AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core i5-14400F Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark comparison between the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and the Intel Core i5-14400F is decisively one-sided. Across all eleven recorded PassMark tests, the AMD processor takes the win. The largest margin appears in the prime number search workload, where the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 129 against the Intel part's 86, a 50% advantage. Integer math also shows a massive gap: 117832 versus 81524, a 44.5% lead for AMD. Extended instruction throughput favors the AMD chip by 33.1%, with scores of 26544 and 19937 respectively.

Multithreaded performance, often the headline metric for productivity comparisons, shows the AMD part at 31817 versus 25470 for Intel, a 24.9% difference. Random string sorting follows a similar pattern: 40557 for AMD, 32680 for Intel, a 24.1% edge. Data compression workloads deliver 374429 for the Ryzen AI Embedded P185 against 315521 for the Core i5-14400F, an 18.7% win. Physics calculations land at 1772 versus 1523, a 16.3% advantage. Floating point math sees AMD at 70587 and Intel at 61319, a 15.1% margin. Data encryption completes the rout with 19612 versus 16949, a 15.7% difference.

Single-thread performance is the closest contest, but AMD still prevails: 3977 versus 3701, a 7.5% lead. The database records eleven wins for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and zero for the Intel Core i5-14400F. The average benchmark score reinforces this hierarchy: the AMD part sits at 62839, while the Intel chip averages 32279. The percentile placement also separates them, with AMD at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs and Intel at the 83rd percentile.

Architecture Differences

These two processors come from different market segments and manufacturing approaches. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses TSMC's 4 nm process node, while the Intel Core i5-14400F relies on Intel's 10 nm node. The AMD chip is built on the Gorgon Point codename with a Zen 5 / Zen 5c generation label. Intel's part uses the Raptor Lake architecture, specifically the Raptor Lake-R codename from the Core 14th Gen series.

Core counts differ meaningfully. The AMD processor provides 12 cores and 24 threads, while the Intel part offers 10 cores and 16 threads. Clock behavior also varies: the AMD chip has a 2.00 GHz base clock and a 5.10 GHz boost clock, whereas the Intel processor runs at 2.50 GHz base and 4.70 GHz boost. Thermal design power is far apart, with the AMD chip rated at 28 W and the Intel part at 65 W. The AMD processor is classified as a mobile part, while the Intel chip is a desktop component.

Cache layouts diverge as well. Both chips share an 80 KB L1 cache per core. The L2 cache differs: AMD uses 1 MB per core, Intel uses 1.25 MB per core. L3 cache is a notable distinction, with the AMD chip providing 16 MB and the Intel chip offering 20 MB shared. Die size is close, with AMD at 233 mm² and Intel at 215 mm².

Memory support separates the two further. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both are dual-channel designs. The AMD processor reports a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; the database does not list a bandwidth figure for the Intel chip. ECC memory is supported by both. PCIe connectivity differs by generation: AMD provides Gen 4 with 16 lanes from the CPU, while Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics are present on the AMD chip as a Radeon 890M, while the Intel Core i5-14400F has no integrated graphics. The AMD processor uses the AMD Socket FP8, and the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The Intel chip has a launch MSRP of $196; no launch MSRP is recorded for the AMD part.

Where Each One Wins

The recorded data grants the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 a clean sweep, so the use-case split is largely about degree of advantage rather than direction. The largest edges appear in integer-heavy and instruction-heavy workloads. For tasks built around prime number calculations, the 50% lead shows the AMD architecture handles this specific mathematical workload with far greater efficiency. Integer math and extended instructions also show outsized gains, suggesting the AMD chip is particularly strong in encryption, compression, and other integer-dense operations.

The multithreaded score of 31817 against 25470 indicates the AMD part carries its 24 threads productively. With 12 cores and 24 threads versus 10 cores and 16 threads, the AMD chip has a structural advantage in parallel workloads, and the benchmark gap reflects that. Data compression and random string sorting, both heavily parallel tasks, show margins around 24% and 18.7% respectively. The physics test, another multithreaded workload, shows a 16.3% lead.

The Intel Core i5-14400F does not win any recorded benchmark, but the closest margin is single-thread performance at 7.5%. This indicates that in lightly threaded scenarios, the gap narrows considerably. The Intel chip's higher base clock of 2.50 GHz versus 2.00 GHz for AMD does not translate into a win, but the smaller single-thread delta suggests that the Raptor Lake architecture remains competitive when only one or two cores are active.

The data also shows a power efficiency angle. The AMD part achieves its decisive benchmark wins while rated at 28 W, compared to 65 W for the Intel chip. The database does not include power consumption measurements, but the TDP figures indicate the AMD processor delivers its performance envelope at a lower thermal design point, which matters for mobile and embedded deployments. The Intel part, as a desktop component with a 65 W TDP, is designed for a different use environment.

The Verdict

The benchmark data points to a clear hierarchy. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 outperforms the Intel Core i5-14400F in every recorded test, with margins ranging from 7.5% in single-thread to 50% in prime number search. The AMD part also sits at the 93rd percentile of all CPUs, ten points above the Intel chip's 83rd percentile. The average benchmark score of 62839 for AMD versus 32279 for Intel nearly doubles the Intel result.

The AMD processor uses a 4 nm TSMC process, offers 12 cores and 24 threads, and is a mobile-class part with integrated Radeon 890M graphics. The Intel Core i5-14400F uses a 10 nm Intel process, offers 10 cores and 16 threads, and is a desktop part without integrated graphics. The AMD chip also supports LPDDR5X memory and reports 89.6 GB/s of bandwidth, while the Intel chip supports DDR4 and DDR5 without a recorded bandwidth figure.

The Intel Core i5-14400F does hold one advantage in the recorded data: its launch MSRP of $196. The database does not list a launch MSRP for the AMD processor, so no direct price comparison is possible. The Intel part also offers PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, while the AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4, which matters for storage and expansion in desktop builds.

For workloads that stress integer math, extended instructions, compression, or multithreaded throughput, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the stronger choice according to the benchmark results. The single-thread gap is small enough that the Intel chip remains viable for lightly threaded desktop tasks, but the overall record shows the AMD processor delivering higher scores across the board. The choice between these two parts rests on platform requirements: socket type, memory support, integrated graphics, and power envelope. On raw benchmark performance, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 wins all eleven recorded comparisons.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i5-14400F has 10 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the single-thread performance difference?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 scores 3977 in the PassMark single-thread test, while the Intel Core i5-14400F scores 3701. The AMD part leads by 7.5%.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-14400F win any benchmark in the comparison?

A: No. The database records 11 wins for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and 0 wins for the Intel Core i5-14400F across the head-to-head benchmarks.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. The Intel Core i5-14400F supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: Which processor has integrated graphics?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 includes a Radeon 890M integrated GPU. The Intel Core i5-14400F has no integrated graphics.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is rated at 28 W. The Intel Core i5-14400F is rated at 65 W.