Fivem

# Fivem Performance Analysis: AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + Intel Arc B570

This combo ranks 2396th out of 3005 tested configurations for Fivem, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700, an 8-core/16-thread Zen 3 part with a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, pairs with the Intel Arc B570 (Xe2-HPG architecture, 10 GB GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus). Measured FPS data across three resolutions and four quality presets reveals a system capable of playable framerates at 1080p and 1440p, but one that struggles at 4K, particularly at higher settings. The combination's overall position suggests that while each component performs adequately in isolation, their interaction in Fivem's multiplayer environment produces results that trail a significant portion of the tested field.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo's rank of 2396 out of 3005 tested combinations places it in approximately the 20th percentile of all configurations evaluated for Fivem. This is a notable underperformance relative to what the individual components' benchmark scores might suggest. The CPU sits at the 78th percentile among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 25517, while the GPU ranks at the 65th percentile with an average score of 20556. The discrepancy between component-level percentiles and the in-game rank indicates that Fivem's specific workload characteristics do not favor this pairing as strongly as synthetic benchmarks would imply.

Looking at the CPU's nearest rivals, the Ryzen 7 5700 scores nearly identically to the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (deltaPct of -0.1, meaning the Ryzen is 0.1% slower), the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (0.1% faster), and the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (0.1% slower). The largest gap among these rivals is a mere 0.3% against the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U. This tight clustering indicates the Ryzen 7 5700 delivers exactly mid-pack CPU performance for its class, with no meaningful advantage or deficit relative to comparable processors.

For the GPU side, the Arc B570's average score of 20556 puts it within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and within 0.1% of the Intel Arc A750. The spread to the other rivals is slightly larger: 0.4% ahead of the NVIDIA Quadro M4000M and 0.5% behind the AMD Radeon R9 M390X. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, suggesting the Arc B570 delivers performance that is essentially equivalent to a broad range of competing graphics cards in aggregate benchmarks. However, the in-game Fivem results show more variation across settings and resolutions than this tight benchmark clustering would predict, pointing to driver-level or architecture-specific behavior in this particular title.

The measured FPS data reveals the practical implications of this ranking. At 1080p Low, the combo achieves 136 FPS, which is comfortably playable. The transition to 4K Ultra drops that to 24 FPS, which is below acceptable thresholds for smooth gameplay. The rank of 2396 reflects this inconsistency, the combo can deliver high framerates in favorable conditions but falls behind when pushed to higher resolutions and quality settings.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depends on the target resolution and the user's framerate priorities. At 1920x1080, the Medium preset delivers 107 FPS average with a minimum of 91 FPS and a maximum of 123 FPS. This represents the best balance between visual quality and performance, as the jump from Medium to High costs 21 FPS (from 107 to 86), while the jump from Low to Medium gains only 29 FPS (from 136 to 107) but adds substantial visual fidelity. The Ultra preset at 1080p drops to 67 FPS, which is still playable but represents a 40 FPS penalty over Medium for what is often marginal visual improvement in multiplayer scenarios.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset again provides the strongest experience. The measured 71 FPS average with a 60 FPS minimum ensures consistent framerates during demanding multiplayer sequences. High settings at 1440p produce 56 FPS, which dips close to the threshold where stutter becomes noticeable, while Low settings reach 89 FPS but sacrifice too much visual detail for most users. The Ultra preset at 1440p falls to 44 FPS, which is below the smoothness threshold for fast-paced multiplayer gameplay.

For 3840x2160, the data presents a more constrained situation. Even Low settings only achieve 50 FPS, and Medium drops to 39 FPS with a minimum of 33 FPS. High settings produce 31 FPS, and Ultra falls to 24 FPS. None of these configurations provide the consistent high refresh rate experience that competitive multiplayer titles typically demand. For 4K users, Low settings at 50 FPS is the only option that maintains playability, and even that requires accepting significant visual compromises. The recommendation for 4K would be to either reduce the resolution to 1440p or accept Low settings as the default.

The overall recommendation across all resolutions is the Medium preset. It provides the best combination of visual quality and performance, with framerates that remain within acceptable ranges even during intense multiplayer sequences. The minimum FPS values recorded for Medium settings (91 FPS at 1080p, 60 FPS at 1440p, 33 FPS at 4K) indicate that this preset maintains consistency without the dramatic drops seen at higher settings.

Resolution Scaling

The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals important information about where the bottleneck lies in this combo. At Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 107 at 1920x1080 to 71 at 2560x1440, then to 39 at 3840x2160. This represents a 33.6% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and a 63.6% reduction from 1080p to 4K. The scaling from 1440p to 4K shows a 45.1% drop, which is steeper than the 1080p to 1440p decline.

For Low settings, the progression is 136 FPS at 1080p, 89 FPS at 1440p, and 50 FPS at 4K. This translates to a 34.6% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a 63.2% drop from 1080p to 4K. The similarity in percentage drops across Low and Medium settings suggests that the scaling behavior is consistent regardless of quality preset.

High settings show 86 FPS at 1080p, 56 FPS at 1440p, and 31 FPS at 4K. The percentage drops are 34.9% and 63.9% respectively. Ultra settings produce 67 FPS at 1080p, 44 FPS at 1440p, and 24 FPS at 4K, with drops of 34.3% and 64.2%.

The consistent pattern of approximately 34% reduction from 1080p to 1440p and roughly 64% reduction from 1080p to 4K across all settings indicates that the scaling is resolution-driven rather than settings-driven. This suggests the GPU is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions. The Arc B570's 10 GB GDDR6 memory with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth and 160-bit bus width becomes increasingly strained as pixel count rises. The GPU's pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s provide theoretical maximums, but the measured FPS data shows these limits being approached as resolution increases.

The CPU's role in this scaling is secondary but not negligible. The Ryzen 7 5700's 8 cores and 16 threads with 16 MB of L3 cache provide sufficient processing power for Fivem's multiplayer workload, but the game's engine appears to scale primarily with GPU load as resolution increases. The fact that FPS drops are nearly identical in percentage terms across all quality presets reinforces that resolution, not settings, drives the performance ceiling.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The full measured FPS dataset provides a comprehensive view of this combo's performance envelope. At 1920x1080, the Low preset achieves 136 FPS average, representing the highest framerate recorded for this combo. Medium settings at 1080p produce 107 FPS average with a minimum of 91 FPS and maximum of 123 FPS, showing a tight distribution that indicates consistent performance. High settings drop to 86 FPS average, and Ultra settings fall to 67 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 1080p is 69 FPS, demonstrating the significant impact of quality settings at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the Low preset delivers 89 FPS average, which is still highly playable. Medium settings produce 71 FPS average with a minimum of 60 FPS and maximum of 81 FPS. The minimum of 60 FPS is notable because it represents the threshold below which frame pacing issues become visible on standard 60 Hz displays. High settings at 1440p achieve 56 FPS average, and Ultra settings drop to 44 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 1440p is 45 FPS, narrower than at 1080p but still substantial.

At 3840x2160, the performance picture changes dramatically. Low settings produce 50 FPS average, which is marginally playable but below the 60 FPS target for smooth gameplay. Medium settings deliver 39 FPS average with a minimum of 33 FPS and maximum of 45 FPS. The 12 FPS range between minimum and maximum at 4K Medium indicates significant frame time variance, which can manifest as visible stuttering in fast-paced multiplayer action. High settings at 4K drop to 31 FPS average, and Ultra settings fall to 24 FPS, both of which are below playable thresholds for most users.

The data shows that the Medium preset consistently provides the most stable performance across all resolutions, with the smallest gap between average and minimum FPS. At 1080p Medium, the minimum is 85% of the average; at 1440p Medium, it is 84.5%; at 4K Medium, it is 84.6%. This consistency suggests that Medium settings engage the hardware in a way that avoids the performance cliffs seen at higher presets.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570's specifications provide context for the measured FPS data. The GPU operates at a base and boost clock of 2500 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The 10 GB GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus delivers 380.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is modest for a modern graphics card but sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming at the settings tested. The GPU's 2304 shading units, 144 TMUs, and 80 ROPs process pixels at a theoretical rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and textures at 360.0 GTexel/s.

The GPU's FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS places it in the mid-range tier, consistent with its 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs. The nearest rival comparison shows the Arc B570 essentially tied with the RTX 3070 Mobile (0.1% difference) and the Arc A750 (also 0.1%), indicating that its raw compute capabilities are well-understood relative to the market. The 18 ray tracing cores and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate suggest modern feature support, though Fivem's workload may not heavily utilize these capabilities.

The measured FPS data indicates that the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions. The 4K results, ranging from 24 FPS at Ultra to 50 FPS at Low, show that the GPU's memory bandwidth and rasterization throughput are insufficient for 4K gaming at acceptable framerates. The 160-bit memory bus and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are particularly constrained at 4K, where the pixel fill rate and memory bandwidth requirements increase substantially.

The 10 GB VRAM capacity is adequate for the tested settings, as no VRAM-related stuttering or texture pop-in was indicated in the FPS data. The minimum FPS values at 4K Medium (33 FPS) and 1440p Medium (60 FPS) suggest that memory allocation is not causing performance degradation, as the minimums are consistent with the average FPS trends. The GPU's 150 W TDP and PCIe 4.0 x8 interface are standard for this performance class, with the x8 interface potentially limiting performance in bandwidth-intensive scenarios, though the measured data does not show obvious signs of this limitation.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 brings 8 cores and 16 threads based on the Zen 3 architecture, manufactured on TSMC's 7 nm process. The CPU runs at a base clock of 3.70 GHz and boosts to 4.60 GHz, with a 65 W TDP that keeps thermal demands modest. The 16 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support with 51.2 GB/s bandwidth provide adequate memory throughput for gaming workloads. The CPU's benchmark scores show strong multi-threaded performance, with a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 20655 and a single-core score of 2916, placing it at the 78th percentile among all CPUs.

The nearest rival comparisons for the CPU show it clustered tightly with several other processors. The deltaPct values of -0.1 to 0.3 against the Intel Xeon D-2752TER, AMD Ryzen 5 7640U, AMD Ryzen 5 6600H, and AMD Ryzen 7 5825U indicate that the Ryzen 7 5700 delivers performance that is statistically indistinguishable from these alternatives in aggregate benchmarks. The 3DMark multi-threaded score of 6617 and single-threaded score of 901 reinforce this mid-pack positioning.

In Fivem, the CPU's role appears to be secondary to the GPU at higher resolutions but becomes more relevant at 1080p. The 136 FPS at 1080p Low suggests that the CPU can feed the GPU sufficiently at lower resolutions, while the 67 FPS at 1080p Ultra indicates that the GPU becomes the bottleneck as pixel workload increases. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide enough parallelism for multiplayer game servers, which typically utilize multiple threads for network handling, world simulation, and player character processing.

The CPU's single-thread performance, as measured by the 3DMark single-thread score of 901 and Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2916, is adequate for Fivem's engine, which likely has a primary simulation thread. The 4.60 GHz boost clock helps ensure that this critical thread runs at high frequency, though the measured FPS data does not show obvious signs of CPU bottlenecking at any resolution or settings combination. The 16 MB L3 cache is sufficient for the game's working set, and the dual-channel memory bandwidth of 51.2 GB/s does not appear to constrain performance.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this hardware in Fivem?

A: The data shows that 1920x1080 with Medium settings provides 107 FPS average with a minimum of 91 FPS, making it the most balanced configuration. At 2560x1440, Medium settings deliver 71 FPS average with a 60 FPS minimum, which is also playable. For 4K, Low settings at 50 FPS is the only option that approaches playability.

Q: How does this combo rank compared to other tested configurations?

A: This combo ranks 2396th out of 3005 tested configurations for Fivem, placing it in approximately the 20th percentile. The CPU sits at the 78th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, indicating the in-game rank underperforms relative to component-level benchmarks.

Q: Is the Intel Arc B570 a bottleneck at 4K?

A: Yes. The measured FPS at 3840x2160 ranges from 24 FPS at Ultra to 50 FPS at Low, with Medium settings producing 39 FPS average and 33 FPS minimum. The GPU's 10 GB VRAM and 380.0 GB/s bandwidth are insufficient for smooth 4K gameplay in Fivem at any settings preset.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Ryzen 7 5700 has an average benchmark score of 25517, placing it within 0.1% of the Intel Xeon D-2752TER (25530), within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (25485), and within 0.1% of the AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (25550). The largest gap is 0.3% against the AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (25446).

Q: What is the FPS drop from 1080p to 4K at Medium settings?

A: At Medium settings, the average FPS drops from 107 at 1920x1080 to 71 at 2560x1440, then to 39 at 3840x2160. This represents a 63.6% reduction from 1080p to 4K, with the largest absolute drop occurring between 1440p and 4K.

Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance more in Fivem?

A: The GPU is the primary limiting factor, particularly at higher resolutions. The consistent percentage drops in FPS from 1080p to 4K across all settings presets (approximately 34% from 1080p to 1440p and 64% from 1080p to 4K) indicate that resolution-driven GPU load determines the performance ceiling. The CPU's 8 cores and 16 threads provide sufficient processing power to avoid becoming the bottleneck at any tested setting.