Fivem

# How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X paired with the Intel Arc B370 ranks 2762 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the bottom 8% of all configurations. This is a weak result for a system built around an 8-core, 16-thread processor that otherwise sits in the 81st percentile among all CPUs. The bottleneck is unambiguous: the Intel Arc B370, which lands in the 5th percentile of all GPUs in the benchmark database. The combo's ranking reflects that the GPU is the limiting factor in nearly every scenario, with the CPU's substantial compute resources left largely underutilized.

The data indicates that this pairing produces playable framerates only at specific settings and resolutions. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 80 FPS, which is the single highest average recorded across all twelve tested configurations. However, the experience degrades rapidly as resolution or graphical fidelity increases. At 4K Ultra, the system falls to 14 FPS, which is unplayable by any standard. Even at 1440p Medium, the average dips to 41 FPS, which is marginal for a multiplayer title. The ranking of 2762 out of 3005 is consistent with a GPU that cannot keep pace with the CPU's capabilities.

# FAQ

Q: Is the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X or the Intel Arc B370 the limiting factor in Fivem?

A: The Intel Arc B370 is overwhelmingly the limiting component. The GPU ranks in the 5th percentile among all GPUs, while the CPU ranks in the 81st percentile among all CPUs. The measured FPS data shows that even at 1080p Low, the system only reaches 80 FPS, which is low for an 8-core processor that scores 15,476 in Cinebench R23 multi-core.

Q: What is the best performance this combo can achieve in Fivem?

A: The best average FPS recorded is 80 at 1920x1080 with Low settings. The next best is 63 FPS at 1080p Medium. At 1440p Low, the average drops to 53 FPS. These are the only three configurations that exceed 50 FPS average.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?

A: The Arc B370 has an average benchmark score of 1184, which is essentially identical to the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 at 1186 (0.2% difference), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 at 1190 (0.5% difference), and the AMD Radeon HD 7650M at 1192 (0.7% difference). It sits just above the AMD FirePro M2000 at 1168, which is 1.4% slower.

Q: Does the CPU's performance in other benchmarks translate to Fivem?

A: Not effectively. The Ryzen 7 5800X demonstrates strong synthetic scores, including 27,732 in Passmark multi-thread and 1,576 in Cinebench R23 single-core. However, Fivem's FPS numbers are capped by the GPU's limitations. The CPU's 3.80 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost clocks are never the primary constraint in any measured configuration.

Q: Is there any configuration where this combo delivers a smooth 60+ FPS experience?

A: Only at 1080p Low, where the average is 80 FPS. At 1080p Medium, the average is 63 FPS, which is also above 60. No other resolution or settings combination reaches a 60 FPS average. At 1440p Low, the average falls to 53 FPS.

Q: How does the CPU's ranking relative to rivals inform its role here?

A: The Ryzen 7 5800X's average benchmark score of 29,123 puts it within 0.1% of the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and 0.6% above the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT. This indicates the CPU is competitive with modern mid-range processors, but that strength is irrelevant when the GPU can only produce 18 FPS at 4K High.

# Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a GPU-bound system with severe performance degradation at higher resolutions. At Low settings, the average FPS drops from 80 at 1920x1080 to 53 at 2560x1440 (a 33.75% decrease) and then to 29 at 3840x2160 (a 45.28% decrease from 1440p). The total drop from 1080p Low to 4K Low is 51 FPS, representing a 63.75% reduction. This steep decline indicates that the Intel Arc B370's rendering capabilities are exhausted quickly as pixel count increases.

At Medium settings, the pattern continues but with lower absolute numbers. The average goes from 63 FPS at 1080p to 41 FPS at 1440p (a 34.92% drop) and then to 23 FPS at 4K (a 43.90% drop from 1440p). The 1080p to 4K reduction at Medium is 40 FPS, or 63.49%. High settings show a similar trajectory: 50 FPS at 1080p, 33 FPS at 1440p (34% drop), and 18 FPS at 4K (45.45% drop from 1440p). Ultra settings are the most punishing, with 39 FPS at 1080p, 26 FPS at 1440p (33.33% drop), and 14 FPS at 4K (46.15% drop from 1440p).

The consistent percentage drops across all settings — roughly one-third from 1080p to 1440p and another 45% from 1440p to 4K — point squarely at the GPU as the limiting component. A CPU-bound scenario would show smaller FPS differences between resolutions, especially at lower settings where the CPU load is relatively higher. Here, even Low settings suffer a 63.75% total drop from 1080p to 4K, confirming that the Arc B370's fill rate and shading throughput are insufficient for high-resolution rendering. The 4K numbers are all below 30 FPS, with Ultra at 14 FPS and High at 18 FPS, making 4K gaming impractical in Fivem with this combo.

# Settings Recommendations

The measured data provides a clear hierarchy of playable configurations. For a 60+ FPS experience, the only viable options are 1080p Low at 80 FPS and 1080p Medium at 63 FPS. The Medium preset at 1080p offers a 21.25% FPS reduction from Low but presumably delivers better visual quality; it also has measured minimum and maximum FPS of 54 and 72, respectively, indicating relatively stable frame pacing. The Low preset lacks min/max data, so the Medium preset's consistency is the only documented evidence of frame stability.

At 1440p, the best achievable average is 53 FPS at Low settings, which falls short of the 60 FPS target. The 1440p Medium preset averages 41 FPS with min/max of 35 and 48, which is playable but not smooth. Given that 1440p Low is only 16.98% slower than 1080p Medium (53 vs 63 FPS), users with 1440p displays could compromise on Low settings for a more responsive experience, but the data does not support recommending any 1440p preset as a primary choice.

At 4K, all settings are below 30 FPS. The highest average is 29 FPS at Low, which is technically playable but far from ideal for a multiplayer game where responsiveness matters. The 4K Medium preset has documented min/max of 20 and 26, which will cause noticeable stutter. No 4K configuration is recommended based on the measured averages.

The optimal balance between performance and visual fidelity is 1080p Medium. It delivers 63 FPS average, which is comfortably above 60, and the min/max range of 54 to 72 suggests occasional dips below 60 but no catastrophic frame time spikes. For users prioritizing maximum smoothness, 1080p Low at 80 FPS is the superior choice. The Ultra preset at any resolution is unjustifiable: 39 FPS at 1080p, 26 FPS at 1440p, and 14 FPS at 4K all fall well below playable thresholds for a multiplayer title. The data suggests that this combo's best experience is locked to 1080p, with Medium being the recommended preset for most users.

# Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo produces its strongest results. Low settings yield an average of 80 FPS with no min/max recorded. Medium settings average 63 FPS, with a minimum of 54 and maximum of 72. High settings average 50 FPS. Ultra settings average 39 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 41 FPS, with each step up in quality costing approximately 10-13 FPS on average.

At 2560x1440, performance drops across all settings. Low averages 53 FPS. Medium averages 41 FPS, with min/max of 35 and 48. High averages 33 FPS. Ultra averages 26 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra is 27 FPS. Notably, 1440p Medium's maximum of 48 FPS is lower than 1080p Low's average of 80, illustrating the resolution penalty.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable framerates. Low averages 29 FPS. Medium averages 23 FPS, with min/max of 20 and 26. High averages 18 FPS. Ultra averages 14 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra is 15 FPS, with every setting falling below 30 FPS. The 4K Medium min of 20 FPS indicates that even the most stable recorded configuration at this resolution will experience significant frame drops.

Across all twelve measured configurations, the highest average is 80 FPS at 1080p Low, and the lowest is 14 FPS at 4K Ultra. The data shows a consistent pattern: setting changes at a fixed resolution produce roughly linear FPS adjustments, while resolution changes at a fixed setting produce larger percentage drops. For example, at Medium settings, the 1080p to 1440p drop is 22 FPS (34.92%), and the 1440p to 4K drop is 18 FPS (43.90%). At Low settings, the corresponding drops are 27 FPS (33.75%) and 24 FPS (45.28%). This uniformity reinforces the GPU-bound nature of the system.

# CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is a Zen 3 architecture processor built on a 7 nm process at TSMC, with 8 cores and 16 threads. It has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz, a 105 W TDP, and 32 MB of L3 cache. Its benchmark scores are robust: 15,476 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 1,574.5 in Cinebench R23 single-core, 11,036 in Geekbench multi-core, and 27,732 in Passmark multi-thread. The CPU sits in the 81st percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 29,123.

However, in Fivem, the CPU's role is diminished by the GPU's limitations. The measured FPS data shows no scenario where the CPU becomes the bottleneck — even at 1080p Low, where CPU load is typically highest relative to GPU load, the system only reaches 80 FPS. This is far below what the 5800X could deliver with a more capable GPU. The CPU's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H (0.1% faster), the Intel Xeon Phi 7210 (0.4% slower), the Intel Core i5-13500HX (0.5% slower), and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT (0.6% slower). These comparisons confirm that the 5800X is competitive with modern mid-range processors, but that competitiveness has no bearing on Fivem's framerates in this pairing.

The CPU's 3DMark scores further illustrate its capability: 7,586 for 16 threads, 6,035 for 8 threads, 3,543 for 4 threads, and 943 for single-thread. The scaling from single-thread to multi-thread performance is strong, indicating the processor can handle heavily threaded workloads. Fivem, being a multiplayer title built on a modified game engine, often relies on single-thread performance for core game logic. The 5800X's 1,574.5 Cinebench R23 single-core score and 943 3DMark single-thread score are respectable, but the GPU's 5th percentile ranking means those scores never translate into higher FPS. In essence, the Ryzen 7 5800X is overqualified for this GPU pairing in Fivem, and its 8 cores, 16 threads, and 4.70 GHz boost clock are severely underutilized in every measured configuration.