AMD Ryzen 3 110 vs AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 Comparison

AMD Ryzen 3 110 and AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 occupy different tiers of the mobile processor stack, yet both share a 28 W TDP envelope. The Ryzen 3 110 is a compact 4-core part built on Zen 3+, while the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is a 12-core design using Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy, but the smaller chip still holds specific advantages in its niche.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The Ryzen AI Embedded P185 delivers substantially higher throughput across every recorded workload. Its average benchmark score of 62839 places it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, while the Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile. The gap is visible in the PassMark suite where the P185 scores 31817 in multithreaded tests, 3977 in single-thread tests, and 117832 in integer math.

The Ryzen 3 110 has no benchmark entries in the database, so direct score comparisons are limited to what the P185 achieves on its own. The P185's data compression score reaches 374429, floating point math hits 70587, and extended instructions score 26544. These figures confirm the P185's position near the top of the mobile embedded segment, sitting within 0.5% of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 and within 0.2% of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX.

The single-thread result of 3977 is particularly relevant for the P185, as it reflects the higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz, which would suggest a lower single-thread ceiling, though no direct measurement exists in the database. The P185's physics score of 1772 and random string sorting score of 40557 further illustrate its lead in mixed workloads.

The Ryzen 3 110's lack of benchmark data makes a numerical head-to-head impossible, but the architectural differences point to a wide margin. The P185 delivers roughly triple the core count and double the thread count, which translates directly into higher multi-threaded potential. The database records no wins for the Ryzen 3 110 in any head-to-head test, while the P185 similarly has no recorded wins against it, leaving the comparison to specification-driven analysis.

Architecture Differences

The two processors use fundamentally different designs. The Ryzen 3 110 is built on the Zen 3+ architecture with the Rembrandt-R codename, manufactured on TSMC's 6 nm process. The P185 uses Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores under the Gorgon Point codename, produced on a 4 nm process. The smaller process node gives the P185 a density advantage, allowing it to pack 12 cores into a 233 mm² die, compared to the Ryzen 3 110's 210 mm² die with only 4 cores.

Cache hierarchies diverge sharply. The Ryzen 3 110 provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 512 KB of L2 per core, and 8 MB of shared L3. The P185 scales this up with 80 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of L3. This means the P185 has double the last-level cache and more generous per-core allocations, which typically benefits memory-heavy workloads.

The integrated graphics also differ. The Ryzen 3 110 includes a Radeon 660M, while the P185 ships with a Radeon 890M. Both are integrated solutions, but the Radeon 890M is positioned higher in AMD's lineup, suggesting stronger graphical output for the P185.

Memory support shows a split. The Ryzen 3 110 supports DDR5 only, while the P185 adds LPDDR5X support alongside DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but the P185 records a higher memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s compared to the Ryzen 3 110's 76.8 GB/s. Both processors support ECC memory, which is notable for embedded and reliability-focused deployments.

PCIe connectivity differs in lane count. The Ryzen 3 110 provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU, while the P185 provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The lane count is a trade-off, as the Ryzen 3 110 offers more expansion capacity despite its lower core count.

The sockets are incompatible. The Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7, while the P185 uses AMD Socket FP8. This means platform selection is fixed for each processor, with no cross-compatibility between the two.

Clock speeds present a mixed picture. The Ryzen 3 110 has a base clock of 3.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The P185 starts lower at 2.00 GHz base but boosts higher to 5.10 GHz. The P185's lower base clock likely reflects power management across 12 cores, while its higher boost clock serves single-threaded bursts.

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not an option on either platform. The Ryzen 3 110 carries part number 100-000000549(FP7r2), while the P185's part number is unknown in the database.

Where Each One Wins

The Ryzen 3 110 wins on PCIe lane count, offering 20 lanes versus the P185's 16 lanes. For systems requiring additional expansion cards or NVMe storage, the extra four lanes provide tangible benefit. It also uses a smaller die at 210 mm², which may translate to lower manufacturing complexity, though both parts are active in production.

The P185 wins on nearly every other measurable specification. Core count triples from 4 to 12, threads triple from 8 to 24, and the boost clock rises from 4.30 GHz to 5.10 GHz. L3 cache doubles from 8 MB to 16 MB, and memory bandwidth increases by roughly 17%, from 76.8 GB/s to 89.6 GB/s. The process node shrinks from 6 nm to 4 nm, and the integrated GPU steps up from Radeon 660M to Radeon 890M.

The P185's generation advantage is clear: Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores are two architectural generations ahead of Zen 3+. The newer design also supports LPDDR5X memory, which is absent on the Ryzen 3 110. For workloads that stress floating point, encryption, or data compression, the P185's benchmark scores indicate strong performance, with integer math reaching 117832 and data encryption hitting 19612.

The Ryzen 3 110's only clear win is expansion capacity via PCIe lanes. Its lower core count and older architecture mean it cannot compete on raw compute, but it may suit lighter embedded tasks where fewer cores suffice and more I/O is needed.

The Verdict

The data points to the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 as the stronger processor by a wide margin. Its 93rd percentile ranking, combined with a 5.10 GHz boost clock and 12 Zen 5 cores, places it firmly above the Ryzen 3 110. The P185's nearest rivals include the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX at 0.2% ahead and the Intel Core i7-13790F at 0.4% behind, showing it competes at the top of its class.

The Ryzen 3 110 serves a different purpose. Its 4-core, 8-thread configuration with Zen 3+ architecture is suited to power-sensitive or I/O-focused mobile systems where the 20 PCIe lanes matter more than raw compute. The 28 W TDP on both parts means thermal design is not the differentiator, but the Ryzen 3 110's lower core count could simplify cooling in compact chassis.

The database shows the P185 with an average benchmark score of 62839, while the Ryzen 3 110 has no recorded score. That absence is decisive. For any workload requiring multithreaded throughput, data processing, or modern instruction set support, the P185 is the only choice supported by measurements. The Ryzen 3 110 remains a viable entry-level option, but the performance gap is not close.

FAQ

Q: How many cores does each processor have?

A: The AMD Ryzen 3 110 has 4 cores and 8 threads, while the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock difference?

A: The Ryzen 3 110 boosts to 4.30 GHz, and the P185 boosts to 5.10 GHz. The base clocks are 3.00 GHz and 2.00 GHz, respectively.

Q: Which processor has more L3 cache?

A: The P185 has 16 MB of L3 cache, double the 8 MB found on the Ryzen 3 110.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the Ryzen 3 110 and the P185 support ECC memory.

Q: What sockets do they use?

A: The Ryzen 3 110 uses AMD Socket FP7, and the P185 uses AMD Socket FP8. They are not interchangeable.

Q: What is the P185's average benchmark score?

A: The P185 records an average benchmark score of 62839, placing it in the 93rd percentile of all CPUs.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Ryzen 3 110 | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 |

|---|---|---|

| Cores | 4 | 12 |

| Threads | 8 | 24 |

| Base Clock | 3.00 GHz | 2.00 GHz |

| Boost Clock | 4.30 GHz | 5.10 GHz |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP7 | AMD Socket FP8 |

| Architecture | Zen 3+ | Zen 5 / Zen 5c |

| Codename | Rembrandt-R | Gorgon Point |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 4 nm |

| Die Size | 210 mm² | 233 mm² |

| L1 Cache | 64 KB (per core) | 80 KB (per core) |

| L2 Cache | 512 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |

| L3 Cache | 8 MB (shared) | 16 MB |

| Memory Support | DDR5 | DDR5, LPDDR5X |

| Memory Bandwidth | 76.8 GB/s | 89.6 GB/s |

| ECC Memory | Yes | Yes |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 20 Lanes (CPU only) | Gen 4, 16 Lanes (CPU only) |

| Integrated Graphics | Radeon 660M | Radeon 890M |

| Market Segment | Mobile | Mobile |

| Production Status | Active | Active |

| Release Date | 2025-09-30 | 2026-02-28 |

| Unlocked Multiplier | No | No |

| Part Number | 100-000000549(FP7r2) | Unknown |