Palworld
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 63 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 22 | 30 | 38 | 47 |
| 1440p QHD | 40 | 53 | 69 | 85 |
| 1080p Full HD | 61 | 81 | 105 | 130 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Palworld with AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + Intel Arc B570, In-Depth Analysis
Palworld with the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and Intel Arc B570 presents a compelling mid-range pairing for a survival title that is notoriously demanding on both CPU and GPU. The measured data reveals a system that is capable of delivering smooth gameplay at 1080p and 1440p, but one that clearly hits its limits at 4K. The benchmark results indicate a configuration where the graphics card is the primary bottleneck at higher resolutions, while the processor's six cores prove sufficient for the game's logic and world simulation tasks.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is dramatic and tells a clear story about where the performance ceiling lies in this combo. At High settings, the average frame rate falls from 81 FPS at 1920x1080 to 53 FPS at 2560x1440, a reduction of about 35%. Pushing further to 3840x2160, the average drops to just 30 FPS, which is roughly a 63% decline from the 1080p figure. This steep curve is a classic sign of GPU-bound performance, where the Intel Arc B570's rendering capabilities are being saturated by the sheer pixel count.
The scaling pattern holds true across other settings. At Medium, the average FPS goes from 105 at 1080p to 69 at 1440p, and then down to 38 at 4K. Even on Low, where the GPU workload is lighter, the frame rate plummets from a very playable 130 FPS at 1080p to 47 FPS at 4K. This consistent, significant drop at the 4K resolution—regardless of the preset—suggests that the Arc B570's 160-bit memory bus and 10 GB of VRAM are insufficient to feed the GPU at that resolution, creating a hard limit on performance that CPU changes cannot overcome.
The data implies that 4K is not a viable target for this combo in Palworld, except perhaps for very light workloads. The jump from 1440p to 4K is far more punishing than the jump from 1080p to 1440p. For instance, at High settings, the drop from 1440p to 4K is 23 FPS, while the drop from 1080p to 1440p is 28 FPS. While both are significant, the 4K result falls below the 30 FPS threshold often considered the minimum for playable, making the performance at that resolution more of a slideshow than a game. The system is clearly optimized for 1080p and 1440p gaming, with the 4K results serving as a demonstration of the GPU's limitations rather than a practical gaming mode.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo's position in the global benchmark database is a stark reminder of the hardware's market segment. With a rank of 2362 out of 2944 tested combos for Palworld, this system falls in the bottom 20th percentile of all tested configurations. This ranking is not a reflection of the components being weak in absolute terms, but rather an indication that the database includes many high-end and enthusiast-tier systems that far exceed this pairing's performance envelope. This is a mid-range setup, and the rank reflects that it is outclassed by a majority of the more powerful combos that have been tested.
However, a rank is only part of the story. The data shows that this combo is specifically built for 1080p and 1440p gaming. Its performance at those resolutions, as detailed in the FPS breakdown, is solid and would provide a good experience. The low rank is heavily influenced by the 4K results, which drag down the overall picture. When looking at the aggregate benchmark scores for the individual components, the CPU and GPU are both near the 65-75th percentile, meaning they are better than most individual parts. The combo's low rank in this specific game thus highlights Palworld's demanding nature, especially at higher resolutions, rather than a fundamental flaw in the pairing itself.
The individual component scores support this view. The Ryzen 5 5600GT has an average benchmark score of 20733, placing it in the 74th percentile of all CPUs, while the Arc B570's average score of 20556 puts it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. These are respectable positions. The fact that their combined rank in Palworld is so much lower suggests that the game's engine is particularly sensitive to the specific combination of hardware, or that the GPU's performance at high resolutions is a significant limiting factor that the average benchmark scores do not fully capture. The combo is far stronger than the rank implies for standard 1080p gaming.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, running on the AM4 socket. With a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, it provides a solid foundation for gaming. In Palworld, which involves significant world simulation, creature AI, and physics, the CPU's role is critical. The benchmark results indicate that this processor handles these tasks well at 1080p and 1440p, as evidenced by the high frame rates achieved even with a mid-range GPU.
The CPU's performance in synthetic benchmarks is consistent with a strong mid-range part. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 17272 and single-core score of 2438 suggest it can handle both multi-threaded workloads and the single-threaded tasks that many game engines still rely on. The Geekbench multicore score of 7986 and single-core score of 1843 further reinforce this. In relation to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 5600GT is essentially on par with the Intel Core i5-12490F, with a deltaPct of -0.3% in average benchmark score, indicating they are performance twins.
The data suggests that the CPU is not the primary bottleneck in this system for Palworld. The significant FPS drops seen when moving from 1440p to 4K are far more attributable to GPU limitations than CPU ones. The processor's 16 MB of L3 cache and dual-channel DDR4 memory support provide adequate bandwidth for the game's data needs. While the CPU may not be a top-tier performer, it has enough headroom to feed the Arc B570 at 1080p and 1440p, ensuring that the graphics card is the limiting factor at those resolutions. The CPU's role is to provide a stable platform, and the data shows it does so effectively.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The measured FPS data provides a clear picture of the combo's capabilities across a matrix of resolutions and settings. At 1920x1080, the system performs admirably. On Low settings, it achieves an average of 130 FPS, which is exceptionally smooth. Medium settings yield an average of 105 FPS, with a minimum of 89 FPS and a maximum of 121 FPS, showing good consistency. High settings bring the average down to 81 FPS, still very playable. Ultra settings are the most demanding, resulting in an average of 61 FPS, which is still a playable frame rate for most users.
Moving to 2560x1440, the performance is still strong but begins to show the GPU's strain. Low settings provide an average of 85 FPS, which is excellent. Medium settings average 69 FPS, with a minimum of 59 FPS and a maximum of 80 FPS, maintaining good fluidity. High settings drop the average to 53 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for competitive play. Ultra settings fall to an average of 40 FPS, which is on the edge of comfortable playability for a game like Palworld.
At 3840x2160, the system struggles to maintain playable frame rates. Low settings are the only option that approaches playability, with an average of 47 FPS. Medium settings average 38 FPS, with a minimum of 33 FPS and a maximum of 44 FPS, which may feel stuttery. High settings average only 30 FPS, which is borderline. Ultra settings are essentially unplayable, with an average of just 22 FPS. The data clearly shows that 4K is not a resolution this combo can handle with any degree of smoothness.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B570 is the clear performance limiter in this configuration for Palworld, particularly as resolution increases. Based on the Xe2-HPG architecture, it features 2304 shading units and 80 ROPs, with a boost clock of 2500 MHz. It is equipped with 10 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 160-bit bus, providing a bandwidth of 380.0 GB/s. This memory configuration appears to be a significant bottleneck at higher resolutions, as the frame rates plummet when the pixel count demands more memory throughput.
The GPU's synthetic benchmarks show it to be a competent mid-range card. Its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2649 and Passmark G3D score of 14195 place it in the 65th percentile of all GPUs. Its performance is nearly identical to the Intel Arc A750, with a deltaPct of -0.1% in average benchmark score, and it is also closely matched with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile, with a deltaPct of 0.1%. This suggests it offers performance similar to last generation's mid-range mobile offerings.
The data from Palworld shows a clear pattern: the GPU's performance is adequate for 1080p and 1440p, but it hits a "memory wall" at 4K. The 10 GB VRAM and 160-bit bus are insufficient for the demands of high-resolution textures and rendering. The FP32 performance of 11.52 TFLOPS is respectable, but it's not enough to overcome the memory bandwidth limitations at 4K. The GPU's role is to provide good 1080p and 1440p gaming performance, and it does that effectively, but it is not a 4K-capable part for a demanding title like Palworld.
Settings Recommendations
Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal experience for this combo is achieved at 1920x1080 with High settings. This preset delivers an average of 81 FPS, which is a great balance between visual fidelity and smoothness. It is a significant improvement over the 61 FPS of Ultra settings, and the visual difference between High and Ultra is often minimal in many games. For players with a 1080p monitor, this is the "sweet spot" for the best experience per the measured rows.
For those with a 2560x1440 monitor, the Low settings preset is the best choice for maximum smoothness, yielding an average of 85 FPS. However, if visual quality is more important, Medium settings, with an average of 69 FPS and a minimum of 59 FPS, is a very strong recommendation. It maintains a frame rate that is consistently above 60 FPS, ensuring a fluid experience, while offering a more detailed world than Low.
At 3840x2160, the data suggests that gameplay is not a viable option for a good experience. The Low setting, with an average of 47 FPS, is the only one that exceeds 30 FPS, but it is still not smooth. Medium settings average 38 FPS, which may be acceptable for a slow-paced game, but Palworld's action-oriented combat and exploration would suffer. The recommendation is to avoid 4K and stick to 1080p or 1440p for a better experience. The performance gap between High and Ultra at 1080p (81 vs. 61 FPS) suggests that the Ultra preset's added demands are not worth the performance cost.
FAQ
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this hardware in Palworld?
A: The data shows the best experience is at 1920x1080 with High settings, which achieves an average of 81 FPS. This provides a strong balance of visual quality and performance.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Palworld?
A: No, the measured data indicates that 4K performance is poor. The highest average FPS at 3840x2160 is 47 FPS on Low settings, dropping to just 22 FPS on Ultra, making it not a recommended resolution for this game.
Q: How does the Intel Arc B570 compare to its closest rivals?
A: The Arc B570 has an average benchmark score of 20556, which is nearly identical to the Intel Arc A750 (deltaPct of -0.1%) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile (deltaPct of 0.1%). It is effectively a performance peer of these cards.
Q: What is the CPU's performance level relative to its competitors?
A: The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT has an average benchmark score of 20733, making it essentially tied with the Intel Core i5-12490F, with a deltaPct of -0.3%. This shows it is a very competitive mid-range processor.
Q: Is the CPU or GPU the main bottleneck at 1440p?
A: The data suggests the GPU is the primary bottleneck at 1440p. The FPS drops significantly when moving from 1080p to 1440p (e.g., from 81 to 53 FPS at High settings), indicating the GPU is struggling with the increased resolution load.
Q: What is the performance difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p?
A: At 1920x1080, the Low preset averages 130 FPS, while the Ultra preset averages 61 FPS. This represents a 69 FPS difference, showing that the Ultra preset is much more demanding on the system.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT
Intel Arc B570
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT + Intel Arc B570 in Palworld
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 47.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 38.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 30.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 22.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 85.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 69.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 53.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 40.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 130.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 105.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 81.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 61.0 |
Palworld with Ryzen 5 5600GT + Other GPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Palworld with Arc B570 + Other CPUs
See how Palworld performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600GT + Arc B570
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.