AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 and Intel Core i5-14401TE occupy different tiers entirely. The AMD part sits at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs in the database, while the Intel processor lands at the 50th percentile. That gap is decisive, and the recorded benchmark scores confirm it.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 delivers a PassMark multi-thread score of 31,817, a single-thread score of 3,977, and an average benchmark score of 62,839. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, meaning the head-to-head comparison is based on the AMD part's full data set against an absence of measurements for the Intel chip. No wins are recorded for either side in the head-to-head table, but the available evidence is one-sided.

The AMD processor's nearest rivals in the database are informative. It sits 0.2% ahead of the Intel Core Ultra 7 255HX (average score 62,738), 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 PRO 465 (average score 62,498), 0.4% behind the Intel Core i7-13790F (average score 63,080), and 0.5% behind the Intel Core Ultra 7 265HX (average score 63,173). The P185 is thus clustered with high-end mobile and desktop parts, all within a 0.5% band. The i5-14401TE has no such reference points; its average benchmark score is zero, and it has no nearest rivals listed.

The AMD part's individual PassMark sub-scores show its strongest areas. Data compression scores 374,429, a massive result that indicates heavy multi-threaded throughput. Integer math scores 117,832, floating-point math scores 70,587, and extended instructions score 26,544. Random string sorting scores 40,557, and data encryption scores 19,612. Prime number finding scores 129, physics scores 1,772, and the single-thread result of 3,977 aligns with a high-boost design.

Because the Intel Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark records, the database cannot show direct comparison numbers. The verdict rests on the AMD part's percentile rank, its recorded scores, and the complete absence of Intel measurements. The Intel chip's 50th percentile standing, however, places it in the middle of all CPUs, while the AMD part's 93rd percentile places it near the top.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 wins in every measurable category because it has recorded data. The Intel Core i5-14401TE wins in no measurable category because it has no data. The database shows the AMD part's strengths across multi-threaded workloads, single-threaded workloads, and specialized instruction sets.

The AMD part's multi-thread score of 31,817 is its headline result, supported by the data compression score of 374,429. That compression result is more than three times the integer math score, indicating the processor handles repetitive data-heavy tasks particularly well. The extended instructions score of 26,544 shows strong SIMD and specialized operation support. Floating-point math at 70,587 is roughly 60% of the integer math score, a balanced ratio for a mixed workload processor.

The single-thread score of 3,977 with a boost clock of 5.10 GHz places the AMD part among fast single-core performers. The physics score of 1,772 is modest relative to the multi-thread score, suggesting that physics simulation, often latency-bound, does not scale as well as pure throughput tasks. The prime number score of 129 is the lowest sub-score, typical for a processor where integer division and branch-heavy loops are not the primary strength.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no wins because it has no measurements. Its 50th percentile rank, however, indicates it performs at the median of all CPUs in the database. With 6 cores and 12 threads, it is a lower-core-count part than the AMD's 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel chip's boost clock of 4.50 GHz is lower than the AMD's 5.10 GHz, and its architecture is Raptor Lake Refresh, a mature desktop design.

The use-case split is therefore clear: the AMD part is for workloads that need high throughput and strong single-thread performance, while the Intel part, based on its specifications alone, is a more modest option that the database cannot quantify beyond its median percentile.

The Verdict

The data directs a clear choice toward the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185. Its 93rd percentile rank versus the Intel's 50th percentile is a 43-point gap. The AMD part delivers a multi-thread score of 31,817, a single-thread score of 3,977, and an average benchmark score of 62,839. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no recorded scores, so any performance claim about it would be unsupported by the database.

The AMD part's nearest rivals all fall within 0.5% of its average score, confirming it is a top-tier performer. The Intel part has no rivals to compare against, which limits analysis to its specifications: 6 cores, 12 threads, a 2.00 GHz base clock, a 4.50 GHz boost clock, and a 45 W TDP. The AMD part has 12 cores, 24 threads, the same 2.00 GHz base clock, a 5.10 GHz boost clock, and a 28 W TDP.

The power difference is notable. The AMD part operates at 28 W, the Intel at 45 W, a 17 W gap favoring the AMD chip. The AMD part also uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel chip uses a 10 nm process from Intel. The AMD part's die size is 233 mm², the Intel's is 215 mm². Both support ECC memory, and both have dual-channel memory buses. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; the Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5 with no recorded memory bandwidth.

For users who need a processor with confirmed high performance, the AMD part is the only choice supported by data. The Intel part is a viable option only for those who prioritize its specific platform features, such as PCIe Gen 5 support and DDR4 compatibility, but the database cannot verify its performance level. The verdict is unambiguous: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is the superior processor based on all available measurements.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has an average benchmark score of 62,839. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has an average benchmark score of 0, meaning no benchmark results are recorded in the database.

Q: How do the core and thread counts compare?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What are the boost clock speeds?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has a boost clock of 4.50 GHz. Both have a base clock of 2.00 GHz.

Q: Which processor has a higher percentile rank?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 is at the 93rd percentile among all CPUs in the database. The Intel Core i5-14401TE is at the 50th percentile.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel Core i5-14401TE supports DDR4 and DDR5, but its memory bandwidth is not recorded in the database.

Q: What is the TDP for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has a TDP of 28 W. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has a TDP of 45 W.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation, built on a Zen 5 / Zen 5c architecture. It uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, with a die size of 233 mm². The Intel Core i5-14401TE uses the Raptor Lake-R codename and belongs to the Core i5 generation under Raptor Lake Refresh, built on a 10 nm process from Intel, with a die size of 215 mm².

Cache configurations differ. The AMD part has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part also has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, but 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has more L2 per core and more total L3, but the AMD chip has more cores to utilize its cache hierarchy.

Memory support diverges. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5, also with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded. The AMD part's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is a measurable advantage for memory-intensive workloads.

PCIe support differs. The AMD part uses Gen 4 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel part uses Gen 5 with 16 lanes (CPU only). The Intel chip has a newer PCIe generation, but the AMD chip's lower power envelope may offset that in some system designs.

Integrated graphics differ. The AMD part includes Radeon 890M graphics. The Intel part includes UHD Graphics 730. Neither has recorded graphics benchmarks in the database, so comparison is limited to naming.

The AMD part has a socket of AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part uses Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part's market segment is Mobile, the Intel part's is Desktop. The AMD part's production status is Active, and so is the Intel's. The AMD part's release date is 2026-02-28, the Intel part's is 2024-06-30.

Specification Differences

The core and thread counts differ: the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P185 has 12 cores and 24 threads, the Intel Core i5-14401TE has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Boost clocks differ: 5.10 GHz for the AMD part, 4.50 GHz for the Intel part. Base clocks are identical at 2.00 GHz.

TDP differs: 28 W for the AMD part, 45 W for the Intel part.

Process nodes differ: 4 nm for the AMD part, 10 nm for the Intel part.

Die sizes differ: 233 mm² for the AMD part, 215 mm² for the Intel part.

L2 cache per core differs: 1 MB for the AMD part, 1.25 MB for the Intel part. L3 cache differs: 16 MB for the AMD part, 20 MB for the Intel part. L1 cache is the same at 80 KB per core.

Memory support differs: DDR5 and LPDDR5X for the AMD part, DDR4 and DDR5 for the Intel part. Memory bandwidth is recorded only for the AMD part at 89.6 GB/s.

PCIe generation differs: Gen 4 for the AMD part, Gen 5 for the Intel part. Both use 16 lanes (CPU only).

Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 890M for the AMD part, UHD Graphics 730 for the Intel part.

Socket differs: AMD Socket FP8 for the AMD part, Intel Socket 1700 for the Intel part.

Market segment differs: Mobile for the AMD part, Desktop for the Intel part.

Release dates differ: 2026-02-28 for the AMD part, 2024-06-30 for the Intel part.

Part numbers: the Intel part has a recorded part number of Q4T4SRNJP, while the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, and neither has a recorded launch MSRP.