Pc Building Simulator

Pc Building Simulator, a simulation title from 2019, presents an interesting case for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 paired with the Intel Arc B570. The measured performance data shows a configuration that is heavily influenced by resolution and settings, with the CPU providing a strong foundation while the GPU becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions. This analysis breaks down the benchmark results, focusing on how this specific combo scales across the tested resolutions and what the numbers indicate about the balance between processor and graphics card.

Resolution Scaling

The performance drop from 1080p to 4K is stark and reveals a clear bottleneck shift. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 192 FPS. Moving to 2560x1440 Low drops that to 121 FPS, a 37% reduction. At 3840x2160 Low, the average falls to 63 FPS, which is a 67% decrease from the 1080p result. This steep decline indicates that the graphics card is the limiting factor as pixel count rises, with the CPU’s performance headroom becoming less relevant.

The trend continues across other settings. At Medium settings, the averages are 136 FPS at 1080p, 86 FPS at 1440p, and 45 FPS at 4K. The 4K Medium result (45 FPS) is less than half of the 1080p Medium result (136 FPS). This pattern confirms that the Arc B570’s rendering throughput is what determines frame rates as resolution scales, rather than the Core Ultra 5 225’s processing power.

High settings tell a similar story: 96 FPS at 1080p, 61 FPS at 1440p, and 32 FPS at 4K. The 4K High average of 32 FPS is barely playable, while 1080p High remains smooth. Ultra settings produce the lowest numbers across the board, with 91 FPS at 1080p, 58 FPS at 1440p, and 30 FPS at 4K. Interestingly, the difference between High and Ultra at 1080p is only 5 FPS (96 vs 91), suggesting that the game’s Ultra preset adds graphical load that the GPU handles with diminishing returns at that resolution.

The scaling behavior points to a GPU-bound scenario at 4K for all settings, and even at 1440p for Medium and above. Only at 1080p does the system show signs of being more balanced, where the CPU can feed the GPU enough frames to reach high triple-digit averages on Low. The data indicates that users targeting 4K should expect sub-60 FPS averages regardless of settings, while 1440p is viable for Low and Medium presets, and 1080p is the sweet spot for high refresh rates.

GPU Role

The Intel Arc B570 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture, a 5 nm design from TSMC. It features 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines. The GPU runs at a fixed clock speed of 2500 MHz for both base and boost, which is a notable design choice. Its memory subsystem includes 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. This configuration yields a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s, with FP32 performance rated at 11.52 TFLOPS.

The memory capacity and bandwidth play a significant role in Pc Building Simulator’s results. The 10 GB frame buffer is sufficient for 1080p and 1440p at all tested settings, but at 4K, the game’s higher resolution textures and effects likely pressure the memory subsystem. The 380.0 GB/s bandwidth is a mid-range figure, which explains why the GPU struggles to maintain high frame rates at 3840x2160. The 160-bit bus is narrower than some competitors, but the effective 19 Gbps memory clock helps compensate.

In the benchmark database, the Arc B570 ranks at the 65th percentile among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 20556. Its nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, which scores 20534, a delta of 0.1%. The Intel Arc A750 is close behind at 20582, a delta of -0.1%. These comparisons show that the B570 sits in a specific performance tier, and the measured FPS in Pc Building Simulator aligns with that positioning. The GPU’s DirectX 12 Ultimate support and Vulkan 1.4 compliance are relevant for modern titles, though this 2019 simulation game likely does not leverage all of those features.

The 150 W TDP and dual-slot design suggest a power-efficient card, but the performance data shows that it is not a high-end solution. The 4K Ultra average of 30 FPS is a hard ceiling for this combo, indicating that the GPU’s raw compute and memory bandwidth are insufficient for demanding 4K scenarios. Conversely, the 1080p Low result of 192 FPS demonstrates that the card can excel when the workload is lighter, making it a capable choice for esports or less demanding titles.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the database of tested combinations for Pc Building Simulator, this pairing of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and Intel Arc B570 ranks at position 2402 out of 3002 combos. This places it in the 80th percentile of tested systems, meaning roughly 20% of all combinations perform worse. It is not a top-tier configuration, but it sits comfortably above the median, reflecting its ability to handle the game at moderate settings.

The rank of 2402 is heavily influenced by the GPU’s limitations at high resolutions. If only 1080p results were considered, the combo would likely rank much higher, given the strong FPS numbers at that resolution. However, the inclusion of 4K results drags the overall rank down, as the sub-60 FPS averages at 3840x2160 are not competitive with systems using more powerful graphics cards.

The CPU’s percentile ranking (85th among all CPUs) suggests that the processor is not the weak link in this combo. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 has an average benchmark score of 36938, which is nearly identical to its nearest rivals. For instance, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F scores 36945 (delta 0%), while the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37018 (delta -0.2%). This indicates that the CPU is well-matched to the GPU in terms of overall system balance, but the GPU’s 65th percentile ranking is what limits the combo’s position.

In practice, this rank means that users with this combo should expect a playable experience at 1080p and 1440p, but not a high-end one. The data shows that the system is closer to the bottom of the pack at 4K, where only the lowest settings approach 60 FPS. For a simulation game like Pc Building Simulator, which may not require high frame rates for competitive play, this rank is acceptable, but it is not a showcase configuration.

Measured FPS Breakdown

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of performance across three resolutions and four settings. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers an average of 192 FPS on Low, 136 FPS on Medium (with a minimum of 115 and maximum of 156), 96 FPS on High, and 91 FPS on Ultra. The spread between Low and Ultra is 101 FPS, showing that settings have a significant impact at this resolution. The Medium preset’s min-max range indicates some frame time variance, but the averages remain smooth.

At 2560x1440, the averages drop to 121 FPS on Low, 86 FPS on Medium (min 73, max 99), 61 FPS on High, and 58 FPS on Ultra. The difference between High and Ultra narrows to just 3 FPS, suggesting that the Ultra preset at 1440p is not much more demanding than High for this GPU. The Medium preset’s minimum of 73 FPS shows that even in heavier scenes, the system stays above 60 FPS, which is a positive sign for this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the results are notably lower: 63 FPS on Low, 45 FPS on Medium (min 38, max 52), 32 FPS on High, and 30 FPS on Ultra. The Low preset is the only one that achieves a playable average, while Medium dips below 45 FPS and High/Ultra hover near 30 FPS. The Medium preset’s minimum of 38 FPS indicates occasional stutter, and the maximum of 52 FPS shows that the system cannot consistently hold even 50 FPS at 4K.

The data reveals a consistent pattern: Low settings at 1080p provide the best absolute performance, while Ultra settings at 4K are the worst. The scaling from Low to Ultra at each resolution is roughly linear, but the GPU’s headroom shrinks as resolution increases. For instance, the jump from Low to Medium at 1080p costs 56 FPS (192 to 136), while the same jump at 4K costs only 18 FPS (63 to 45). This suggests that the GPU becomes the limiting factor sooner at higher resolutions, where the CPU’s role diminishes.

CPU Role

The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is a 10-core, 10-thread processor based on the Arrow Lake architecture, fabricated on a 3 nm process from TSMC. It has a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz, with a TDP of 65 W. The cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Memory support is DDR5 with a dual-channel bus, offering a theoretical bandwidth of 102.4 GB/s.

In Pc Building Simulator, the CPU’s role is evident in the 1080p results, where the combo achieves high frame rates. At 1080p Low, the 192 FPS average suggests that the CPU can feed the GPU enough data to saturate it, even with the Arc B570’s capabilities. The processor’s single-thread performance, as indicated by a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 3655, is strong enough for this simulation genre, which often relies on single-threaded game logic.

However, the CPU’s multi-threaded performance is also relevant. With a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 25891, the Core Ultra 5 225 can handle background tasks and any multi-threaded aspects of the game without bottlenecking. The PassMark multi-thread score of 30459 and physics score of 2342 further confirm that the CPU is not a limiting factor in this title.

The CPU’s 85th percentile ranking among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 36938, places it slightly above its nearest rivals. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F scores 36945 (delta 0%), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37018 (delta -0.2%), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37093 (delta -0.4%), and the Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37112 (delta -0.5%). These deltas are negligible, indicating that the Core Ultra 5 225 is on par with these alternatives for this game.

The CPU’s 10 cores and 10 threads are sufficient for Pc Building Simulator, which is not a heavily threaded title. The boost clock of 4.90 GHz provides the single-thread speed needed for simulation logic, while the 20 MB L3 cache helps reduce memory latency. The lack of hyperthreading (10 threads for 10 cores) is not a disadvantage here, as the game does not appear to scale with additional threads beyond the physical cores.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings for this combo depend heavily on the target resolution. For 1920x1080, all settings are playable, but the Ultra preset at 91 FPS offers the best visual fidelity while still maintaining a high frame rate. The High preset at 96 FPS is nearly identical, so users should choose Ultra for the extra graphical details without sacrificing much performance. The Medium preset at 136 FPS is ideal for high-refresh-rate monitors (144 Hz), while Low at 192 FPS is reserved for maximum competitive performance.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset at 86 FPS provides the best balance between visuals and smoothness, with a minimum of 73 FPS ensuring no major dips. The High preset at 61 FPS is also viable for 60 Hz displays, but the Ultra preset at 58 FPS is slightly below the 60 FPS threshold, making it less desirable. For users with 144 Hz 1440p monitors, the Low preset at 121 FPS is the only option that fully utilizes the refresh rate, though it compromises on visual quality.

At 3840x2160, the recommendations are more constrained. The Low preset at 63 FPS is the only setting that achieves a playable average, and even then, it hovers near 60 FPS. The Medium preset at 45 FPS is borderline, with a minimum of 38 FPS that could cause noticeable stutter in busy scenes. High and Ultra at 32 FPS and 30 FPS respectively are not recommended for a smooth experience, as they fall below 30% of the 1080p Low performance.

The data suggests that the best overall experience for this combo is at 1080p with Ultra settings, delivering 91 FPS with the highest visual quality. For 1440p users, Medium is the sweet spot, and for 4K, only Low settings are viable. The measured rows indicate that the Arc B570 is well-suited for 1080p gaming, adequate for 1440p at moderate settings, and underpowered for 4K beyond the lowest preset. Users should prioritize 1080p or 1440p with this hardware to get the most out of the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and Intel Arc B570 combination.