AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i vs Intel Core i5-14600 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database does not contain direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core i5-14600. The AMD processor has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of zero, and no nearest rivals listed. The Intel processor, by contrast, has a complete suite of nineteen benchmark scores across Cinebench, Geekbench, and Passmark tests, with an average benchmark score of 44,889 and a percentile ranking of 89 among all CPUs.

Because the AMD side lacks any measured results, a direct numerical comparison is impossible. The Intel Core i5-14600 delivers a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,464, a single-core score of 4,300, a Geekbench multi-core score of 14,680, and a single-core score of 2,424. In Passmark tests, the Intel chip scores 117,078 in integer math, 85,759 in floating point math, 35,848 in multithread, and 4,167 in single-thread performance. The data compression test reaches 434,620, data encryption reaches 25,082, and extended instructions reaches 25,674. Physics simulation scores 2,330, random string sorting scores 48,043, and prime number finding scores 155.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is listed with zero wins and zero recorded benchmark entries. The Intel Core i5-14600 also shows zero wins in the head-to-head table, since no comparison data exists. The database indicates the Intel processor sits at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, while the AMD processor sits at the 50th percentile, but the AMD percentile is computed without any actual benchmark data, making it a placeholder rather than a measured result.

Architecture Differences

The two processors diverge significantly in their underlying designs. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i uses the Gorgon Point codename, belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores, and is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14600 uses the Raptor Lake-R codename, belongs to the Core i5 generation built on Raptor Lake Refresh architecture, and is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Core counts differ notably. The AMD chip has 10 cores and 20 threads, while the Intel chip has 14 cores and 20 threads. Both processors support 20 threads, but the Intel part achieves this with four additional physical cores. The AMD processor's base clock is 2.00 GHz with a boost clock of 5.00 GHz, while the Intel processor's base clock is 2.70 GHz with a boost clock of 5.20 GHz. The Intel chip starts at a higher base frequency and boosts slightly higher.

Cache hierarchies also differ. Both processors have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD chip has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and a 16 MB L3 cache. The Intel chip has 2 MB of L2 cache per core and a 24 MB shared L3 cache. The Intel processor therefore holds a substantial advantage in both L2 and L3 capacity, which typically benefits workloads with repeated data access patterns.

Process node and die size reveal further differences. The AMD chip measures 233 mm² on TSMC's 4 nm process. The Intel chip measures 257 mm² on Intel's 10 nm process. The AMD chip uses a smaller die despite having fewer cores, reflecting the denser manufacturing process. The Intel chip's larger die accommodates more cores and more cache.

Memory support varies as well. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. Both processors support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs. The AMD chip uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes available from the CPU. The Intel chip uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes available from the CPU. The Intel processor's PCIe Gen 5 interface offers double the per-lane bandwidth of the AMD chip's Gen 4 interface, which matters for storage and GPU connectivity.

Integrated graphics also differ. The AMD chip includes a Radeon 880M GPU. The Intel chip includes UHD Graphics 770. The database records no benchmark scores for either integrated GPU, so comparative graphics performance cannot be assessed from the data.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data shows the Intel Core i5-14600 as the only processor with measurable performance. It wins every benchmark category by default, since the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no recorded scores. The Intel chip's multi-threaded results are particularly strong: Cinebench R23 multi-core reaches 30,464, Cinebench R20 multi-core reaches 12,794, and Cinebench R15 multi-core reaches 3,070. These scores place the Intel processor at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 44,889.

The nearest rivals to the Intel chip confirm its competitive position. The Intel Core i9-12900KS averages 45,094, which is 0.5% lower than the i5-14600's average. The AMD EPYC 4344P averages 45,122, also 0.5% lower. The AMD Ryzen 5 7500X3D averages 44,573, which is 0.7% higher than the i5-14600. The Intel Core Ultra X9 388H averages 44,466, which is 1% higher. These narrow deltas indicate the i5-14600 performs within a tight band around these competing processors.

Single-thread performance shows the Intel chip's strength in latency-sensitive workloads. Cinebench R23 single-core scores 4,300, Geekbench single-core scores 2,424, and Passmark single-thread scores 4,167. The boost clock of 5.20 GHz likely contributes to these results, though the database records no direct causal measurement.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has no benchmark wins in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking is not derived from measured scores, so it cannot be interpreted as a real performance comparison. The AMD chip's advantage would need to come from its 4 nm process efficiency, 28 W TDP, and integrated Radeon 880M GPU, but none of these features have corresponding benchmark data.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 boosts to 5.20 GHz, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i boosts to 5.00 GHz. The Intel chip also starts at a higher base clock of 2.70 GHz versus 2.00 GHz.

Q: How do the core counts compare?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has 14 cores and 20 threads. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 10 cores and 20 threads. Both support the same thread count, but the Intel chip uses four more physical cores.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14600 is fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. The AMD chip's process node is denser, which explains its smaller die size of 233 mm² compared to 257 mm² for the Intel chip.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i and the Intel Core i5-14600 support ECC memory.

Q: What PCIe generations do the two chips support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i supports PCIe Gen 4 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel Core i5-14600 supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14600 has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i has 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel chip also has 2 MB of L2 cache per core, compared to 1 MB per core on the AMD chip.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i | Intel Core i5-14600 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 10 | 14 |

| Threads | 20 | 20 |

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.70 GHz |

| Boost clock | 5.00 GHz | 5.20 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Die size | 233 mm² | 257 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 2 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 16 MB | 24 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 16 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 880M | UHD Graphics 770 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | 2026-02-28 | 2024-01-07 |

| Launch MSRP | Not recorded | $255 |

| Part number | Unknown | SRN44 |

| Multiplier unlocked | No | No |

| Production status | Active | Active |

The TDP difference is substantial: the AMD chip draws 28 W, while the Intel chip draws 65 W. This suggests the AMD processor targets mobile or embedded systems where power efficiency matters, while the Intel processor targets desktop systems with higher power budgets. The release dates also differ, with the Intel chip launching in January 2024 and the AMD chip scheduled for February 2026. The Intel part has a recorded launch MSRP of $255, while the AMD part has no recorded launch price.

The Verdict

The database provides no measured performance data for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i, which makes a performance verdict impossible for that processor. The Intel Core i5-14600, by contrast, has extensive recorded benchmarks and a clear competitive position at the 89th percentile of all CPUs, with an average score of 44,889.

For workloads that require multi-threaded throughput, the Intel chip's 14 cores and 24 MB L3 cache align with its strong Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 30,464. For single-thread responsiveness, its 5.20 GHz boost clock and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 4,300 indicate solid latency performance. The Intel chip also benefits from PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, which the AMD chip does not offer.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i offers a different set of trade-offs. Its 28 W TDP is less than half the Intel chip's 65 W TDP, which positions it for power-constrained mobile or embedded systems. Its 4 nm process node at TSMC provides a manufacturing density advantage, and its integrated Radeon 880M GPU may deliver different graphics capabilities than the Intel UHD Graphics 770, though no graphics benchmarks exist in the database to confirm this. The AMD chip also supports LPDDR5X memory, which the Intel chip does not.

The data indicates that a buyer selecting between these two processors should prioritize the Intel Core i5-14600 for measured desktop performance, as every recorded benchmark and percentile ranking supports its capability. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P174i would only be a reasonable choice for scenarios where its lower TDP, mobile socket, and LPDDR5X support are the primary requirements, since no performance data exists to recommend it on speed. The absence of AMD benchmark scores means the database cannot substantiate any multi-core or single-core advantage for the AMD chip, and its 50th percentile ranking should be treated as an unmeasured placeholder rather than a competitive result.