Fortnite

# Fortnite with AMD Ryzen 5 5600G + Intel Arc B370

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G paired with the Intel Arc B370 integrated GPU presents a distinctive combination for Fortnite, one where the graphics solution is clearly the limiting factor across all tested resolutions. The data shows a system that can deliver playable frame rates at 1080p with lower settings, but struggles significantly as resolution increases. This analysis walks through the measured FPS data, the role of each component, and how this pairing ranks among the 2,740 tested combinations in the database.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for playable Fortnite performance?

A: The data shows 1920x1080 with Low settings delivers 104 FPS average, which is the only configuration exceeding 100 FPS. The 2560x1440 Low setting achieves 66 FPS, while 3840x2160 Low drops to 35 FPS.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals in the GPU benchmark?

A: The Arc B370 scores 1184 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, with a percentile ranking of 5 among all GPUs. Its nearest rival, the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, scores 1186 (0.2% higher), and the AMD FirePro M2000 scores 1168 (1.4% lower).

Q: What is the CPU's performance percentile and nearest rival comparison?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600G ranks in the 74th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 21088. Its closest rival is the Intel Core i3-1220P at 21066 (0.1% difference), while the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U scores 21133 (0.2% higher).

Q: Does the system achieve 60 FPS at 1440p?

A: Only at Low settings, where the average is 66 FPS. The Medium setting at 1440p averages 46 FPS, High averages 36 FPS, and Ultra averages 24 FPS.

Q: What is the frame rate drop from 1080p Low to 4K Low?

A: The average FPS drops from 104 at 1920x1080 Low to 35 at 3840x2160 Low, representing a 66% reduction in average frame rate.

Q: How many cores and threads does the Ryzen 5 5600G have?

A: The CPU has 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.90 GHz and boost clock of 4.40 GHz. It features 16 MB of L3 cache and is built on the Zen 3 architecture with a 7 nm process node.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is an integrated graphics processor based on the Xe3-LPG architecture, built on Intel's 3 nm process node. Its clock speeds are listed with a base of 300 MHz and a boost of 2400 MHz, though the memory configuration is "System Shared" with bandwidth described as "System Dependent" — meaning performance scales with the system's main memory capabilities rather than dedicated VRAM.

The GPU's compute resources include 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster operation units. It also features 10 ray tracing cores. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance of 6.144 TFLOPS. The TDP is 25 W, and it uses an IGP slot width with no power connectors required.

In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 benchmark, the Arc B370 scores 1184 points, placing it in the 5th percentile of all GPUs. This is a very low ranking, and its nearest rivals are all older or lower-end parts: the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 scores 1186 (0.2% higher), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 scores 1190 (0.5% higher), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M scores 1192 (0.7% higher). Only the AMD FirePro M2000 scores lower at 1168 (1.4% below).

This GPU's limited compute capability directly explains the Fortnite results. At 1080p with Low settings, the system manages 104 FPS, indicating the GPU can handle the lighter load. However, the score in the GPU benchmark — near the bottom of the database — suggests that as settings increase, the graphics processor becomes the bottleneck. The shared memory architecture means there is no dedicated VRAM pool to fall back on, which further constrains performance at higher resolutions and detail levels.

Resolution Scaling

The measured data shows a clear pattern of frame rate degradation as resolution increases. Starting from 1920x1080 Low at 104 FPS average, moving to 2560x1440 Low drops the average to 66 FPS, and at 3840x2160 Low the system manages only 35 FPS. This represents a progressive decline of roughly 37% from 1080p to 1440p, then another 47% from 1440p to 4K.

For the Medium settings, the pattern is similar but with lower absolute numbers. At 1080p Medium, the average is 73 FPS (with a minimum of 62 and maximum of 84). At 1440p Medium, it falls to 46 FPS (min 39, max 53). At 4K Medium, the average drops to 25 FPS (min 21, max 28). The percentage drops are approximately 37% from 1080p to 1440p and 46% from 1440p to 4K.

The High settings show 57 FPS at 1080p, 36 FPS at 1440p, and 19 FPS at 4K. This is a 37% reduction at each step up in resolution. The Ultra settings are the most demanding: 37 FPS at 1080p, 24 FPS at 1440p, and 13 FPS at 4K.

The consistent scaling pattern — approximately one-third to nearly one-half reduction at each resolution step — strongly indicates that the GPU is the limiting component. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the frame rate would remain relatively flat across resolutions because the CPU workload does not scale with pixel count in the same way. Instead, the data shows a steep decline that tracks with the increasing pixel count, confirming that the Intel Arc B370's processing capability is constraining performance across all settings.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The complete set of measured frames per second data covers three resolutions and four quality settings, providing a full picture of this combination's capabilities.

At 1920x1080, the system achieves its best results. Low settings produce an average of 104 FPS. Medium settings average 73 FPS, with a minimum of 62 and maximum of 84. High settings average 57 FPS. Ultra settings average 37 FPS. This is the only resolution where any setting breaks the 100 FPS threshold, and the only one where even Ultra remains above 30 FPS.

At 2560x1440, performance drops noticeably. Low settings average 66 FPS, which is still playable for most users. Medium settings average 46 FPS (min 39, max 53), High averages 36 FPS, and Ultra averages 24 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at this resolution is 42 FPS, showing how much headroom the GPU lacks for higher detail levels.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles across the board. Low settings average 35 FPS, which is borderline for smooth gameplay. Medium averages 25 FPS (min 21, max 28), High averages 19 FPS, and Ultra averages 13 FPS. None of these are comfortably playable for a competitive game like Fortnite, and the Ultra setting at 4K is essentially a slideshow.

The data also reveals the variance within the Medium settings rows. At 1080p Medium, the spread between minimum and maximum is 22 FPS (62 to 84). At 1440p Medium, the spread is 14 FPS (39 to 53). At 4K Medium, the spread is 7 FPS (21 to 28). This tightening range at higher resolutions suggests the GPU is becoming saturated, with less headroom for frame time variation.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured rows, the optimal experience depends heavily on the target resolution. The data provides clear guidance on which settings deliver the most usable frame rates.

At 1920x1080, the Low preset at 104 FPS average is the clear choice for competitive play. This setting provides well over double the frame rate of the next step up (Medium at 73 FPS) and is the only configuration in the entire dataset to exceed 100 FPS. For players who prioritize smoothness and responsiveness in Fortnite's Battle Royale gameplay, this is the best option. The Medium preset at 73 FPS is a reasonable alternative if visual quality matters more, as it maintains a playable frame rate with a modest visual upgrade over Low. High at 57 FPS is borderline but workable, while Ultra at 37 FPS is not recommended for fast-paced play.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset at 66 FPS is the only setting that comfortably exceeds the 60 FPS threshold. Medium at 46 FPS is playable but not ideal for competitive scenarios. High at 36 FPS and Ultra at 24 FPS are both below what most players would consider acceptable for Fortnite. The recommendation is to stick with Low at this resolution unless visual fidelity takes priority over frame rate.

At 3840x2160, no setting achieves a consistently playable frame rate. Low at 35 FPS is the best available option but still falls short of the smoothness needed for competitive play. Medium at 25 FPS, High at 19 FPS, and Ultra at 13 FPS are all too low for practical use. The data suggests that 4K is not a viable target for this combination in Fortnite, regardless of settings.

The overall recommendation from the measured data is to run Fortnite at 1920x1080 with Low settings for the best balance of frame rate and playability. This configuration offers the highest average FPS and avoids the severe drops seen at higher resolutions.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600G is a 6-core, 12-thread processor from the 5000 series, based on the Zen 3 architecture with the Cezanne codename. It operates at a base clock of 3.90 GHz with a boost clock of 4.40 GHz, and has a 65 W TDP. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in dual-channel configuration with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s, and interfaces via PCIe Gen 3 with 16 lanes.

In CPU benchmarks, the Ryzen 5 5600G demonstrates solid mid-range performance. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score is 10551, with a single-core score of 1409. The 3DMark multi-threaded tests show scaling from 1705 (2 threads) to 5455 (max threads). The PassMark multithread score is 19717, with a single-thread score of 3177. The average benchmark score across all tests is 21088, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs.

The nearest rivals, as listed in the data, are all within a narrow band. The Intel Core i3-1220P scores 21066 (0.1% below), the Intel Core Ultra 7 256V scores 21112 (0.1% above), the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U scores 21133 (0.2% above), and the Intel Core Ultra 7 155U scores 21174 (0.4% above). This indicates the 5600G is positioned at the edge of a performance tier, with negligible differences to its nearest competitors.

In the context of Fortnite, the CPU's role is to feed the GPU with draw calls and handle game logic. The measured FPS data suggests the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in this system. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 104 FPS, which is a reasonable result for the CPU's capability. However, the sharp FPS drops at higher resolutions point to the GPU as the limiting factor. The CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads provide sufficient processing power for Fortnite's workload, and its 74th percentile ranking confirms it is a capable mid-range processor that will not hold back the system in most scenarios.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600G and Intel Arc B370 ranks 2517 out of 2740 tested combinations for Fortnite. This places it in the bottom 8% of all tested configurations, reflecting the GPU's severe performance limitations.

The GPU's 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs is the dominant factor in this low overall ranking. With a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 1184, the Arc B370 sits alongside GPUs from over a decade ago, such as the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (1190) and ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (1186). These are not competitive parts for modern gaming at high settings, and the Fortnite results confirm this.

The CPU, by contrast, is a much stronger component. Its 74th percentile ranking and average score of 21088 place it in the upper-mid range of processors. This disparity between CPU and GPU capability means the system is heavily unbalanced, with the graphics solution dragging down the overall experience.

Given that the combo ranks 2517 out of 2740, only 223 tested combinations perform worse in Fortnite. The measured FPS data supports this ranking: at 1080p Low, the system achieves 104 FPS, but this drops to 57 FPS at High and 37 FPS at Ultra. At 1440p, even Low settings only reach 66 FPS, and at 4K, the best case is 35 FPS. These numbers are below what most gamers would expect from a modern system, and the ranking reflects that reality.

For context, the CPU alone ranks in the 74th percentile, meaning it outperforms nearly three-quarters of all processors in the database. But the GPU's 5th percentile ranking pulls the overall combo down dramatically. This is a case where the graphics solution is the definitive limiting factor, and any improvement in Fortnite performance would require a more capable GPU rather than a stronger CPU.