AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 vs AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS Comparison

FAQ

Q: What are the core and thread counts for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads.

Q: What is the process node for both chips?

A: Both processors are built on a 4 nm process at TSMC.

Q: How much L3 cache does each processor have?

A: The P132 has 4 MB of L3 cache, while the 8845HS has 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Q: What are the base and boost clock speeds?

A: The P132 runs at a base clock of 2.00 GHz and boosts up to 4.50 GHz. The 8845HS runs at a base clock of 3.80 GHz and boosts up to 5.10 GHz.

Q: Which integrated GPU does each processor use?

A: The P132 uses the Radeon 840M, and the 8845HS uses the Radeon 780M.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the P132 and the 8845HS support ECC memory.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations, which explains the performance and feature gaps. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 is based on Gorgon Point, using a hybrid Zen 5 / Zen 5c core arrangement. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses the older Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename.

The P132 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. That is a 2-core and 4-thread advantage for the 8845HS. Clock speeds also favor the 8845HS: it starts at a 3.80 GHz base and reaches a 5.10 GHz boost, whereas the P132 starts at 2.00 GHz and boosts to 4.50 GHz.

Cache hierarchies differ substantially. The P132 uses 80 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 4 MB of L3 total. The 8845HS uses 64 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, but its L3 jumps to 16 MB shared. That larger shared cache gives the 8845HS a notable advantage in workloads that benefit from frequent data reuse across cores.

Both chips are fabricated on TSMC's 4 nm node, so the process technology is identical. The 8845HS has published transistor and die details: 25,000 million transistors on a 178 mm² die. The P132 does not have those figures in the database.

Memory support is another point of differentiation. The P132 supports both DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the 8845HS lists only DDR5. Both run dual-channel memory with a peak bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. PCIe connectivity also differs: the P132 provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes (CPU only), while the 8845HS provides Gen 4 with 20 lanes (CPU only). That extra PCIe bandwidth on the 8845HS could matter for add-in cards or high-speed storage.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The P132 carries the Radeon 840M, while the 8845HS carries the Radeon 780M. The database does not include detailed GPU benchmark numbers, but the model names indicate a generational shift.

Power targets separate the two clearly. The P132 is rated at 28 W TDP, while the 8845HS is rated at 45 W TDP. That 17 W difference reflects the 8845HS's higher core count, higher clocks, and larger L3 cache. Both use the same AMD Socket FP8, and both are unlocked multipliers.

Release timing also differs. The 8845HS entered production in April 2024, while the P132 is dated March 2026. Both are marked as active in production status and target the mobile market segment.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains a full benchmark suite for the P132, but the 8845HS has no recorded benchmark scores in the available data. Because of that, direct head-to-head comparisons against the 8845HS cannot be made from measured results. However, the P132's absolute scores and its position relative to other CPUs provide context for what the 8845HS would need to beat.

The P132 achieves a Passmark single-thread score of 3713. That is a strong result for a 6-core mobile part. Its multithread score is 19262. The average benchmark score across all tests is 37804, placing the P132 in the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Looking at the P132's nearest rivals, the performance cluster is tight. The Intel Core 5 211E scores 37829, which is 0.1% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 37762, 0.1% lower. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904, 0.3% higher. The Intel Core i9-14901E scores 37911, also 0.3% higher. These deltas are small, meaning the P132 sits in a very competitive performance band.

Specific P132 benchmark scores include 230437 for data compression, 11444 for data encryption, 16520 for extended instructions, 57 for finding prime numbers, 42248 for floating point math, 62249 for integer math, 1022 for physics, and 25181 for random string sorting. These numbers indicate a processor that handles both integer and floating-point workloads with similar competence.

The lack of benchmark data for the 8845HS means no direct score comparisons are possible. The 8845HS has a 50th percentile ranking, which suggests it sits near the median of the database, but that ranking is not backed by any specific test scores in this record. Without measured results, any quantitative comparison between the two chips would be speculative.

The Verdict

From the available data, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 is the better-documented and more thoroughly benchmarked processor. It has a full set of Passmark scores and a clear percentile rank of 86. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS lacks benchmark measurements entirely, so its performance cannot be verified against the P132.

The 8845HS has structural advantages on paper. It offers more cores, more threads, higher clocks, and more L3 cache. Those specifications should translate to better multithreaded throughput in theory. But the database does not confirm that with any test results.

The P132 counters with a newer architecture (Zen 5 / Zen 5c versus Zen 4), a lower TDP of 28 W versus 45 W, and support for LPDDR5X memory. Its single-thread score of 3713 and multithread score of 19262 are concrete numbers that buyers can rely on.

For users who need verified performance, the P132 is the only chip with data to support a decision. For users who prioritize raw core count and cache size, the 8845HS may be attractive, but its lack of benchmark scores leaves its real-world performance unproven in this database.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in several key specification fields. The P132 has 6 cores and 12 threads, while the 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. Base clock speeds are 2.00 GHz for the P132 and 3.80 GHz for the 8845HS. Boost clocks are 4.50 GHz and 5.10 GHz, respectively.

TDP ratings differ by 17 W: the P132 draws 28 W, and the 8845HS draws 45 W. Both use AMD Socket FP8, but the codenames differ: Gorgon Point for the P132 and Hawk Point for the 8845HS. The architecture is Zen 5 / Zen 5c for the P132 and Zen 4 for the 8845HS.

Cache configurations differ in L1 and L3. The P132 has 80 KB of L1 per core and 4 MB of L3. The 8845HS has 64 KB of L1 per core and 16 MB of shared L3. L2 cache is identical at 1 MB per core.

Memory support is broader on the P132, which accepts DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the 8845HS supports DDR5 only. Both run dual-channel with 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. PCIe lane counts differ: 14 lanes for the P132 versus 20 lanes for the 8845HS, both Gen 4.

Integrated graphics differ: Radeon 840M on the P132 versus Radeon 780M on the 8845HS. The 8845HS has published transistor and die size figures (25,000 million transistors, 178 mm²), while the P132 does not. Release dates are also separate: the 8845HS launched in April 2024, and the P132 is dated March 2026.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 wins on power efficiency. Its 28 W TDP is substantially lower than the 8845HS's 45 W TDP, which makes it the better fit for thermally constrained or battery-powered designs. It also supports LPDDR5X memory, which can reduce power consumption further and enable more compact board layouts.

The P132 wins on single-thread performance evidence. Its Passmark single-thread score of 3713 is a strong absolute number, and the Zen 5 architecture should give it an IPC advantage over Zen 4. For lightly threaded workloads like front-end tasks, web serving, or control-plane processing, the P132's newer architecture may deliver better responsiveness per watt.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS wins on raw core and thread counts. With 8 cores and 16 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads, it has a clear structural advantage for parallel workloads. The 16 MB of shared L3 cache is four times larger than the P132's 4 MB, which helps with workloads that repeatedly access a large working set.

The 8845HS also wins on clock speeds. Its 3.80 GHz base and 5.10 GHz boost are well above the P132's 2.00 GHz base and 4.50 GHz boost. This suggests the 8845HS can sustain higher throughput in bursty workloads, assuming the 45 W TDP is acceptable.

The 8845HS wins on PCIe connectivity. Its 20 Gen 4 lanes provide more room for expansion than the P132's 14 lanes. For embedded designs that need multiple NVMe drives, 10GbE NICs, or other PCIe peripherals, that headroom is valuable.

For heavily multithreaded server-like tasks, the 8845HS's core count and cache size are the deciding factors. For efficiency-focused mobile or embedded deployments, the P132's lower TDP and newer architecture make it the practical choice. The database confirms the P132's performance with measured scores, while the 8845HS's advantages remain theoretical until benchmark data becomes available.