Downfall
This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 97 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.
Average FPS: resolution vs quality settings
| Ultra | High | Medium | Low | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4K Ultra HD | 34 | 55 | 67 | 82 |
| 1440p QHD | 55 | 88 | 108 | 132 |
| 1080p Full HD | 77 | 124 | 151 | 185 |
Cell color: green is 120+ FPS, teal is 60+, amber is 30+, red is below 30.
Downfall with Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + Intel Arc B580, In-Depth Analysis
# How This Combo Ranks
The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 paired with the Intel Arc B580 lands at rank 2196 out of 2928 tested combos in Downfall, placing it in the 25th percentile of all configurations. This is a mid-pack result that reflects a pairing with clear strengths at lower resolutions but diminishing returns as the workload scales up. The combo sits noticeably behind the top quartile of systems, and the data shows that while this pairing can handle the game at playable framerates in most scenarios, it is not positioned to deliver elite performance in this horror title.
The ranking context matters here: 732 combos outperform this setup, and 732 combos sit below it, meaning this configuration is squarely in the middle of the pack. That placement aligns with the component profiles — the CPU ranks in the 89th percentile among all processors, while the GPU sits in the 68th percentile among all graphics cards. The gap between these two percentile positions hints at a system where the graphics card is the more limiting factor, a theme that recurs throughout the measured results. In a genre like horror, where atmospheric tension often relies on smooth frame delivery, this mid-pack ranking suggests the combo delivers competent but not exceptional gameplay experiences.
# GPU Role
The Intel Arc B580 brings 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 456.0 GB/s. The memory clock runs at 2375 MHz, translating to 19 Gbps effective, while the base and boost clocks both sit at 2670 MHz. These specifications position the card with a pixel rate of 213.6 GPixel/s and a texture rate of 427.2 GTexel/s, supported by 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The 20 RT cores and 13.67 TFLOPS of FP32 performance round out the compute capabilities.
In Downfall, the GPU's role is decisive across all measured settings. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 185 FPS, but at 1080p Ultra it drops to 77 FPS — a 58% reduction that falls squarely on the graphics card's shoulders. The 12 GB VRAM capacity appears sufficient for this game's demands at the tested resolutions, as no memory-related performance cliffs appear in the data. The card's 68th percentile standing among all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 23021, situates it competitively against the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (avgScore 22895, deltaPct 0.6) and the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (avgScore 23061, deltaPct -0.2). The B580 edges out the RTX 2080 by 0.6% and trails the RX 580 2048SP by 0.2%, showing it trades blows with older high-end cards.
The GPU's architecture, based on Xe2-HPG and built on a 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors, delivers its best results in this game when settings are kept moderate. The measured FPS data shows that moving from Medium to Ultra at any resolution incurs a substantial penalty — at 1440p, Medium yields 108 FPS while Ultra drops to 55 FPS, a 49% decline. This pattern holds across all resolutions and points to the GPU as the primary bottleneck when settings escalate, with the CPU's 89th percentile standing unable to compensate for the graphics card's limits at higher quality presets.
# Resolution Scaling
The resolution scaling behavior in Downfall reveals a system that transitions from CPU-bound at lower resolutions to GPU-bound as pixel count increases. At 1080p Low, the combo produces 185 FPS, dropping to 132 FPS at 1440p Low (a 29% reduction) and 82 FPS at 4K Low (a 38% further drop from 1440p). This scaling pattern suggests that at Low settings, the CPU's 14 cores and 14 threads, boosting up to 5.00 GHz, are capable of feeding the GPU adequately at 1080p, but the GPU begins to struggle as resolution increases.
The story changes at higher settings. At Ultra, 1080p yields 77 FPS, 1440p yields 55 FPS (a 29% drop), and 4K yields 34 FPS (a 38% drop from 1440p). The consistent percentage drops across Low and Ultra settings indicate that the GPU is the limiting factor even at 1080p Ultra, where the 77 FPS result is well below what the CPU could theoretically support. The 4K Ultra result of 34 FPS is below the 60 FPS threshold commonly associated with smooth gameplay, and even 4K Medium at 67 FPS only barely crosses that line.
The data shows that the sweet spot for this combo is 1440p Medium, where 108 FPS with a minimum of 92 FPS and maximum of 124 FPS provides a comfortable margin above playability thresholds. At 1080p, all settings except Ultra exceed 120 FPS, with Low hitting 185 FPS and Medium at 151 FPS. The 4K results are more concerning: only Low settings (82 FPS) and Medium (67 FPS) clear 60 FPS, while High drops to 55 FPS and Ultra falls to 34 FPS. This scaling profile indicates that users targeting 4K should stick to Medium or lower settings, while 1440p offers the best balance of visual quality and performance.
# FAQ
Q: What is the combo's overall rank in Downfall?
A: The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 with Intel Arc B580 ranks 2196 out of 2928 tested combos, placing it in the 25th percentile of all configurations tested in this game.
Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to its nearest GPU rivals?
A: The B580's average benchmark score of 23021 puts it 0.6% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 (22895) and 0.2% behind the AMD Radeon RX 580 2048SP (23061). It also trails the NVIDIA P106-100 (23249) by 1% and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 (23172) by 0.7%.
Q: What is the best resolution and settings combination for this setup?
A: The data shows 1440p Medium delivers 108 FPS average with a 92 FPS minimum and 124 FPS maximum, offering the best balance of frame rate and visual quality. At 1080p, High settings at 124 FPS is also a strong option.
Q: Can this combo handle 4K gaming in Downfall?
A: At 4K, only Low (82 FPS) and Medium (67 FPS) settings exceed 60 FPS. High drops to 55 FPS and Ultra falls to 34 FPS, so 4K gaming requires reduced settings for smooth performance.
Q: How does the CPU compare to its nearest rivals in overall benchmarks?
A: The Core Ultra 5 235 has an average benchmark score of 46062, which is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030) and 0.2% ahead of both the AMD EPYC 4364P (45970) and AMD EPYC 7303 (45960). It trails the Intel Core i9-13900HX (46098) by 0.1%.
Q: What is the GPU's memory configuration and how does it affect Downfall?
A: The Arc B580 features 12 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 456.0 GB/s bandwidth. The measured FPS data shows no memory-related performance cliffs, indicating this capacity is sufficient for Downfall at all tested resolutions and settings.
# Measured FPS Breakdown
At 1920x1080, the combo delivers its strongest results. Low settings produce 185 FPS average, Medium yields 151 FPS with a minimum of 128 FPS and maximum of 174 FPS, High achieves 124 FPS, and Ultra drops to 77 FPS. The gap between Low and Ultra at 1080p is 108 FPS, representing a 58% performance reduction when maxing out settings.
At 2560x1440, the scaling continues but with lower absolute numbers. Low settings reach 132 FPS, Medium delivers 108 FPS with a minimum of 92 FPS and maximum of 124 FPS, High produces 88 FPS, and Ultra falls to 55 FPS. The delta between Low and Ultra at 1440p is 77 FPS, a 58% reduction that mirrors the 1080p pattern.
At 3840x2160, the GPU's limitations become pronounced. Low settings yield 82 FPS, Medium delivers 67 FPS with a minimum of 57 FPS and maximum of 77 FPS, High drops to 55 FPS, and Ultra bottoms out at 34 FPS. The spread from Low to Ultra at 4K is 48 FPS, a 59% reduction that shows the GPU is consistently the bottleneck at this resolution.
The Medium settings at each resolution show the most consistent frame delivery, with the 1440p Medium result of 108 FPS (min 92, max 124) providing the tightest relative variance at 18% between minimum and maximum. At 4K Medium, the variance is wider — 57 FPS minimum versus 77 FPS maximum, a 35% spread that suggests occasional frame drops in demanding scenes. For a horror game, these dips could matter during tense moments, making the 1440p Medium preset the most reliable choice for consistent performance.
# CPU Role
The Intel Core Ultra 5 235 brings 14 cores and 14 threads to this pairing, with a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.00 GHz. Built on Arrow Lake architecture using a 3 nm process with 17,800 million transistors, it features 24 MB of shared L3 cache and per-core L1 and L2 caches of 192 KB and 3 MB respectively. The CPU's 89th percentile ranking among all processors, with an average benchmark score of 46062, indicates strong computational capacity for gaming workloads.
In Downfall, the CPU's role is most evident at lower resolutions and settings where the GPU is less taxed. At 1080p Low, the combo reaches 185 FPS, a figure that suggests the CPU is capable of feeding the GPU well beyond what most displays can show. The 14 threads, while not offering hyper-threading, provide adequate parallelism for this horror title's workload. The single-thread performance, measured at 2085 in Cinebench R23 single-core and 4516 in Passmark single-thread, supports the high frame rates seen at 1080p.
The CPU's nearest rivals in overall benchmark scoring include the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 375 (46030, deltaPct 0.1), Intel Core i9-13900HX (46098, deltaPct -0.1), AMD EPYC 4364P (45970, deltaPct 0.2), and AMD EPYC 7303 (45960, deltaPct 0.2). These delta values are all within 0.2% of the Core Ultra 5 235, indicating that this CPU sits in a tightly contested performance band. In Downfall, however, the CPU's 89th percentile standing does not translate into top-tier gaming results because the GPU becomes the limiting factor at higher settings.
The 65W TDP and dual-channel DDR5 memory support with 102.4 GB/s bandwidth provide a solid foundation for gaming, but the measured FPS data shows that the CPU's headroom is largely untapped beyond 1080p Low. At 1440p and above, the FPS drops align more closely with GPU scaling patterns than CPU capabilities. The CPU's multi-threaded performance, reflected in a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 14769 and Passmark multi-thread score of 37816, suggests it could drive higher frame rates if paired with a more powerful GPU in this game. As configured, the Core Ultra 5 235 is not the bottleneck in Downfall — the Arc B580 takes that role once settings rise above Low.
Hardware Specifications
Intel Core Ultra 5 235
Intel Arc B580
FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings
Performance data for Intel Core Ultra 5 235 + Intel Arc B580 in Downfall
| Resolution | Settings | Avg FPS |
|---|---|---|
| 3840x2160 | Low | 82.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Medium | 67.0 |
| 3840x2160 | High | 55.0 |
| 3840x2160 | Ultra | 34.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Low | 132.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Medium | 108.0 |
| 2560x1440 | High | 88.0 |
| 2560x1440 | Ultra | 55.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Low | 185.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Medium | 151.0 |
| 1920x1080 | High | 124.0 |
| 1920x1080 | Ultra | 77.0 |
Downfall with iUltra 5 235 + Other GPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.
Downfall with Arc B580 + Other CPUs
See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.
Other Games with iUltra 5 235 + Arc B580
Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.