Fivem
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 75 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 28 | 38 | 42 | 56 |
| 1440p QHD | 49 | 64 | 77 | 103 |
| 1080p Full HD | 72 | 94 | 121 | 153 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Fivem with AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis
The AMD Ryzen 5 2600 and Intel Arc B580 combination ranks 1398th out of 1792 tested combos in Fivem, placing it in the lower half of the database. This rank indicates that while the pairing is functional, it does not deliver top-tier performance in this specific multiplayer title, with the data showing a clear bias toward 1080p and lower settings for acceptable frame rates. The benchmark results reveal a system that can handle competitive play at lower presets but struggles to maintain high refresh rates at higher resolutions, making it a sensible match for 1080p gaming rather than a high-end 4K setup.
How This Combo Ranks
The combo’s rank of 1398 out of 1792 places it in the 22nd percentile of all tested combinations, a position that reflects the mid-range nature of both components. This ranking is not a condemnation but a contextualization: the Ryzen 5 2600 is a 2018-era processor, and the Arc B580 is a newer graphics card, yet their combined output in Fivem lands them below most modern pairings. The data shows that the CPU’s single-thread performance, with a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 1579, is a limiting factor in a game like Fivem, which relies heavily on per-core IPC. Compared to its nearest rivals, the Ryzen 5 2600 sits within a tight band: it is 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-1345U, 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, 0.6% behind the Intel Core i5-11600KF, and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i7-10700F. This cluster of scores, all within 1% of each other, suggests that the CPU is not an outlier for better or worse, and the overall combo rank is more heavily influenced by the GPU’s mid-tier standing.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B580 brings 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth, which is substantial for a card in its class. Clock speeds are fixed at 2670 MHz for both base and boost, a modest figure that, combined with 2560 shading units and 80 ROPs, yields a 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 compute rate. In Fivem, the GPU’s role becomes evident in the scaling from Low to Ultra settings: at 1080p, the average FPS drops from 153.1 on Low to 72 on Ultra, a 53% reduction that shows the card’s limits under heavy load. The 12 GB VRAM is ample for this game, as Fivem’s multiplayer environments rarely exceed 8 GB even at 4K, so memory capacity is not the bottleneck. Instead, the pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s suggest a card that is well-suited to 1440p but begins to falter at 4K, where the data shows only 37.5 FPS on High settings. The GPU’s percentile rank of 66 versus all GPUs, and its average benchmark score of 23021, places it just 0.7% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060, indicating that in synthetic tests it trades blows with that card, but in Fivem the real-world results are more modest.
Settings Recommendations
For the best balance of visual fidelity and playable frame rates, the Medium preset at 1080p is the standout choice from the measured data. It yields an average of 120.9 FPS, which is 27.1 FPS higher than High settings at the same resolution, while still offering a significant visual upgrade over Low. At 1440p, Medium drops to 77.2 FPS, which is playable but not ideal for fast-paced multiplayer, so users with 1440p monitors should consider High at 64.2 FPS if they prefer sharper visuals, though the margin for error in Fivem’s chaotic scenes is thinner. The Ultra preset is not recommended at any resolution: its 72 FPS at 1080p is the lowest of the four settings, and at 4K it falls to 28.3 FPS, which is below the threshold for smooth gameplay. Low settings at 1080p, with 153.1 FPS, are the choice for competitive players who prioritize frame rate over appearance, but for most users, Medium offers the best compromise without the visual penalty of Low.
Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the data shows a clear progression across presets: Low averages 153.1 FPS, Medium 120.9 FPS, High 93.8 FPS, and Ultra 72 FPS. These numbers indicate that the combo can comfortably drive a 144Hz monitor at Medium settings, but falls short of that target at High and Ultra. Moving to 2560x1440, the averages drop to 102.6 FPS on Low, 77.2 FPS on Medium, 64.2 FPS on High, and 48.5 FPS on Ultra. The 1440p results show a steeper decline relative to 1080p, with Low losing 50.5 FPS and Ultra losing 23.5 FPS, which suggests that the GPU is becoming more of a limiting factor as resolution increases. At 3840x2160, performance takes a significant hit: Low averages 56.4 FPS, Medium 41.5 FPS, High 37.5 FPS, and Ultra 28.3 FPS. None of these 4K figures are ideal for a multiplayer title, and even Low settings struggle to maintain 60 FPS, highlighting that this combo is not meant for 4K gaming. The min and max FPS values are not provided in the data, so the analysis relies solely on averages, but the consistency of the scaling pattern indicates a stable, if not spectacular, performer.
Resolution Scaling
The FPS drop from 1080p to 4K is steep and reveals the limiting component. Going from 1080p Low (153.1 FPS) to 4K Low (56.4 FPS) is a 63% reduction, while the same jump at Ultra goes from 72 FPS to 28.3 FPS, a 61% decline. This proportional drop across all settings suggests that the GPU is the primary constraint at higher resolutions, as the Arc B580’s 456.0 GB/s bandwidth and 13.67 TFLOPS are not sufficient to maintain frame rates when pixel count quadruples. However, the CPU also plays a role in the 1080p to 1440p transition: from 1080p Low to 1440p Low, the FPS drops from 153.1 to 102.6, a 33% reduction that is less severe than the 4K drop but still notable. The Ryzen 5 2600’s 6 cores and 12 threads, with a boost clock of 3.90 GHz, can feed the GPU at 1080p, but the data implies that at 4K, the GPU’s raw throughput becomes the bottleneck, as the CPU has fewer pixels to process per frame relative to its compute capacity.
CPU Role
The Ryzen 5 2600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 3.90 GHz, built on the 12 nm Zen architecture. Its Cinebench R23 scores of 11186 multi-core and 1579 single-core place it at the 77th percentile versus all CPUs, which is respectable for its age but not competitive with modern chips. In Fivem, which is known for being CPU-intensive due to its multiplayer scripting, the single-core performance is critical, and the 1579 score is the likely reason why 1080p Low achieves 153.1 FPS but cannot push higher. The CPU’s nearest rivals all score within 1% of its average benchmark score of 19616, with the Intel Core i5-1345U at 19691 (0.4% higher) and the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U at 19508 (0.6% lower), indicating that the 2600 is not anomalously weak. The data shows that at 1080p, the CPU keeps pace with the GPU’s output, but at 1440p and above, the GPU’s workload increases, and the CPU’s 16 MB of shared L3 cache and 46.9 GB/s memory bandwidth become secondary factors. For Fivem, users should pair this CPU with a 1080p monitor and Medium settings to avoid CPU bottlenecks, as the measured 120.9 FPS at that preset is the sweet spot.
FAQ
Q: Is this combo good for 1080p gaming in Fivem?
A: Yes, the measured data shows 153.1 FPS on Low and 120.9 FPS on Medium at 1920x1080, which are playable and smooth for multiplayer, though High and Ultra drop to 93.8 and 72 FPS respectively.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K resolution in Fivem?
A: No, the 4K results are all below 60 FPS, with the highest being 56.4 FPS on Low and the lowest at 28.3 FPS on Ultra, making 4K impractical for competitive play.
Q: How does the Ryzen 5 2600 compare to its closest rivals?
A: It is within 1% of its nearest rivals: 0.4% behind the Intel Core i5-1345U, 0.6% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 7530U, 0.6% behind the Intel Core i5-11600KF, and 0.7% ahead of the Intel Core i7-10700F.
Q: What is the best settings preset for this combo?
A: Medium at 1080p offers 120.9 FPS, which is the best balance of performance and visual quality; Low at 1080p gives 153.1 FPS for maximum frame rate, but Ultra is not recommended.
Q: Is the GPU or CPU the bottleneck in this system?
A: At 1080p, the CPU’s single-core performance is likely the limiting factor, but at 1440p and 4K, the GPU becomes the bottleneck, as shown by the 63% FPS drop from 1080p Low to 4K Low.
Q: How much VRAM does the Arc B580 have, and is it enough?
A: The Arc B580 has 12 GB of GDDR6 memory, which is more than sufficient for Fivem, as the game’s environments do not typically require that much VRAM even at 4K.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 2600
Intel Arc B580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 2600 + Intel Arc B580 in Fivem
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 56.4 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 41.5 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 37.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 28.3 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 102.6 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 77.2 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 64.2 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 48.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 153.1 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 120.9 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 93.8 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 72.0 |
Fivem with Ryzen 5 2600 + Other GPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Fivem with Arc B580 + Other CPUs
See how Fivem performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 2600 + Arc B580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.