Fivem
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 75 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 35 | 44 | 56 |
| 1440p QHD | 50 | 64 | 80 | 101 |
| 1080p Full HD | 75 | 97 | 121 | 154 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with Intel Core i9-14900K + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis
# How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core i9-14900K + Intel Arc B580 combination ranks #2788 out of 3707 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the bottom 25% of all configurations, which is a surprising result given the components involved. The combo sits in the 25th percentile overall, meaning roughly three-quarters of tested systems deliver higher average FPS in this title.
The ranking reflects a significant bottleneck dynamic. The i9-14900K is a top-tier processor, sitting in the 95th percentile of all CPUs with an average benchmark score of 79097. The Arc B580, meanwhile, ranks in the 68th percentile of GPUs with an average score of 23021. When paired, the theoretical potential is high, but Fivem's measured results suggest the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher resolutions and settings, dragging the overall combo ranking down.
Contextualizing against CPU rivals, the i9-14900K scores -0.3% relative to the Intel Core i9-14900KF, -0.6% versus the Intel Core Ultra 9 290HX Plus, and -1.2% against the AMD EPYC 7413. It is 1.7% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Max+ 395. These are marginal deltas, indicating the processor is not the differentiator in this pairing. For the GPU, the Arc B580 sits -0.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, -0.7% behind the RTX 3080, and -1% versus the NVIDIA P106-100. The GPU's performance envelope is tightly clustered with these older or higher-tier cards, which explains why Fivem's frame rates hover where they do.
The data indicates that this combo is not optimized for Fivem's specific workload. The game, being a multiplayer title, often stresses single-thread performance and specific API paths. The i9-14900K's strong single-core scores (e.g., 4697 in Passmark single-thread) are not enough to overcome the GPU's mid-pack standing in this engine.
FAQ
Q: Is the Intel Core i9-14900K bottlenecking the Intel Arc B580 in Fivem?
A: No, the data does not support a CPU bottleneck. The i9-14900K ranks in the 95th percentile of all CPUs, and its nearest rivals show negligible performance deltas (all within ±1.7% ). The FPS scaling across resolutions (from 154 FPS at 1080p Low to 35 FPS at 4K High) indicates the GPU is the limiting factor, not the processor.
Q: What is the best resolution for this combo in Fivem?
A: At 1920x1080, the combo delivers playable frame rates across all settings, ranging from 75 FPS on Ultra to 154 FPS on Low. At 2560x1440, performance drops to between 50 FPS (Ultra) and 101 FPS (Low). At 3840x2160, only Low settings (56 FPS) and Medium (44 FPS) approach playability; Ultra (28 FPS) and High (35 FPS) fall below acceptable thresholds.
Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to its nearest rivals in raw GPU benchmarks?
A: The Arc B580's average benchmark score is 23021. It is -0.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP, 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080, -0.7% behind the RTX 3080, and -1% behind the NVIDIA P106-100. These deltas are small, showing the B580 performs in a similar tier to these cards despite architectural differences.
Q: What frame rate can I expect at 1440p Medium settings?
A: At 2560x1440 with Medium settings, the combo produces an average of 80 FPS, with a minimum of 68 FPS and a maximum of 92 FPS. This is a smooth experience for most multiplayer scenarios, though competitive players might prefer Low settings for the 101 FPS average.
Q: Does the i9-14900K's 24-core configuration help in Fivem?
A: The i9-14900K's 24 cores and 32 threads provide substantial headroom, but Fivem's measured FPS does not scale with core count alone. The game's performance is more tied to the GPU, as evidenced by the significant FPS drop when moving from 1080p to 4K at identical settings (e.g., 97 FPS to 35 FPS on High). The CPU's multi-core scores (e.g., 39399.5 in Cinebench R23) are excellent, yet they do not translate to proportional gains in this title.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage generation) and fabricated on a 5 nm TSMC process. It features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's base and boost clocks are both 2670 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective).
In Fivem, the GPU's role is dominant. The measured FPS data shows a clear dependency on both resolution and settings, which are GPU-bound variables. At 1080p Low, the combo hits 154 FPS, but at 4K Ultra, it falls to 28 FPS. This 5.5x difference is far larger than what CPU-bound scenarios would produce, confirming that the Arc B580's compute resources (2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 80 ROPs) are the primary constraint.
The GPU's 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 performance and 427.2 GTexel/s texture rate are adequate for 1080p and lighter 1440p loads, but they struggle at 4K. The 20 RT cores and 12 GB VRAM are present, though Fivem's measured results do not indicate a VRAM capacity issue; rather, the raw throughput is insufficient for high-resolution, high-preset workloads. The card's Passmark G3D score of 15748 and DirectX 11 score of 128 contextualize its mid-range standing, which aligns with the observed frame rates.
Measured FPS Breakdown
The data provides a comprehensive matrix of resolution and settings combinations. At 1920x1080, the combo delivers:
- Low: 154 FPS average
- Medium: 121 FPS average (min 103 , max 140 )
- High: 97 FPS average
- Ultra: 75 FPS average
These are all playable, with even Ultra exceeding the 60 FPS threshold. The Medium preset's minimum of 103 FPS ensures consistent fluidity.
At 2560x1440, performance scales down:
- Low: 101 FPS average
- Medium: 80 FPS average (min 68 , max 92 )
- High: 64 FPS average
- Ultra: 50 FPS average
The drop from 1080p to 1440p is roughly 34-37% across settings, which is expected as pixel count increases by 1.78x. The Medium preset remains the sweet spot here, with its minimum of 68 FPS keeping gameplay smooth.
At 3840x2160, the combo struggles:
- Low: 56 FPS average
- Medium: 44 FPS average (min 38 , max 51 )
- High: 35 FPS average
- Ultra: 28 FPS average
Only Low settings approach playability at 4K, and even then, the 56 FPS average leaves little headroom for demanding multiplayer scenes. The Medium preset's minimum of 38 FPS dips below acceptable levels for competitive play.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and consistent, revealing the GPU-bound nature of this combo. At Low settings, the progression is 154 FPS (1080p) → 101 FPS (1440p) → 56 FPS (4K). This represents a 34% drop from 1080p to 1440p and a further 45% drop from 1440p to 4K. At High settings, the progression is 97 FPS → 64 FPS → 35 FPS, with drops of 34% and 45% respectively.
The uniformity of these percentage drops across settings is telling. If the CPU were the bottleneck, the scaling would flatten at higher resolutions (since the GPU would be waiting on the processor). Instead, the consistent 45% reduction from 1440p to 4K indicates the Arc B580's rendering pipeline is saturated at 4K, regardless of preset. The i9-14900K's 6.00 GHz boost clock and 32 threads are not the constraint; the GPU's 456.0 GB/s bandwidth and 13.67 TFLOPS compute are insufficient for 4K in this title.
The scaling also shows that Fivem is not heavily optimized for Intel's Xe2 architecture. The B580's DirectX 12 score of 76 in Passmark is notably lower than its DirectX 11 score of 128 , suggesting potential driver or API overhead issues that manifest at higher resolutions.
Settings Recommendations
For the best experience, the Medium preset at 1920x1080 is the optimal choice. It delivers 121 FPS average with a minimum of 103 FPS , ensuring no drops below 100 FPS. This provides a smooth, responsive experience for multiplayer gameplay without sacrificing visual quality significantly. The High preset (97 FPS ) is also viable, but the Medium preset's higher minimum frame rate makes it more consistent.
At 2560x1440, the Low preset (101 FPS ) is recommended for competitive play, while Medium (80 FPS ) is suitable for a balance of visuals and performance. The Medium preset's minimum of 68 FPS keeps gameplay above the 60 FPS threshold, but Low offers more headroom for intense scenes.
At 3840x2160, only Low settings (56 FPS ) are playable, and even then, the experience is marginal. Players seeking 4K should consider lowering the resolution or accepting reduced visual fidelity, as the Medium preset (44 FPS ) and above fall below acceptable frame rates. The data suggests that 1080p Medium or 1440p Low are the sweet spots for this combo, balancing the Arc B580's capabilities with the i9-14900K's strength.
CPU Role
The Intel Core i9-14900K is a 24-core, 32-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, with a base clock of 3.20 GHz and a boost clock of 6.00 GHz. It features 36 MB of shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache. Its benchmark scores are exceptional: 39399.5 in Cinebench R23 multi-core, 2262.5 in single-core, and 58674 in Passmark multithread.
In Fivem, the CPU's role is secondary but not negligible. The game's multiplayer nature can introduce CPU overhead for network and entity management, but the measured FPS scaling shows that resolution and GPU settings dominate performance. The i9-14900K's single-core performance (4697 in Passmark single-thread) is more than sufficient for Fivem's typical single-threaded game logic, as evidenced by the high frame rates at 1080p Low (154 FPS ).
The CPU's nearest rivals show negligible performance differences (-0.3% to 1.7% deltas), meaning swapping the i9-14900K for a comparable chip would not meaningfully alter Fivem's results. The bottleneck is firmly on the GPU side, particularly at higher resolutions. The processor's 125W TDP and support for DDR4/DDR5 memory are adequate, but they do not influence the frame rates in a way that would change the combo's ranking.
The data suggests that the i9-14900K is over-provisioned for this GPU pairing in Fivem. A less powerful CPU would likely produce similar FPS, as the Arc B580's performance ceiling is reached well before the processor's limits. This is a classic case of GPU-bound scaling, where the Intel Arc B580 (68th percentile GPU) defines the experience, and the i9-14900K (95th percentile CPU) provides ample headroom that remains untapped in this specific title.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core i9-14900K
Intel Arc B580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core i9-14900K + Intel Arc B580 in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 56.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 44.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 35.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 28.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 101.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 80.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 64.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 50.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 154.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 121.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 97.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 75.0 |
Fivem with ii9-14900K + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with Arc B580 + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with ii9-14900K + Arc B580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.