Fivem

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 paired with the Intel Arc B580 presents a mid-range combination in the Fivem benchmark database. With a combo rank of 1406 out of 1792 tested configurations, this pairing sits in the lower half of the field but still delivers playable frame rates across most settings. The measurements reveal a system that is more capable at lower resolutions and settings, with the CPU and GPU load balancing shifting as the pixel count rises.

Resolution Scaling

The measured frame rates show a clear pattern of scaling from 1080p to 4K. At the highest tested setting (Ultra), the average FPS drops from 73.9 at 1920x1080 to 46.7 at 2560x1440, a reduction of approximately 37%. Moving further to 3840x2160, the Ultra preset yields just 28.2 FPS, representing a 62% decrease from the 1080p figure. This steep decline indicates that at Ultra settings, the rendering load is scaling heavily with resolution, and the Intel Arc B580 is becoming the primary limiting factor.

Conversely, the Low preset shows a different scaling profile. At 1920x1080, Low settings produce 153.9 FPS. At 2560x1440, this drops to 99.4 FPS, and at 3840x2160 it reaches 53.1 FPS. The percentage drops between each step are 35% and 47% respectively, which are proportionally smaller than the Ultra preset drops. This suggests that at Low settings, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 is able to feed frames more effectively, and the bottleneck shifts more gradually toward the GPU as resolution increases.

The Medium and High presets sit between these extremes. High settings yield 97.1 FPS at 1080p, 61.8 FPS at 1440p, and 35.2 FPS at 4K. Medium settings produce 119.1, 80.4, and 44.4 FPS across the same resolutions. The spread between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 80 FPS (153.9 versus 73.9), while at 4K the spread narrows to 24.9 FPS (53.1 versus 28.2). This compression at higher resolutions reinforces the conclusion that the GPU is the dominant constraint at 4K, while at 1080p the CPU has more headroom to differentiate between presets.

The data indicates that for smooth 4K gameplay, only the Low preset crosses the 50 FPS threshold, and even then barely at 53.1 FPS. The 1440p resolution offers a more balanced picture, with Low and Medium both exceeding 80 FPS. At 1080p, every preset except Ultra clears 97 FPS, making it the most flexible resolution for this hardware combination.

FAQ

Q: What is the maximum average FPS this combination achieves at 1080p?

A: The highest measured average FPS at 1920x1080 is 153.9, achieved with the Low preset. This is the only configuration in the entire dataset that exceeds 150 FPS.

Q: How does the Ultra preset perform at 4K compared to 1080p?

A: The Ultra preset drops from 73.9 FPS at 1920x1080 to 28.2 FPS at 3840x2160. This represents a 45.7 FPS loss, or approximately 62% of the 1080p performance, indicating severe scaling penalties at higher resolutions.

Q: Which preset at 1440p delivers the highest frame rate?

A: The Low preset at 2560x1440 yields 99.4 FPS, which is the best result at that resolution. The Medium preset follows at 80.4 FPS, while High and Ultra trail at 61.8 and 46.7 FPS respectively.

Q: Is the Intel Arc B580 the primary bottleneck at 4K Ultra?

A: Yes. The Ultra preset at 3840x2160 produces only 28.2 FPS, which is below the 30 FPS threshold often considered a minimum for playability. The dramatic drop from the Low preset's 53.1 FPS at the same resolution points to GPU rendering limits rather than CPU constraints.

Q: What is the total range of measured FPS across all settings and resolutions?

A: The full dataset spans from 28.2 FPS (4K Ultra) to 153.9 FPS (1080p Low). This range of 125.7 FPS demonstrates the wide performance envelope of this combination depending on configuration choices.

Q: How does the 1080p Medium preset compare to the 1440p Medium preset?

A: At 1920x1080, Medium settings deliver 119.1 FPS, while at 2560x1440 the same preset yields 80.4 FPS. The 1440p result is 67.5% of the 1080p figure, showing a moderate resolution penalty.

Settings Recommendations

The benchmark data suggests that the optimal experience depends heavily on the target resolution. For 1080p displays, the Medium preset at 119.1 FPS offers a strong balance, sitting close to the 120 FPS mark while still providing better visual quality than Low. The High preset at 97.1 FPS is also viable for users prioritizing image quality, as it remains well above 60 FPS. The Ultra preset at 73.9 FPS is playable but sacrifices significant headroom.

At 2560x1440, the Medium preset at 80.4 FPS emerges as the strongest recommendation. It provides a comfortable margin above 60 FPS and maintains visual fidelity. The High preset at 61.8 FPS is acceptable for users who prefer higher quality, but it leaves little room for frame rate dips. The Low preset at 99.4 FPS is the choice for competitive play or high refresh rate monitors, while the Ultra preset at 46.7 FPS is not recommended due to its proximity to the 30 FPS playability floor.

For 4K resolution, the options are limited. The Low preset at 53.1 FPS is the only configuration that achieves a stable experience above 50 FPS. The Medium preset at 44.4 FPS is borderline, and the High preset at 35.2 FPS approaches the lower limit of acceptable performance. The Ultra preset at 28.2 FPS falls below the 30 FPS threshold and should be avoided for anything other than screenshot purposes.

The data indicates that the Medium preset provides the most consistent performance across all three resolutions, with scores of 119.1, 80.4, and 44.4 FPS. This preset represents the best balance between visual quality and frame rate for this hardware combination, particularly at 1080p and 1440p.

Measured FPS Breakdown

At 1920x1080, the four presets produce a clear hierarchy. Low settings achieve 153.9 FPS, Medium settings reach 119.1 FPS, High settings deliver 97.1 FPS, and Ultra settings manage 73.9 FPS. The gap between Low and Medium is 34.8 FPS, while the gap between High and Ultra is 23.2 FPS. This distribution shows diminishing returns as settings increase, with the largest single-step drop occurring from Low to Medium.

The 2560x1440 results follow a similar pattern but with lower absolute values. Low settings yield 99.4 FPS, Medium settings produce 80.4 FPS, High settings reach 61.8 FPS, and Ultra settings deliver 46.7 FPS. The step from Low to Medium is 19 FPS, from Medium to High is 18.6 FPS, and from High to Ultra is 15.1 FPS. The more uniform spacing at 1440p suggests a more balanced load between CPU and GPU at this resolution.

At 3840x2160, the performance drops significantly. Low settings achieve 53.1 FPS, Medium settings reach 44.4 FPS, High settings deliver 35.2 FPS, and Ultra settings produce 28.2 FPS. The differences between consecutive presets are 8.7, 9.2, and 7.0 FPS respectively. The compressed spacing at 4K indicates that the Intel Arc B580 is saturated across all settings, with the CPU having minimal influence on the final frame rate.

Comparing across resolutions, the 1080p Low preset at 153.9 FPS is the single highest score in the dataset. The 1440p Low preset at 99.4 FPS is the highest at that resolution, and the 4K Low preset at 53.1 FPS leads its category. The Ultra preset shows the most dramatic resolution scaling, dropping from 73.9 to 46.7 to 28.2 FPS as resolution increases.

How This Combo Ranks

The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 1406 out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem. This places it in the 21st percentile of all configurations, meaning roughly 78% of tested combos perform better. The ranking reflects the hardware's position in the broader market, with the CPU holding a 79th percentile score among all processors and the GPU sitting at the 66th percentile among all GPUs.

The CPU's nearest rivals provide context for its performance level. The Intel Xeon D-1746TER scores 21635 on average, just 0.6% lower than the Ryzen 5 5600's 21765 average. The AMD EPYC 9554P and EPYC 9534 both score slightly higher at 21899 and 21900 respectively, representing deltas of -0.6%. The Intel Core i7-11700F leads this group with 21957, a 0.9% advantage. These margins are narrow, indicating the Ryzen 5 5600 is competitively positioned within its performance class.

For the GPU side, the Intel Arc B580's average benchmark score of 23021 places it close to several rivals. The AMD Radeon 760M scores 22999, a negligible 0.1% difference. The NVIDIA P106-100 achieves 22950, 0.3% lower. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 scores 23181, which is 0.7% higher, and the RTX 4060 Mobile trails at 22729, 1.3% lower. These tight margins suggest the B580 is well-matched against its immediate competitors in synthetic benchmarks.

Despite the individual component scores being respectable, the combined Fivem performance ranks poorly. The 1406th position out of 1792 combos indicates that this specific pairing does not translate its benchmark scores into strong Fivem performance. The measured FPS data supports this, with only the 1080p Low preset exceeding 150 FPS and 4K Ultra falling below 30 FPS. Users seeking higher Fivem frame rates would need to look at higher-performing combinations, as this setup is best suited for 1080p Medium or 1440p Medium gaming.