Fivem

How This Combo Ranks

The pairing of the AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT with the Intel Arc B370 lands at rank 2762 out of 3005 tested combos in Fivem. That places this system in the bottom 8% of all configurations we track for this title, a position driven almost entirely by the GPU's limited throughput rather than the processor's capabilities. The data shows a combo that is functionally playable at lower resolutions and settings, but one that struggles to maintain competitive frame rates as graphical demands increase.

Benchmark results indicate that the CPU is a top-tier component relative to the broader market, sitting in the 81st percentile among all processors. The Arc B370, however, sits in the 5th percentile among all GPUs, a stark contrast that explains the overall ranking. This is a system where the processor is effectively waiting on the graphics card at every turn. The combo's rank reflects that bottleneck dynamic: the CPU has ample headroom, but the GPU caps the experience well before the Ryzen 7 5800XT breaks a sweat.

Compared to other tested combinations, this pairing is near the bottom of the barrel. The delta between the CPU's high percentile and the GPU's low percentile is extreme, and Fivem's measured frames reflect that imbalance. In practical terms, this combo ranks behind the vast majority of systems tested, meaning users should expect performance that aligns with entry-level integrated graphics solutions rather than dedicated gaming rigs. The CPU's strength does little to rescue the overall standing when the GPU delivers scores comparable to hardware from over a decade ago.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B370 is the decisive factor in this combo's Fivem performance, and the numbers are not flattering. The GPU's architecture is Xe3-LPG, built on Intel's 3 nm process, with a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 2400 MHz. It features 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 raster output pipelines. The pixel rate is 48.00 GPixel/s and the texture rate is 96.00 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 6.144 TFLOPS.

Crucially, this GPU uses system shared memory, meaning there is no dedicated VRAM. Memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as "System Shared," with bandwidth described as "System Dependent." This is a fundamental limitation for a game like Fivem, which is a multiplayer modification framework built on Grand Theft Auto V's engine. The shared memory architecture means the GPU competes with the CPU for memory bandwidth, and the measured FPS data reflects this constraint.

In the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, the Arc B370 scores 1184. Its nearest rivals include the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570 (score 1186, delta -0.2%), the ATI Radeon HD 5770 (score 1190, delta -0.5%), the AMD Radeon HD 7650M (score 1192, delta -0.7%), and the AMD FirePro M2000 (score 1168, delta 1.4%). These are all legacy or low-end parts from a bygone era. The Arc B370 is essentially competing with hardware from over a decade ago, and its 5th percentile ranking among all GPUs confirms that it is an entry-level solution at best.

The GPU's TDP is 25 W, and it is classified as an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with a slot width of "IGP" and no power connectors. This is not a discrete card; it is an integrated solution designed for portable devices. The display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," further confirming its intended use case. For Fivem, the boost clock of 2400 MHz is the peak the GPU can reach, but the shared memory and low shader count severely limit what that clock can achieve in practice.

FAQ

Q: What is the overall ranking of this CPU+GPU combo in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 2762 out of 3005 tested combinations, placing it in the bottom 8% of all systems tested for this game.

Q: How does the Intel Arc B370 compare to its nearest rivals in GPU benchmarks?

A: The Arc B370 scores 1184 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. It is 0.2% behind the ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570, 0.5% behind the ATI Radeon HD 5770, 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon HD 7650M, and 1.4% ahead of the AMD FirePro M2000.

Q: What is the best FPS this combo achieves at 1080p?

A: The highest average FPS at 1920x1080 is 80, achieved with Low settings. Medium settings yield 63 FPS, High yields 50 FPS, and Ultra yields 39 FPS.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in this configuration?

A: No, the data indicates the opposite. The Ryzen 7 5800XT is in the 81st percentile among CPUs, while the Arc B370 is in the 5th percentile among GPUs, so the GPU is the limiting factor.

Q: What memory configuration does the Intel Arc B370 use?

A: The GPU uses system shared memory, with no dedicated VRAM. Memory type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system-dependent rather than fixed specs.

Q: How does the Ryzen 7 5800XT perform in multi-threaded benchmarks?

A: In Cinebench R23, the CPU scores 23794 in multi-core and 3359 in single-core. In 3DMark, it scores 7683 with 16 threads and 959 with a single thread.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data for Fivem reveals a clear pattern across resolutions and settings. At 3840x2160 (4K), the combo is essentially unplayable. Low settings produce an average of 29 FPS, Medium yields 23 FPS with a min of 20 and max of 26, High drops to 18 FPS, and Ultra falls to 14 FPS. None of these figures approach a smooth experience, and even the best case at 4K Low is below the threshold for acceptable playability.

Dropping to 2560x1440 improves things marginally but still leaves much to be desired. Low settings deliver an average of 53 FPS, which is playable but not smooth. Medium settings produce 41 FPS on average, with a minimum of 35 and maximum of 48. High settings yield 33 FPS, and Ultra drops to 26 FPS. The 1440p results show a system that can handle lower presets but struggles the moment graphical fidelity increases.

At 1920x1080, the combo finally finds a semblance of playability. Low settings produce a respectable 80 FPS average, which is smooth enough for most multiplayer scenarios. Medium settings yield 63 FPS on average, with a minimum of 54 and maximum of 72, providing a decent balance between visuals and performance. High settings drop to 50 FPS, which is still playable but with noticeable dips in busy scenes. Ultra settings fall to 39 FPS, which is borderline and likely to feel choppy in Fivem's dense urban environments.

The scaling across settings is consistent: each step up in quality costs roughly 15-20% of the frame rate. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 41 FPS, demonstrating that the GPU's limited resources are quickly exhausted by higher-quality textures and effects. The minimum FPS figures, where available, show that frame pacing is an issue at Medium settings, with the 1080p Medium result dipping to 54 FPS against an average of 63. This suggests stuttering in demanding scenes, which is a common complaint in multiplayer mods.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5800XT is a Zen 3 part built on TSMC's 7 nm process, with the codename Vermeer. It features 8 cores and 16 threads, with a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 4.80 GHz. The CPU supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s. It has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 512 KB of L2 cache per core, and 32 MB of shared L3 cache. The TDP is 105 W, and it uses the AMD Socket AM4 interface with PCIe Gen 4 support.

In Fivem, the CPU's role is to handle game logic, physics, and the many scripts that run in multiplayer sessions. The 8-core, 16-thread configuration is more than adequate for this task. Cinebench R23 scores show a multi-core result of 23794 and a single-core result of 3359. In 3DMark, the CPU scores 7683 with 16 threads, 6141 with 8 threads, 3603 with 4 threads, 1879 with 2 threads, and 959 with a single thread. PassMark results are equally strong: multi-threaded score of 28053, single-threaded score of 3535, and strong results in integer math (93942) and floating point math (53808).

The CPU's nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks are the AMD Ryzen 7 7840H (avg score 29868, delta 0%), the AMD Ryzen 7 8845HS (avg score 29955, delta -0.3%), the AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS (avg score 29955, delta -0.3%), and the AMD Ryzen 5 9600X (avg score 29713, delta 0.6%). These are all modern mobile or desktop parts, and the 5800XT is within a fraction of a percent of each. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking among all processors confirms it is a strong performer.

However, in this specific combo, the CPU's power is largely untapped. The measured FPS in Fivem scales almost entirely with GPU load, and the Arc B370 is the bottleneck at every resolution and setting. The CPU could easily push higher frame rates if paired with a more capable GPU, but as configured, it is idle much of the time. The data shows a processor that has no trouble keeping up with Fivem's demands, but it cannot compensate for the GPU's shortcomings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo in Fivem is at 1920x1080 with Low settings. This configuration delivers an average of 80 FPS, which is the only setting/resolution combination that approaches a consistently smooth experience. For players who prioritize frame rate above all else, this is the clear choice.

If visual fidelity is more important than raw FPS, 1920x1080 with Medium settings is the best compromise. The average of 63 FPS is playable, and the minimum of 54 FPS indicates that most scenes will stay above the stutter threshold. The visual upgrade from Low to Medium is noticeable in Fivem, as the game's world detail and texture quality benefit significantly from the higher preset. However, users should be prepared for occasional dips in densely populated areas.

At 2560x1440, only Low settings are viable, with an average of 53 FPS. This is borderline playable but not recommended for competitive multiplayer scenarios where reaction time matters. The 1440p Medium preset drops to 41 FPS, which is too low for a smooth experience. High and Ultra settings at 1440p are not recommended, as they fall to 33 FPS and 26 FPS respectively.

4K is not a viable option for this combo. Even at Low settings, the average of 29 FPS is well below the playable threshold, and Ultra settings produce just 14 FPS. Users with 4K displays should either lower the resolution to 1080p or accept that this game will not run smoothly at native 4K.

The data suggests that this combo is best suited for 1080p gaming with modest settings. The jump from Low to Medium at 1080p costs 17 FPS on average, which is a significant trade-off. For most players, the Medium preset at 1080p offers the best balance of visual quality and performance, provided they can tolerate the occasional frame dip. Those who demand maximum smoothness should stick with Low settings, where the combo delivers its best measured performance of 80 FPS.