AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i5-14400F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for this comparison is asymmetric. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no benchmark scores listed in the database, while the Intel Core i5-14400F has a full suite of measurements. Consequently, the head-to-head analysis is based entirely on the Intel processor's performance profile, with the AMD part's capabilities inferred from its architecture and specifications rather than direct test results.

The Intel Core i5-14400F delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,645 and a single-core score of 3,055. In Geekbench, it records 11,268 for multicore and 2,058 for single-core. The PassMark suite shows a multithread score of 25,470 and a single-thread score of 3,701. These figures place the i5-14400F at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 32,279.

The nearest rivals for the Intel chip provide context for its performance tier. The AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U averages 32,233, a delta of 0.1% relative to the i5-14400F. The Intel Core i9-11900 scores 32,226, a 0.2% delta. The AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS records 32,354, putting it 0.2% ahead of the i5-14400F. The Intel Core i7-12800H scores 32,121, a 0.5% delta. These margins are within a single percentage point, indicating the i5-14400F sits in a tightly contested performance band.

The PassMark sub-tests reveal specific strengths. The data compression score of 315,521 is notably high, while integer math reaches 81,524 and floating-point math hits 61,319. Extended instructions score 19,937, random string sorting reaches 32,680, and find prime numbers records 86. The physics test scores 1,523.

For the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i, the database lists no benchmark results, no wins, and no nearest rivals. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and its percentile versus all CPUs is 50. This means the AMD part cannot be directly compared on any measured metric. The only quantitative data available are its architectural specifications, which appear in the Architecture Differences section.

The Intel processor's Cinebench R15 scores are 2,181 multicore and 307 single-core. Cinebench R20 shows 9,090 multicore and 1,283 single-core. These successive Cinebench versions demonstrate scaling across workloads, with the R23 multicore figure representing the most demanding render test in the recorded set.

The Verdict

From the data available, the Intel Core i5-14400F is the only chip with measurable performance, and it occupies a solid mid-to-high tier position. Its 83rd percentile ranking places it above the median, and its average score of 32,279 puts it within 0.5% of four closely matched rivals. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no recorded benchmark scores, so no direct performance verdict can be rendered for it.

The Intel chip's benchmark profile suggests it handles multithreaded workloads effectively. A Cinebench R23 multicore score of 21,645 and a PassMark multithread score of 25,470 indicate strong parallel processing capability. The single-thread scores of 3,055 in Cinebench R23 and 3,701 in PassMark show competitive per-core performance as well.

For the AMD part, the absence of measurements means the database cannot confirm or deny performance claims. Its specifications do indicate design intent: a mobile segment processor with a 28 TDP, versus the Intel desktop chip's 65 TDP. The AMD part uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while Intel uses a 10 nm process from its own foundry. The AMD chip includes integrated Radeon 880M graphics, while the Intel i5-14400F has no integrated graphics at all.

The launch MSRP for the Intel Core i5-14400F is $196. The AMD part has no launch MSRP listed. The production status for both is Active. The Intel part's part number is SRN3RSRN47, while the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown.

Buyers seeking a desktop processor with verified benchmark results should consider the i5-14400F, as its scores are fully documented. Buyers requiring integrated graphics or a lower-power mobile solution would look to the AMD part, but the database provides no performance evidence to support a specific performance expectation.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and Intel Core i5-14400F differ substantially in architecture, process technology, and platform design.

The AMD processor uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel processor uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series. It is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². The AMD chip is roughly 8% larger in die area despite the smaller process node.

Both processors feature 10 cores. The AMD part supports 20 threads, while the Intel part supports 16 threads. The AMD chip's base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel chip's base clock is 2.50 GHz with a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The Intel part starts at a higher base frequency, but the AMD part has a higher boost ceiling.

Cache configurations differ notably. Both list 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 per core, while the Intel part has 1.25 MB of L2 per core. The L3 cache shows a larger difference: the AMD part has 16 MB, while the Intel part has 20 MB shared. The Intel chip holds a 25% advantage in L3 cache capacity.

Memory support overlaps partially. Both support DDR5 and dual-channel memory buses. The AMD part also supports LPDDR5X, while the Intel part additionally supports DDR4. The AMD part lists a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; the Intel part has no bandwidth figure recorded. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation. The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel chip offers a newer PCIe generation, which provides higher interface bandwidth potential.

Integrated graphics present a clear split. The AMD part includes Radeon 880M graphics. The Intel i5-14400F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A. This means the AMD chip can output display signals without a discrete GPU, while the Intel part requires a separate graphics card.

The market segments differ. The AMD part is classified as Mobile, while the Intel part is Desktop. The AMD chip uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel chip uses Intel Socket 1700. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The AMD part's release date is recorded as 2026-02-28, while the Intel part's release date is 2024-01-07.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports 20 threads from its 10 cores. The Intel Core i5-14400F supports 16 threads from its 10 cores.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds?

A: The AMD part boosts to 5.00 GHz, while the Intel part boosts to 4.70 GHz. The AMD chip has a 0.30 GHz higher boost clock.

Q: Does either processor include integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i includes Radeon 880M integrated graphics. The Intel Core i5-14400F has no integrated graphics, listed as N/A.

Q: What is the Intel processor's benchmark percentile?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F sits at the 83rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 32,279.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14400F has 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 16 MB of L3 cache.

Q: What process nodes do the two chips use?

A: The AMD part is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel part is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14400F wins decisively in measured performance, since it holds the only benchmark scores in this comparison. Its Cinebench R23 multicore result of 21,645 and PassMark multithread score of 25,470 demonstrate strong parallel workloads. The single-thread scores of 3,055 in Cinebench R23 and 3,701 in PassMark indicate capable per-core performance as well. The chip's 83rd percentile ranking confirms it outperforms the majority of CPUs in the database.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i wins in several specification categories without benchmark confirmation. Its 20 threads versus 16 threads gives it a 25% thread-count advantage. Its boost clock of 5.00 GHz exceeds the Intel part's 4.70 GHz by 0.30 GHz. The AMD chip's 28 TDP is less than half the Intel chip's 65 TDP, indicating lower power draw for mobile applications. The AMD part includes Radeon 880M integrated graphics, which the Intel part lacks entirely.

The AMD part's memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no bandwidth figure. The AMD chip supports LPDDR5X in addition to DDR5, whereas the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5. For embedded or mobile platforms where power efficiency and integrated graphics matter, the AMD part holds the architectural advantage. For desktop builds with discrete graphics and verified performance, the Intel part has the data advantage.

The PCIe generation favors Intel, which uses Gen 5 versus the AMD part's Gen 4. The Intel chip also has 20 MB of L3 cache versus 16 MB on the AMD chip. The Intel part's release date of 2024-01-07 is earlier than the AMD part's 2026-02-28, making the AMD chip a newer design. The Intel part carries a launch MSRP of $196, while the AMD part has no listed price.

Neither processor has benchmark wins recorded in the head-to-head section, and both show zero wins. The database records no direct comparison tests. The Intel part's average benchmark score of 32,279 places it just 0.2% above the AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 8840U and 0.2% below the AMD Ryzen 7 6800HS, showing it sits in a competitive cluster. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no rivals listed, so its relative standing cannot be established from the data.