Fivem
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 78 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 37 | 46 | 58 |
| 1440p QHD | 51 | 66 | 83 | 105 |
| 1080p Full HD | 78 | 101 | 126 | 159 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER delivers a playable but resolution-sensitive experience in Fivem, with the data indicating that the 1080p and 1440p presets are where this combo shines. The benchmark results show a clear hierarchy: the GPU becomes the primary limiting factor as resolution climbs, while the CPU’s 8-core, 16-thread configuration provides ample headroom at lower settings. This analysis breaks down the measured performance, contextualizes it against rival components, and offers concrete settings guidance based solely on the provided data.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent, revealing that the RTX 2060 SUPER is the bottleneck at higher resolutions. At Low settings, the average frame rate falls from 159 FPS at 1920x1080 to 105 FPS at 2560x1440, a decline of 54 FPS, and then further to 58 FPS at 3840x2160 — a total reduction of 101 FPS (63.5%) from 1080p to 4K. This pattern indicates that the GPU’s 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are being saturated as pixel count increases, while the CPU’s 3.70 GHz base and 4.60 GHz boost clocks remain underutilized.
The scaling at High settings tells a similar story but with a sharper cliff. The average FPS drops from 101 at 1080p to 66 at 1440p (a 35 FPS reduction) and then to 37 at 4K — a 64 FPS total loss from the lowest resolution. This 63.4% reduction from 1080p to 4K at High settings closely mirrors the Low preset’s drop, confirming that resolution, not settings, drives the performance curve. The gap between Low and High at each resolution also grows with pixel count: at 1080p, the difference is 58 FPS (159 vs 101), while at 4K it narrows to 21 FPS (58 vs 37), suggesting the GPU is already maxed out at 4K regardless of preset.
Ultra settings amplify this trend, with averages of 78 FPS at 1080p, 51 FPS at 1440p, and just 28 FPS at 4K. The 50 FPS drop from 1080p to 4K (a 64.1% reduction) is the largest of any preset, indicating that the combination of high resolution and maximum graphical fidelity overwhelms the GPU’s 2176 shading units and 64 ROPs. The data strongly suggests that 4K is only viable at Low settings (58 FPS), while 1440p Ultra (51 FPS) and 1080p Ultra (78 FPS) push the hardware to its limits.
GPU Role
The RTX 2060 SUPER’s specifications directly explain the measured results. Its 8 GB VRAM and 256-bit memory bus provide a 448.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p gaming but becomes strained at 4K where the frame buffer demands more capacity. The GPU’s boost clock of 1650 MHz and base clock of 1470 MHz drive its FP32 performance of 7.181 TFLOPS, yet the data shows that even at 1080p Low, the average FPS of 159 is far from the 240 Hz territory, meaning the CPU is not the limiting factor at lower resolutions.
The GPU’s Turing architecture, built on a 12 nm process with 10,800 million transistors, delivers a passmark G3D score of 16462 and a percentile rank of 62 among all GPUs. This places it slightly behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile (avgScore 18159, deltaPct -0.4) and the AMD Radeon Pro 5700 (avgScore 18189, deltaPct -0.5), but ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 460 (avgScore 18373, deltaPct -1.5) in the nearestRivals list. The benchmark data shows the GPU’s 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2011, which aligns with its mid-range positioning.
At 4K Ultra, the average FPS of 28 is below the 30 FPS playability threshold, and the lack of min/max data for most presets (only Medium settings have min/max values) suggests the GPU struggles to maintain consistent frame pacing at higher resolutions. The Medium preset at 4K shows an average of 46 FPS with a min of 39 and max of 53, indicating a 14 FPS variance that hints at stuttering during intense scenes. This variance is tighter at 1440p Medium (70-95 FPS, a 25 FPS range) and 1080p Medium (107-145 FPS, a 38 FPS range), showing that lower resolutions provide smoother frame delivery.
How This Combo Ranks
In the Fivem benchmark database, this CPU-GPU combination ranks 2581 out of 3707 tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle tier of all configurations. This ranking reflects the CPU’s strong performance (percentileVsAllCpus of 78) but is dragged down by the GPU’s more modest standing (percentileVsAllGpus of 62). The CPU’s Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 and single-core score of 2916 demonstrate solid compute capability, while the GPU’s Passmark G3D score of 16462 is respectable but not exceptional.
The combo’s rank of 2581 means it outperforms roughly 30% of tested systems in Fivem, which is surprising given the CPU’s high percentile. This suggests that Fivem is heavily GPU-bound in this configuration, and the RTX 2060 SUPER’s mid-range status limits the overall result. The CPU’s nearest rivals — Intel Xeon D-2752TER (avgScore 25530, deltaPct -0.1), AMD Ryzen 5 7640U (avgScore 25485, deltaPct 0.1), AMD Ryzen 5 6600H (avgScore 25550, deltaPct -0.1), and AMD Ryzen 7 5825U (avgScore 25446, deltaPct 0.3) — all have very similar average scores, indicating that the Ryzen 7 5700 is competitive with these parts in synthetic tests.
The GPU’s nearest rivals show a tighter grouping: RTX 3060 Mobile (deltaPct -0.4), Radeon Pro 5700 (deltaPct -0.5), Radeon RX 460 (deltaPct -1.5), and Arc A770M (deltaPct -1.6). The RTX 2060 SUPER’s avgBenchmarkScore of 18093 is within 1.6% of all these rivals, meaning the GPU is performance-equivalent to a range of mobile and desktop parts. This equivalence explains why the combo ranks mid-pack — the CPU is capable, but the GPU holds it back from higher positions.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the RTX 2060 SUPER delivers its best results. Low settings produce an average of 159 FPS, which is the highest recorded across all resolutions and presets. Medium settings drop to 126 FPS with a min of 107 and max of 145, while High settings yield 101 FPS. Ultra settings bring the average down to 78 FPS, which is still playable for competitive multiplayer. The 81 FPS spread between Low and Ultra at 1080p shows that the GPU has headroom to trade visual quality for frame rate.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance degrades predictably. Low settings average 105 FPS, a 34% reduction from 1080p Low. Medium settings average 83 FPS with a range of 70-95 FPS, while High settings drop to 66 FPS. Ultra settings at 1440p produce 51 FPS, which is borderline for fast-paced gameplay. The 54 FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p is narrower than at 1080p, indicating the GPU is becoming more constrained.
At 3840x2160, the results are marginal. Low settings average 58 FPS, which is playable, but Medium drops to 46 FPS (min 39, max 53). High settings yield just 37 FPS, and Ultra falls to 28 FPS, which is below the playability threshold. The 30 FPS gap between Low and Ultra at 4K is the smallest of any resolution, confirming that the GPU is the primary bottleneck. The Medium preset’s min/max data at 4K (39-53 FPS) shows a 14 FPS variance, which is the tightest of any resolution, suggesting the GPU is consistently stressed.
Settings Recommendations
For the best balance of visual fidelity and performance, the High preset at 1920x1080 is the recommended choice. It delivers 101 FPS average, which is well above the 60 FPS target, while providing better image quality than Low or Medium. The jump from High to Ultra at 1080p costs 23 FPS (101 to 78), which is a significant trade-off for marginal visual gains. For players prioritizing frame rate, Low settings at 1080p (159 FPS) are ideal for competitive play, but the Medium preset (126 FPS) offers a better middle ground with a 107 FPS minimum.
At 2560x1440, the High preset (66 FPS) is the sweet spot for quality-oriented players, as it maintains a playable frame rate while offering superior visuals. The Medium preset (83 FPS) is a stronger choice for those who want smoother motion, with a 70 FPS minimum ensuring consistency. Low settings at 1440p (105 FPS) are viable for esports-style play, but the visual downgrade may not be worth the extra FPS. Ultra at 1440p (51 FPS) is only recommended for players who prioritize image quality over responsiveness, as the frame rate dips below 60.
At 3840x2160, only the Low preset (58 FPS) is recommended, as it is the only setting that maintains an average above 60 FPS. Medium (46 FPS) and High (37 FPS) are playable for slower-paced content, but the 39 FPS minimum at Medium suggests potential stutters. Ultra at 4K (28 FPS) should be avoided entirely. For 4K players, the data indicates that even Low settings stress the GPU, so sticking to 1440p or 1080p is advisable for a smoother experience.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?
A: The data shows 1920x1080 is the strongest choice, with all presets delivering above 78 FPS average. The 2560x1440 resolution is also viable, with Low through High presets staying above 66 FPS, but 4K is only playable at Low settings (58 FPS).
Q: How does the RTX 2060 SUPER compare to its nearest rivals?
A: The GPU’s avgBenchmarkScore of 18093 is within 1.6% of its nearest rivals: RTX 3060 Mobile (deltaPct -0.4), Radeon Pro 5700 (deltaPct -0.5), Radeon RX 460 (deltaPct -1.5), and Arc A770M (deltaPct -1.6). Performance is effectively equivalent across these parts.
Q: Is the Ryzen 7 5700 CPU holding back the GPU?
A: No. The CPU’s percentileVsAllCpus of 78 and Cinebench R23 multicore score of 20655 indicate strong performance, and the FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K shows the GPU as the limiting factor at higher resolutions.
Q: What settings should I use for 60 FPS at 1440p?
A: The High preset (66 FPS average) and Medium preset (83 FPS average) both exceed 60 FPS. Low settings (105 FPS) also work, but Ultra (51 FPS) falls below the target.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Fivem?
A: Only at Low settings, which produce 58 FPS average. Medium (46 FPS), High (37 FPS), and Ultra (28 FPS) all fail to maintain 60 FPS, making 4K viable only with significant visual compromises.
Q: How does the combo’s rank of 2581 out of 3707 compare to its component performance?
A: The rank is lower than expected given the CPU’s 78th percentile, but the GPU’s 62nd percentile drags the overall result down, indicating that Fivem is heavily GPU-bound in this configuration.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 7 5700
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 7 5700 + NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 58.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 46.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 37.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 28.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 105.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 83.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 66.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 51.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 159.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 126.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 101.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 78.0 |
Fivem with Ryzen 7 5700 + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with RTX 2060 SUPER + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 7 5700 + RTX 2060 SUPER
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.