AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core i5-14501E contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results. The database shows zero wins for each processor in the head-to-head section, with no individual benchmark scores, no percentage deltas, and no comparison metrics available for either unit. This absence of measured performance data means the database cannot currently quantify how these two CPUs compare in raw throughput, single-threaded tasks, or multi-threaded workloads.

When examining the broader database context, both processors sit at the 50th percentile against all CPUs. This percentile value indicates that each processor lands exactly in the middle of the database's recorded performance distribution, though neither has an average benchmark score attached to its entry. The absence of scores alongside a mid-tier percentile suggests the percentile values are derived from architectural characteristics rather than observed test results.

Without benchmark numbers, the only measurable comparison comes from the specification sheet. The Intel Core i5-14501E carries a 5.20 GHz boost clock compared to the AMD Ryzen 3 110's 4.30 GHz boost clock, a difference that typically translates to faster single-threaded execution in real workloads. On the multi-threaded side, the Intel part provides 12 threads from 6 cores, while the AMD part provides 8 threads from 4 cores, a 50% thread count advantage for Intel that usually improves parallel task throughput.

The database records no nearest rivals for either processor, so there are no reference points for contextualizing performance against similarly positioned chips. All direct comparison metrics remain empty, leaving the head-to-head analysis entirely dependent on architectural and specification differences rather than measured outcomes.

The Verdict

The data does not support a performance-based verdict because no benchmark results exist for either processor. The database shows zero scores, zero wins, and zero head-to-head comparisons. What can be stated from the recorded information is structural: the Intel Core i5-14501E offers more cores (6 versus 4), more threads (12 versus 8), a higher base clock (3.30 GHz versus 3.00 GHz), and a higher boost clock (5.20 GHz versus 4.30 GHz). The AMD Ryzen 3 110 counters with a lower thermal envelope at 28 W compared to Intel's 65 W, a smaller process node at 6 nm versus 10 nm, and a compact 210 mm² die size versus Intel's 215 mm².

From the recorded data alone, the Intel Core i5-14501E appears positioned for higher raw throughput based on core count, thread count, and clock speeds. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 appears positioned for efficiency-focused deployments given its dramatically lower TDP and smaller manufacturing process. Users who prioritize maximum thread count and clock speed would look toward the Intel part based on specifications. Users who prioritize lower power consumption and smaller physical footprint would look toward the AMD part. Neither choice is validated by performance measurements, as the database contains none.

The production status for both processors is active, and neither has a launch MSRP recorded in the database. Both support ECC memory, and both use dual-channel memory buses. The Intel part supports both DDR4 and DDR5, while the AMD part supports only DDR5.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the Rembrandt-R codename, built on a 6 nm process by TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14501E uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, built on a 10 nm process by Intel's foundry. These represent fundamentally different design philosophies: Zen 3+ is a refined version of AMD's Zen 3 core, while Raptor Lake is Intel's hybrid-architecture successor to Alder Lake, though the database notes the i5-14501E as a Raptor Lake Refresh part.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The AMD processor provides 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 8 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel processor provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part's L3 cache is three times larger (24 MB versus 8 MB), and its per-core L2 cache is more than double (1.25 MB versus 512 KB). These differences typically influence workloads with high cache reuse, where larger caches reduce memory traffic.

Integrated graphics also differ. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 includes a Radeon 660M integrated GPU, while the Intel Core i5-14501E includes UHD Graphics 770. The database does not record performance metrics for either iGPU, so no comparison of graphics capability can be made from the data.

The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP7, a mobile socket, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700, a desktop socket. This reflects their market segment classifications: the AMD part is listed as Mobile, and the Intel part is listed as Desktop.

Specification Differences

The database records the following differences between the two processors:

• Cores: AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores; Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores.
• Threads: AMD has 8 threads; Intel has 12 threads.
• Base clock: AMD at 3.00 GHz; Intel at 3.30 GHz.
• Boost clock: AMD at 4.30 GHz; Intel at 5.20 GHz.
• TDP: AMD at 28 W; Intel at 65 W.
• Socket: AMD Socket FP7 versus Intel Socket 1700.
• Architecture: Zen 3+ versus Raptor Lake.
• Process node: 6 nm (TSMC) versus 10 nm (Intel).
• Die size: 210 mm² versus 215 mm².
• L1 cache per core: 64 KB versus 80 KB.
• L2 cache per core: 512 KB versus 1.25 MB.
• L3 cache shared: 8 MB versus 24 MB.
• Memory support: DDR5 only versus DDR4 and DDR5.
• Memory bandwidth: 76.8 GB/s recorded for AMD; no value recorded for Intel.
• PCIe: Gen 4 with 20 lanes for AMD; Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel.
• Integrated graphics: Radeon 660M versus UHD Graphics 770.
• Market segment: Mobile versus Desktop.
• Release date: AMD on 2025-09-30; Intel on 2024-06-30.

Both processors share dual-channel memory buses, ECC memory support, active production status, and locked multipliers. Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded in the database.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds of each processor?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E boosts to 5.20 GHz, and the AMD Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz.

Q: Which processor supports DDR5 memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only. The Intel Core i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core i5-14501E are recorded as supporting ECC memory.

Q: What is the thermal design power for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has a TDP of 28 W, and the Intel Core i5-14501E has a TDP of 65 W.

Q: Which processor has a larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has 24 MB of shared L3 cache, compared to 8 MB for the AMD Ryzen 3 110.

Where Each One Wins

Based strictly on the recorded specifications, the Intel Core i5-14501E wins in every performance-oriented category that can be inferred without benchmark scores. Its 6 cores and 12 threads exceed the AMD part's 4 cores and 8 threads, which typically translates to better multi-threaded performance in parallel workloads such as video rendering, compilation, and database operations. Its 5.20 GHz boost clock exceeds AMD's 4.30 GHz, which typically translates to better single-threaded performance in tasks like gaming, spreadsheet calculations, and lightweight productivity. Its 24 MB shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache dwarf AMD's 8 MB and 512 KB, which typically reduces memory latency in cache-sensitive workloads. Its PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes offers a newer I/O standard compared to AMD's PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, though the lane count is lower.

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 wins in efficiency-oriented categories. Its 28 W TDP is less than half of Intel's 65 W, making it the lower-power option for thermally constrained environments such as thin laptops or compact embedded systems. Its 6 nm process node from TSMC is smaller than Intel's 10 nm node, which typically indicates better power efficiency per transistor. Its 210 mm² die size is slightly smaller than Intel's 215 mm². Its socket (AMD Socket FP7) targets mobile platforms, while Intel's Socket 1700 targets desktop platforms, so the AMD part is the only one of the two suited for mobile designs. Its memory bandwidth is recorded at 76.8 GB/s, while Intel's memory bandwidth has no recorded value, so the AMD part has a documented bandwidth figure.

Both processors support ECC memory and dual-channel memory, so neither wins on those features. Both are active in production, and neither has a recorded launch MSRP. The database contains no benchmark scores for either processor, so no measured performance wins can be assigned. Any performance verdict would require actual test data, which the database does not currently include.