Fivem

The Intel Core i9-14900K paired with the AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT delivers a performance profile in Fivem that is heavily dictated by resolution and preset selection. The data shows a clear progression where the CPU's strength is most apparent at lower resolutions, while the GPU becomes the limiting factor as pixel count rises. This analysis examines the measured frames per second (FPS) across three resolutions and four settings presets, interpreting what the numbers reveal about this specific hardware combination.

Resolution Scaling

The transition from 1920x1080 to 3840x2160 produces a dramatic shift in frame rates that illustrates the balance between CPU and GPU load in Fivem. At 1920x1080 with Low settings, the combo achieves 202 FPS average. Moving to 2560x1440 at the same preset drops that to 128.9 FPS, a reduction of 73.1 FPS. At 3840x2160 Low, the average falls further to 76 FPS, meaning the jump from 1080p to 4K cuts performance by more than half, from 202 to 76 FPS.

This scaling pattern points to the GPU becoming the primary constraint at higher resolutions. The RX 6750 XT’s 12 GB of GDDR6 memory and 192-bit bus are being pushed harder as the pixel workload increases. At 1080p, the Core i9-14900K’s 24 cores and 32 threads clearly feed the GPU efficiently, allowing it to reach 202 FPS. At 4K, however, the GPU’s rendering throughput limits the output, with the CPU having ample headroom that goes unused.

The gap between Low and Ultra settings widens with resolution. At 1080p, the spread from Low (202 FPS) to Ultra (99.3 FPS) is 102.7 FPS. At 1440p, that spread narrows to 67.5 FPS (128.9 to 61.4). At 4K, it shrinks further to 41.1 FPS (76 to 34.9). This compression at higher resolutions confirms that the GPU’s fixed compute resources, not the CPU’s processing capability, determine the ceiling as settings and resolution increase.

How This Combo Ranks

Within the benchmark database, this specific configuration sits at rank 855 out of 1792 tested combos for Fivem. This placement places it in the middle of the distribution, which aligns with its measured performance. The CPU itself is a high performer, holding the 97th percentile against all processors in the database. Its average benchmark score of 79824 places it just behind the AMD EPYC 7413 (80041, deltaPct -0.3) and ahead of the Intel Core i9-14900KF (79245, deltaPct 0.7) and Intel Core Ultra 7 265KF (79240, deltaPct 0.7).

The GPU, however, sits at the 79th percentile against all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 35327. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (35264, deltaPct 0.2) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile (35435, deltaPct -0.3). The combination of a top-tier CPU with a mid-range GPU creates an imbalance. The ranking of 855 out of 1792 reflects this pairing, where the GPU’s ceiling prevents the CPU from fully expressing its capabilities in Fivem at higher settings.

Benchmark results indicate that this combo outperforms roughly half of the tested configurations, but it does not break into the upper quartile. The deltaPct values for the CPU’s rivals show a tight cluster within 0.9% of each other, indicating that the processor’s raw compute is not the differentiator here. Instead, the combo’s rank is more directly tied to the GPU’s throughput in Fivem’s specific workload.

GPU Role

The AMD Radeon RX 6750 XT operates with a base clock of 2150 MHz and a boost clock of 2600 MHz, with a game clock of 2495 MHz. Its memory runs at 2250 MHz, which translates to 18 Gbps effective, providing 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth across a 192-bit bus. The 12 GB GDDR6 frame buffer is sufficient for the resolutions tested, but the 2560 shading units and 64 ROPs determine how fast each frame is rendered.

In Fivem, the GPU’s role becomes more pronounced as resolution rises. At 1920x1080 Low, the GPU can process frames quickly enough to reach 202 FPS, suggesting it is not heavily taxed. At 3840x2160 Ultra, the average drops to 34.9 FPS, indicating the GPU’s compute units are saturated. The 13.31 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 416.0 GTexel/s texture rate are fixed values that the game’s engine must work within, and higher presets demand more of those resources.

The GPU’s memory bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s also matters for Fivem, which features large open-world environments. At 4K, the pixel fill rate of 166.4 GPixel/s becomes a limiting factor. The data shows that Low settings at 4K still yield 76 FPS, which is playable, but Ultra at 4K drops to 34.9 FPS, a figure that would be less fluid. The GPU’s 40 ray accelerators are present, but Fivem’s workload appears to rely more on traditional rasterization given the frame rates observed.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its highest frame rates. Low settings produce 202 FPS average, Medium reaches 159.7 FPS, High hits 126.5 FPS, and Ultra falls to 99.3 FPS. The step from Low to Medium costs 42.3 FPS, while High to Ultra costs 27.2 FPS. This resolution keeps the GPU well within its limits, allowing the i9-14900K’s strong single-thread performance to shine.

At 2560x1440, the averages drop across all presets. Low yields 128.9 FPS, Medium gives 104.2 FPS, High provides 79.5 FPS, and Ultra manages 61.4 FPS. The gap between Medium and High is 24.7 FPS, larger than the 12.5 FPS gap between Low and Medium. This suggests that certain settings within the Medium to High range impose a heavier load on the GPU.

At 3840x2160, the numbers tighten further. Low averages 76 FPS, Medium drops to 58.9 FPS, High falls to 48.2 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 34.9 FPS. The difference between Low and Medium is 17.1 FPS, while Medium to High is 10.7 FPS. The scaling from High to Ultra is 13.3 FPS, showing that the GPU’s resources are nearly exhausted at this resolution. The data shows no min or max FPS values, so only the averages can be considered for stability assessment.

FAQ

Q: What is the best average FPS this combo achieves in Fivem?

A: The highest measured average is 202 FPS at 1920x1080 with Low settings.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS is 34.9, which is the lowest measured value across all tested configurations.

Q: Is the CPU or GPU more likely to limit performance at 1080p?

A: At 1920x1080, the high frame rates (202 FPS on Low) suggest the GPU is the primary limiter, as the CPU’s 24 cores and 32 threads provide sufficient processing power to maintain those numbers.

Q: What is the combo’s ranking among all tested configurations in Fivem?

A: The combo ranks 855 out of 1792 tested combinations.

Q: How does the RX 6750 XT compare to its nearest rival in synthetic benchmarks?

A: The GPU’s average benchmark score is 35327, which is 0.2% above the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (35264) and 0.3% below the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile (35435).

Q: What is the FPS difference between Low and Ultra at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low settings average 128.9 FPS, while Ultra averages 61.4 FPS, a difference of 67.5 FPS.

Settings Recommendations

For players targeting high refresh rates at 1920x1080, the Low preset delivers 202 FPS, which is ideal for competitive play. Medium at 159.7 FPS still offers smooth motion, while High at 126.5 FPS balances visual fidelity with responsiveness. Ultra at 99.3 FPS remains playable but may not fully utilize a 144 Hz display.

At 2560x1440, Medium settings at 104.2 FPS provide the best combination of smoothness and visual quality. Low at 128.9 FPS is viable for esports-focused play, but High at 79.5 FPS and Ultra at 61.4 FPS introduce noticeable dips that could affect fluidity. The data suggests that Medium is the sweet spot for this resolution.

At 3840x2160, only Low settings (76 FPS) approach a consistently smooth experience. Medium at 58.9 FPS is acceptable for slower-paced exploration, while High at 48.2 FPS and Ultra at 34.9 FPS fall below the 60 FPS threshold. The measured rows indicate that players prioritizing frame rate at 4K should stick to Low, while those who value visuals over speed can consider Medium as a compromise.