AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 and Intel Core i5-14501TE target different market segments, and the data shows a clear split in intended use cases. The Ryzen 3 110 is a mobile processor on AMD Socket FP7, built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename. The Core i5-14501TE is a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700, using the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename.

The Ryzen 3 110 uses a 6 nm process node from TSMC, while the Core i5-14501TE uses a 10 nm process node from Intel. This process advantage gives AMD a smaller die size at 210 mm² compared to Intel's 215 mm², though the difference is marginal. The Ryzen 3 110 ships with 4 cores and 8 threads, while the Core i5-14501TE offers 6 cores and 12 threads, giving Intel a 50% advantage in core count and thread count.

The Ryzen 3 110 has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Core i5-14501TE has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel part boosts 0.80 GHz higher, which suggests a stronger single-thread ceiling. However, the AMD part runs at a higher base clock, which can benefit sustained workloads that do not reach boost states.

Cache configurations differ substantially. The Ryzen 3 110 carries 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The Core i5-14501TE carries 80 KB of L1 per core, 1.25 MB of L2 per core, and 24 MB of shared L3. The Intel processor has 3 times the L3 capacity and more than double the L2 per core. Larger caches typically reduce memory latency and improve performance in data-heavy workloads.

The Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel bus and a measured memory bandwidth of 76.8 GB/s. The Core i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded for it. Both processors support ECC memory, which is an unusual feature pairing for their respective market positions.

The Ryzen 3 110 integrates Radeon 660M graphics, while the Core i5-14501TE integrates UHD Graphics 770. Both are capable iGPUs for basic display output, but their performance characteristics are not detailed in the benchmark data.

The Ryzen 3 110 uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the Core i5-14501TE uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part offers a newer PCIe generation, which can double bandwidth per lane, but the AMD part provides more total lanes.

The release dates put the Ryzen 3 110 in September 2025 and the Core i5-14501TE in June 2024, making the AMD part roughly 15 months newer.

The Verdict

The recorded data shows two processors designed for different physical environments. The Ryzen 3 110 belongs to the mobile segment with a 28 W TDP, while the Core i5-14501TE belongs to the desktop segment with a 45 W TDP. The higher TDP on the Intel part suggests it is designed to sustain higher power draw and potentially higher performance, but the mobile positioning of the AMD part indicates a focus on power efficiency.

For users working within a mobile platform, the Ryzen 3 110 is the only choice that fits the AMD Socket FP7. Its 28 W TDP aligns with thin-and-light laptops or compact mobile workstations. The 4-core, 8-thread configuration with Zen 3+ architecture provides a balanced baseline for everyday workloads.

For desktop builders, the Core i5-14501TE offers more cores, more threads, more cache, and a higher boost clock. The 6-core, 12-thread configuration with 24 MB of L3 cache gives it a structural advantage in multi-threaded scenarios. The PCIe Gen 5 support also future-proofs storage and graphics connectivity.

The data does not include benchmark scores or nearest rival comparisons, so performance rankings cannot be quantified. The percentile versus all CPUs is identical at 50 for both parts, which indicates that within the database's broader population, neither processor stands out as exceptional on average. However, this percentile does not account for the different market segments.

The Ryzen 3 110 has a 4.30 GHz boost clock, which is 0.80 GHz lower than the Intel part's 5.10 GHz. This gap suggests that in bursty single-thread tasks, the Core i5-14501TE would likely show an advantage. Conversely, the Ryzen 3 110's higher base clock of 3.00 GHz versus 2.20 GHz suggests it maintains a higher floor for sustained all-core operation at lower power.

The launch MSRP is not recorded for either processor, so no pricing comparison is possible from the data.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark array in the database is empty, and the wins counter shows zero for both processors. This means no direct comparative measurements exist between the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core i5-14501TE in the database. Without recorded benchmark scores, nearest rivals, or delta percentages, the performance relationship must be inferred from architectural specifications.

The most significant numerical differences appear in core count, cache size, and clock speeds. The Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores versus 4 cores for the Ryzen 3 110, a 50% difference. Thread count follows the same ratio: 12 threads versus 8 threads. In workloads that scale with thread count, the Intel part would have a structural advantage.

L3 cache capacity shows a 3x difference: 24 MB on Intel versus 8 MB on AMD. L2 cache per core also favors Intel at 1.25 MB versus 512 KB, a 2.44x difference. These cache deltas suggest that the Intel part can hold significantly more working data on-die, which reduces repeated memory accesses.

Boost clock difference is 0.80 GHz in favor of Intel (5.10 GHz versus 4.30 GHz). Base clock difference is 0.80 GHz in favor of AMD (3.00 GHz versus 2.20 GHz). This symmetrical gap implies that AMD tunes its silicon for a higher floor, while Intel tunes for a higher ceiling.

Memory bandwidth is recorded only for AMD at 76.8 GB/s. The Intel part has no recorded memory bandwidth, so a direct comparison is not possible. Both support dual-channel memory, and both support ECC.

PCIe generation differs: AMD uses Gen 4 with 20 lanes, Intel uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes. PCIe Gen 5 doubles the per-lane data rate compared to Gen 4, so 16 Gen 5 lanes potentially provide more aggregate bandwidth than 20 Gen 4 lanes, depending on device usage.

The process node difference is notable: 6 nm TSMC versus 10 nm Intel. The smaller process typically enables better power efficiency at equivalent performance, which aligns with the Ryzen 3 110's lower 28 W TDP.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference between the two?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz. The Intel part is 0.80 GHz higher.

Q: Which processor supports newer PCIe technology?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen 3 110 and the Intel Core i5-14501TE have ECC memory support recorded in the database.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only. The Intel Core i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 8 MB of shared L3 cache, making Intel's capacity 3 times larger.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen 3 110 uses the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, part of the Ryzen 3 generation. The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series. Both are active production parts, but they represent different design philosophies from different foundries.

AMD builds the Ryzen 3 110 on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 210 mm². Intel builds the Core i5-14501TE on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 215 mm². The process node difference is a full generation apart in lithography terms, which typically affects power density and transistor characteristics.

The cache hierarchy shows distinct design choices. AMD uses 64 KB L1 per core, 512 KB L2 per core, and 8 MB L3 shared. Intel uses 80 KB L1 per core, 1.25 MB L2 per core, and 24 MB L3 shared. Intel's per-core L2 is more than double AMD's, and the L3 pool is 3 times larger. This suggests Intel's architecture is designed to feed more cores with a larger working set.

The integrated graphics differ: AMD pairs the Ryzen 3 110 with Radeon 660M, while Intel pairs the Core i5-14501TE with UHD Graphics 770. Both are integrated solutions, but they come from different GPU families with different driver ecosystems.

The memory controller on the Ryzen 3 110 supports only DDR5, while the Core i5-14501TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part's exclusive DDR5 support aligns with its newer release date of September 2025. The Intel part's dual support reflects its June 2024 release and broader platform compatibility.

PCIe connectivity differs in both generation and lane count. The Ryzen 3 110 provides Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, while the Core i5-14501TE provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel part offers a newer standard but fewer lanes, while the AMD part offers an older standard with more lanes.

Socket platforms are incompatible: AMD Socket FP7 versus Intel Socket 1700. This means motherboard choices are completely separate, and upgrades require a full platform switch.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in every major specification category captured in the database.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 110 | Intel Core i5-14501TE |

|---------------|-----------------|----------------------|

| Cores | 4 | 6 |

| Threads | 8 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Raptor Lake |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen 3 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB per core | 80 KB per core |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB shared | 24 MB shared |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bus | Dual-channel | Dual-channel |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | Not recorded |

| ECC Memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2025-09-30 | 2024-06-30 |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000000549 (FP7r2) | Q49KSRNJN |

The TDP difference of 17 W reflects the different power envelopes. The mobile Ryzen 3 110 operates at 28 W, while the desktop Core i5-14501TE operates at 45 W. This power gap likely explains the boost clock advantage on the Intel part, as higher power budgets permit higher transient clocks.

The Ryzen 3 110's memory bandwidth is recorded at 76.8 GB/s, a figure that is absent for the Intel part. The Intel part's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means its bandwidth depends on which memory type is installed, so a single figure would not apply universally.

Both parts have the same percentile versus all CPUs at 50, and both have an average benchmark score of 0 in the database. Neither has any recorded benchmark entries, nearest rivals, or head-to-head results. The data therefore describes specifications only, with no measured performance deltas to report.