AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark scores for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core i5-14501TE. Neither processor has any entries in the benchmark results field, and the win counts for each side are zero. Without measured scores, a direct numerical comparison of application performance cannot be made from the recorded data. Both processors hold the same percentile rank against all CPUs in the database at 50, indicating that neither has established a statistical performance advantage in the current dataset. The absence of benchmark data means any claims about which part is faster in specific workloads would be speculation, not analysis grounded in measurements.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent fundamentally different design approaches. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on the Zen 5 and Zen 5c core architecture. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process node, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i5-14501TE uses the Raptor Lake-R codename, belonging to the Core 14th Gen series and the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. Intel fabricates this chip on its own 10 nm process, with a die size of 215 mm². The process node difference is significant: AMD uses a 4 nm TSMC process while Intel uses a 10 nm process, which contributes to differences in power efficiency and thermal behavior.

Core and thread counts differ substantially. The AMD part provides 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel part provides 6 cores and 12 threads. This gives the AMD processor a 4-core, 8-thread advantage in raw parallel capacity. Cache layouts also diverge. Both use 80 KB of L1 cache per core. For L2, the AMD processor allocates 1 MB per core, while the Intel processor allocates 1.25 MB per core. The L3 cache favors Intel: the AMD chip has 16 MB total, while the Intel chip has 24 MB shared. The larger shared L3 on Intel may benefit workloads with moderate working sets that fit within the cache.

Clock speeds are close on paper. The AMD processor has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel processor has a base clock of 2.20 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. Intel holds a 0.20 GHz advantage at base frequency and a 0.10 GHz advantage at boost frequency. However, the power envelopes differ considerably. The AMD processor has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel processor has a TDP of 45 watts. This 17-watt difference means the AMD part is designed for substantially lower sustained power draw, which has direct implications for cooling requirements and system integration.

Memory support differs in flexibility. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory across a dual-channel bus, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports both DDR4 and DDR5 across a dual-channel bus, but the database does not list a memory bandwidth figure for it. Both support ECC memory. PCIe connectivity differs by generation: the AMD processor uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes available from the CPU, while the Intel processor uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics also differ: the AMD part carries a Radeon 880M, while the Intel part carries UHD Graphics 770. The AMD processor uses AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD processor targets the mobile market segment, while the Intel processor targets the desktop segment. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The Intel part has a recorded part number of Q49KSRNJN, while the AMD part number is listed as unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD processor provides 4 additional cores and 8 additional threads.

Q: What are the power consumption ratings?

A: The AMD processor has a TDP of 28 watts. The Intel processor has a TDP of 45 watts. The AMD part is rated for 17 watts less than the Intel part.

Q: Which processor offers more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE offers 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i offers 16 MB of L3 cache. Intel has 8 MB more L3 cache than AMD.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core i5-14501TE list ECC memory support as true in the database.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part does not list DDR4 support, while the Intel part does not list LPDDR5X support.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. The Intel part holds a 0.10 GHz advantage at boost.

Q: What process node is used for each processor?

A: The AMD processor is fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process. The Intel processor is fabricated by Intel on a 10 nm process.

The Verdict

The recorded data does not include benchmark scores for either processor, so a performance verdict cannot be derived from measurements. What the data does show is a clear split in design intent. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i pairs a 28-watt TDP with 10 cores and 20 threads, positioning it as a high-throughput, power-constrained part for mobile integration on AMD Socket FP8. The Intel Core i5-14501TE pairs a 45-watt TDP with 6 cores and 12 threads, positioning it as a desktop processor on Intel Socket 1700 with support for both DDR4 and DDR5 memory. The Intel part has a higher base clock, a higher boost clock, more L2 cache per core, and more L3 cache overall. The AMD part has more cores, more threads, a smaller process node, a lower TDP, and a higher memory bandwidth figure at 89.6 GB/s. Selection between the two depends on platform requirements: the AMD part suits systems built around Socket FP8 with power budgets near 28 watts, while the Intel part suits Socket 1700 desktop builds with a 45-watt power envelope and the option to use DDR4 modules.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in every major specification category recorded in the database.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i | Intel Core i5-14501TE |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 6 |

| Threads | 20 | 12 |

| Base Clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.20 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 45 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die Size | 233 mm² | 215 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 80 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 24 MB (shared) |

| Memory Support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory Bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not listed |

| ECC Memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 5, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Multiplier Unlocked | No | No |

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark scores, the wins must be assessed from architectural specifications rather than measured performance. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i wins in scenarios that rely on parallel thread capacity. Its 10 cores and 20 threads exceed the Intel part by 4 cores and 8 threads, which can translate to better throughput in heavily threaded workloads if those workloads scale with core count. The AMD part also wins on power efficiency by specification: a 28-watt TDP compared to 45 watts for Intel means less heat generation and lower cooling demands in compact or passively cooled systems. The 4 nm TSMC process node supports this efficiency advantage. Memory bandwidth is another AMD win, with a recorded 89.6 GB/s versus no listed figure for Intel. The AMD part also provides LPDDR5X support, which is absent from the Intel memory support list, making it suitable for low-power mobile memory configurations.

The Intel Core i5-14501TE wins in clock speed on both base and boost frequencies. Its 2.20 GHz base clock and 5.10 GHz boost clock edge out the AMD part by 0.20 GHz and 0.10 GHz respectively. For single-threaded workloads that depend on frequency and per-core cache, these advantages matter. The Intel part also wins on L2 cache per core at 1.25 MB versus 1 MB, and on L3 cache at 24 MB versus 16 MB, a difference of 8 MB. The larger L3 cache can reduce memory access latency for working sets that fit within it. Intel also wins on memory flexibility by supporting both DDR4 and DDR5, allowing system builders to use either memory generation. The Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 for its 16 CPU lanes, while the AMD part uses Gen 4, which provides higher bandwidth for compatible devices. The Intel processor targets desktop systems, so it is designed for Socket 1700 motherboards rather than mobile platforms. The AMD processor targets mobile systems, so it is designed for Socket FP8 boards with a lower power envelope. Each processor wins in the platform context it was built for: AMD for power-constrained mobile integration with high thread counts, Intel for desktop builds that can accommodate a 45-watt TDP and prefer higher clocks, larger cache, and dual-generation DDR4/DDR5 memory support.