Inside

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER combination delivers exceptional performance in Inside, a 2016 puzzle platformer. The data shows a system capable of obliterating this title’s requirements, with frame rates that remain fluid even at 4K Ultra settings. The benchmark results indicate that this combo ranks in the top 18.7% of all tested configurations for this game, placing it at rank 313 out of 1671 combos. This pairing of a Zen 3 CPU with an Ada Lovelace GPU creates a system where the graphics card is the primary driver of performance, though the CPU’s capabilities are more than sufficient to keep up.

GPU Role — VRAM, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the dominant component in this pairing. Its 16 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 256-bit bus provides 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth, which is far beyond what a 2D side-scrolling puzzle platformer like Inside can utilize. The GPU’s boost clock of 2610 MHz and base clock of 2340 MHz are more than adequate for the game’s simple geometry and lighting effects. In benchmark results, the GPU’s average score of 48704 places it in the 86th percentile of all GPUs, confirming its high-end status.

The GPU’s performance in this game is best illustrated by the measured FPS. At 4K High settings, the system achieves an average of 119.8 FPS, which is already above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. More tellingly, the jump from 4K High to 4K Low settings increases the average to 234.9 FPS, showing that the GPU has immense headroom even at the highest resolution tested. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s 8448 shading units and 264 texture mapping units are clearly not stressed by Inside’s visual fidelity, making the GPU the clear performance ceiling for this system in other, more demanding titles.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combo’s rank of 313 out of 1671 tested combinations places it in the 81st percentile of all systems benchmarked for Inside. This is a strong result, but it is important to note that the ranking is not solely determined by raw hardware power. The data shows that the system is overkill for this particular game, as even the weakest tested components can likely run Inside at playable frame rates. The ranking reflects the system’s ability to achieve very high frame rates, particularly at lower resolutions and settings, rather than its ability to simply run the game.

When compared to other combos, the 5600GT and RTX 4070 Ti SUPER pairing benefits from the GPU’s massive performance advantage. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER’s nearest rivals include the NVIDIA CMP 50HX, which scores a 0.7% higher average benchmark score, and the Intel Arc A550M, which scores 2.1% lower. These small deltas in synthetic benchmarks do not translate to meaningful differences in Inside’s frame rates, where the GPU’s real-world performance is consistently high. The combo’s ranking is therefore a reflection of the GPU’s dominance, with the CPU playing a supporting role.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT provides 6 cores and 12 threads, with a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz. This Zen 3 architecture CPU, built on a 7 nm process from TSMC, is more than capable of handling Inside’s lightweight physics and logic. The CPU’s 16 MB of L3 cache and 512 KB of L2 cache per core are sufficient for the game’s data requirements, and its 51.2 GB/s of dual-channel DDR4 memory bandwidth is not a bottleneck.

In synthetic benchmarks, the 5600GT scores an average of 20740, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core i5-12490F, scores 0.3% higher, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X scores 0.3% lower. These results indicate that the CPU’s performance is well within the range needed to feed the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in Inside. The measured frame rates support this, as the system achieves 309.4 FPS at 1080p Low settings, which is a resolution and settings combination where CPU limitations would typically surface. The fact that the system still delivers over 300 FPS at 1080p Low shows that the CPU is not a limiting factor in this game.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data shows a clear scaling pattern across resolutions. At High settings, the system delivers 233.6 FPS at 1080p, 197.4 FPS at 1440p, and 119.8 FPS at 4K. This represents a 49% drop in performance from 1080p to 4K, which is a substantial reduction. However, the absolute frame rates remain high, indicating that the GPU is still the primary bottleneck at 4K. The CPU’s influence is minimal, as the frame rate drop is consistent with the GPU’s workload increasing with resolution.

The pattern is even more pronounced at Low settings. The system achieves 309.4 FPS at 1080p, 276.1 FPS at 1440p, and 234.9 FPS at 4K. The drop from 1080p to 4K is only 24%, which is less severe than the High settings drop. This is because at Low settings, the GPU’s workload is reduced, allowing the CPU to have a relatively larger impact on the frame rate. The fact that the system still delivers 234.9 FPS at 4K Low settings demonstrates that the GPU is so powerful that even with reduced graphical fidelity, it can maintain very high frame rates. The data indicates that the GPU is the limiting component across all resolutions, with the CPU providing ample headroom.

FAQ

*Q: What is the average FPS for this combo at 4K Ultra settings in Inside?*

A: The system achieves an average of 117.9 FPS at 3840x2160 resolution with Ultra settings.

Q: How does the Ryzen 5 5600GT's performance compare to its nearest rival?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600GT scores an average of 20740, which is 0.3% higher than the AMD Ryzen 5 5600X but 0.3% lower than the Intel Core i5-12490F.

Q: At which resolution and settings does the system exceed 300 FPS?

A: The system exceeds 300 FPS at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings, achieving an average of 309.4 FPS.

Q: What is the GPU's percentile ranking compared to all GPUs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is in the 86th percentile of all GPUs based on its average benchmark score of 48704.

Q: What is the difference in average FPS between 1080p High and 4K High settings?

A: The average FPS drops from 233.6 at 1080p High to 119.8 at 4K High, a difference of 113.8 FPS.

*Q: How many combos does this system rank above in Inside?*

A: The combo ranks 313 out of 1671 tested combos, placing it above 1358 other configurations.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of the system’s performance in Inside. At 1920x1080 resolution, the system achieves an average of 309.4 FPS on Low settings, 282.2 FPS on Medium, 233.6 FPS on High, and 234.8 FPS on Ultra. The similarity between High and Ultra FPS at this resolution suggests that the CPU is beginning to limit performance at these settings, as the GPU has more than enough power to render the scene.

At 2560x1440 resolution, the frame rates remain high. The system delivers 276.1 FPS on Low, 254.8 FPS on Medium, 197.4 FPS on High, and 187.1 FPS on Ultra. The drop from Low to Ultra is 89 FPS, showing that the GPU’s workload increases significantly with settings at this resolution. At 3840x2160, the system achieves 234.9 FPS on Low, 195.6 FPS on Medium, 119.8 FPS on High, and 117.9 FPS on Ultra. The 4K results show a more pronounced difference between Low and Ultra settings, with a 117 FPS drop, indicating that the GPU is fully utilized at this resolution.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the High settings preset offers the best balance of visual fidelity and performance across all resolutions. At 1080p High, the system delivers 233.6 FPS, which is only slightly lower than the 234.8 FPS achieved at Ultra. The visual difference between High and Ultra in Inside is minimal, but the frame rate is nearly identical, making High the more efficient choice. At 1440p, High settings produce 197.4 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay, and the 10.3 FPS drop from Ultra is negligible in practice.

The 4K resolution presents a more nuanced decision. At 4K High, the system achieves 119.8 FPS, which is excellent for a 4K display. The Ultra preset at 4K only delivers 117.9 FPS, a difference of 1.9 FPS that is imperceptible. Therefore, High settings are recommended for 4K as well. For players seeking maximum frame rates, the Medium preset offers a significant boost, with 195.6 FPS at 4K, but this comes at a cost of reduced visual quality. The data shows that High settings provide the best overall experience, as they deliver frame rates that are indistinguishable from Ultra while offering the same visual experience in most cases. The Low preset, while achieving 309.4 FPS at 1080p, is unnecessary given the system’s performance at higher settings.