Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 261 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 119 | 139 | 161 | 189 |
| 1440p QHD | 201 | 236 | 273 | 320 |
| 1080p Full HD | 293 | 343 | 396 | 465 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is a remarkably scalable title on the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and Intel Arc B570 combination, but the data clearly shows that the most balanced and consistent experience is found at 1440p with Medium settings. At this resolution and preset, the system delivers a 273 FPS average with a recorded minimum of 232 FPS and a maximum of 314 FPS, providing a smooth and responsive experience that far exceeds the needs of high-refresh-rate displays. While 1080p offers higher raw frame rates, the 1440p Medium setting is the sweet spot, balancing visual fidelity with a performance buffer that avoids the steep drop-offs seen at higher presets. For players prioritizing maximum competitive fluidity over visual detail, 1080p Low is the only setting that pushes the average past 400 FPS, though this comes at the cost of all graphical enhancements.
Settings Recommendations
The measured data indicates that the Medium preset at 2560x1440 is the optimal configuration for this hardware pairing. The 273 FPS average at this setting is a massive 36 FPS higher than the High preset at the same resolution, and it maintains a higher minimum FPS (232) compared to the 201 FPS average seen at Ultra. The performance scaling from Low to Medium at 1440p is efficient, with the FPS dropping from 320 to 273, a 47 FPS cost for a significant visual upgrade. The jump from Medium to High, however, costs another 37 FPS, and the jump to Ultra costs an additional 35 FPS, showing diminishing returns in frame rate for each step up the quality ladder.
At 1080p, the story is similar but with more headroom. The Medium preset here yields a 396 FPS average with a minimum of 337 FPS, which is exceptionally high. However, the 1440p Medium configuration is the recommended choice because it offers a 273 FPS average, which is still far above the refresh rate of most monitors, while providing a sharper image. The 4K resolution is playable but less ideal; the High preset at 3840x2160 averages 139 FPS, which is decent, but the Medium preset at this resolution is the only one that provides a recorded minimum FPS (137) for stability, though its 161 FPS average is still lower than the 1440p Medium output. The Ultra preset at any resolution is the least efficient, with 4K Ultra dropping to a 119 FPS average, which is the lowest measured score in the entire dataset.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combo for the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 and Intel Arc B570?
A: The data indicates that 2560x1440 with Medium settings is the most balanced choice. It delivers a 273 FPS average with a 232 FPS minimum, providing a high-performance experience without the significant frame rate penalties seen at High or Ultra presets.
Q: Can this system handle 4K gaming in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive?
A: Yes, 4K is playable. The High preset at 3840x2160 achieves a 139 FPS average, and the Medium preset achieves 161 FPS. However, the Ultra preset dips to a 119 FPS average, which is noticeably lower, indicating that 4K requires sticking to Medium or High settings for optimal smoothness.
Q: How much performance is gained by lowering settings from High to Low?
A: The gains are substantial. At 1080p, the average FPS jumps from 343 on High to 465 on Low, a 122 FPS increase. At 1440p, the increase is from 236 to 320 FPS (84 FPS), and at 4K, it goes from 139 to 189 FPS (50 FPS). This shows the game is highly sensitive to graphical settings.
Q: Is the Arc B570's 10 GB VRAM a limiting factor in this game?
A: Based on the measured FPS data, there is no indication of VRAM capacity being a bottleneck. The performance scaling between Low, Medium, High, and Ultra presets is consistent across resolutions, with no sudden or disproportionate drops that would suggest a memory capacity constraint at higher settings.
Q: Does the CPU or GPU limit performance more in this game?
A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary limiter at higher resolutions and settings. The FPS drops significantly from 1080p to 4K (e.g., from 343 to 139 FPS on High), which is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance. The CPU's strong single-thread score of 4412 in Passmark supports its capability to feed the GPU at lower resolutions where frame rates are extremely high.
Q: How does the Intel Core Ultra 5 225 compare to its nearest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?
A: The CPU's average benchmark score of 36938 is effectively tied with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F, which has a score of 36945 (0% difference). It is only 0.2% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D and 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450, indicating near-identical performance in general processing tasks.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B570 is the central component in determining frame rates in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive, particularly as resolution and graphical settings increase. Its 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus provides 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is ample for this title at the tested resolutions. The GPU's core configuration includes 2304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 raster output pipelines, with a boost clock locked at 2500 MHz. These specifications combine to deliver a pixel rate of 200.0 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 360.0 GTexel/s, figures that explain the strong raw performance observed in the FPS measurements.
The data shows a clear GPU-bound trend. At 1080p, the system achieves an average of 465 FPS on Low settings, but this drops to 293 FPS on Ultra, showing a 172 FPS spread. This gap widens at higher resolutions; at 1440p, the spread between Low and Ultra is 119 FPS (320 to 201), and at 4K, it is 70 FPS (189 to 119). This pattern indicates that the GPU's workload increases significantly with both resolution and preset quality, and its performance ceiling is the primary constraint on maximum frame rates. The GPU's Passmark G3D score of 14195 places it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 20556 is within a fraction of a percent of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile and the Intel Arc A750, establishing its performance class.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the system delivers exceptional performance across all settings. The Low preset yields a 465 FPS average, which is the highest score in the entire dataset. The Medium preset averages 396 FPS with a minimum of 337 FPS and a maximum of 456 FPS, providing a substantial performance buffer. The High preset drops to a 343 FPS average, while the Ultra preset is the slowest at 1080p with a 293 FPS average. These numbers show that at 1080p, the combination of the Core Ultra 5 225 and Arc B570 is never a limiting factor for smooth gameplay, even at the most demanding settings.
Moving to 2560x1440, the frame rates remain very high but show a clear performance gradient. The Low preset averages 320 FPS. The Medium preset, as previously noted, provides a 273 FPS average with a 232 FPS minimum, making it a strong choice for high-refresh-rate gaming. The High preset averages 236 FPS, and the Ultra preset falls to a 201 FPS average. The performance drop from 1080p to 1440p is consistent across settings, with roughly a 30-40% reduction in average FPS, such as the drop from 396 to 273 FPS on Medium.
At 3840x2160, the system becomes more constrained. The Low preset is the only one to break the 180 FPS barrier, averaging 189 FPS. The Medium preset averages 161 FPS and is the only 4K setting with a recorded minimum FPS of 137. The High preset averages 139 FPS, and the Ultra preset averages 119 FPS, which is the lowest score in the entire test matrix. While 4K is playable, the data shows that it requires a trade-off between visual quality and frame rate, with Medium being the most viable option for maintaining a stable experience.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS scaling from 1080p to 4K reveals a significant GPU workload increase, confirming that the Arc B570 is the performance bottleneck at higher resolutions. On the Low preset, the average FPS drops from 465 at 1080p to 320 at 1440p (a 145 FPS or 31% decrease), and then further to 189 at 4K (a 131 FPS or 41% decrease from 1440p). This scaling is typical for a GPU-bound scenario, where the number of pixels rendered quadruples from 1080p to 4K, demanding more from the graphics card.
On the High preset, the scaling is similar. The average FPS drops from 343 at 1080p to 236 at 1440p (a 107 FPS decrease), and then to 139 at 4K (a 97 FPS decrease). The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K is approximately 59%, which is substantial. The Medium preset shows a slightly less steep decline, going from 396 to 273 to 161 FPS across the three resolutions. This pattern indicates that the game's visual effects at High and Ultra settings are more demanding on the GPU's compute and memory subsystems, amplifying the impact of resolution scaling. In contrast, the CPU's role is less evident in this scaling; if the CPU were the primary limiter, the FPS would remain relatively flat across resolutions. The fact that FPS consistently drops with each step up in resolution points directly to the Arc B570 as the limiting component.
CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 5 225, with its 10 cores and 10 threads, plays a crucial role in feeding the Arc B570 with data, especially at lower resolutions where frame rates are incredibly high. Its architecture, based on Arrow Lake-S, operates with a base clock of 3.30 GHz and a boost clock of 4.90 GHz. The CPU's cache hierarchy includes 192 KB of L1 cache per core, 3 MB of L2 cache per core, and a shared 20 MB L3 cache. This configuration provides the low-latency access to game data necessary for high-performance gaming.
The CPU's benchmark results show strong single-threaded performance, which is vital for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive's game logic and physics. Its Passmark single-thread score is 4412, and its Cinebench R23 single-core score is 3655. These scores are corroborated by the high average FPS at 1080p, where the CPU is more likely to be the limiting factor. The system achieves a 465 FPS average on Low settings at 1080p, indicating the CPU can handle a massive number of frames per second. However, the performance drops to 293 FPS at Ultra settings at the same resolution, showing that the GPU becomes the bottleneck as the graphical load increases.
The CPU's average benchmark score of 36938 places it in the 85th percentile of all CPUs, and it is nearly identical in performance to its nearest rivals, including the AMD Ryzen 5 5600F (0% difference) and the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D (-0.2%). This indicates that the Core Ultra 5 225 is a very capable processor for gaming, and in this specific game, it does not appear to be a limiting factor at any resolution. The data shows that the performance ceiling is consistently dictated by the GPU, as evidenced by the significant FPS drops when increasing resolution or graphical settings. The CPU's robust single-threaded and multi-threaded capabilities ensure that it can keep up with the Arc B570's output, providing a balanced and high-performance platform for Counter-Strike: Global Offensive.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 225
Intel Arc B570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 225 + Intel Arc B570 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 189.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 161.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 139.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 119.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 320.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 273.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 236.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 201.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 465.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 396.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 343.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 293.0 |
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with iUltra 5 225 + Other GPUs
See how Counter-Strike: Global Offensive performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with Arc B570 + Other CPUs
See how Counter-Strike: Global Offensive performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 5 225 + Arc B570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.