Undisputed

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G paired with the Intel Arc B370 produces a distinctive performance envelope in Undisputed, one that is heavily dictated by the graphics solution. The data shows a system that is fully capable of smooth gameplay at mainstream resolutions, but which hits a hard ceiling when pushed to higher pixel counts. This analysis breaks down the measured FPS, the role of each component, and how this specific combination stacks up against the broader field of tested hardware.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data reveals a clear hierarchy of playable settings, with the Low preset emerging as the only option that provides a consistently high refresh rate experience across all resolutions. At 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers an average of 115 FPS, which is not only the highest score in the entire dataset but also more than 30 FPS ahead of the next best setting at the same resolution. This makes Low the definitive choice for competitive play or for users with high-refresh-rate monitors, as the data indicates the system has ample headroom to avoid significant frame drops.

The Medium preset offers a strong middle ground, particularly for users who prioritize visual fidelity over raw frame rate. At 1080p, Medium achieves an average of 83 FPS with a minimum of 70 FPS and a maximum of 95 FPS. This demonstrates that the system can maintain a stable 60+ FPS experience with a moderate increase in graphical load. At 1440p, Medium still holds at 60 FPS average, with the same 51-69 FPS variance, making it a viable option for 1440p displays that support adaptive sync. The jump from Low to Medium at 1080p costs 32 FPS on average, suggesting that the visual improvements at Medium come at a significant performance cost.

The High preset is best reserved for users with 1080p displays who want a more polished look without sacrificing playability. The 68 FPS average at 1080p is still above the 60 FPS threshold, but the margin for error is thinner. Moving to 1440p on High drops the average to 49 FPS, which is borderline for a sports title that benefits from smooth motion. The Ultra preset is difficult to recommend in any scenario. At 1080p, it produces a 44 FPS average, and at 1440p, it falls to 32 FPS. The 4K Ultra result of 20 FPS is effectively unplayable. The performance delta between Medium and Ultra at 1080p is 39 FPS, indicating that the Ultra preset's demands are disproportionate to any potential visual benefit on this hardware.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is unequivocally the limiting factor in this combination. Its benchmark results place it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, with an average 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184. The data from Undisputed aligns perfectly with this lowly ranking. The GPU's memory architecture is "System Shared" with a bandwidth that is "System Dependent," meaning it relies on the main system memory for its frame buffer. This configuration inherently limits performance, particularly at higher resolutions where memory bandwidth demands increase.

The Arc B370's clock speeds are listed as a 300 MHz base and a 2400 MHz boost. While the boost clock is respectable, the integrated nature of the GPU, designated as "IGP" with a 25 W TDP, restricts its sustained performance. The data shows a stark drop in FPS as resolution increases, which is a classic symptom of a GPU hitting its memory bandwidth or shading throughput limits. The GPU has 1280 shading units and 40 texture mapping units, which is a modest configuration for modern gaming. Its fp32 performance of 6.144 TFLOPS is low, and this is reflected in the 4K results.

At 4K, the GPU clearly cannot cope. The drop from the Low preset's 52 FPS to the Medium preset's 38 FPS and then to High at 31 FPS and Ultra at 20 FPS shows a steep performance cliff. This indicates that even modest increases in texture quality or shadow resolution at 4K overwhelm the GPU's available resources. The GPU's nearest rivals according to benchmark data are the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 and the ATI Radeon HD 5770, which are legacy parts from a bygone era. This contextualizes the Arc B370's performance as being generations behind modern discrete graphics solutions. In Undisputed, this GPU is only suitable for 1080p gaming, and even then, it requires dropping to Medium settings to ensure a consistently smooth 60+ FPS experience.

CPU Role

In stark contrast to the GPU, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a capable performer that does not bottleneck this game. Its benchmark scores are strong, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. The data from Undisputed shows that the CPU is not the primary constraint, as the FPS scales predictably with resolution, which is a GPU-bound characteristic. The 5600G features 6 cores and 12 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. This is more than sufficient for a sports title like Undisputed.

The CPU's multi-threaded performance in Cinebench R23 is 10551 points, and its single-core score is 1409 points. These scores indicate a healthy balance for gaming. The data shows that at 1080p Low, the system achieves 115 FPS. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see this frame rate plateau regardless of resolution. Instead, the FPS drops from 115 at 1080p Low to 83 at 1440p Low and then to 52 at 4K Low. This scaling pattern is a textbook example of a GPU-limited scenario. The CPU is able to feed frames to the GPU much faster than the GPU can render them at higher resolutions.

The 5600G's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i3-1220P, the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V, and the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, all of which have similar average benchmark scores. This suggests that the 5600G is a solid mid-range CPU that provides a stable foundation for gaming. The 16 MB of L3 cache is also beneficial for game logic and physics calculations. The data implies that if a more powerful discrete GPU were paired with this CPU, the overall frame rates in Undisputed would be significantly higher. The 5600G is not holding the system back; the Arc B370 is.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the Ryzen 5 5600G and the Intel Arc B370 ranks at 2592 out of 2813 tested combos in Undisputed. This places it in the bottom 8% of all configurations, which is a direct consequence of the GPU's weak performance. The combo rank is a holistic metric that takes into account both the CPU and GPU capabilities, and the GPU's low percentile drags the entire system down. This ranking is expected given the GPU's position in the 5th percentile of all GPUs.

The data suggests that this combo is a functional, entry-level configuration. It is not designed for high-end gaming. The rank implies that the vast majority of other tested systems, even those with older or less powerful CPUs, will outperform this combo in Undisputed because they have a stronger GPU. The CPU's strong performance is masked by the GPU's limitations. The 74th percentile CPU ranking is completely overshadowed by the 5th percentile GPU ranking. This is a classic case of a system being unbalanced, where the CPU has far more potential than the GPU can utilize. In practical terms, this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming on Low to Medium settings, and its low overall rank reflects this limited scope of usability.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K provides a clear picture of the system's bottleneck. When moving from 1080p Low (115 FPS) to 1440p Low (83 FPS), the frame rate drops by 32 FPS, a 28% decrease. Moving from 1440p Low to 4K Low (52 FPS) results in a further 31 FPS drop, a 37% decrease. This accelerating degradation is a definitive sign of a GPU that is running out of memory bandwidth and raw compute power.

The trend is even more pronounced at Medium settings. The 1080p Medium average is 83 FPS, which drops to 60 FPS at 1440p (a 28% drop) and then to 38 FPS at 4K (a 37% drop). The percentage drops are consistent, indicating that the GPU's performance is scaling linearly with the increase in pixel count. This is typical for a GPU that is not bandwidth-limited but is instead limited by its shading units and texture fillrate. The data shows that the CPU is not a factor here. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would remain relatively flat as the resolution increases, since the CPU's workload stays constant. Instead, the FPS falls sharply, confirming the GPU as the limiting component. The jump from 1080p to 1440p is the most significant hurdle, with a 32 FPS drop on Low, suggesting that 1440p is a stretch for this GPU. The 4K results are, for all intents and purposes, not playable at any setting above Low.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average FPS this combo can achieve in Undisputed?*

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 115, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with the Low settings preset.

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G or the Intel Arc B370 the limiting factor in this game?

A: The benchmark data indicates the Intel Arc B370 is the clear limiting factor. The FPS drops significantly as resolution increases, which is characteristic of a GPU bottleneck, while the CPU's strong benchmark scores suggest it has ample headroom.

*Q: Can this system run Undisputed at 4K resolution?*

A: Yes, but only at the Low settings preset, which achieves an average of 52 FPS. All other settings presets at 4K produce averages below 40 FPS, with Ultra falling to 20 FPS.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184, which is within 1.4% of the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, ATI Radeon HD 5770, and AMD Radeon HD 7650M. This places it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: What is the recommended settings preset for a stable 60 FPS experience at 1080p?

A: The Medium preset at 1920x1080 provides an average of 83 FPS with a minimum of 70 FPS, ensuring a stable 60+ FPS experience. The High preset is also playable with a 68 FPS average.

Q: How does the combo's overall ranking compare to other tested systems?

A: This combo ranks 2592 out of 2813 tested combinations in Undisputed, placing it in the bottom 8% of all configurations.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The following table details the exact average FPS for every tested resolution and settings preset.

| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS | Min FPS | Max FPS |

| :--------- | :------- | :------ | :------ | :------ |

| 3840x2160 | High | 31 | -- | -- |

| 3840x2160 | Low | 52 | -- | -- |

| 3840x2160 | Medium | 38 | 32 | 43 |

| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 20 | -- | -- |

| 2560x1440 | High | 49 | -- | -- |

| 2560x1440 | Low | 83 | -- | -- |

| 2560x1440 | Medium | 60 | 51 | 69 |

| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 32 | -- | -- |

| 1920x1080 | High | 68 | -- | -- |

| 1920x1080 | Low | 115 | -- | -- |

| 1920x1080 | Medium | 83 | 70 | 95 |

| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 44 | -- | -- |

The data shows a consistent pattern: the Low preset is the only setting that provides a high-performance experience. The Medium preset is the most balanced, offering a solid 60 FPS at 1080p and 1440p. The High and Ultra presets are only viable at 1080p, and even then, they do not guarantee a smooth experience. The min and max FPS data for Medium settings shows a variance of around 25 FPS, which can be noticeable in a sports game where camera cuts and character models can cause sudden frame time spikes. The 4K data confirms that this resolution is beyond the capabilities of the Intel Arc B370 in this title.