Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
This combination delivers exceptional performance with an average of 294 FPS, perfect for high refresh rate gaming and competitive play.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 136 | 156 | 182 | 212 |
| 1440p QHD | 228 | 268 | 306 | 360 |
| 1080p Full HD | 330 | 385 | 446 | 524 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis
Resolution Scaling
The measured frame rates across the three resolution tiers reveal a configuration that scales with unusual linearity for a competitive shooter. At 1080p with Low settings, the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and Intel Arc B580 combination delivers 524.3 FPS average. Moving to 1440p Low drops this to 360.1 FPS, a reduction of approximately 31%. The final step to 4K Low yields 212.3 FPS, another 41% decline from the 1440p figure. This progression indicates that the rendering load is scaling almost directly with pixel count, which is characteristic of a system where neither component is creating a hard ceiling at these settings.
The High preset tells a similar story but with a steeper overall curve. At 1080p, the average is 385.3 FPS. At 1440p, it falls to 267.9 FPS, a 30% drop. At 4K, the average sits at 155.5 FPS, representing a 42% decline from 1440p. The consistency of these percentage drops across presets suggests the limiting factor shifts smoothly rather than hitting a wall at any specific resolution. The gap between Low and High at 4K is 56.8 FPS, while at 1080p that same preset spread is 139 FPS. This narrowing at higher resolutions points to the GPU becoming progressively more dominant in determining the final frame rate.
The Ultra preset produces the lowest numbers across the board, as expected. The 4K Ultra result of 136.4 FPS is still comfortably above typical display refresh rates, but it is the only measured configuration that dips below the 150 FPS mark. The delta between 1080p Ultra (330.4 FPS) and 4K Ultra (136.4 FPS) is a substantial 194 FPS, indicating that the extra pixel workload at 4K has a pronounced effect when combined with the highest quality settings. The data shows that this combination maintains playable frame rates at every resolution, but the margin for error shrinks considerably at 4K with maxed-out settings.
Settings Recommendations
The measured rows provide a clear hierarchy for players prioritizing frame rate over visual fidelity. The Low preset at 1080p produces the highest average in the entire dataset at 524.3 FPS. This is the configuration that maximizes the headroom for high-refresh-rate displays, and the data indicates that the CPU and GPU combination is well-suited to this task. The Medium preset at 1080p yields 446.3 FPS, which is a 78 FPS penalty for the step up in quality. For competitive play where every frame matters, the Low preset is the clear choice.
However, the data also shows that the Medium preset at 1440p delivers 305.6 FPS, which is still exceptionally high and offers a better visual experience than 1080p Low. The step from Medium to High at 1440p costs 37.7 FPS, bringing the average to 267.9 FPS. This remains well above the threshold for smooth gameplay on most monitors. The Ultra preset at 1440p produces 227.5 FPS, which is still very playable but represents a 25% reduction from the Medium preset at the same resolution.
For players who prioritize visual quality without sacrificing competitive responsiveness, the High preset at 1440p appears to be the sweet spot. It provides a 267.9 FPS average, which is more than sufficient for 240 Hz displays, while offering substantially better image quality than Low settings. The 4K High preset at 155.5 FPS is viable for 144 Hz monitors, but the data suggests that the step to Ultra at 4K (136.4 FPS) offers diminishing returns given the 19.1 FPS penalty. The benchmark results indicate that the Medium preset at 1080p, with 446.3 FPS, is a strong compromise for those who want improved visuals without leaving significant performance on the table.
CPU Role
The AMD Ryzen 5 5600 is a 6-core, 12-thread processor based on the Zen 3 architecture, built on a 7 nm process. Its base clock of 3.50 GHz and boost clock of 4.40 GHz position it as a mid-range desktop part that relies on solid single-thread performance for gaming workloads. In the synthetic benchmark data, the CPU achieves a single-thread score of 882 in 3DMark and 3256 in PassMark single-thread tests. These figures indicate strong per-core capability, which is directly relevant to a game like Counter-Strike: Global Offensive that has historically favored high clock speeds over massive core counts.
The multi-threaded results show the expected scaling from the 6-core design. The Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18309 reflects the processor's ability to handle parallel workloads, but the game's frame rate data suggests that this is not the primary constraint. At 1080p Low, the combination reaches 524.3 FPS, which is a very high number that indicates the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU efficiently at lower resolutions. The fact that the frame rate decreases by roughly 31% when moving from 1080p to 1440p Low suggests that the CPU is not the bottleneck at 1080p, as the GPU is taking on more of the rendering load at higher pixel counts.
The CPU's L3 cache of 32 MB shared across all cores is a notable feature for gaming performance, as it helps reduce memory latency in scenarios with repetitive data access patterns. The processor's position in the broader benchmark landscape, with a percentile rank of 79 among all CPUs, places it above the median but not at the top tier. Its nearest rivals in average benchmark score include the Intel Core i7-11700F at 21957 (0.9% higher) and the AMD EPYC 9534 at 21900 (0.6% higher), which are both significantly more expensive parts. This suggests that the Ryzen 5 5600 offers competitive processing power for its class, and the game's frame rate results confirm that it is not holding back the Arc B580 in most measured scenarios.
How This Combo Ranks
The combination of the AMD Ryzen 5 5600 and Intel Arc B580 achieves a rank of 1250 out of 1605 tested combos in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. This places it in the lower-middle portion of the database, which is somewhat surprising given the high absolute frame rates measured in this game. The rank reflects the fact that many other combinations, likely featuring more powerful CPUs and GPUs, achieve even higher frame rates in this particular title. The percentile position indicates that approximately 22% of tested combinations perform worse than this pairing, while 78% perform better.
This ranking should be interpreted with the understanding that Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is a highly optimized esports title where even mid-range hardware can produce triple-digit frame rates. The combo's rank of 1250 does not diminish the practical performance demonstrated in the measured data, which shows 524.3 FPS at 1080p Low. The gap between the combo's absolute performance and its relative rank highlights the competitive nature of the benchmark database, where many high-end systems are tested. The Ryzen 5 5600's percentile rank of 79 among all CPUs and the Arc B580's percentile rank of 66 among all GPUs both contribute to this overall position, but the game's engine appears to reward raw single-thread performance and GPU rasterization power in a way that favors more expensive components.
The data shows that the combo is not near the top of the ranking, but it also demonstrates that the performance is far from inadequate. The measured frame rates at every resolution and preset combination remain well above playable thresholds, and the ranking reflects a broader field of comparison rather than a verdict on the combo's suitability for this game. Players using this configuration would experience smooth gameplay in virtually all scenarios, even if the absolute numbers do not match the top-ranked systems.
GPU Role
The Intel Arc B580 is built on the Xe2-HPG architecture using a 5 nm process, with 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus delivering 456.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The GPU's base and boost clocks are both set at 2670 MHz, with memory running at 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective). The 2560 shading units and 80 ROPs provide the raw computational throughput, with a pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s. These specifications position the card as a solid mid-range offering, and the measured frame rates in this game reflect that positioning.
The GPU's role in the measured results becomes more apparent at higher resolutions. At 4K Ultra, the average frame rate drops to 136.4 FPS, which is the lowest figure in the dataset. This represents a 74% reduction from the 1080p Low result of 524.3 FPS. The scaling from 1080p to 4K at each preset shows that the GPU is the primary driver of performance differences at higher pixel counts. The 12 GB VRAM capacity is sufficient for this game, as Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is not a VRAM-heavy title, and the memory bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s provides ample headroom for the game's relatively simple textures and geometry.
The GPU's synthetic benchmark scores, including a PassMark G3D score of 15748 and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 3068, place it in the 66th percentile among all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 with an average benchmark score of 23181 (0.7% higher) and the AMD Radeon 760M at 22999 (0.1% lower). This indicates that the Arc B580 is competitive with mainstream options from other vendors. The measured game performance aligns with this positioning, as the frame rates are high but not exceptional when compared to the top-tier GPUs that would appear in the upper ranks of the combo database. The GPU's FP32 throughput of 13.67 TFLOPS and its DirectX 12 Ultimate support ensure it is well-equipped for modern rendering workloads, and the data confirms that it handles this esports title with ease at all tested settings.
Hardware Specifications
AMD Ryzen 5 5600
Intel Arc B580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for AMD Ryzen 5 5600 + Intel Arc B580 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 212.3 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 182.3 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 155.5 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 136.4 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 360.1 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 305.6 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 267.9 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 227.5 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 524.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 446.3 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 385.3 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 330.4 |
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with Ryzen 5 5600 + Other GPUs
See how Counter-Strike: Global Offensive performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive with Arc B580 + Other CPUs
See how Counter-Strike: Global Offensive performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with Ryzen 5 5600 + Arc B580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.