AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core i5-110 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a complete benchmark profile for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185, while the Intel Core i5-110 has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. This makes a direct head-to-head comparison of measured performance impossible. However, the recorded data for the AMD part can be placed in context against its nearest rivals, all of which are Intel or AMD processors with similar average benchmark scores.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 delivers a multithread score of 31,817 in the PassMark multithread test. Its single-thread score is 3,977, which is identical across both the single_thread and singlethread test entries, confirming consistency in the measurements. The processor achieves an integer math score of 117,832 and a floating point math score of 70,587. Extended instructions score 26,544, while data encryption reaches 19,612 and data compression hits 374,429. Prime number finding scores 129, random string sorting scores 40,557, and physics simulation scores 1,772.

The average benchmark score for the AMD part is 62,839, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs in the database. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX, averages 62,738, a delta of 0.2 percent in favor of the AMD chip. The Intel Core i7-13790F averages 63,080, which is 0.4 percent higher than the AMD part. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX averages 63,173, 0.5 percent higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 averages 62,498, 0.5 percent lower. These deltas are all within a narrow band, indicating that the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 sits squarely in a competitive performance tier where no single processor holds a commanding lead.

Because the Intel Core i5-110 has no benchmark entries, the head-to-head section is defined entirely by the absence of data for that part. The database records zero wins for each side in the headToHeadBenchmarks field, and the winsA and winsB counters are both zero. This means no measured comparison exists between the two specific processors. The analysis instead relies on the AMD part's percentile placement and its rival deltas to characterize its standing.

The Verdict

The data indicates that the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is a high-performing mobile processor, ranked at the 93rd percentile across all CPUs. Its average benchmark score of 62,839 places it within 0.5 percent of several strong competitors, including the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX and the Intel Core i7-13790F. The AMD part edges out the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 by 0.2 percent and 0.5 percent, respectively. This is a tightly contested field, and the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 holds its own.

The Intel Core i5-110 presents a different profile. It sits at the 50th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of zero because no benchmark results are recorded. The absence of data means no performance verdict can be derived from measurements. The part targets the desktop segment with a 65 W TDP, while the AMD part targets mobile with a 28 W TDP. The AMD chip uses 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel chip uses 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD part boosts to 5.10 GHz, higher than the Intel part's 4.30 GHz. The Intel part starts at a 2.90 GHz base clock, higher than the AMD part's 2.00 GHz base clock.

Who should pick which depends on the workload and platform. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is suited for mobile systems requiring high multithread throughput, given its 24 threads and 93rd percentile ranking. The Intel Core i5-110 is a desktop processor with a higher base clock and a 50th percentile placement, but without benchmark scores, its relative performance cannot be quantified. The data does not support a recommendation for the Intel part beyond its role as a desktop option with a lower core count.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185?

A: The average benchmark score is 62,839, placing it at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX?

A: The AMD part scores 62,839 on average, which is 0.2 percent higher than the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX's average score of 62,738.

Q: What benchmark scores are recorded for the Intel Core i5-110?

A: The database contains no benchmark entries for the Intel Core i5-110. Its average benchmark score is listed as zero, and it has no nearest rivals recorded.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i5-110 has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the launch MSRP for the Intel Core i5-110?

A: The launch MSRP is $200.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 boosts to 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-110 boosts to 4.30 GHz.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses an AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel Core i5-110 uses an Intel Socket 1200. The AMD part has 12 cores and 24 threads, whereas the Intel part has 6 cores and 12 threads. Base clocks are 2.00 GHz for the AMD chip and 2.90 GHz for the Intel chip. Boost clocks are 5.10 GHz for the AMD chip and 4.30 GHz for the Intel chip.

Thermal design power differs substantially: the AMD part is rated at 28 W, while the Intel part is rated at 65 W. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory, while the Intel processor supports DDR4. Memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for the AMD part and 42.7 GB/s for the Intel part. ECC memory support is present on the AMD part but absent on the Intel part.

PCIe generation and lane counts differ as well. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only), while the Intel part uses Gen 3 with 16 lanes (CPU only). Integrated graphics are the Radeon 890M on the AMD side and the UHD Graphics 630 on the Intel side. The market segment is Mobile for the AMD part and Desktop for the Intel part. The production status is Active for both. The release dates are 2026-02-28 for the AMD chip and 2025-09-10 for the Intel chip. The multiplier is locked on both. The Intel part has a part number of SA35X, while the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown. The launch MSRP for the Intel part is $200; the AMD part has no launch MSRP recorded.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses the Gorgon Point codename with a Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) generation label. The Intel Core i5-110 uses the Comet Lake codename with a Core i5 (Comet Lake) generation label. The AMD part is built on a 4 nm process node by TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel part is built on a 14 nm process node by Intel, with no die size recorded.

Cache configurations differ markedly. The AMD processor has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel processor has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 256 KB of L2 cache per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. No v-cache or total L3 values are recorded for either part.

The memory support, PCIe generation, and integrated graphics differences are architectural as well. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel memory, while the Intel part supports DDR4 with dual-channel memory. The AMD part uses Gen 4 PCIe, while the Intel part uses Gen 3. The AMD integrated graphics are the Radeon 890M, while the Intel integrated graphics are the UHD Graphics 630. The AMD part supports ECC memory, while the Intel part does not.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 wins in scenarios that demand high thread counts and modern platform features. Its 12 cores and 24 threads provide substantial parallel processing capability, and its multithread score of 31,817 reflects that. The 93rd percentile ranking indicates strong overall performance relative to the full database. The 4 nm process node, DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory support, and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth make it suitable for memory-intensive workloads. The 28 W TDP positions it for mobile systems where power efficiency is a priority. The Radeon 890M integrated graphics add capability for graphical tasks without a discrete GPU.

The Intel Core i5-110 wins in scenarios that favor a desktop platform with a higher base clock. Its 2.90 GHz base clock exceeds the AMD part's 2.00 GHz base clock, which can benefit lightly threaded tasks that rely on sustained base frequency. The 65 W TDP and Intel Socket 1200 target traditional desktop builds. DDR4 memory support and Gen 3 PCIe are older standards, but they remain compatible with a wide range of existing desktop components. The 50th percentile ranking shows it sits in the middle of the performance distribution, though without benchmark scores, its specific strengths cannot be measured.

For workloads such as data compression, the AMD part's score of 374,429 indicates high throughput, and its integer math score of 117,832 supports compute-heavy tasks. For tasks dependent on single-thread speed, the AMD part's 3,977 single-thread score is the only recorded figure, and it outpaces the Intel part's base clock on paper. The Intel part's lack of recorded data means no measured win can be assigned to it. The database shows the AMD part as the only one with quantified performance, and it holds the performance advantage in every measured category by default.