Undisputed

Undisputed, a sports title from 2023, presents a clear performance picture for the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and Intel Arc B370 combination. The measured data reveals a system that is heavily constrained by its graphics processor, yet offers playable experiences at lower resolutions and settings. This analysis walks through the CPU and GPU roles, settings recommendations, and resolution scaling based solely on the provided benchmark results.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, built on a 7 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The CPU features a 16 MB L3 cache and 512 KB of L2 cache per core. Its memory support is DDR4 with dual-channel configuration, providing a theoretical bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The processor also integrates Radeon Vega 7 graphics, though the system under analysis uses the discrete Intel Arc B370.

In terms of synthetic benchmarks, the 5600GT achieves a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17272 and a single-core score of 2438. Its Geekbench multicore score is 7986, with a single-core score of 1843. The processor’s average benchmark score across all tests is 20733, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Intel Core i5-12490F scores 20802, which is a delta of -0.3%, meaning the 5600GT is effectively tied with that chip. The Intel Xeon 6325P and Intel Core Ultra 5 125U score 20821 and 20826 respectively, both with deltas of -0.4%, again showing near-identical performance. The AMD EPYC 7J13 scores 20845, a -0.5% delta. These numbers indicate that the 5600GT offers competitive multi-threaded throughput for its class.

For Undisputed, a sports game, the CPU’s role typically involves managing game logic, physics, and AI. The 12 threads provide ample parallel processing capability. However, the measured FPS data shows that at 1080p Low settings, the system reaches 115 FPS average, while at 1080p Ultra it drops to 44 FPS. This dramatic swing suggests that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck at lower settings; instead, the GPU is likely the limiting factor. The CPU’s strong single-thread performance (2438 in R23 single-core) helps maintain frame pacing, but the overall frame rates at higher settings are constrained by the graphics processor. The data shows that even at 4K Ultra, the average FPS is 20, which is far below the 1080p Low result, reinforcing that the GPU workload dominates the performance envelope.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics solution based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process. It has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The GPU features 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster operation units. It also includes 10 ray tracing cores. The memory configuration is "System Shared," meaning it uses the host system’s DDR4 memory rather than dedicated VRAM. The memory bus width and bandwidth are listed as "System Shared" and "System Dependent," respectively. This means the GPU’s memory performance is tied to the CPU’s memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. The GPU’s pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s, texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, and it delivers 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 compute.

In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the Arc B370 scores 1184, placing it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (score 1186, delta -0.2%), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (score 1190, delta -0.5%), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (score 1192, delta -0.7%). The AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168, a delta of 1.4% relative to the B370. These comparisons show that the Arc B370 performs at a level comparable to older discrete GPUs from over a decade ago, indicating a very low performance tier.

This GPU limitation is directly visible in the Undisputed FPS data. At 1080p Low, the system averages 115 FPS, which is playable. However, at 1080p High, the average drops to 68 FPS, and at 1080p Ultra, it falls to 44 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra shows a 61.7% reduction in frame rate (from 115 to 44 FPS). At higher resolutions, the situation worsens. At 1440p Ultra, the average is 32 FPS, and at 4K Ultra, it is 20 FPS. The shared memory architecture means that increasing resolution and settings increases memory pressure, and the GPU’s limited compute resources (6.144 TFLOPS) become the clear bottleneck. The data indicates that the GPU can handle the game at lower settings but struggles to maintain smooth framerates at higher presets, especially at 1440p and 4K.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience depends on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For a smooth 60+ FPS experience, the only setting that consistently delivers this is 1080p Low, which averages 115 FPS. At 1080p Medium, the average drops to 83 FPS, still above 60, with a minimum of 70 FPS and maximum of 95 FPS. This makes 1080p Medium a viable option for those wanting better visual quality without sacrificing too much performance.

At 1440p, the situation changes. The Low preset averages 83 FPS, which is excellent, while Medium averages 60 FPS (min 51, max 69). The High preset drops to 49 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS target. For a balanced experience at 1440p, Low or Medium are the recommended choices, with Medium providing a visible quality improvement at the cost of some headroom. The High preset is playable but may feel less smooth.

At 4K, no preset achieves 60 FPS. The Low preset averages 52 FPS, which is the highest of all 4K options. Medium averages 38 FPS (min 32, max 43), High averages 31 FPS, and Ultra averages 20 FPS. For 4K gaming, the Low preset is the only one that approaches playability, though it still falls short of a consistent 60 FPS. The data suggests that the best overall experience for this combo is 1080p Medium, which balances visual fidelity with frame rate, or 1080p Low for maximum smoothness. For users prioritizing frame rate, 1440p Low is also a strong option, offering 83 FPS average.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average FPS achieved by this CPU-GPU combo in Undisputed?

A: The highest average FPS recorded is 115, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: At which resolution and settings does the combo first drop below 60 FPS average?

A: The first drop below 60 FPS occurs at 2560x1440 with High settings, which averages 49 FPS. At 1920x1080, all tested settings average above 44 FPS, with Ultra at 44 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU’s benchmark score compare to its nearest rival?

A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT has an average benchmark score of 20733, which is 0.3% lower than the Intel Core i5-12490F’s score of 20802.

Q: What is the GPU’s percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc B370 is in the 5th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 1184 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test.

Q: What is the average FPS at 1080p with Medium settings?

A: At 1920x1080 with Medium settings, the average FPS is 83, with a minimum of 70 and a maximum of 95.

Q: Does the combo achieve 60 FPS at 4K resolution?

A: No, the highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 52, which is achieved with Low settings. All other presets at 4K average below 40 FPS.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured data shows a clear pattern of FPS degradation as resolution increases from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 115 at 1080p to 83 at 1440p, a 27.8% decrease, and then to 52 at 4K, a 54.8% decrease from 1080p. At Medium settings, the averages are 83 FPS at 1080p, 60 FPS at 1440p, and 38 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 4K at Medium is 54.2% (from 83 to 38). At High settings, the averages are 68 FPS at 1080p, 49 FPS at 1440p, and 31 FPS at 4K, representing a 54.4% drop from 1080p to 4K. Finally, at Ultra settings, the averages are 44 FPS at 1080p, 32 FPS at 1440p, and 20 FPS at 4K, a 54.5% drop.

The consistent pattern of roughly a 54-55% reduction in FPS when moving from 1080p to 4K, regardless of settings, indicates that the GPU is the primary limiting component. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the FPS would not scale so predictably with resolution, as the CPU workload per frame remains relatively constant across resolutions. The GPU’s limited compute resources (6.144 TFLOPS) and shared memory bandwidth (system dependent, tied to 51.2 GB/s) mean that as pixel count increases, the GPU must process more fragments and textures, leading to the observed decline. The fact that even at 1080p Ultra the FPS is 44, which is below 60, further suggests that the GPU is the limiting factor even at lower resolutions when settings are maximized. The data strongly implies that upgrading the GPU would yield the most significant performance improvement in this game.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The following table details the exact average FPS values for each resolution and settings combination as measured in the FACT PACK.

1920x1080:

• Low: Average FPS 115
• Medium: Average FPS 83, Minimum FPS 70, Maximum FPS 95
• High: Average FPS 68
• Ultra: Average FPS 44

2560x1440:

• Low: Average FPS 83
• Medium: Average FPS 60, Minimum FPS 51, Maximum FPS 69
• High: Average FPS 49
• Ultra: Average FPS 32

3840x2160:

• Low: Average FPS 52
• Medium: Average FPS 38, Minimum FPS 32, Maximum FPS 43
• High: Average FPS 31
• Ultra: Average FPS 20

These numbers reveal that the combo’s sweet spot is at 1080p, where it can maintain playable frame rates across all settings. At 1440p, Low and Medium presets are viable, but High and Ultra fall below 50 FPS. At 4K, only the Low preset averages above 50 FPS, and even that is below 60. The minimum FPS values, where available, show that the Medium preset at 1080p has a minimum of 70 FPS, while at 1440p the minimum is 51 FPS, and at 4K it is 32 FPS. These minimums indicate that frame pacing can become inconsistent at higher resolutions, potentially leading to stutter.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

In the database of tested combinations for Undisputed, this specific pairing of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and Intel Arc B370 ranks 2592 out of 2813 total combos. This places it in the bottom 8% of all tested systems. Given the GPU’s 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs, this low combo rank is expected. The CPU, on the other hand, is in the 74th percentile, indicating that the processor is relatively capable compared to other CPUs, but it is paired with a very weak graphics solution.

The rank of 2592 out of 2813 means that approximately 221 other combos perform worse than this one. The data suggests that the Intel Arc B370 is the primary reason for this low ranking, as its performance is comparable to GPUs from the early 2010s, based on the nearest rival scores (e.g., ATI Radeon HD 5770 with a delta of -0.5%). The CPU’s strong synthetic scores (e.g., Cinebench R23 multicore 17272) do not translate into high FPS in Undisputed because the graphics workload is the bottleneck. This combo is suitable for low-resolution, low-settings gaming, but it cannot deliver high-fidelity experiences in this title. The rank reflects that this is a bottom-tier configuration for Undisputed, and users should expect significant compromises in visual quality and resolution to achieve playable frame rates.