AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core i5-14501TE Comparison

FAQ

Q: How do the core counts differ between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and the Intel Core i5-14501TE?

A: The AMD processor uses 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel processor uses 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD part therefore has double the core count and double the thread count.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-14501TE is built on a 10 nm process at Intel.

Q: Which processor has a higher base clock, and which has a higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501TE has a higher base clock at 2.20 GHz, compared to the AMD's 2.00 GHz. Both processors share the same boost clock of 5.10 GHz.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and the Intel Core i5-14501TE support ECC memory.

Q: What is the TDP of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has a TDP of 28 watts, while the Intel Core i5-14501TE has a TDP of 45 watts.

Q: What are the integrated graphics solutions on each chip?

A: The AMD processor uses the Radeon 890M, and the Intel processor uses UHD Graphics 770.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 / Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i5-14501TE belongs to the Core 14th Gen series, uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, and is part of the Raptor Lake Refresh generation. It is built on a 10 nm process at Intel, with a die size of 215 mm².

The core organization differs substantially. The AMD chip has 12 cores and 24 threads, whereas the Intel chip has 6 cores and 12 threads. Both allocate 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but L2 cache differs: AMD provides 1 MB per core, while Intel provides 1.25 MB per core. L3 cache also differs, with AMD using 16 MB and Intel using 24 MB shared.

The memory support profiles are distinct. The AMD processor supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory in a dual-channel configuration, with a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel processor supports DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also dual-channel, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. ECC memory is supported on both.

PCIe capabilities differ by generation and lane count. The AMD processor uses PCIe Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel processor uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). This gives the Intel part a newer PCIe generation, while the AMD part relies on the previous generation.

The market segments differ. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is listed as a mobile segment processor on AMD Socket FP8. The Intel Core i5-14501TE is listed as a desktop segment processor on Intel Socket 1700. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier. The release dates differ as well, with the Intel part recorded as released in 2024 and the AMD part recorded as released in 2026.

Where Each One Wins

Benchmark results in the database are only recorded for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185. The Intel Core i5-14501TE has no benchmark scores in the database, so direct wins cannot be established from measured data. The AMD processor's average benchmark score is 62839, placing it in the 93rd percentile among all CPUs. The Intel processor has a recorded average benchmark score of 0 and sits in the 50th percentile, reflecting the absence of benchmark data.

The AMD processor's individual benchmark results show strength across multiple workloads. In integer math, it scores 117832. In floating point math, it scores 70587. Data compression yields 374429, and random string sorting yields 40557. Extended instructions score 26544, and data encryption scores 19612. Physics tests score 1772, and find prime numbers scores 129. Single-thread performance is recorded at 3977, and multithread performance at 31817.

Given the lack of Intel benchmark data, the use-case split must be inferred from the architectural specifications and the AMD's measured performance. The AMD part, with 12 cores, 24 threads, and a 28 watt TDP, is positioned for mobile embedded workloads where power efficiency and parallel throughput matter. The Intel part, with 6 cores, 12 threads, a 45 watt TDP, and a desktop socket, is positioned for desktop applications where a higher base clock and PCIe Gen 5 support could be relevant. The Intel chip also offers 24 MB of shared L3 cache, which may benefit workloads with larger working sets, though no measured scores confirm this.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several recorded specifications. Core count: AMD has 12, Intel has 6. Thread count: AMD has 24, Intel has 12. Base clock: AMD at 2.00 GHz, Intel at 2.20 GHz. Boost clock: both at 5.10 GHz, so no difference there.

TDP: AMD at 28 watts, Intel at 45 watts. Socket: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1700. Process node: 4 nm TSMC versus 10 nm Intel. Die size: 233 mm² versus 215 mm². L2 cache per core: 1 MB versus 1.25 MB. L3 cache: 16 MB versus 24 MB shared. Memory support: DDR5 and LPDDR5X versus DDR4 and DDR5. Memory bandwidth: 89.6 GB/s recorded for AMD, none recorded for Intel. PCIe: Gen 4 with 16 lanes versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes. Integrated graphics: Radeon 890M versus UHD Graphics 770. Market segment: Mobile versus Desktop. Release date: 2026 versus 2024. Part number: unknown versus Q49KSRNJN. The production status for both is Active, and both support ECC memory and lack an unlocked multiplier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

No head-to-head benchmark results are recorded in the database between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and the Intel Core i5-14501TE. The head-to-head benchmark field is empty, and the win counts for both processors are zero. The Intel processor has no individual benchmark scores at all, so no direct comparison points exist for any specific workload.

The AMD processor's own benchmark scores can be interpreted relative to the broader CPU population. Its average benchmark score of 62839 places it near several Intel rivals in the database. The Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX has an average score of 62738, which is 0.2% lower than the AMD part. The Intel Core i7-13790F has an average score of 63080, which is 0.4% higher than the AMD part. The Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX has an average score of 63173, which is 0.5% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 has an average score of 62498, which is 0.5% lower. These deltas show the AMD processor sitting in a tight cluster around the 62800 to 63200 range, with all four nearest rivals within half a percent of its average score.

The largest recorded wins for the AMD processor are internal to its own benchmark suite. Data compression at 374429 is by far the highest single score, more than three times its integer math score of 117832. Random string sorting at 40557 and extended instructions at 26544 are also strong. Data encryption at 19612 and floating point math at 70587 round out the compute-heavy results. Multithread performance at 31817 and single-thread performance at 3977 show the expected gap between parallel and serial workloads.

Because the Intel part has no benchmark scores, no exact deltas can be calculated between the two. The database shows the Intel processor at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0, which indicates missing data rather than a measured performance level. The AMD processor, by contrast, has a full suite of 11 recorded benchmark results and a 93rd percentile ranking.

The Verdict

The data supports different conclusions for different scenarios. For mobile embedded systems where power draw and parallel throughput are priorities, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has the recorded evidence. Its 12 cores, 24 threads, 28 watt TDP, and 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth align with a workload profile that favors many concurrent tasks. Its 93rd percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 62839 confirm solid measured performance across the database's benchmark suite.

For desktop systems where a higher base clock, PCIe Gen 5 support, and larger L3 cache are relevant, the Intel Core i5-14501TE has the architectural specifications but no measured benchmark data. Its 2.20 GHz base clock exceeds the AMD's 2.00 GHz, its 24 MB shared L3 cache exceeds the AMD's 16 MB, and its PCIe Gen 5 interface is a generation newer. Its 45 watt TDP and desktop socket position it differently from the AMD mobile part.

The absence of Intel benchmark scores means the database cannot confirm how the Intel part performs in real workloads. The AMD part, with a complete benchmark record, can be directly compared to other CPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals, all within 0.5% in average score, include the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX at 0.2% lower, the Intel Core i7-13790F at 0.4% higher, the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX at 0.5% higher, and the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 at 0.5% lower. This cluster indicates that the AMD processor's performance sits in a narrow competitive band around the 62800 to 63200 average score range.

The recorded data suggests that the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the more thoroughly characterized processor in the database, with measured strengths in multithreaded and data-heavy workloads. The Intel Core i5-14501TE remains an unmeasured quantity, defined only by its specifications. Users choosing between them must weigh the AMD part's confirmed benchmark performance against the Intel part's unverified but distinct architectural features. The data does not support a definitive performance ranking between the two, only a specification-based separation of roles: one mobile embedded chip with measured results, one desktop chip without them.