AMD Ryzen 3 210

The AMD Ryzen 3 210 is a 4-core, 8-thread mobile processor built on the Zen 4 architecture (codenamed Hawk Point) and fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm process. It runs at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts up to 4.70 GHz, with a 28 W TDP. The chip integrates a Radeon 740M GPU and supports dual-channel DDR5 memory with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. In benchmark results, the processor achieves an average score of 16,934 and sits at the 75th percentile among all CPUs, indicating that it outperforms three-quarters of the processors in the database.

Single-Thread vs Multi-Thread Behavior

The Ryzen 3 210's single-thread performance is a standout. In Cinebench R23, it scores 1,581 points in the single-core test, while the multicore test yields 11,198 points. The PassMark single-thread score of 3,652 reinforces this strength, driven by the 4.70 GHz boost clock. This per-core efficiency is the processor's primary asset, making it well suited for workloads that rely on fast, sequential execution.

Multi-thread performance is equally solid for a 4-core part. The Cinebench R20 multicore score of 4,703 and the R15 multicore score of 1,128 reflect the scaling of 8 threads. In PassMark, the multithread score of 13,175, integer math of 37,300, and floating-point math of 23,331 show balanced parallel throughput. The data compression score of 148,777 and encryption score of 8,482 further indicate strong data-handling capabilities.

For real-world use, this split means the Ryzen 3 210 excels in single-threaded tasks like web browsing, office productivity, and many games, while still offering enough parallel power for light video editing or compilation. The 8 threads keep multitasking responsive, but the 4-core limit prevents it from matching higher-core parts in heavily threaded workloads. The benchmark data clearly prioritizes per-core speed over raw core count.

Who Should Consider It

Given the benchmark profile, the Ryzen 3 210 is best for users whose primary workloads are single-threaded or lightly threaded. The high single-thread scores (Cinebench R23 single 1,581, PassMark single 3,652) make it a strong candidate for gaming, where many titles favor a few fast cores. The integrated Radeon 740M provides basic graphics, though a discrete GPU would be needed for demanding games. The 28 W TDP also suits thin-and-light laptops where power efficiency is critical.

For content creation, the multi-thread scores (Cinebench R23 multi 11,198, PassMark multithread 13,175) indicate capability for moderate tasks like photo editing or 2D animation, but not heavy 3D rendering or 4K video work. Office and productivity users will find the processor more than adequate, with strong integer math (37,300) and extended instructions (11,296) for spreadsheets and database operations. The Ryzen 3 210 is a versatile mobile processor covering a broad range of everyday tasks, with a clear strength in single-threaded responsiveness.

Benchmark Performance

The Ryzen 3 210's average benchmark score of 16,934 places it at the 75th percentile of all CPUs—a notable position for a 4-core mobile part. In Cinebench R23, the multicore score of 11,198 and single-core score of 1,581 demonstrate a strong balance. The PassMark suite reinforces this: multithread 13,175, single-thread 3,652, and floating-point math 23,331 all indicate solid performance across varied tasks.

Comparing to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 3 210 is essentially tied with the AMD EPYC 7702, which has an average score of 16,932 and a delta of 0%. This is remarkable because the EPYC 7702 is a server-class processor, yet the Ryzen 3 210 matches it in aggregate benchmarks. Against the Intel Core i5-1235U, the Ryzen 3 210 holds a 0.1% lead (16,934 vs. 16,910). It is also 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core i3-12100E (16,905) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS (16,902). These small deltas indicate that the Ryzen 3 210 is competitive with a wide range of processors from different segments.

The benchmark results show consistent performance across test suites. Cinebench and PassMark scores align, suggesting no particular weakness in either synthetic or real-world workloads. The data indicates a well-rounded part that can hold its own against both older server chips and contemporary mobile and desktop processors.

Platform and Compatibility

The Ryzen 3 210 is built for AMD Socket FP7, a mobile platform socket. Combined with the 28 W TDP and the "Mobile" market segment, this indicates it is intended for laptops and portable devices. The socket is not designed for user upgrades, and the multiplier is locked, so overclocking is unsupported. The processor uses the Zen 4 architecture on a 4 nm process from TSMC, with 20,900 million transistors on a 137 mm² die.

Memory support is limited to DDR5, operating on a dual-channel interface with a bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. ECC memory is not supported. For expansion, the processor provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), sufficient for a discrete GPU and NVMe storage in a typical mobile design. The integrated Radeon 740M handles display output and basic graphics acceleration, eliminating the need for a separate GPU in light workloads.

The processor was released on 2025-01-05 and is currently in active production, with part number 100-000001612. The locked multiplier and fixed FP7 socket mean the Ryzen 3 210 is a closed platform, but for mobile users this is not a limitation—it is designed as a complete, efficient solution within a laptop chassis.

How It Compares

Against the AMD EPYC 7702, the Ryzen 3 210 achieves an identical average score of 16,934 vs. 16,932 (0% delta). This is striking because the EPYC 7702 is a server processor with far more cores, yet the Ryzen 3 210's per-core efficiency allows it to match the aggregate score. The data shows that modern 4-core mobile chips can rival older high-core server parts in general-purpose benchmarks.

Versus the Intel Core i5-1235U, the Ryzen 3 210 holds a 0.1% advantage (16,934 vs. 16,910). Both are mobile processors, but the Ryzen 3 210's higher single-thread performance likely contributes to this edge. The delta is small, indicating close overall performance.

The Intel Core i3-12100E, a desktop part, trails by 0.2% (16,934 vs. 16,905). The Ryzen 3 210's ability to keep pace with a desktop processor in the same performance class underscores its strong per-core design, even within a lower power envelope.

Finally, against the AMD Ryzen 5 7235HS, the Ryzen 3 210 also leads by 0.2% (16,934 vs. 16,902). The 7235HS is a higher-tier Ryzen 5 part, but the 210's superior single-thread and efficient multi-thread scaling allow it to edge ahead. Overall, the Ryzen 3 210 sits at the top of its immediate competitive cluster, with deltas of 0% to 0.2% against all four nearest rivals.