Thief

Thief

AVERAGE FPS
97
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 97 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings

UltraHighMediumLow
4K Ultra HD 47 49 60 78
1440p QHD 75 77 101 134
1080p Full HD 110 115 147 171

Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.

Every measured configuration

3840x2160 Low 78
3840x2160 Medium 60
3840x2160 High 49
3840x2160 Ultra 47
2560x1440 Low 134
2560x1440 Medium 101
2560x1440 High 77
2560x1440 Ultra 75
1920x1080 Low 171
1920x1080 Medium 147
1920x1080 High 115
1920x1080 Ultra 110

Thief with Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060, In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i5-12400F paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 lands in the 737th position out of 1642 tested combinations for Thief, placing it in the upper-middle tier of the database. This rank is not a statement of weakness; rather, it reflects a balanced pairing where neither component becomes a glaring bottleneck at most settings. The combo’s position suggests that while there are many faster, likely more expensive configurations, this duo delivers a thoroughly playable experience across the board, with the data indicating that the system’s overall benchmark average score of 19221 for the CPU and 30109 for the GPU places it in a competitive neighborhood. Specifically, the CPU’s average benchmark score sits nearly identical to the Intel Core i7-8700K, with a delta of just 0.1%, and it is only 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-1335U. On the GPU side, the RTX 5060’s average score is effectively tied with the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT, showing a 0% delta, and it is a mere 0.2% behind the older AMD Radeon RX 570. These close margins in synthetic benchmarks do not tell the whole story for Thief, as the measured frame rates reveal a component that scales predictably with resolution and settings, but the rank of 737 out of 1642 shows there is substantial headroom above this configuration for those chasing maximum refresh rates.

How This Combo Ranks

The data positions this combination in the 55th percentile of all tested combos, which is a respectable showing for a mainstream pairing. The ranking at 737 out of 1642 indicates that a majority of tested systems deliver higher average frame rates in Thief, but the gap is not insurmountable. The benchmark results show that the RTX 5060’s performance, as measured by its average benchmark score of 30109, is nearly indistinguishable from the RX 7700 XT’s 30097, suggesting that in GPU-bound scenarios, this combo will perform on par with that rival. However, the CPU’s 77th percentile ranking among all processors means it is a stronger relative performer than the GPU’s 73rd percentile, hinting that at lower resolutions, the graphics card may be the limiting factor. In practical terms for Thief, this rank means the combo is well-suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, but it will not top any charts at 4K, where the data shows the average frame rates dip below the 60 FPS threshold on higher presets. The delta between the CPU and its closest rival, the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, shows a 0.7% deficit, and it sits 1.3% ahead of the AMD EPYC 7773X, which are all negligible differences that reinforce the idea that the i5-12400F is not the source of any significant slowdown in this game.

Settings Recommendations

The measured FPS data offers clear guidance on the optimal settings for this combo. At 1920x1080, the Ultra preset achieves an average of 109.5 FPS, which is perfectly playable on a standard 60Hz or even 144Hz monitor. However, dropping to High yields 115.1 FPS, a modest 5.1% improvement, while Medium jumps to 147.1 FPS, and Low reaches 170.7 FPS. The most significant leap in performance comes from moving from High to Medium, which offers a 27.8% increase in frame rate for what is likely a minor visual fidelity loss in a stealth game where shadows and lighting matter. At 2560x1440, the story is similar: Ultra delivers 74.5 FPS, High provides 76.8 FPS, Medium hits 100.8 FPS, and Low reaches 134.4 FPS. For the best experience, the data suggests that Medium at 1440p is the sweet spot, as it maintains a 100+ FPS average while still offering moderate visual quality. At 3840x2160, the situation changes dramatically; Ultra and High are both below 60 FPS (47.1 and 48.6 FPS respectively), Medium scrapes by at 60.3 FPS, and only Low achieves a comfortable 78.4 FPS. Therefore, for 4K gameplay, users should select Low or Medium if they prioritize smoothness over fidelity, as the jump from Medium to High at this resolution only costs 11.7 FPS, but neither is ideal for fast-paced action.

FAQ

Q: Can this combo run Thief at 4K with playable frame rates?

A: Yes, but only at lower settings. The data shows an average of 78.4 FPS at 4K Low, dropping to 60.3 FPS at Medium, 48.6 FPS at High, and 47.1 FPS at Ultra. For a stable 60 FPS experience, Medium is the maximum setting, while High and Ultra will fall short of that target.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RTX 5060’s average benchmark score is 30109, which is exactly 0% different from the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT’s score of 30097. It is also 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 570 (30158) and 0.5% ahead of the NVIDIA Tesla M60 (29969).

Q: Is the Intel Core i5-12400F a bottleneck for the RTX 5060 in Thief?

A: The benchmark data suggests no significant bottleneck. The CPU’s average score of 19221 is within 0.1% of the Intel Core i7-8700K (19210) and 0.3% of the Intel Core i5-1335U (19167), showing it provides consistent performance. The frame rates scale predictably with resolution, indicating that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher settings.

Q: What is the performance difference between 1080p and 1440p at Ultra settings?

A: At 1920x1080 Ultra, the average FPS is 109.5, while at 2560x1440 Ultra, it drops to 74.5. This represents a 32% decrease in performance when moving to the higher resolution, which is a typical scaling pattern for GPU-bound scenarios.

Q: Which preset offers the largest relative performance gain?

A: The data shows that moving from High to Medium at 1440p provides a significant boost, increasing from 76.8 FPS to 100.8 FPS, a 31.3% improvement. Similarly, at 1080p, the jump from High (115.1 FPS) to Medium (147.1 FPS) is a 27.8% increase, making Medium the most efficient preset for gaining frame rates.

Q: How does the combo’s rank translate to real-world performance?

A: Being ranked 737 out of 1642 combos means it is in the 55th percentile, indicating that a majority of tested systems outperform it. However, the measured data shows it can still achieve over 100 FPS at 1080p Medium and over 74 FPS at 1440p Ultra, so it is far from inadequate for this game.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured frame rates across all resolutions and settings paint a clear picture of this combo’s capabilities. At 1920x1080, the lowest setting produces an average of 170.7 FPS, which is an excellent result for competitive play. Moving to Medium yields 147.1 FPS, a 13.8% reduction, while High delivers 115.1 FPS, a 21.8% drop from Medium. Ultra is the most demanding, with 109.5 FPS, which is only 4.9% slower than High. This pattern suggests that the High and Ultra presets are closely related in terms of GPU load, while Medium offers a substantial performance headroom. At 2560x1440, the scaling is more pronounced: Low starts at 134.4 FPS, Medium at 100.8 FPS (a 25% drop), High at 76.8 FPS (a 23.8% drop from Medium), and Ultra at 74.5 FPS (a 3% drop from High). The 1440p data indicates that the jump from Medium to High is the most costly, suggesting that High enables effects that heavily tax the GPU. At 3840x2160, the frame rates compress significantly: Low is 78.4 FPS, Medium is 60.3 FPS, High is 48.6 FPS, and Ultra is 47.1 FPS. The difference between High and Ultra at 4K is minimal at 1.5 FPS, indicating that these settings are nearly identical in their performance impact at this resolution. The overall trend shows that the combo is most comfortable at 1080p and 1440p, with 4K requiring significant setting compromises to maintain smooth gameplay.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the primary driver of frame rates in this pairing, particularly as resolution increases. The GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus provides a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s, which is sufficient for Thief’s textures at most settings, but the data suggests that at 4K Ultra, the memory capacity or bandwidth may be a limiting factor, as the average FPS drops to 47.1. The GPU’s boost clock of 2497 MHz and base clock of 2280 MHz, combined with its 3840 shading units, delivers a raw compute throughput of 19.18 TFLOPS. This is reflected in the benchmark scores, where the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 20891 places it in the 73rd percentile of all GPUs. When compared to its nearest rivals, the RTX 5060 is statistically tied with the RX 7700 XT (delta 0%), which is notable because the RX 7700 XT typically has more memory bandwidth. However, the RTX 5060’s performance in Thief shows it can hold its own, as evidenced by the 115.1 FPS average at 1080p High. The GPU’s role becomes more critical at 1440p and 4K, where the frame rate drops are consistent with a GPU-bound scenario. For instance, moving from 1080p Ultra (109.5 FPS) to 1440p Ultra (74.5 FPS) results in a 32% reduction, which is a typical GPU scaling curve. The data suggests that the RTX 5060 is well-matched for this game up to 1440p, but at 4K, it is the component that prevents the system from achieving high refresh rates on demanding presets.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i5-12400F serves as a capable foundation for this combo, with its 6 cores and 12 threads operating at a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.40 GHz. The CPU’s 18 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB per-core L2 cache provide ample storage for game data, and its Alder Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process, offers strong single-thread performance, as evidenced by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2332. In Thief, which is not a heavily multithreaded title, the CPU’s performance is more than adequate, as indicated by its 77th percentile ranking among all CPUs. The benchmark data shows a 0.1% delta from the Intel Core i7-8700K, meaning the 12400F provides essentially identical performance in synthetic tests, which translates to negligible differences in gaming. The CPU’s role becomes more apparent at lower resolutions and settings, where the frame rates are higher. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 170.7 FPS, and while this is GPU-limited to some extent, the CPU’s ability to feed the GPU is critical. The data shows that the CPU’s average benchmark score of 19221 is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i5-1335U and 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS, all of which are close enough to be considered identical. This suggests that the i5-12400F will not hold back the RTX 5060 in Thief, as the measured frame rates scale smoothly with GPU load. The CPU’s 65W TDP also means it runs efficiently, allowing the GPU to remain the primary power draw, but the data does not indicate any thermal throttling issues that would affect performance.

Resolution Scaling

The frame rate data across 1080p, 1440p, and 4K reveals how the system’s limiting component shifts with resolution. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates, with Low hitting 170.7 FPS and Ultra still maintaining 109.5 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is significant: at High settings, the average FPS falls from 115.1 to 76.8, a 33.3% reduction. This is a clear indication that the system is becoming more GPU-bound at 1440p, as the CPU has enough headroom to handle the increased pixel count. The scaling from 1440p to 4K is even more dramatic, with High settings dropping from 76.8 FPS to 48.6 FPS, a 36.7% reduction. At Ultra settings, the drop is 74.5 FPS to 47.1 FPS, a 36.8% reduction. These consistent percentage drops suggest that the RTX 5060 is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions, as the CPU’s performance remains constant regardless of resolution. The data also shows that the gap between Low and Ultra settings narrows as resolution increases. At 1080p, the difference between Low and Ultra is 61.2 FPS (170.7 vs 109.5), while at 4K, it is only 31.3 FPS (78.4 vs 47.1). This compression indicates that at 4K, even the lowest settings are taxing the GPU heavily, leaving less room for setting-based performance variation. The implication is that for users who want to play at 4K, they must accept lower presets, while those at 1080p can enjoy high frame rates with the Ultra preset. The scaling pattern strongly suggests that the CPU is not a bottleneck at any resolution, as the frame rates drop in a predictable manner that aligns with the GPU’s computational load.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i5-12400F

Cores / Threads 6 / 12
Base Clock 2500 MHz
Boost Clock 4400 MHz
TDP 65W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060

VRAM 8 GB GDDR7
Base Clock —
Boost Clock 2497 MHz MHz
TDP 145 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i5-12400F + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 in Thief

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 78.4
3840x2160 Medium 60.3
3840x2160 High 48.6
3840x2160 Ultra 47.1
2560x1440 Low 134.4
2560x1440 Medium 100.8
2560x1440 High 76.8
2560x1440 Ultra 74.5
1920x1080 Low 170.7
1920x1080 Medium 147.1
1920x1080 High 115.1
1920x1080 Ultra 109.5

Thief with ii5-12400F + Other GPUs

See how Thief performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Thief with RTX 5060 + Other CPUs

See how Thief performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii5-12400F + RTX 5060

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.