AMD

AMD EPYC 7F52

AMD processor specifications and benchmark scores

16
Cores
32
Threads
3.9
GHz Boost
240W
TDP
๐Ÿ›ก๏ธECC Memory

AMD EPYC 7F52 Specifications

โš™๏ธ

EPYC 7F52 Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The AMD EPYC 7F52 features 16 physical cores and 32 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
16
Threads
32
SMP CPUs
2
โฑ๏ธ

EPYC 7F52 Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in EPYC 7F52 benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The EPYC 7F52 by AMD can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
3.5 GHz
Boost Clock
3.9 GHz
Multiplier
35x
๐Ÿ’พ

AMD's EPYC 7F52 Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the EPYC 7F52 processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The EPYC 7F52's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
96 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
512 KB (per core)
L3 Cache
256 MB (shared)
๐Ÿ—๏ธ

Zen 2 Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The AMD EPYC 7F52 is built on AMD's 7 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in EPYC 7F52 incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
Zen 2
Codename
Rome
Process Node
7 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Transistors
3,800 million
Die Size
74 mmยฒ
Generation
EPYC (Zen 2 (Rome))
๐Ÿ”ข

Zen 2 Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The EPYC 7F52 by AMD supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4A
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AES
AVX
AVX2
BMI1
BMI2
SHA
F16C
FMA3
AMD64
AMD-V
SMAP
SMEP
SMT
Precision Boost 2
XFR 2
๐Ÿ”Œ

EPYC 7F52 Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The AMD EPYC 7F52 has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 240W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
240W
๐Ÿ”ง

AMD Socket SP3 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The EPYC 7F52 uses the AMD Socket SP3 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
AMD Socket SP3
PCIe
Gen 4
Package
FCLGA-4094
DDR5

AMD Socket SP3 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the EPYC 7F52 define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the EPYC 7F52 determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Type
DDR4
Memory Bus
Eight-channel
Memory Bandwidth
204.8 GB/s
ECC Memory
Supported
๐Ÿ“ฆ

EPYC 7F52 Product Information

Release and pricing details

The AMD EPYC 7F52 is manufactured by AMD and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the EPYC 7F52 by AMD offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within AMD's product lineup.

Manufacturer
AMD
Release Date
Apr 2020
Market
Server/Workstation
Status
Active
Part Number
100-000000140100-000000140WOF

EPYC 7F52 Benchmark Scores

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource

Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how AMD EPYC 7F52 performs in parallel rendering workloads like video production and 3D animation. The R15 version remains useful for comparing against older hardware benchmarks. Higher scores directly correlate with faster render times in Cinema 4D and similar 3D applications.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore #177 of 1788
3,540
24%
Max: 14,978
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how AMD EPYC 7F52 handles tasks that can't be parallelized across multiple cores. Games and many desktop applications still rely heavily on single-thread performance. A higher single-core score means snappier system responsiveness in everyday use.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore #177 of 1245
499
24%
Max: 2,114

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource

Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on AMD EPYC 7F52. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore #177 of 1788
14,751
24%
Max: 62,412
Compare with other CPUs

๐Ÿ† Top 5 Performers

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of AMD EPYC 7F52. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore #177 of 1784
2,082
24%
Max: 8,811
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource

Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of AMD EPYC 7F52 after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore #177 of 1788
35,123
24%
Max: 148,601
Compare with other CPUs

๐Ÿ† Top 5 Performers

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how AMD EPYC 7F52 maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore #177 of 1788
4,958
24%
Max: 20,979
Compare with other CPUs

About AMD EPYC 7F52

AMD EPYC 7F52: Core and Thread Configuration

The AMD EPYC 7F52 leverages a 16-core, 32-thread configuration to deliver aggressive multi-threaded performance, positioning it as a specialized solution for workloads demanding high parallelism. Built on the Zen 2 (Rome) architecture, this CPU uses simultaneous multithreading (SMT) to double its thread count, enabling efficient handling of virtualization, cloud computing, and dense server environments. With 16 cores, the EPYC 7F52 excels in applications requiring scalable thread throughput, such as containerized microservices or rendering pipelines, where raw concurrency outweighs raw single-threaded speed. Its core density outpaces many consumer-grade processors, offering server-grade efficiency while maintaining compatibility with the broader EPYC ecosystem. The chipโ€™s design prioritizes density over traditional consumer CPU philosophies, making it ideal for scenarios where core count directly translates to faster task completion. By avoiding hyperthreading compromises seen in some rivals, AMD ensures consistent per-core performance across sustained workloads. This balance of core count and architectural efficiency makes the EPYC 7F52 a compelling choice for developers and IT professionals managing threaded-heavy applications.

Clock Speeds and Performance Dynamics

Operating at a base clock of 3.50 GHz and boosting up to 3.90 GHz, the EPYC 7F52 strikes a rare equilibrium between sustained workload stability and burst performance. These clocks, unusually high for a server CPU with 16 cores, allow the processor to maintain competitiveness in lightly threaded tasks while excelling in multi-core scenarios. The 400 MHz headroom between base and turbo speeds ensures responsive scaling under variable workloads, critical for hybrid environments running both latency-sensitive and throughput-oriented applications. This clock flexibility pairs with Zen 2โ€™s 15% IPC improvement over its predecessor, amplifying single-threaded efficiency despite the server-centric focus. Benchmarks like Cinebench R23 single-core (4,958 points) highlight its ability to rival desktop CPUs in per-core throughput, a rarity in its class. The absence of aggressive clock tapering under load common in high-core-count parts keeps thermal and power headroom usable for sustained compute cycles. For users prioritizing predictable clock behavior, the EPYC 7F52โ€™s design minimizes the โ€œturbo lotteryโ€ often seen in consumer chips, offering deterministic performance in mission-critical settings.

Thermal and Memory Architecture

With a 240W TDP, the EPYC 7F52 demands robust cooling infrastructure, reflecting its high-performance server-oriented design. The Socket SP3 platform enables dual-socket configurations and PCIe 4.0 connectivity, future-proofing systems for high-bandwidth peripherals while maintaining backward compatibility with PCIe 3.0 hardware. Its thermal envelope aligns with datacenter cooling standards, requiring enterprise-grade airflow or liquid cooling to maintain optimal operating temperatures under load. The CPUโ€™s 8-channel DDR4 memory controller supports ECC RAM, crucial for error-resilient compute clusters handling financial transactions or scientific simulations. While the exact memory speed isnโ€™t specified in the provided data, EPYCโ€™s Rome generation typically supports DDR4-3200, providing ample bandwidth to feed its 256MB L3 cache a critical factor in reducing latency for large datasets. This cache size, combined with the memory subsystem, minimizes bottlenecks in virtualization and in-memory databases, where data locality and access speed are paramount. The thermal design, though power-hungry, ensures consistent performance across its 16 cores without throttling compromises in well-cooled systems.

Use Cases and Application Optimization

Benchmark data, including a Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 35,123 points, underscores the EPYC 7F52โ€™s dominance in heavily threaded creative workflows and compute-intensive tasks. Its architecture shines in video encoding, 3D rendering, and machine learning training phases where core count and cache hierarchy outweigh single-threaded prowess. The CPUโ€™s 256MB L3 cache also benefits latency-sensitive applications like real-time analytics or game servers, where quick data retrieval across threads is critical. Enterprise environments leveraging KVM or VMware virtualization benefit from the core density and memory bandwidth, enabling higher VM density per host without resource contention. While its clocks arenโ€™t extreme by gaming CPU standards, the 7F52โ€™s single-core performance (Cinebench R20: 2,082 points) makes it viable for hybrid workloads combining compute tasks with light gaming or simulation. The EPYC 7F52โ€™s sweet spot lies in scenarios where its 16 cores can saturate without bottlenecking, such as CI/CD pipelines or physics-based simulations in HPC clusters. For users seeking a server CPU blending throughput and responsiveness, AMDโ€™s EPYC 7F52 remains a benchmark for 7nm-era datacenter hardware.

The Intel Equivalent of EPYC 7F52

Looking for a similar processor from Intel? The Intel Core i5-10400H offers comparable performance and features in the Intel lineup.

Intel Core i5-10400H

Intel โ€ข 4 Cores

View Specs Compare

Popular AMD EPYC 7F52 Comparisons

See how the EPYC 7F52 stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare EPYC 7F52 with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs