Greedfall

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F pairs with the Intel Arc B580 to deliver a mid-range gaming experience in Greedfall, a 2019 Action RPG. This combination ranks 2190th out of 2938 tested combos for this game, placing it in the lower-middle portion of the database. The following analysis breaks down the CPU’s role, answers common questions, and provides a full breakdown of the measured performance data.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F is a 6-core, 12-thread processor built on the Zen 3 architecture with the Vermeer codename. It operates at a base clock of 3.00 GHz and boosts to 4.00 GHz, with a 65W TDP. The CPU sits on the AM4 socket and supports DDR4 memory in a dual-channel configuration, offering 51.2 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The 32 MB of shared L3 cache is a notable asset for gaming workloads, as it reduces latency when accessing frequently used data.

In the context of Greedfall, the CPU's specifications suggest it is more than adequate for feeding the GPU at most settings. The 6-core/12-thread configuration is a standard for modern gaming, and the 4.00 GHz boost clock provides solid single-thread performance. The PassMark single-thread score of 2872 and multithread score of 19236 indicate a balanced processor. However, the data shows that in this specific game, the Arc B580 is the primary limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings.

The CPU’s benchmark percentile of 85 places it above most processors in the database, but its nearest rivals show how tightly contested this segment is. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 scores 36938 (a 0% delta), the AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D scores 37018 (-0.2%), the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 scores 37093 (-0.4%), and the Intel Core i9-12900T scores 37112 (-0.5%). The Ryzen 5 5600F’s average benchmark score of 36945 is virtually identical to these competitors, meaning swapping between them would yield negligible performance differences in CPU-bound scenarios.

At 1080p Low settings, the combo achieves 147 FPS, which suggests that the CPU is capable of pushing high frame rates without bottlenecking the GPU. The jump from Low to Medium at 1080p results in a drop to 115 FPS, and High settings yields 105 FPS. These figures indicate that the GPU starts to take on more load as settings increase, but the CPU remains sufficient. At 4K Ultra, the average FPS falls to 28, which is a dramatic reduction that points heavily toward GPU limitations rather than CPU constraints.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the expected average frame rate at 1440p with High settings?

A: The measured data shows an average of 73 FPS at 2560x1440 with High settings. This is a playable frame rate for most users, though it is significantly lower than the 105 FPS seen at 1080p High.

Q: How does the CPU compare to its closest rivals in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The Ryzen 5 5600F has an average benchmark score of 36945. The Intel Core Ultra 5 225 is essentially tied with a score of 36938 (0% delta). The AMD Ryzen 5 5500X3D is 0.2% faster, the AMD Ryzen AI 7 PRO 450 is 0.4% faster, and the Intel Core i9-12900T is 0.5% faster. These differences are within the margin of error for most real-world applications.

Q: Is the Intel Arc B580 more comparable to a high-end or mid-range GPU?

A: The Arc B580’s PassMark G3D score of 15748 places it in the 68th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (score 23061, -0.2% delta), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (score 22895, +0.6% delta), NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (score 23172, -0.7% delta), and NVIDIA P106-100 (score 23249, -1% delta). This suggests the B580 performs in a similar tier to older high-end cards, but it is not current-generation flagship material.

Q: What is the best resolution for a smooth experience with this combo?

A: Based on the data, 1080p is the safest choice. At Medium settings, it delivers an average of 115 FPS with a minimum of 98 FPS, ensuring consistent smoothness. At 1440p, the Medium preset still provides a playable 80 FPS average, but the 4K results drop below 50 FPS for most presets, which is not ideal for fast-paced action.

Q: How much performance is lost when moving from 1080p to 4K at High settings?

A: The average FPS at 1080p High is 105, while at 4K High it is 43. This represents a 59% reduction in frame rate. The scaling indicates that the GPU is heavily taxed at higher resolutions, with the CPU becoming less relevant.

Q: Does the CPU bottleneck the GPU in this game?

A: The data suggests no. At 1080p Low, the system reaches 147 FPS, which is a high frame rate that would still be limited by the GPU’s maximum output. The CPU’s single-thread score of 2872 is sufficient to drive the Arc B580 without becoming a limiting factor, as evidenced by the consistent performance scaling across settings.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The measured FPS data reveals a clear pattern of GPU-bound performance as resolution increases. At 1080p Low, the combo averages 147 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops this to 102 FPS, a 30.6% reduction. At 4K Low, the average falls to 61 FPS, another 40.2% drop from 1440p. This steep decline is characteristic of a GPU that is being overwhelmed by pixel count, rather than a CPU struggling with game logic.

The trend continues across all settings. For Medium, the averages are 115 FPS at 1080p, 80 FPS at 1440p, and 48 FPS at 4K. The High preset shows 105 FPS at 1080p, 73 FPS at 1440p, and 43 FPS at 4K. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, with 67 FPS at 1080p, 46 FPS at 1440p, and 28 FPS at 4K. In every case, the frame rate drops by roughly 30-40% when moving up one resolution tier, which is a classic sign of a GPU bottleneck.

The Arc B580’s specifications support this interpretation. With 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus providing 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth, the card has sufficient memory capacity but is limited by its raw compute power. The FP32 performance of 13.67 TFLOPS and the 2560 shading units are modest by current standards. The pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s are adequate for 1080p but struggle to maintain high fill rates at 4K.

At 1080p, the CPU’s role becomes more apparent. The difference between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 80 FPS (147 down to 67), indicating that the GPU is still the primary constraint even at lower resolutions. However, the fact that the system can exceed 100 FPS at 1080p Medium and High suggests the Ryzen 5 5600F is not holding back performance. If the CPU were the bottleneck, we would expect to see similar FPS figures across different resolutions, which is not the case here.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

For the best balance of visual quality and performance, the Medium preset at 1440p is the standout recommendation. It delivers an average of 80 FPS with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS. This frame rate range is smooth enough for most players, while the 1440p resolution offers a significant visual upgrade over 1080p. The minimum of 68 FPS ensures that even in demanding scenes, the game remains playable without major stutters.

At 1080p, the Medium preset is also excellent, providing an average of 115 FPS with a minimum of 98 FPS. This is ideal for competitive play or for users with high refresh rate monitors. The High preset at 1080p is another viable option, with an average of 105 FPS, but the visual difference between Medium and High in Greedfall is often subtle compared to the 10 FPS performance cost.

For those with 4K displays, the Low preset is the only viable option, yielding an average of 61 FPS. However, this is a compromise, as Low settings often reduce draw distances and texture quality significantly. The Medium preset at 4K drops to 48 FPS, which is below the 60 FPS threshold most gamers consider smooth. The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution, as it only achieves 67 FPS at 1080p and falls to 28 FPS at 4K, which is a poor experience.

The data suggests that the “sweet spot” for this combo is 1440p Medium. It offers a 73% higher resolution than 1080p while maintaining a frame rate that is only 30% lower than the 1080p Medium preset. This is a favorable trade-off for most users. If frame rate is the absolute priority, 1080p Low at 147 FPS is the maximum performance available, but the visual sacrifices are substantial.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600F and Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 2190th out of 2938 tested combos in Greedfall. This places it in the 74.5th percentile of all combinations, meaning roughly a quarter of tested systems perform better. This is a modest ranking, but it reflects the mid-range nature of both components.

The ranking is primarily influenced by the GPU’s performance. The Arc B580 sits in the 68th percentile of all GPUs based on its average benchmark score of 23021. The CPU, on the other hand, is in the 85th percentile of all CPUs. The disparity between these two percentiles explains why the combo ranks lower than the CPU’s individual standing — the GPU is the limiting factor.

In terms of raw scores, the combo’s performance is consistent with what the GPU benchmarks suggest. The Arc B580’s nearest rivals, such as the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 and RTX 3080, would likely achieve similar or slightly better frame rates in Greedfall, given their comparable average scores. The RTX 3080 has a 0.7% higher score than the B580, which would translate to a marginal FPS advantage in real games.

The CPU’s ranking among its peers is less impactful on the overall combo ranking. Since the Ryzen 5 5600F is not a bottleneck in this game, the combo’s position is almost entirely determined by the GPU. Users looking to improve this ranking would need to upgrade the GPU rather than the CPU, as the data shows the processor has headroom to support a more powerful graphics card.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a complete picture of this combo’s performance in Greedfall. The following breakdown lists every recorded data point, from the highest frame rates to the lowest.

1920x1080 (Full HD):

• Low: Average 147 FPS
• Medium: Average 115 FPS, Minimum 98 FPS, Maximum 133 FPS
• High: Average 105 FPS
• Ultra: Average 67 FPS

At 1080p, the combo demonstrates strong performance. The Low preset achieves a high average of 147 FPS, which is excellent for fast-paced action. The Medium preset offers a well-balanced experience with a 115 FPS average and a minimum of 98 FPS, ensuring no major dips. High settings maintain a solid 105 FPS, while Ultra drops to 67 FPS, which is still playable but shows the GPU’s limits when all effects are enabled.

2560x1440 (Quad HD):

• Low: Average 102 FPS
• Medium: Average 80 FPS, Minimum 68 FPS, Maximum 92 FPS
• High: Average 73 FPS
• Ultra: Average 46 FPS

1440p results show a clear step down. Low settings still produce a respectable 102 FPS, but the Medium preset falls to 80 FPS with a minimum of 68 FPS. High settings average 73 FPS, which is on the edge of smoothness for some users. Ultra drops to 46 FPS, which begins to feel sluggish for an action RPG.

3840x2160 (4K Ultra HD):

• Low: Average 61 FPS
• Medium: Average 48 FPS, Minimum 41 FPS, Maximum 55 FPS
• High: Average 43 FPS
• Ultra: Average 28 FPS

4K is the most demanding scenario. The Low preset is the only one that approaches playability with a 61 FPS average. Medium falls to 48 FPS with a minimum of 41 FPS, which will cause noticeable stuttering in busy areas. High averages 43 FPS, and Ultra is virtually unplayable at 28 FPS. The 4K results confirm that the Arc B580 is not suited for high-fidelity gaming at this resolution, regardless of the CPU’s capabilities.

The data across all resolutions shows a consistent pattern: the Intel Arc B580 is the performance ceiling, and the Ryzen 5 5600F provides ample support without becoming a bottleneck. For the best experience, users should target 1080p or 1440p with Medium or High settings, avoiding Ultra and 4K unless they are willing to accept significant frame rate reductions.