Downfall

Downfall

AVERAGE FPS
96
good

This combination provides smooth gameplay with an average of 96 FPS, suitable for most gaming scenarios.

Downfall with Intel Core i7-13700K + Intel Arc B580 — In-Depth Analysis

The Intel Core i7-13700K paired with the Intel Arc B580 delivers a playable experience in Downfall, but the data reveals a clear performance hierarchy dictated by both resolution and graphics preset. At 1080p with Low settings, the combo achieves an average of 184.6 FPS, demonstrating substantial headroom. However, this figure drops precipitously as visual fidelity increases, with Ultra settings at 1080p yielding only 77.2 FPS. The pattern is consistent across resolutions: the gap between Low and Ultra settings widens significantly at higher pixel counts. At 1440p, the spread is from 133.7 FPS (Low) down to 55.9 FPS (Ultra), while at 4K, the range tightens to 80.7 FPS (Low) versus 31.6 FPS (Ultra). This scaling indicates that the Arc B580’s rendering pipeline becomes the primary constraint as resolution climbs, rather than the CPU.

Resolution Scaling

The measured FPS data shows how the system transitions from a CPU-friendly workload at 1080p to a GPU-bound scenario at 4K. At 1080p Low, the 184.6 FPS average suggests the Core i7-13700K’s 16 cores and 24 threads are more than adequate to feed the graphics card, leaving the B580 as the limiting factor even at this modest preset. Moving to 1440p Low, performance drops to 133.7 FPS, a 27.6% reduction that aligns closely with the increase in pixel count. At 4K Low, the average falls to 80.7 FPS, which is 56.3% lower than the 1080p Low result. This steep decline points to the GPU’s fill rate and memory bandwidth—456.0 GB/s on a 192-bit bus—becoming the bottleneck.

The story changes when examining High settings across resolutions. At 1080p High, the combo manages 121.2 FPS, which drops to 89.3 FPS at 1440p and further to 56.3 FPS at 4K. The percentage drop from 1080p to 4K at High settings is 53.5%, slightly less severe than the Low preset’s 56.3% drop. This suggests that at higher quality settings, the additional shading work (2560 shading units, 160 TMUs) mitigates some of the raw pixel throughput penalty, but the overall trend remains GPU-limited. The Ultra preset tells a different story: 77.2 FPS at 1080p, 55.9 FPS at 1440p, and 31.6 FPS at 4K. The 4K Ultra result is particularly telling—it is 59.1% slower than the 1080p Ultra figure, indicating that the B580’s 12 GB GDDR6 buffer and 213.6 GPixel/s pixel rate are saturated by the combination of high resolution and maximum effects.

The data indicates that the i7-13700K’s role diminishes as resolution increases. At 1080p Low, the CPU’s single-thread performance (1136 in 3dmark_single_thread) and multi-thread capability (12412 in 3dmark_max_threads) likely keep frame pacing consistent, but the B580’s 13.67 TFLOPS FP32 throughput becomes the wall. At 4K, the gap between Low and Ultra narrows to 49.1 FPS (from 80.7 to 31.6), whereas at 1080p the gap is 107.4 FPS (from 184.6 to 77.2). This compression at 4K confirms that the GPU is fully occupied, and the CPU’s clock speed of 5.40 GHz boost is no longer the relevant factor.

FAQ

*Q: What is the highest average FPS recorded for this combo in Downfall?*

A: The maximum measured average is 184.6 FPS, achieved at 1920x1080 resolution with Low settings.

Q: How does the combo perform at 4K with Ultra settings?

A: At 3840x2160 with Ultra settings, the average FPS falls to 31.6, which is the lowest recorded figure across all tested configurations.

Q: Is the Intel Core i7-13700K or the Intel Arc B580 the limiting factor at 1080p?

A: Benchmark results indicate the GPU is the primary constraint even at 1080p Low, where the 184.6 FPS average is likely near the B580’s ceiling for this workload, given the CPU’s high 3dmark scores.

Q: What is the performance difference between Low and High settings at 1440p?

A: At 2560x1440, Low settings produce 133.7 FPS, while High settings yield 89.3 FPS, a difference of 44.4 FPS in favor of Low.

Q: Does the combo rank higher or lower than the median tested configuration?

A: The combo ranks 1354 out of 1741 tested combos, placing it in the lower-middle tier of all configurations evaluated for Downfall.

Q: How does the Arc B580 compare to its nearest rival in average benchmark score?

A: The Arc B580’s average benchmark score is 23021, which is 0.7% lower than the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060’s score of 23181.

Settings Recommendations

The measured data suggests that High settings offer the best balance of visual quality and performance for most users. At 1080p High, the combo achieves 121.2 FPS, which is well above the 60 FPS threshold for smooth gameplay. At 1440p High, the average drops to 89.3 FPS, still comfortably playable, while 4K High yields 56.3 FPS—borderline for a horror title where frame pacing matters less than atmosphere. Medium settings provide a modest uplift over High: 149.9 FPS at 1080p, 106.5 FPS at 1440p, and 67.1 FPS at 4K. The jump from High to Medium is 28.7 FPS at 1080p, 17.2 FPS at 1440p, and 10.8 FPS at 4K, suggesting diminishing returns at higher resolutions.

Ultra settings are difficult to recommend based on the data. At 1080p, Ultra delivers 77.2 FPS, which is still playable but represents a 36.3% drop from High. At 1440p, Ultra falls to 55.9 FPS, dipping below the ideal 60 FPS mark. At 4K, Ultra is effectively unplayable at 31.6 FPS. Low settings, while providing the highest frame rates (184.6 FPS at 1080p, 133.7 FPS at 1440p, 80.7 FPS at 4K), sacrifice visual detail that is critical for a horror game’s atmosphere. The sweet spot is High at 1080p or 1440p, where the B580’s 12 GB memory and 427.2 GTexel/s texture rate are utilized without overwhelming the render pipeline.

How This Combo Ranks

The combo’s rank of 1354 out of 1741 tested combinations places it in the 22nd percentile of all configurations evaluated for Downfall. This is a low position, indicating that the pairing does not excel in this specific title. The GPU’s percentileVsAllGpus of 66 shows that the Arc B580 is a mid-range graphics card, but its performance in Downfall is hampered by the game’s demands. The CPU’s percentileVsAllCpus of 93 suggests that the i7-13700K is a high-end processor, yet the combo’s overall rank is dragged down by the GPU’s limitations at higher settings.

The nearest rival data for the CPU shows it is tightly clustered with its peers: the i7-13700KF is 0.1% faster, the AMD EPYC 4364P is 0.3% slower, and the Intel Core i9-12900F is 0.4% slower. This indicates the CPU is not the source of the combo’s low rank. For the GPU, the Arc B580 sits between the AMD Radeon 760M (0.1% faster) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (0.7% faster), with the RTX 4060 Mobile 1.3% slower. These narrow deltas suggest that the B580 is competitive with its direct rivals, but in Downfall specifically, the measured FPS at High and Ultra settings falls short of what one might expect from a card with 2560 shading units.

CPU Role

The Intel Core i7-13700K is a 16-core, 24-thread processor based on the Raptor Lake architecture, built on Intel’s 10 nm process. It features a base clock of 3.40 GHz and a boost clock of 5.40 GHz, with a 30 MB shared L3 cache and 2 MB per-core L2 cache. In Downfall, the CPU’s role is to maintain frame pacing and handle game logic, but the measured FPS data suggests it is rarely the bottleneck. At 1080p Low, the 184.6 FPS average is likely near the GPU’s limit, as evidenced by the B580’s passmark_directx_11 score of 128 and 3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12 score of 3068.

The CPU’s benchmark scores support its capability: a cinebench_r23_multicore score of 39000 and a geekbench_singlecore score of 2850 indicate strong single-thread and multi-thread performance. However, in Downfall, the scaling from 1080p to 4K shows that the GPU is the limiting component at all settings above Low. The CPU’s 125 W TDP and 10 nm process node are adequate for sustained gaming loads, but the data shows no evidence of CPU-induced frame rate caps. The 3dmark_16_threads score of 10717 and 3dmark_2_threads score of 2262 suggest that even lightly threaded game engines are well-served by this processor. The i7-13700K’s 5.40 GHz boost clock is particularly relevant for horror games, which often rely on single-threaded scripting, but the FPS figures indicate that the Arc B580’s rendering throughput is the decisive factor in this pairing.

Hardware Specifications

Intel Core i7-13700K

Cores / Threads 16 / 24
Base Clock 3400 MHz
Boost Clock 5400 MHz
TDP 125W
Socket Intel Socket 1700
View Full CPU Details →

Intel Arc B580

VRAM 12 GB GDDR6
Base Clock
Boost Clock 2670 MHz MHz
TDP 190 WW
View Full GPU Details →

FPS Benchmarks by Resolution & Settings

Performance data for Intel Core i7-13700K + Intel Arc B580 in Downfall

Resolution Settings Avg FPS
3840x2160 Low 80.7
3840x2160 Medium 67.1
3840x2160 High 56.3
3840x2160 Ultra 31.6
2560x1440 Low 133.7
2560x1440 Medium 106.5
2560x1440 High 89.3
2560x1440 Ultra 55.9
1920x1080 Low 184.6
1920x1080 Medium 149.9
1920x1080 High 121.2
1920x1080 Ultra 77.2

Downfall with ii7-13700K + Other GPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same CPU but different graphics cards.

Downfall with Arc B580 + Other CPUs

See how Downfall performs with the same GPU but different processors.

Other Games with ii7-13700K + Arc B580

Explore FPS benchmarks for other games using this same hardware combination.