Inside

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT combination delivers exceptional performance in Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer that scales aggressively across resolutions and settings. This pairing of a 6-core Zen 3 processor with a high-end RDNA 2 graphics card produces frame rates that range from silky smooth at 1080p to fully playable at 4K Ultra, though the data reveals a clear shift in system bottleneck as resolution increases.

CPU Role

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, built on TSMC's 7 nm process. It operates with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, drawing a 65 W TDP. The processor features a 16 MB L3 cache and 512 KB of L2 cache per core, with a dual-channel DDR4 memory interface providing 51.2 GB/s of bandwidth. In synthetic benchmarks, the chip scores 913 in 3dMark single-thread and 5554 in 3dMark max threads, while Cinebench R23 results show 2438 single-core and 17272 multi-core points. These figures place the CPU in the 78th percentile among all tested processors.

In Inside, the CPU's role is substantial at lower resolutions. At 1080p Low settings, the system produces 308.6 FPS, indicating that the processor is capable of feeding the GPU with an enormous number of frames. The 5600GT's nearest rivals include the Intel Core i7-10700 (average score 20746, deltaPct 0) and the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X (average score 20680, deltaPct 0.3), showing near-identical overall compute performance. However, the benchmark results suggest that the 5600GT's 6-core/12-thread configuration and high boost clock are more than adequate for a game like Inside, which is not heavily multithreaded. The single-thread score of 913 in 3dMark and 2438 in Cinebench R23 single-core are key indicators that this CPU can maintain high frame pacing without becoming a limiting factor, especially when compared to the 0% deltaPct against the Core i7-10700.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT is built on the RDNA 2.0 architecture with the Navi 22 chip, manufactured on a 7 nm process at TSMC. It features 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, along with 40 ray tracing cores. The GPU operates with a base clock of 2321 MHz and a boost clock of 2581 MHz, with a game clock of 2424 MHz. Memory is 12 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus, delivering 384.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The card's FP32 performance is 13.21 TFLOPS, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. In synthetic benchmarks, the GPU scores 19786 in PassMark G3D and 108032 in Geekbench Vulkan, placing it in the 77th percentile of all GPUs.

The RX 6700 XT is the dominant component in this pairing for Inside. At 4K Ultra settings, the system delivers 70.5 FPS, which is a demanding scenario for any GPU. The card's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6800 (avgScore 33493, deltaPct 0.7) and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 (avgScore 33294, deltaPct 1.3), indicating that the 6700 XT is positioned just below the top tier but remains highly capable. The GPU's 12 GB VRAM is more than sufficient for Inside's textures, even at 4K, and the 384.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures no memory starvation occurs. The 2581 MHz boost clock is a significant factor in the card's ability to push frame rates well past 100 FPS at 1440p High settings (119 FPS) and maintain playability at 4K.

How This Combo Ranks

The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT ranks 881 out of 1671 tested combos in Inside. This places the pairing in the upper-middle tier of all systems tested, which is a strong showing given the game's age and the hardware's specifications. The rank reflects a system that can handle the game at maximum settings across all resolutions without significant compromise.

The data indicates that this combo is more GPU-limited than CPU-limited at higher resolutions. At 1080p Low, the system achieves 308.6 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it drops to 70.5 FPS. This 238.1 FPS difference demonstrates that the RX 6700 XT is the primary constraint when pushing pixels, while the Ryzen 5 5600GT is able to keep up with the GPU's demands at lower resolutions. The rank of 881 out of 1671 suggests that while many systems with faster GPUs or CPUs exist, this particular pairing offers a balanced profile that excels in a title like Inside, which does not require extreme compute power. The combo's performance is particularly notable at 1440p, where it delivers 119 FPS on High settings, indicating that it is well-suited for high-refresh-rate gaming at that resolution.

FAQ

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600GT compare to its nearest CPU rivals in overall benchmark scores?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600GT has an average benchmark score of 20740. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i7-10700, scores 20746 with a deltaPct of 0, indicating essentially identical performance. The AMD Ryzen 5 5600X scores 20680 with a deltaPct of 0.3, meaning the 5600GT is 0.3% faster.

*Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p with High settings in Inside?*

A: At 2560x1440 with High settings, the system delivers an average FPS of 119. This is a comfortable frame rate for smooth gameplay, particularly for a puzzle platformer where precise timing is not critical.

*Q: Is the RX 6700 XT's 12 GB VRAM sufficient for Inside at 4K?*

A: Yes, the 12 GB of GDDR6 memory is more than adequate. The game's textures are not demanding by modern standards, and the card's 384.0 GB/s bandwidth ensures that memory bandwidth is not a bottleneck, as evidenced by the 70.5 FPS average at 4K Ultra.

Q: How does the RX 6700 XT compare to the RX 6800 in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The RX 6700 XT has an average benchmark score of 33721, while the RX 6800 scores 33493 with a deltaPct of 0.7. This means the 6700 XT is actually 0.7% faster in the aggregated benchmark data, despite being a lower-tier card in the product stack.

Q: What is the single-thread performance of the Ryzen 5 5600GT, and why does it matter?

A: The CPU scores 913 in 3dMark single-thread and 2438 in Cinebench R23 single-core. This matters because Inside is not a heavily multithreaded game, and high single-thread performance ensures that the CPU does not become a bottleneck, especially at lower resolutions where the GPU is less stressed.

*Q: Can this combo handle 4K Ultra settings in Inside?*

A: Yes, it delivers 70.5 FPS at 3840x2160 with Ultra settings. While this is below the 1440p High result of 119 FPS, it remains fully playable and smooth for a game of this genre.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a clear scaling pattern that shifts the bottleneck from the CPU at lower resolutions to the GPU at higher ones. At 1080p Low, the system produces 308.6 FPS, which is an extremely high frame rate that relies heavily on the CPU's ability to process game logic and draw calls. As resolution increases, the GPU becomes the limiting factor. At 1440p Low, the frame rate drops to 241.5 FPS, a decrease of 67.1 FPS from 1080p. At 4K Low, the system still manages 154 FPS, showing that the RX 6700 XT is capable of massive throughput even at high pixel counts.

The scaling from 1080p to 4K at High settings is particularly illustrative. At 1080p High, the system achieves 169.3 FPS. This drops to 119 FPS at 1440p High (a 29.7% reduction) and then to 76.7 FPS at 4K High (a 35.5% reduction from 1440p). This pattern indicates that the GPU is the primary constraint at 1440p and 4K, as the CPU's 6 cores and 12 threads are sufficient to maintain high frame rates even when the GPU is heavily loaded. The gap between Low and Ultra settings also widens with resolution. At 1080p, the difference between Low (308.6 FPS) and Ultra (163.1 FPS) is 145.5 FPS. At 4K, the difference between Low (154 FPS) and Ultra (70.5 FPS) is 83.5 FPS, showing that Ultra settings place a proportionally larger load on the GPU at higher resolutions.

The data suggests that for 1080p and 1440p gaming, this combo is well-balanced, with the CPU capable of feeding the GPU sufficiently. At 4K, the GPU is clearly the limiting component, as evidenced by the fact that the 4K Low result (154 FPS) is still far below the 1080p Ultra result (163.1 FPS), indicating that pixel throughput is the primary bottleneck. For players targeting 4K, dropping from Ultra to High (76.7 FPS) or Medium (119.6 FPS) yields substantial improvements, while at 1080p, even Ultra settings deliver over 160 FPS, making the CPU the more critical component for achieving the highest possible frame rates.