Undisputed

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H paired with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 delivers a highly capable 1080p and 1440p experience in Undisputed, with the data showing a clear shift in bottleneck behavior as resolution increases. At 1080p, the combo achieves exceptional frame rates, while at 4K, the GPU becomes the decisive limiting factor, dropping performance dramatically. This analysis breaks down the measured results, contextualizes the CPU and GPU roles, and provides actionable settings guidance based solely on the provided benchmark data.

CPU Role — cores, clocks, and how they relate to this game's results

The Intel Core Ultra 5 135H is a 14-core, 18-thread mobile processor based on the Meteor Lake architecture, built on Intel's 7 nm process node. It features a base clock of 3.60 GHz and a boost clock of 4.60 GHz, with a TDP of 28 W. The cache hierarchy includes 112 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3 cache. This CPU sits in the 81st percentile of all CPUs tested, with an average benchmark score of 29093. Its nearest rival, the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X, scores 29123, a delta of -0.1%, indicating near-identical performance. The Intel Core i5-13500HX is slightly ahead at 29270, a -0.6% delta, while the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT trails at 28940, a +0.5% delta.

For a sports title like Undisputed, the CPU's single-threaded performance is critical for game logic, physics, and AI, while multi-threaded capabilities handle broader simulation tasks. In Cinebench R23, the 135H scores 1700 points single-core and 11875.5 points multi-core. This strong single-core showing, combined with 18 threads, ensures that the CPU can feed the RTX 5060 without becoming a bottleneck at lower resolutions. The PassMark single-thread score of 3521 reinforces this, placing it in a competitive position for gaming workloads. The data suggests that at 1080p, where the GPU has less work per frame, the CPU's 4.60 GHz boost clock is sufficient to maintain high frame rates, as evidenced by the 235 FPS average at Low settings.

However, the CPU’s role diminishes as resolution rises. The measured FPS at 4K Ultra drops to 41, while at 1080p Ultra it holds at 90. This indicates that the RTX 5060's rendering load, not the CPU's processing power, becomes the primary constraint at higher resolutions. The CPU's 14 cores and 18 threads provide ample headroom for the game's background tasks, but the benchmark results show that the scaling from 1080p to 4K is governed by the GPU's pixel throughput and memory bandwidth. In essence, the 135H is a capable partner that does not hold back the GPU at 1080p or 1440p, but at 4K, the GPU's limits are exposed.

FAQ — 4-6 Q&A pairs answerable from FACT PACK data

Q: What is the best resolution for this combo to maintain a 60+ FPS average?

A: Based on the measured data, both 1080p and 1440p achieve 60+ FPS averages across all settings. At 4K, the average FPS drops to 64 on High and 41 on Ultra, so 1440p is the safest choice for consistent high frame rates.

Q: How does the Core Ultra 5 135H compare to its nearest CPU rivals?

A: The 135H has an average benchmark score of 29093, which is 0.1% behind the AMD Ryzen 7 5800X (29123) and 0.5% behind the Intel Xeon Phi 7210 (29245). It is 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600XT (28940) and 0.6% behind the Intel Core i5-13500HX (29270). This places it in a tight performance cluster with these desktop and mobile parts.

Q: Is the RTX 5060 a bottleneck at 4K resolution?

A: Yes, the data strongly indicates a GPU bottleneck at 4K. The average FPS falls from 107 at Low to 41 at Ultra, a 62% reduction, while the CPU's performance headroom is less relevant at that resolution. The GPU's 8 GB GDDR7 memory and 128-bit bus width limit its ability to handle 4K Ultra settings.

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra settings at 1440p?

A: At 1440p, the Low preset yields an average of 170 FPS, while Ultra drops to 65 FPS. This is a 105 FPS difference, showing that the RTX 5060's performance scales significantly with graphical fidelity demands.

Q: How does the RTX 5060 rank against other GPUs in the database?

A: The RTX 5060 sits in the 72nd percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 26331. Its nearest rival, the AMD Radeon 860M, scores 26401, a -0.3% delta, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX550 is also at 26421, a -0.3% delta. The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT trails at 26011, a +1.2% delta.

Q: Does the combo rank highly among all tested combinations for this game?

A: The combo ranks 2470 out of 3718 tested combos for Undisputed. This places it in the lower-middle tier, suggesting that while it handles the game well at 1080p and 1440p, many other CPU-GPU pairings deliver higher raw performance, particularly at 4K.

Resolution Scaling — how FPS drops from 1080p to 4K and what it says about the limiting component

The resolution scaling data reveals a classic GPU-bound pattern. At 1080p, the combo produces impressive frame rates: 235 FPS on Low, 169 FPS on Medium, 140 FPS on High, and 90 FPS on Ultra. Moving to 1440p, these numbers drop to 170 FPS, 122 FPS, 101 FPS, and 65 FPS respectively. At 4K, the performance falls further to 107 FPS, 77 FPS, 64 FPS, and 41 FPS. The percentage drops from 1080p to 4K are substantial: Low drops by 54%, Medium by 54%, High by 54%, and Ultra by 54%. This consistent ~54% reduction across all settings confirms that the bottleneck is tied to pixel count and fill rate, which is the GPU's domain.

The RTX 5060 has a pixel rate of 119.9 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 299.6 GTexel/s, with 48 ROPs. At 4K, the sheer number of pixels (3840x2160) overwhelms these resources, particularly at Ultra settings where additional effects and higher-quality textures increase the load. The CPU's role, by contrast, remains relatively constant across resolutions. The Core Ultra 5 135H’s single-thread performance, measured at 1700 in Cinebench R23, does not change with resolution, so the FPS drop cannot be attributed to the CPU. The data shows that the GPU's 8 GB GDDR7 memory and 128-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are the limiting factors at 4K, as higher resolutions demand more memory bandwidth and capacity. This is evident in the 4K Ultra result of 41 FPS, which is below the playable threshold for most users, while 4K High at 64 FPS is borderline.

How This Combo Ranks — use comboRankInGame vs other tested combos

The combo of the Intel Core Ultra 5 135H and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 ranks 2470 out of 3718 tested combinations for Undisputed. This ranking places it in the 66th percentile of all combos, meaning that about one-third of tested configurations perform worse. However, this rank is not a reflection of poor performance; rather, it reflects the database's inclusion of higher-end desktop GPUs and CPUs that outclass this mobile-centric pairing. The CPU's 81st percentile ranking and the GPU's 72nd percentile ranking suggest that both components are above average, but the combo's overall rank is dragged down by the GPU's relative weakness at higher resolutions.

In practical terms, the rank indicates that this combo is suited for 1080p and 1440p gaming, where it outperforms many other mobile and low-end desktop combos. The nearest GPU rivals, such as the AMD Radeon 860M and NVIDIA GeForce MX550, have similar average benchmark scores but are typically paired with weaker CPUs. The 135H's strong multi-threaded performance (Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 11875.5) ensures that the combo does not suffer from CPU bottlenecks in CPU-intensive scenes, which is a common issue for lower-ranked combos. The data suggests that the rank is more indicative of the GPU's 4K limitations than any fundamental flaw, making this combo a solid mid-range option for esports and sports titles at sub-4K resolutions.

Measured FPS Breakdown — resolution by resolution, settings by settings, exact numbers

The measured FPS data provides a comprehensive view of performance across three resolutions and four settings presets. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its best results: Low settings produce an average of 235 FPS, Medium yields 169 FPS with a minimum of 144 FPS and a maximum of 194 FPS, High achieves 140 FPS, and Ultra drops to 90 FPS. These numbers indicate that the RTX 5060 is well-utilized, and the CPU is not holding back frame rates. The gap between Low and Ultra is 145 FPS, showing that the GPU has significant headroom at this resolution.

At 2560x1440, the performance scales down predictably. Low settings average 170 FPS, Medium averages 122 FPS with a range of 104 to 140 FPS, High averages 101 FPS, and Ultra averages 65 FPS. The drop from 1080p to 1440p is roughly 28-30% across settings, which is expected given the increased pixel count. The 1440p Ultra result of 65 FPS is still playable, but it indicates that the GPU is nearing its limits. The minimum FPS of 104 at Medium suggests that even in demanding moments, the frame rate remains stable.

At 3840x2160, the GPU becomes the clear limiting factor. Low settings average 107 FPS, Medium averages 77 FPS with a minimum of 66 FPS and a maximum of 89 FPS, High averages 64 FPS, and Ultra plummets to 41 FPS. The 4K Ultra result is below the 60 FPS threshold, making it unsuitable for competitive play. The 4K High result of 64 FPS is the only 4K setting that approaches playability, but it is marginal. The data shows that the combo is not designed for 4K gaming, as the RTX 5060's 8 GB memory and 128-bit bus cannot sustain high frame rates at this resolution.

Settings Recommendations — which preset gives the best experience per the measured rows

Based on the measured FPS data, the optimal settings depend on the target resolution and desired frame rate. For 1080p gaming, the High preset at 140 FPS provides an excellent balance of visual quality and performance, well above the 60 FPS threshold. The Ultra preset at 90 FPS is also viable for those prioritizing visuals, as it remains smooth. However, the Medium preset at 169 FPS is the best choice for high-refresh-rate monitors (144Hz+), as it offers a significant FPS boost over High with only a marginal visual penalty. The Low preset at 235 FPS is unnecessary for most users but is ideal for competitive play where maximum frame rates are paramount.

For 1440p gaming, the High preset at 101 FPS is the recommended choice, as it delivers a smooth experience on standard 60Hz monitors and is competitive on 100Hz displays. The Medium preset at 122 FPS is better for high-refresh-rate panels, offering a 21 FPS improvement over High. The Ultra preset at 65 FPS is playable but sits close to the 60 FPS baseline, so it is only recommended for users who prioritize graphical fidelity over frame rate stability. The Low preset at 170 FPS is overkill for most, but it ensures the absolute highest performance.

For 4K gaming, the data suggests avoiding Ultra settings entirely, as the 41 FPS average is unplayable. The High preset at 64 FPS is the only viable option, providing a borderline experience that may suffer in intense scenes. The Medium preset at 77 FPS is a better choice for consistency, though it still falls short of the 90+ FPS targets seen at lower resolutions. Ultimately, the best experience is achieved by sticking to 1080p or 1440p, where the combo excels. At 1440p High, the combo offers a 101 FPS average, which is 37 FPS higher than 4K High, making it the sweet spot for this CPU-GPU pairing.