Fivem

Fivem on the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 shows a pairing where the GPU is the primary driver of performance, but the CPU still plays a role at lower resolutions. The data indicates that this combo ranks in the 34th percentile of tested configurations for this game, placing it in a position where settings management is critical for a smooth experience.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data reveals a steep performance drop as resolution increases, which is a classic sign of a GPU-bound workload. At 1080p with Low settings, the system achieves 163 FPS. Moving to 1440p Low drops this to 108 FPS, a reduction of 55 FPS. At 4K Low, the average falls to 60 FPS, which is a 103 FPS drop from the 1080p figure. This scaling pattern indicates that the RTX 5060’s rendering capabilities are the limiting factor as pixel count increases.

The gap between resolutions narrows at higher settings, which further confirms the GPU bottleneck. At High settings, the average FPS goes from 103 at 1080p to 68 at 1440p and then 38 at 4K. The difference between 1080p and 1440p is 35 FPS, while the difference between 1440p and 4K is 30 FPS. This shows that while the GPU is still the main constraint, the performance penalty for each resolution step is significant.

When comparing the Ultra preset, the trend continues but the absolute numbers are much lower. The system manages 80 FPS at 1080p Ultra, which drops to 53 FPS at 1440p Ultra, and then to 29 FPS at 4K Ultra. The 4K Ultra result is the only one that falls below 30 FPS, making it nearly unplayable for a smooth experience. This data suggests that for this game, 1440p is the practical ceiling for high-refresh-rate play, while 4K is only viable on lower settings.

The fact that the FPS drop from 1080p to 1440p is larger than the drop from 1440p to 4K at Low settings (55 FPS vs. 48 FPS) indicates that the CPU is still contributing some overhead at the lowest resolution. However, this effect is diminished at higher settings where the GPU workload dominates. Overall, the resolution scaling data points to a system that is well-balanced for 1080p and capable at 1440p, but one that will struggle to maintain high frame rates at 4K.

FAQ

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain a high refresh rate?

A: At 1080p, the system can achieve an average of 163 FPS on Low settings and 103 FPS on High settings, making it the only resolution where triple-digit frame rates are consistently possible across multiple presets.

Q: Is the RTX 5060 capable of 4K gaming in Fivem?

A: The data shows 4K is possible but not ideal. The average FPS at 4K ranges from 60 on Low settings to 29 on Ultra. Only the Low preset provides a playable 60 FPS average; Medium and High settings yield 47 and 38 FPS respectively.

Q: How does the CPU performance compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H has an average benchmark score of 29093, which is nearly identical to the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, which scores 29123, a delta of -0.1%. It also performs similarly to the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT, which has a delta of 0.5%.

Q: What is the GPU's performance standing relative to other graphics cards?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 sits in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs. Its average benchmark score of 26331 is within 1% of the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, which has a deltaPct of 1.2%, and the AMD Radeon 860M, which has a deltaPct of -0.3%.

Q: Which settings preset provides the best balance between visual quality and performance?

A: For most users, the High preset at 1080p or 1440p offers a good balance. At 1080p High, the system averages 103 FPS, and at 1440p High, it averages 68 FPS. These are playable frame rates with better visual fidelity than Low or Medium.

Q: How much of a performance drop is seen when moving from 1080p to 4K?

A: The drop is substantial. On Low settings, the average FPS falls from 163 at 1080p to 60 at 4K, a 63% reduction. On High settings, it falls from 103 FPS to 38 FPS, a similar proportional decrease.

GPU Role

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 is the dominant component in this pairing for Fivem. With 8 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus, the memory bandwidth is listed at 448.0 GB/s. This memory configuration is likely a key factor in the performance scaling seen across resolutions, as the game's asset streaming and texture load increase with pixel count. The GPU’s base clock is 2280 MHz with a boost clock of 2497 MHz, and it has 3840 shading units.

The GPU's processing power is reflected in its benchmark scores. It achieves a Passmark G3D score of 20891 and a Geekbench OpenCL score of 112787. These scores place it in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, indicating it is a solid mid-range performer. In comparison to its nearest rivals, the RTX 5060 is nearly identical in average score to the AMD Radeon 860M, with a deltaPct of -0.3%, and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT, with a deltaPct of 1.2%. This suggests that in synthetic tests, the RTX 5060 is on par with these cards.

The measured FPS data shows the GPU’s limits clearly. The fact that 4K Ultra only produces 29 FPS highlights that the card is not intended for maximum settings at that resolution. The 8 GB VRAM capacity may also be a limiting factor at 4K, as the high texture detail required for Ultra settings could exceed the available memory. The data does not explicitly show VRAM usage, but the performance cliff between Medium (47 FPS) and Ultra (29 FPS) at 4K suggests a significant increase in workload that the GPU cannot handle.

At 1080p, the GPU has more headroom, allowing for higher frame rates. The difference between Low (163 FPS) and Ultra (80 FPS) at 1080p is 83 FPS, which shows the GPU can handle the lower resolution with ease. The GPU’s role is thus clear: it is a capable 1080p and 1440p card, but its 8 GB memory and overall compute power are insufficient for a consistently smooth 4K experience in Fivem.

How This Combo Ranks

This specific combination of the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 ranks 1969 out of 3005 tested combos for Fivem. This puts it in the lower half of all tested configurations, which is a notable finding given the individual component scores. The CPU has an 81st percentile ranking among all CPUs, and the GPU has a 72nd percentile ranking, yet their combined performance is not as strong as those individual scores might suggest.

The rank suggests that while the components are individually solid, the combination may not be optimized for Fivem's specific workload. The game is known to be CPU-heavy in certain scenarios, but the resolution scaling data indicates a GPU bottleneck. This discrepancy suggests that the CPU's performance, while good, may not be fully utilized at higher resolutions, or that the game's engine does not scale well with this particular hardware configuration.

The deltaPct values for the CPU's nearest rivals are all within 1% of its average score. The AMD Ryzen 7 5800X is only 0.1% faster, and the Intel Core i5-13500HX is 0.6% faster. This means the CPU is performing exactly as expected. Similarly, the GPU is within 1.2% of its closest rival, the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT. The low rank is therefore not due to a defective or underperforming part, but rather the overall system's capability in this specific game.

For a PC builder, this rank is a warning that a system with these components will not be a top-tier performer in Fivem. It will handle 1080p gaming well, but users expecting high-refresh-rate 4K or maxed-out settings will be disappointed. The rank indicates that other combinations, potentially with more powerful GPUs or different CPU architectures, would yield better results in this title. The data shows that this combo is a mid-pack performer, suitable for mainstream gaming but not for enthusiast-level Fivem play.

Settings Recommendations

Based on the measured FPS data, the best experience for this combo is found at 1080p with the High preset. This yields an average of 103 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay and provides good visual quality. The Ultra preset at 1080p drops to 80 FPS, which is still playable, but the 23 FPS gain from turning down to High is more significant than the visual difference in most cases.

For users with a 1440p monitor, the High preset is also the recommended choice. It produces an average of 68 FPS, which is acceptable for most players. The Medium preset at 1440p offers 85 FPS, but this comes with reduced visual fidelity. The data shows that the jump from Medium to High at 1440p results in a 17 FPS loss, which is a reasonable trade-off for better graphics. The Ultra preset at 1440p dips to 53 FPS, which may be too low for fast-paced multiplayer action.

At 4K, the options are limited. The Low preset is the only one that provides a 60 FPS average, but it comes with minimal visual quality. The Medium preset provides 47 FPS, which is borderline playable, but the 40 FPS minimum FPS could cause noticeable stutters. The High and Ultra presets at 4K are not recommended, as they produce 38 and 29 FPS averages respectively, which will feel sluggish.

The data suggests that the "sweet spot" for this system is 1080p High or 1440p High. These settings offer a good balance between frame rate and visual fidelity. For users who prioritize frame rate over visuals, dropping to Low at 1440p or 1080p will yield higher FPS, but the visual downgrade is significant. The Medium preset at 1440p is a viable alternative, offering 85 FPS, which is smoother than High but not as visually rich. The ultimate recommendation is to start at High and adjust downward if the frame rate is not satisfactory.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the system shows a wide performance range across the four presets. On Low settings, the average FPS is 163. The Medium preset averages 129 FPS, with a minimum of 109 and a maximum of 148. High settings reduce the average to 103 FPS. The Ultra preset is the most demanding, yielding an average of 80 FPS. This shows a clear 83 FPS difference between the Low and Ultra presets at 1080p.

Moving to 2560x1440, the performance drops across all presets. Low settings produce an average of 108 FPS. Medium settings average 85 FPS, with a minimum of 72 and a maximum of 98. High settings average 68 FPS. The Ultra preset at 1440p is significantly slower, averaging 53 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 55 FPS, which is a smaller absolute difference than at 1080p due to the overall lower numbers.

At 3840x2160, the system is clearly struggling to maintain high frame rates. Low settings average 60 FPS. Medium settings average 47 FPS, with a minimum of 40 and a maximum of 54. High settings drop to an average of 38 FPS. The Ultra preset is the lowest measured result, averaging just 29 FPS. The range between Low and Ultra at 4K is only 31 FPS, highlighting that even the lowest settings cannot fully compensate for the resolution's demands.

The data shows a consistent pattern: the RTX 5060 provides diminishing returns as resolution increases. At 1080p, there is a large headroom, allowing for high frame rates even on Ultra. At 1440p, the system is still capable, but the Ultra preset becomes less viable. At 4K, only the Low preset provides a playable 60 FPS average, with all other settings falling below that threshold. The Medium preset at both 1440p and 1080p shows the only recorded minimum and maximum FPS values, indicating it may have more variable frame times than other presets.