INTEL

Intel Core Ultra 5 235H

Intel processor specifications and benchmark scores

14
Cores
14
Threads
5
GHz Boost
28W
TDP
Integrated GPU NPU

At a Glance

Intel
Cores / Threads 14C / 14T
Boost Clock 5 GHz
Base Clock 2.4 GHz
L3 Cache 18 MB (shared)
TDP 28W
Architecture Arrow Lake
Socket Intel BGA 2049
nm
Process 3 nm
Released Jan 2025

Intel Core Ultra 5 235H Specifications

Core Ultra 5 235H Core Configuration

Processing cores and threading

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H features 14 physical cores and 14 threads, which directly impacts multi-threaded performance in CPU benchmarks. More cores allow the processor to handle parallel workloads efficiently, improving performance in video editing, 3D rendering, and multitasking scenarios. Thread count determines how many simultaneous tasks the CPU can process, with higher thread counts benefiting productivity applications and content creation workflows.

Cores
14
Threads
14
Hybrid Cores
P-Cores: 4 E-Cores: 10
SMP CPUs
1

Ultra 5 235H Clock Speeds

Base and boost frequencies

Clock speed is a critical factor in Core Ultra 5 235H benchmark performance, measured in GHz. The base clock represents the guaranteed operating frequency, while the boost clock indicates maximum single-core performance under optimal conditions. Higher clock speeds translate to faster single-threaded performance, which is essential for gaming and applications that don't fully utilize multiple cores. The Core Ultra 5 235H by Intel can dynamically adjust its frequency based on workload and thermal headroom.

Base Clock
2.4 GHz
Boost Clock
5 GHz
E-Core Frequency
1800 MHz up to 4.4 GHz
Multiplier
24x

Intel's Core Ultra 5 235H Cache Hierarchy

L1, L2, L3 cache sizes

Cache memory is ultra-fast storage built directly into the Ultra 5 235H processor die. L1 cache provides the fastest access for frequently used data, while L2 and L3 caches offer progressively larger storage with slightly higher latency. Larger cache sizes significantly improve CPU benchmark scores by reducing memory access times. The Core Ultra 5 235H's cache configuration is optimized for both gaming performance and productivity workloads, minimizing data fetch delays during intensive computations.

L1 Cache
192 KB (per core)
L2 Cache
3 MB (per core)
L3 Cache
18 MB (shared)

Arrow Lake Architecture & Process

Manufacturing and design details

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H is built on Intel's 3 nm manufacturing process, which determines power efficiency and thermal characteristics. Smaller process nodes allow for more transistors in the same space, enabling higher performance per watt. The architecture defines how the processor handles instructions and manages data flow, directly impacting benchmark results across different workload types. Modern CPU architectures like the one in Ultra 5 235H incorporate advanced branch prediction and out-of-order execution for optimal performance.

Architecture
Arrow Lake
Codename
Arrow Lake-H
Process Node
3 nm
Foundry
TSMC
Generation
Ultra 5 (Arrow Lake-H)

Arrow Lake Instruction Set Features

Supported CPU instructions and extensions

The Core Ultra 5 235H by Intel supports various instruction set extensions that enable optimized performance for specific workloads. SIMD instructions like SSE and AVX accelerate multimedia, scientific computing, and AI workloads by processing multiple data points simultaneously. Features like AES-NI provide hardware-accelerated encryption, while AVX-512 (if supported) enables advanced vector processing for data centers and high-performance computing. These instruction sets are critical for software compatibility and performance in modern applications.

MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
SSSE3
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AVX
AVX2
AVX-VNNI
FMA3
SHA
AES-NI
F16C
BMI1
BMI2
Intel 64
VT-x
VT-d
TXT
Thread Director
AI Boost

Ultra 5 235H Power & Thermal

TDP and power specifications

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H has a TDP (Thermal Design Power) of 28W, indicating the cooling solution required for sustained operation. TDP affects both system power consumption and the type of cooler needed. Lower TDP processors are ideal for compact builds and laptops, while higher TDP chips typically offer better sustained performance in demanding CPU benchmarks. Understanding power requirements helps ensure your system can deliver consistent performance without thermal throttling.

TDP
28W
PL1 (Base Power)
28 W
PL2 (Turbo Power)
60 W
Tj Max
110°C

Intel BGA 2049 Platform & Socket

Compatibility information

The Core Ultra 5 235H uses the Intel BGA 2049 socket, which determines motherboard compatibility. Choosing the right platform is essential for building a system around this processor. The socket type also influences available features like PCIe lanes, memory support, and upgrade paths. When comparing CPU benchmarks, ensure you're looking at processors compatible with your existing or planned motherboard to make informed purchasing decisions.

Socket
Intel BGA 2049
Chipsets
WM880, HM870
PCIe
Gen 5, 8 Lanes(CPU only)
Package
FC-BGA
DDR5

Intel BGA 2049 Memory Support

RAM compatibility and speeds

Memory support specifications for the Ultra 5 235H define which RAM types and speeds are compatible. Faster memory can significantly improve CPU benchmark performance, especially in memory-intensive applications and gaming. The memory controller integrated into the Core Ultra 5 235H determines maximum supported speeds and channels. Dual-channel or quad-channel memory configurations can double or quadruple memory bandwidth, providing noticeable performance gains in content creation and scientific workloads.

Memory Type
DDR5, LPDDR5X
Memory Bus
Dual-channel
Memory Bandwidth
102.4 GB/s

Intel's Core Ultra 5 235H Integrated Graphics

Built-in GPU specifications

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H includes integrated graphics, eliminating the need for a dedicated GPU in basic computing scenarios. Integrated graphics are ideal for office productivity, video playback, and light gaming. While not designed for demanding GPU benchmarks, the iGPU in the Ultra 5 235H provides hardware video encoding and decoding capabilities. This makes the processor suitable for compact builds, HTPCs, and systems where power efficiency is prioritized over gaming performance.

iGPU
Arc Graphics 140T
Graphics Model
Arc Graphics 140T

Core Ultra 5 235H by Intel AI & NPU

Neural processing capabilities

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H features a dedicated Neural Processing Unit (NPU) for accelerating AI and machine learning workloads. This specialized hardware offloads AI tasks from the CPU cores, improving efficiency in applications like real-time video enhancement, noise cancellation, and intelligent assistants. NPU performance is measured in TOPS (Tera Operations Per Second), with higher values indicating faster AI processing. The NPU enables on-device AI capabilities without relying on cloud services, enhancing privacy and reducing latency.

NPU
Yes / 13 TOPS

Core Ultra 5 235H Product Information

Release and pricing details

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H is manufactured by Intel and represents their commitment to delivering competitive CPU performance. Understanding the release date and pricing helps contextualize benchmark comparisons with other processors from the same generation. Launch pricing provides a baseline for evaluating value, though street prices often differ. Whether you're building a new system or upgrading, the Core Ultra 5 235H by Intel offers a specific balance of performance, features, and cost within Intel's product lineup.

Manufacturer
Intel
Release Date
Jan 2025
Market
Mobile
Status
Active
Part Number
SRQAP

Core Ultra 5 235H Benchmark Scores

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicoreSource

Cinebench R15 multi-core renders a complex 3D scene using all CPU threads simultaneously. This test reveals how Intel Core Ultra 5 235H performs in parallel rendering workloads.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_multicore #302 of 1788
2,437
16%
Max: 14,978

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R15 single-core measures the speed of one CPU thread rendering 3D geometry. This score indicates how Intel Core Ultra 5 235H handles tasks that can't be parallelized.

cinebench_cinebench_r15_singlecore #303 of 1245
343
16%
Max: 2,114

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicoreSource

Cinebench R20 multi-core uses a scene requiring 4x more computational power than R15. This test better reflects modern CPU capabilities for professional rendering on Intel Core Ultra 5 235H. The more demanding workload provides better differentiation between current-generation processors. Content creators and 3D artists use this benchmark to estimate real-world render performance.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_multicore #302 of 1788
10,155
16%
Max: 62,412
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R20 single-core tests one thread against a more demanding scene than R15. This reveals the true single-thread rendering capability of Intel Core Ultra 5 235H. The increased complexity provides more accurate performance differentiation between modern CPUs. Single-thread performance remains critical for gaming and applications with serial bottlenecks.

cinebench_cinebench_r20_singlecore #302 of 1784
1,433
16%
Max: 8,811

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicoreSource

Cinebench R23 multi-core is the current standard for CPU rendering benchmarks with a 10-minute minimum runtime. This extended test reveals sustained performance of Intel Core Ultra 5 235H after thermal limits kick in. The longer duration exposes cooling limitations that shorter benchmarks miss. Professional users rely on R23 scores to predict real-world rendering performance under sustained workloads.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_multicore #302 of 1788
24,180
16%
Max: 148,601
Compare with other CPUs

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecoreSource

Cinebench R23 single-core measures sustained single-thread performance over 10 minutes. This reveals how Intel Core Ultra 5 235H maintains boost clocks under continuous load. The extended runtime shows whether thermal throttling affects single-core performance. This score is particularly important for understanding real-world responsiveness beyond initial boost behavior.

cinebench_cinebench_r23_singlecore #302 of 1788
3,413
16%
Max: 20,979

passmark_data_compressionSource

Data compression measures how fast Intel Core Ultra 5 235H can compress and decompress files. This is important for archiving, backup software, and file transfer applications. Higher scores mean faster ZIP, RAR, and backup operations. Software distribution and cloud storage services benefit from efficient compression performance.

passmark_data_compression #291 of 528
276,729
5%
Max: 5,427,555
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
5,427,555
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
4,680,013
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
4,517,407
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
3,929,890

passmark_data_encryptionSource

Data encryption tests how fast Intel Core Ultra 5 235H can encrypt information using AES and other algorithms. This is critical for security applications, VPNs, and secure communications. Modern CPUs with AES-NI hardware acceleration score significantly higher.

passmark_data_encryption #183 of 528
21,757
7%
Max: 316,606
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
316,606
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
296,808
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
284,927
#4 AMD EPYC 9754
231,891
#5 AMD EPYC 9745
229,447

passmark_extended_instructionsSource

Extended instructions tests Intel Core Ultra 5 235H performance using SSE and AVX instruction sets. These specialized instructions accelerate multimedia, scientific, and AI workloads. Video encoding and image processing heavily utilize SIMD capabilities. Machine learning inference and scientific computing also benefit from strong SIMD performance.

passmark_extended_instructions #240 of 528
21,159
5%
Max: 392,159
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
392,159
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
314,798
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
303,321
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
280,477

passmark_find_prime_numbersSource

Find prime numbers tests Intel Core Ultra 5 235H ability to identify primes through intensive calculations. This is a pure computational benchmark that stresses CPU arithmetic units without memory bottlenecks.

passmark_find_prime_numbers #114 of 528
244
10%
Max: 2,422

passmark_floating_point_mathSource

Floating point math measures how Intel Core Ultra 5 235H handles decimal calculations critical for scientific computing and 3D rendering. This affects performance in CAD and physics simulations. Game physics engines also rely heavily on floating point operations. Scientific and engineering applications benefit significantly from higher floating point scores.

passmark_floating_point_math #143 of 528
90,304
8%
Max: 1,141,430
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,141,430
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
978,377
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
922,900
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
761,219
#5 AMD EPYC 9655P
710,260

passmark_integer_mathSource

Integer math tests how fast Intel Core Ultra 5 235H processes whole number calculations essential for database operations and compression algorithms. This is fundamental to general computing performance. Encryption and data processing heavily rely on integer operations.

passmark_integer_math #320 of 528
71,248
4%
Max: 1,806,439
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
1,806,439
#2 AMD EPYC 9845
1,687,531
#3 AMD EPYC 9755
1,549,946
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
1,224,315

passmark_multithreadSource

PassMark multi-thread tests Intel Core Ultra 5 235H across integer math, floating point, compression, and encryption using all cores. This provides an overall multi-threaded CPU performance score. The combined result reflects general-purpose parallel computing capability.

passmark_multithread #213 of 528
28,448
16%
Max: 174,825
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_physicsSource

Physics tests how Intel Core Ultra 5 235H handles physics simulations used in games and engineering software. This measures performance in calculating object interactions and movements. Games with complex physics benefit from higher scores. Engineering applications like structural analysis and fluid dynamics also rely on physics computation.

passmark_physics #165 of 528
2,027
7%
Max: 27,806
Compare with other CPUs

passmark_random_string_sortingSource

Random string sorting measures how fast Intel Core Ultra 5 235H can organize text data. This is important for database operations, search indexing, and data processing applications. Applications that process large amounts of text benefit from higher scores. Database servers and search engines rely heavily on efficient string manipulation.

passmark_random_string_sorting #257 of 528
33,467
5%
Max: 609,901
Compare with other CPUs

Top 5 Performers

#1 AMD EPYC 9965
609,901
#2 AMD EPYC 9755
571,185
#3 AMD EPYC 9845
538,060
#4 AMD EPYC 9745
468,975
#5 AMD EPYC 9655P
455,310

passmark_single_threadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of Intel Core Ultra 5 235H across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications.

passmark_single_thread #58 of 528
4,361
86%
Max: 5,097

passmark_singlethreadSource

PassMark single-thread measures per-core performance of Intel Core Ultra 5 235H across various computational tasks. This score is critical for gaming and single-threaded applications. Higher scores mean better system responsiveness in everyday use.

passmark_singlethread #58 of 528
4,361
86%
Max: 5,097

About Intel Core Ultra 5 235H

The Intel Core Ultra 5 235H is a 14-core, 14-thread mobile processor from the Core Ultra Series 2 family, built on Intel's Arrow Lake architecture (codename Arrow Lake-H) and fabricated by TSMC on a 3 nm process node. It runs from a 2.40 GHz base clock up to a 5.00 GHz boost clock within a 28 W TDP envelope, and it integrates an Arc Graphics 140T GPU. The chip is soldered to the Intel BGA 2049 socket, placing it firmly in the mobile segment with no upgrade path. Its average benchmark score of 35063 lands it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs in the database, and its cache hierarchy consists of 192 KB of L1 per core, 3 MB of L2 per core, and 18 MB of shared L3.

Benchmark Performance

The Core Ultra 5 235H posts an average benchmark score of 35063, which places it at the 89th percentile of all CPUs tracked. That percentile figure tells the story: this is a well-above-average mobile chip, but it is not at the very top of the performance hierarchy. The nearest rivals in the database are separated by less than one percentage point in either direction, making the 235H a tightly competitive part in its class.

In Cinebench R23, the multicore score is 24180, while the single-core score is 3413. The R20 run shows 10155 multicore and 1433 single-core, and R15 shows 2437 multicore and 343 single-core. The R23 multicore figure is particularly strong for a 28 W mobile part; it indicates that the chip can sustain heavy all-core workloads without collapsing under thermal pressure, which is consistent with the low TDP class. The single-core R23 score of 3413 is equally notable — a figure that would have been flagship-level just a few generations ago, now available in a thin-and-light power envelope.

Passmark results reinforce the same picture. The multithread score is 28448, and the single-thread score is 4361. Data compression scores 276729, data encryption scores 21757, and extended instructions scores 21159. Floating-point math comes in at 90304, integer math at 71248, physics at 2027, random string sorting at 33467, and find prime numbers at 244. The gap between multithread and single-thread Passmark scores — 28448 versus 4361 — is a ratio of roughly 6.5:1, which is what you would expect from a 14-core part without simultaneous multithreading.

Compared to its nearest rivals, the 235H is 0.3% ahead of the Intel Core i7-13700HX, which averages 34960. It trails the Intel Core i5-13600T by 0.5% (average 35256), the Intel Core i9-12900HX by 0.6% (average 35289), and the Intel Core i5-14400 by 0.8% (average 35336). These deltas are tiny — well within run-to-run variance for most benchmarks — so the practical takeaway is that the 235H trades blows with all four rivals, and the ranking among them is effectively a statistical tie. The consistency of the Cinebench multicore ratios across R15, R20, and R23 — each hovering around 7.1:1 against the single-core result — indicates predictable scaling with thread count and no severe throttling as the workload extends.

Power and Thermals

The 235H is rated at a 28 W TDP. That is a low-power mobile class, typical of ultrabooks and thin-and-light laptops rather than thick gaming machines. The 3 nm TSMC process node helps keep power draw in check while still allowing a 5.00 GHz boost clock. The combination of a 28 W envelope and a 3 nm process means a modest cooling solution should suffice — a thin heatpipe or a small vapor chamber paired with a single fan is likely adequate for sustained workloads.

Because the chip is soldered to the board via Intel BGA 2049, there is no aftermarket cooler upgrade path. The thermal solution is whatever the OEM integrates into the laptop chassis. That said, the 28 W TDP class means the chip will not demand exotic cooling, and the data shows it can sustain high multicore scores — the R23 multicore figure of 24180 is evidence that the thermal design holds up under load. The locked multiplier further reinforces the intended use case: this is a chip designed to run within its specified envelope, not to be pushed beyond it.

How It Compares

Intel Core i7-13700HX: The 235H edges out the 13700HX by 0.3% in average benchmark score (35063 versus 34960). The 13700HX is an older HX-series part, so the fact that a 28 W Ultra 5 can match or slightly exceed it speaks to the efficiency gains of the newer Arrow Lake architecture and the 3 nm process. In practice, the two chips will feel identical in most workloads, but the 235H achieves parity at a fraction of the power budget.

Intel Core i5-13600T: The 235H trails the 13600T by 0.5% (35063 versus 35256). The 13600T is a desktop part with a low TDP, so this comparison pits a mobile chip against a desktop chip with similar power limits. The 0.5% gap is negligible; the 235H holds its own against a desktop rival, which is a strong result for a mobile processor and suggests that the efficiency of the 3 nm node largely closes the gap between form factors.

Intel Core i9-12900HX: The 235H is 0.6% behind the 12900HX (35063 versus 35289). The 12900HX is a previous-generation flagship HX part with a much higher power budget, so the fact that the 235H comes within 0.6% of it — while using a fraction of the power — is a significant efficiency story. The 12900HX may edge ahead in raw throughput, but the 235H delivers comparable performance in a far thinner chassis.

Intel Core i5-14400: The 235H trails the 14400 by 0.8% (35063 versus 35336). The 14400 is a current desktop mid-range part, and again the mobile chip is within a single percentage point. This is the largest gap among the four rivals, but 0.8% is still within the noise for most real-world applications. The comparison demonstrates that the 235H can hang with desktop parts from the same era, which is a meaningful accomplishment for a 28 W mobile chip.

Who Should Consider It

The benchmark data points to a mobile chip that handles a broad range of workloads. The R23 multicore score of 24180 and the Passmark multithread score of 28448 indicate strong all-core performance for content creation tasks — video encoding, 3D rendering, and batch photo processing will all run comfortably. The single-core R23 score of 3413 and Passmark single-thread score of 4361 mean that everyday productivity, web browsing, and office applications will feel responsive.

For gaming, the integrated Arc Graphics

The AMD Equivalent of Core Ultra 5 235H

Looking for a similar processor from AMD? The AMD Ryzen 5 7400F offers comparable performance and features in the AMD lineup.

AMD Ryzen 5 7400F

AMD • 6 Cores

View Specs Compare

Popular Intel Core Ultra 5 235H Comparisons

See how the Core Ultra 5 235H stacks up against similar processors from the same generation and competing brands.

Compare Core Ultra 5 235H with Other CPUs

Select another CPU to compare specifications and benchmarks side-by-side.

Browse CPUs