AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark comparisons between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core i5-14401E. The database does, however, include a full Cinebench suite for the Intel part, which allows for an assessment of its performance profile. The Intel Core i5-14401E achieves a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18161 and a single-core score of 2564. In Cinebench R20, it scores 7627 multi-core and 1076 single-core, while in Cinebench R15 it records 1830 multi-core and 258 single-core. These results place the Intel processor at the 60th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 5253.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its percentile ranking sits at 50, and its average benchmark score is listed as zero. This means that no direct numerical comparison can be made between the two processors based on measured performance data. The Intel part is clearly the only one with verified benchmark results, and its multi-core scores in particular show a strong scaling pattern from Cinebench R15 through R23, indicating consistent performance across rendering workloads.

Without any head-to-head entries or AMD benchmark scores, the analysis must rely on architectural and specification differences to infer relative performance. The Intel Core i5-14401E brings 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 offers 4 cores and 8 threads. The Intel part also has a higher boost clock of 4.70 GHz compared to 4.30 GHz on the AMD, though the AMD has a higher base clock at 3.00 GHz versus 2.50 GHz. These factors suggest the Intel processor would hold an advantage in multi-threaded workloads, while the single-thread comparison would depend on boost behavior and architectural efficiency.

FAQ

Q: What is the core and thread count difference between the two processors?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has 6 cores and 12 threads. The Intel part provides 50% more cores and threads.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E boosts up to 4.70 GHz, which is higher than the AMD Ryzen 3 110's 4.30 GHz boost clock. However, the AMD part has a higher base clock at 3.00 GHz versus the Intel's 2.50 GHz.

Q: What are the process node differences between the two chips?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14401E uses a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD part uses a smaller manufacturing node.

Q: Which processor supports more memory types?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports only DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses.

Q: What is the thermal design power (TDP) for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has a TDP of 65 watts. The AMD part consumes significantly less power by specification.

Q: What integrated graphics do the two processors include?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 includes a Radeon 660M integrated GPU, while the Intel Core i5-14401E features UHD Graphics 730. Both provide onboard display output.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different architectural lineages. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, while the Intel Core i5-14401E is based on Raptor Lake, specifically the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. The AMD chip is manufactured on a 6 nm process by TSMC with a die size of 210 mm², whereas the Intel chip uses a 10 nm process from Intel with a slightly larger die at 215 mm².

Cache layouts differ considerably. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14401E offers a larger cache hierarchy: 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part has substantially more L3 cache, which can benefit workloads with large working sets.

Memory support also distinguishes the two. The AMD chip supports only DDR5 memory with a rated bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, though its memory bandwidth figure is not recorded in the database. Both support ECC memory, which is notable for workstation or server use cases.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation and lane count. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel Core i5-14401E offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes. The Intel part supports a newer PCIe standard, but the AMD part has more available lanes. The market segments are also distinct: the AMD processor is designed for mobile platforms with an AMD Socket FP7, while the Intel processor targets desktop systems with an Intel Socket 1700.

The integrated graphics solutions differ as well. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 includes a Radeon 660M GPU, while the Intel Core i5-14401E has UHD Graphics 730. Neither chip has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not supported on either part per the recorded specifications.

The Verdict

The data shows a clear split in intended use cases. The Intel Core i5-14401E is the only processor with recorded benchmark scores, and those scores place it at the 60th percentile among all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 5253 puts it within a narrow margin of its nearest rivals: the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 scores 5259 (0.1% higher), the Intel Core i7-11700B scores 5241 (0.2% lower), the Intel Core i9-10850K scores 5240 (0.2% lower), and the Intel Core i5-13400T scores 5210 (0.8% lower). This suggests the Core i5-14401E performs at a level comparable to older high-end desktop and server parts.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has no benchmark data and a percentile ranking of 50, which is below the Intel part. Its architectural advantages include a smaller 6 nm process node, lower 28-watt TDP, and faster base clock. However, the Intel part offers more cores, threads, cache, and a higher boost clock. For workloads that rely on multi-threading, the Intel processor is the stronger choice based on its recorded Cinebench results. For power-constrained or mobile applications, the AMD processor has clear specification advantages.

Users who need verified rendering performance should select the Intel Core i5-14401E. Users who prioritize power efficiency, a smaller process node, or mobile compatibility should consider the AMD Ryzen 3 110, though its performance remains unquantified in the database.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core i5-14401E:

• Cores: 4 (AMD) vs 6 (Intel)
• Threads: 8 (AMD) vs 12 (Intel)
• Base clock: 3.00 GHz (AMD) vs 2.50 GHz (Intel)
• Boost clock: 4.30 GHz (AMD) vs 4.70 GHz (Intel)
• TDP: 28 W (AMD) vs 65 W (Intel)
• Socket: AMD Socket FP7 (AMD) vs Intel Socket 1700 (Intel)
• Architecture: Zen 3+ (AMD) vs Raptor Lake (Intel)
• Codename: Rembrandt-R (AMD) vs Raptor Lake-R (Intel)
• Process node: 6 nm (AMD) vs 10 nm (Intel)
• Foundry: TSMC (AMD) vs Intel (Intel)
• Die size: 210 mm² (AMD) vs 215 mm² (Intel)
• L1 cache: 64 KB per core (AMD) vs 80 KB per core (Intel)
• L2 cache: 512 KB per core (AMD) vs 1.25 MB per core (Intel)
• L3 cache: 8 MB shared (AMD) vs 20 MB shared (Intel)
• Memory support: DDR5 (AMD) vs DDR4, DDR5 (Intel)
• Memory bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s (AMD) vs not recorded (Intel)
• PCIe: Gen 4, 20 lanes (AMD) vs Gen 5, 16 lanes (Intel)
• Integrated graphics: Radeon 660M (AMD) vs UHD Graphics 730 (Intel)
• Market segment: Mobile (AMD) vs Desktop (Intel)
• Release date: 2025-09-30 (AMD) vs 2024-06-30 (Intel)
• Part number: 100-000000549 (AMD) vs Q49JSRNJS (Intel)

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14401E wins in every recorded benchmark category. Its Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18161 and single-core score of 2564 demonstrate strong performance in both threaded and single-threaded rendering tasks. The R20 scores of 7627 multi-core and 1076 single-core confirm this pattern. The R15 results of 1830 multi-core and 258 single-core round out a consistent performance profile. The Intel part also wins on core count, thread count, boost clock, L1 cache per core, L2 cache per core, L3 cache, memory type flexibility, and PCIe generation support.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 wins on base clock, TDP, process node, memory bandwidth (recorded at 76.8 GB/s), PCIe lane count, and market segment focus. Its 28-watt TDP is less than half of the Intel part's 65-watt TDP, making it suitable for power-sensitive mobile designs. The smaller 6 nm process node indicates a more modern manufacturing approach. The higher base clock of 3.00 GHz could provide advantages in lightly threaded workloads that do not reach boost frequencies. The AMD part also uses a newer socket and has a later release date, suggesting platform recency.

For multi-threaded productivity, rendering, and compilation workloads, the Intel Core i5-14401E is the clear choice based on measured results. For battery-powered or thermally constrained systems, the AMD Ryzen 3 110 offers superior efficiency by specification. The lack of benchmark data for the AMD part means its actual performance remains unverified, so any selection involving the AMD chip relies on architectural expectations rather than recorded measurements.