Fivem

Fivem with the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER presents a compelling dataset for understanding how a mid-range CPU and a last-generation GPU handle a demanding multiplayer title. The measured frames per second (FPS) across three resolutions and four quality presets reveal a system that is clearly GPU-bound at higher resolutions, yet shows surprising headroom at 1080p. This analysis breaks down the performance characteristics, offering a detailed look at resolution scaling, optimal settings, and the specific roles of the processor and graphics card.

Resolution Scaling

The transition from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 demonstrates a classic performance curve, but the magnitude of the drop is heavily dependent on the graphics preset. At the Low preset, the system delivers an average of 174.6 FPS at 1080p. Moving to 2560x1440 drops this to 117.8 FPS, a reduction of 56.8 FPS, and then to 66.1 FPS at 4K, a further loss of 51.7 FPS. This steep decline indicates that even at low graphical fidelity, the GPU is being tasked heavily by the pixel count increase. The scaling suggests the RTX 2070 SUPER is the primary limiter, as the CPU, with its 8 cores and 16 threads, appears more than capable of feeding frames at these rates.

The situation shifts when examining the High preset. At 1080p, the average FPS is 112.1, which then falls to 70.1 at 1440p and finally to 40.7 at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is significant, representing a 71.4 FPS decrease. This pattern reinforces that the GPU is the bottleneck, as the additional shading and texture work at higher resolutions consumes the available processing power. Interestingly, the difference between Low and High presets at 1080p is 62.5 FPS, while at 4K, the difference narrows to 25.4 FPS. This compression of the performance gap at higher resolutions is a hallmark of a GPU-limited scenario; the GPU is already saturated, so reducing settings yields diminishing returns.

The data indicates that the system's performance ceiling is defined by the RTX 2070 SUPER's 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and its 448.0 GB/s bandwidth. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS plummets to 32.8, a figure that is barely playable for most users. The scaling from High to Ultra at 4K is a 7.9 FPS drop, while the same setting change at 1080p results in a 24.3 FPS drop. This suggests that at 4K, the card is not only bandwidth-limited but also potentially capacity-limited, as the higher-resolution textures and effects associated with the Ultra preset likely strain the memory allocation. The benchmark results clearly show that this combination is best suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with 4K being a stretch goal only for less demanding presets.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS rows, the most balanced experience is found at the High preset for 1440p and 1080p, while the Medium preset serves as a strong fallback for 4K. At 1920x1080, the High preset delivers an average of 112.1 FPS, which is well above the threshold for smooth, high-refresh-rate gameplay. The Ultra preset, while visually superior, drops the average to 87.8 FPS, a 24.3 FPS penalty that may not justify the visual gain for competitive play. For users with 144Hz monitors, the Low preset at 1080p, with its 174.6 FPS average, offers the best chance of hitting the maximum refresh rate, though it sacrifices visual fidelity.

For 2560x1440, the High preset is the clear winner, producing an average of 70.1 FPS. This is a playable frame rate for most titles, and the visual quality is high. The Medium preset at 89.8 FPS is also a viable option, especially for those who prioritize higher frame rates over maximum detail. The Ultra preset at 56.7 FPS is borderline, as it dips below the 60 FPS target that many consider the baseline for a smooth experience. The data suggests that 1440p High is the sweet spot for this combo, offering a 39.4 FPS improvement over the 4K High preset while maintaining a high level of graphical fidelity.

At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates on higher presets. The Low preset, with an average of 66.1 FPS, is the only setting that consistently stays above 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 50.3 FPS is acceptable for slower-paced gameplay but may feel less responsive in action-heavy scenes. The High and Ultra presets, at 40.7 and 32.8 FPS respectively, are not recommended for a smooth experience. The recommendation is to use the Low preset for 4K gaming, accepting the significant visual compromise to maintain a playable frame rate. The performance hierarchy is clear: 1080p High and Ultra, 1440p High and Medium, and 4K Low.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database for Fivem, this specific combination of the AMD Ryzen 7 5700 and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER holds a rank of 1070 out of 1792 tested combos. This places it in the 59.7th percentile of all systems tested, indicating that it performs better than the median but is far from the top tier. The rank reflects a system that is capable of delivering above-average performance, but it is likely outpaced by many modern combinations featuring newer CPUs and GPUs.

The CPU's individual standing helps contextualize this rank. The AMD Ryzen 7 5700 has a percentile rank of 84 among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 27220. Its nearest rivals, according to the data, include the Intel Core i9-9900K with an average score of 27043, a delta of 0.7%, and the Intel Core i7-12700H with a score of 27006, a delta of 0.8%. This indicates that the Ryzen 7 5700 is a very strong processor, sitting within 1% of these high-performance competitors in synthetic benchmarks. The CPU is not the limiting factor in this system.

The GPU, however, presents a different picture. The RTX 2070 SUPER has a percentile rank of 65 among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 22206. Its nearest rival, the NVIDIA RTX A400, scores 22307, a delta of -0.5%, while the NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z scores 22006, a delta of 0.9%. This shows that the GPU is a solid mid-range performer, but it is not a top-tier component. The combo's overall rank of 1070 suggests that while the CPU is capable, the GPU's performance ceiling drags the combined score down relative to systems with newer or higher-end graphics cards. The data implies that this system is a balanced but not exceptional performer, with the GPU being the primary constraint on overall Fivem performance.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the system's capabilities across all settings. At 1920x1080, the performance is consistently high. The Low preset yields an average of 174.6 FPS, which is the highest recorded for any configuration. The Medium preset follows at 140.8 FPS, then High at 112.1 FPS, and finally Ultra at 87.8 FPS. The scaling from Low to Ultra represents a 86.8 FPS drop, showing a substantial performance cost for maximum visual quality. This data point suggests that the CPU is not a bottleneck at 1080p, as even the most demanding preset maintains a frame rate above 60 FPS.

At 2560x1440, the performance remains respectable but begins to show the GPU's limitations. The Low preset averages 117.8 FPS, which is still very high. The Medium preset drops to 89.8 FPS, and the High preset to 70.1 FPS. The Ultra preset falls to 56.7 FPS, which is the first instance where the system dips below the 60 FPS threshold. The transition from 1080p to 1440p at the Ultra preset results in a 31.1 FPS loss, highlighting the increased pixel load. The data confirms that 1440p is a viable resolution for this combo, provided users are willing to adjust settings from the maximum.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly across the board. The Low preset averages 66.1 FPS, which is the only playable option at this resolution. The Medium preset averages 50.3 FPS, the High preset 40.7 FPS, and the Ultra preset 32.8 FPS. The difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 4K is 33.3 FPS, which is a smaller absolute gap than at 1080p. This indicates that the GPU is so heavily loaded at 4K that the visual settings have a reduced impact on the final frame rate. The data clearly shows that 4K gaming is only feasible with significant compromises to graphical quality.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 SUPER plays the decisive role in this system's Fivem performance. With 8 GB of GDDR6 memory and a 256-bit memory bus, the card provides a bandwidth of 448.0 GB/s. The benchmark data suggests that this memory configuration is a critical factor, especially at higher resolutions. The card's base clock of 1605 MHz and boost clock of 1770 MHz are standard for the Turing architecture, and the 2560 shading units are responsible for the raw compute throughput. The card's FP32 performance is rated at 9.062 TFLOPS, which is a moderate figure for its generation.

The GPU's performance in synthetic benchmarks, such as the Passmark G3D score of 18169, places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. This is a lower percentile than the CPU, reinforcing the idea that the GPU is the weaker link in this pairing. The card's nearest rivals, including the RTX A400 and GTX TITAN Z, show that it is competitive with other mid-range options from its era. However, it is significantly outpaced by newer generations, as evidenced by the comparison to the RTX 4060 Mobile, which scores 22729, a delta of -2.3% (meaning the RTX 2070 SUPER is slightly slower).

The measured FPS data directly correlates with the GPU's capabilities. The transition from 1080p to 4K causes a massive drop in performance, which is attributed to the GPU's inability to handle the increased pixel count and texture loads. The 8 GB VRAM capacity is likely a limiting factor at 4K Ultra, where high-resolution textures can exceed this allocation, leading to potential stuttering or asset swapping. The card's 215 W TDP and the requirement for a 550 W PSU indicate that it is a power-hungry component, but this is not a performance metric. The data shows that the RTX 2070 SUPER is a capable 1080p and 1440p card, but it is not suited for 4K gaming at high settings, which is the primary reason for the combo's overall rank.