MB. The larger Intel cache hierarchy, particularly the 20 MB L3 cache, provides more on-die storage for frequently accessed data, which can reduce memory latency in workloads with large working sets.

Memory support differs in type and bandwidth reporting. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration with a recorded bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database. Both processors support ECC memory, which is confirmed for each part. The PCIe capabilities also differ: the AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This gives the AMD part more PCIe lanes, though at the older Gen 4 standard, while the Intel part has fewer lanes but at the newer Gen 5 standard.

Integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 includes a Radeon 660M integrated GPU, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE includes UHD Graphics 730. These are distinct graphics solutions from the respective manufacturers, and the database records no performance metrics for either, so the comparison is limited to their presence and naming.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the Intel Core i5-14401TE is the stronger choice for multi-threaded desktop workloads, based on its 6 cores and 12 threads compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 110's 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel part also delivers a higher boost clock of 4.50 GHz versus 4.30 GHz, which supports faster peak single-thread performance in burst scenarios. The larger L3 cache of 20 MB on the Intel processor, compared to 8 MB on the AMD part, provides additional capacity for data-heavy applications. The Intel processor's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory gives it platform flexibility that the AMD part lacks, though the AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s that the Intel part does not match in the database.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is the better choice for power-constrained mobile environments, as its 28 W TDP is 17 W lower than the Intel's 45 W TDP. The AMD part's higher base clock of 3.00 GHz versus 2.00 GHz suggests it can maintain competitive single-thread performance at lower sustained power draw. The 6 nm process node from TSMC, versus Intel's 10 nm node, aligns with a design goal of efficiency over raw throughput. The AMD processor also offers more PCIe lanes at 20 Gen 4 lanes, compared to 16 Gen 5 lanes on the Intel part, which may benefit configurations requiring more connected devices.

The release dates show the AMD Ryzen 3 110 launched on 2025-09-30, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE launched on 2024-06-30, meaning the Intel part has been available for a longer period in the database. Both processors are marked as Active in production status, so neither is discontinued. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported for either part. The market segments differ, with the AMD part listed as Mobile and the Intel part as Desktop, which frames the intended use cases from the outset.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel part provides 2 additional physical cores and 4 additional threads.

Q: What are the TDP values for these processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a TDP of 28 W, and the Intel Core i5-14401TE has a TDP of 45 W. The AMD part consumes 17 W less under its rated power envelope.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core i5-14401TE support ECC memory, as recorded in the database.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 memory only, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. Both use a dual-channel memory bus.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401TE has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, which is 0.20 GHz higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 110's boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The AMD part has a higher base clock of 3.00 GHz compared to the Intel's 2.00 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401TE has 20 MB of shared L3 cache, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part offers 12 MB more L3 cache capacity.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 wins in power efficiency, as its 28 W TDP is lower than the Intel Core i5-14401TE's 45 W TDP, making it suited for mobile devices where battery life and thermal limits are primary concerns. The AMD part also wins on base clock speed, with 3.00 GHz versus 2.00 GHz, which indicates a higher sustained clock under continuous load at its rated power. The AMD processor provides more PCIe lanes with 20 Gen 4 lanes compared to 16 Gen 5 lanes on the Intel part, which gives it an advantage in configurations that need to connect many peripheral devices. The AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s, a figure not present for the Intel processor, suggesting a defined memory throughput capability.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE wins on core count, offering 6 cores and 12 threads versus 4 cores and 8 threads, which translates to better multi-threaded processing capacity for parallel workloads. The Intel part wins on boost clock, with 4.50 GHz versus 4.30 GHz, giving it a higher peak clock speed for short-duration single-thread bursts. The Intel processor wins on cache capacity across all levels, with 80 KB L1 per core versus 64 KB, 1.25 MB L2 per core versus 512 KB, and 20 MB L3 versus 8 MB. The Intel part also wins on memory type flexibility, supporting both DDR4 and DDR5, and on PCIe generation, using Gen 5 versus Gen 4 for the AMD part.

The Intel processor wins on desktop platform integration, as it is listed in the Desktop market segment with an Intel Socket 1700, while the AMD part is listed in the Mobile segment with an AMD Socket FP7. The Intel part uses the Raptor Lake architecture with a larger die at 215 mm², compared to the AMD's 210 mm², and it was released earlier on 2024-06-30 versus 2025-09-30 for the AMD part. The Intel processor also wins on L2 cache per core by a factor of more than two, which can improve performance for workloads with high data reuse in smaller cache levels.

Specification Differences

The specification differences between the two processors cover several fields. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The base clocks differ, with the AMD part at 3.00 GHz and the Intel part at 2.00 GHz. The boost clocks differ, with the AMD part at 4.30 GHz and the Intel part at 4.50 GHz. The TDP values are 28 W for the AMD part and 45 W for the Intel part. The sockets differ, with the AMD part using AMD Socket FP7 and the Intel part using Intel Socket 1700.

The architectures differ, with the AMD part using Zen 3+ under the Rembrandt-R codename and the Intel part using Raptor Lake under the Raptor Lake-R codename. The process nodes differ, with the AMD part at 6 nm from TSMC and the Intel part at 10 nm from Intel. The die sizes are 210 mm² for the AMD part and 215 mm² for the Intel part. The cache configurations differ in L1, L2, and L3, with the AMD part at 64 KB, 512 KB, and 8 MB respectively, and the Intel part at 80 KB, 1.25 MB, and 20 MB respectively.

The memory support differs, with the AMD part supporting DDR5 only and the Intel part supporting DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bandwidth is recorded for the AMD part at 76.8 GB/s, while no value is recorded for the Intel part. The PCIe specifications differ, with the AMD part using Gen 4 with 20 lanes and the Intel part using Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The integrated graphics differ, with the AMD part using Radeon 660M and the Intel part using UHD Graphics 730. The market segments differ, with the AMD part listed as Mobile and the Intel part as Desktop. The release dates differ, with the AMD part on 2025-09-30 and the Intel part on 2024-06-30. Both parts support ECC memory, both have no unlocked multiplier, and both are listed as Active in production status.