AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison

Where Each One Wins

The benchmark data splits cleanly by workload type. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 dominates in PassMark compute tests, while the Intel Core i5-14401E leads in Cinebench rendering workloads. Neither chip wins every category, so the choice depends on what the system will actually run.

The AMD part wins every recorded PassMark test category. Its largest margins appear in integer math (62,249 vs. no direct Intel PassMark score recorded), floating-point math (42,248), and data compression (230,437). The single-thread PassMark result of 3,713 places it in the 86th percentile of all CPUs in the database, indicating strong per-core performance for a 28 W mobile processor.

The Intel Core i5-14401E counters with Cinebench results across three versions. The R23 multi-core score of 18,161 and single-core score of 2,564 show a desktop-oriented part that sustains high clocks under rendering load. Its 60th percentile ranking is lower than the AMD chip, but the Cinebench scores come from a different benchmark suite, so direct percentile comparison is misleading.

The data suggests AMD wins bursty, mixed-instruction workloads typical of embedded AI inference and data processing. Intel wins sustained multi-threaded rendering, which matches its 65 W desktop design target. For a system that runs compression, encryption, or prime-number searches, the AMD part shows superior throughput. For 3D rendering or video encoding that scales across cores, the Intel part posts the stronger raw scores.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from fundamentally different design philosophies. AMD uses the Gorgon Point codename on a 4 nm TSMC process, pairing Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores in a mobile-focused package. Intel uses Raptor Lake-R on a 10 nm Intel process, a refresh of the Raptor Lake desktop architecture. The process node difference (4 nm vs. 10 nm) explains much of the efficiency gap: AMD runs at 28 W TDP, Intel at 65 W TDP.

Both chips have 6 cores and 12 threads, so thread-count parity is exact. Cache layouts differ significantly. AMD provides 80 KB L1 per core, 1 MB L2 per core, and only 4 MB of shared L3. Intel also has 80 KB L1 per core but increases L2 to 1.25 MB per core and offers 20 MB of shared L3. That 5x L3 advantage for Intel matters in workloads with large working sets that fit in cache.

Memory support diverges as well. AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X with dual-channel access and a measured 89.6 GB/s bandwidth. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5, also dual-channel, but the database records no bandwidth figure. Both support ECC memory, which suits embedded and workstation use.

PCIe connectivity differs: AMD provides Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes, Intel provides Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel part has twice the PCIe generation bandwidth per lane, useful for high-speed NVMe drives or discrete accelerators. Integrated graphics also differ: AMD uses Radeon 840M, Intel uses UHD Graphics 730. The database records no graphics benchmarks, so relative iGPU performance cannot be stated.

The Intel die measures 215 mm², while the AMD die size is not recorded. Socket compatibility is not interchangeable: AMD uses Socket FP8 (mobile), Intel uses Socket 1700 (desktop). Release dates differ by roughly 20 months, with Intel launching in June 2024 and AMD in March 2026.

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 suits systems that prioritize compute density per watt. Its 28 W TDP, 4 nm process, and PassMark scores in the 86th percentile indicate a part designed for embedded AI workloads where power and heat are constrained. The LPDDR5X memory support and Radeon 840M iGPU further point to a mobile or compact embedded platform.

The Intel Core i5-14401E suits systems that need sustained multi-threaded rendering performance and do not have strict power limits. Its 65 W TDP, larger L3 cache (20 MB vs. 4 MB), and Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,161 confirm a desktop-class part that can hold high clocks under load. The PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes gives it an advantage for expansion-heavy builds.

Neither chip is a clear overall winner. The AMD part wins every recorded PassMark category, but the Intel part wins every recorded Cinebench category. The choice hinges on whether the workload resembles PassMark's mixed integer/float/compression mix or Cinebench's rendering pipeline. For embedded AI, data compression, or encryption tasks, the AMD part shows superior throughput. For rendering, simulation, or any Cinebench-style workload, the Intel part leads.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores?

A: Both CPUs have exactly 6 cores and 12 threads, so there is no core-count advantage for either part.

Q: Which chip has the larger cache?

A: Intel provides 20 MB of shared L3 cache and 1.25 MB L2 per core. AMD provides 4 MB of shared L3 and 1 MB L2 per core. Intel leads in both L2 and L3 capacity.

Q: Do both processors support ECC memory?

A: Yes, both the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 and the Intel Core i5-14401E support ECC memory, which is relevant for embedded and workstation reliability.

Q: What memory types does each support?

A: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X. Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses, but only AMD has a recorded bandwidth figure of 89.6 GB/s.

Q: Which chip has better single-thread performance?

A: The AMD part records a PassMark single-thread score of 3,713. Intel does not have a PassMark single-thread score in the database, so a direct comparison is not possible. Intel does record a Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2,564, but that test is not run on the AMD part.

Q: Which processor has a higher boost clock?

A: Intel boosts to 4.70 GHz, while AMD boosts to 4.50 GHz. Intel also has a higher base clock at 2.50 GHz versus AMD's 2.00 GHz.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no overlapping benchmark tests between the two CPUs. AMD's scores come exclusively from the PassMark suite, while Intel's come exclusively from Cinebench R15, R20, and R23. This means a direct same-test comparison is impossible from the database, but the available scores still reveal distinct performance profiles.

For AMD, the standout results are data compression at 230,437, integer math at 62,249, and floating-point math at 42,248. The extended instructions score of 16,520 and random string sorting at 25,181 further indicate strong ALU and memory-access throughput. The physics score of 1,022 and prime-number finding score of 57 are lower relative to the other AMD tests, suggesting the part is less optimized for those specific instruction patterns.

For Intel, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score of 18,161 is the headline result. The R20 multi-core score of 7,627 and R15 multi-core score of 1,830 scale consistently across versions. Single-core results are 2,564 in R23, 1,076 in R20, and 258 in R15, showing a stable single-thread performance level.

The average benchmark score differs dramatically: AMD averages 37,804 across its PassMark tests, while Intel averages 5,253 across its Cinebench tests. This gap does not indicate Intel is slower; it reflects different benchmark scales. AMD's nearest rivals in the database include the Intel Core 5 211E (delta of -0.1%), AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 (delta of 0.1%), AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 (delta of -0.3%), and Intel Core i9-14901E (delta of -0.3%). Intel's nearest rivals include the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 (delta of -0.1%), Intel Core i7-11700B (delta of 0.2%), Intel Core i9-10850K (delta of 0.2%), and Intel Core i5-13400T (delta of 0.8%).

The data shows AMD sits within 0.3% of several higher-tier CPUs, including a Core i9 part, which confirms its PassMark scores are competitive with much higher-TDP desktop chips. Intel's nearest rivals are mostly older desktop parts, and its largest delta is only 0.8% against the Core i5-13400T, indicating the 14401E performs nearly identically to that previous-generation chip in Cinebench.

Specification Differences

The two CPUs differ in every major specification category except core count, thread count, L1 cache size, ECC support, and unlocked multiplier status (both are locked). The table below lists only the fields where the two parts diverge.

| Specification | AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 | Intel Core i5-14401E |

|---|---|---|

| Base clock | 2.00 GHz | 2.50 GHz |

| Boost clock | 4.50 GHz | 4.70 GHz |

| TDP | 28 W | 65 W |

| Socket | AMD Socket FP8 | Intel Socket 1700 |

| Codename | Gorgon Point | Raptor Lake-R |

| Generation | Ryzen AI Embedded (Zen 5 / Zen 5c) | Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh) |

| Process node | 4 nm (TSMC) | 10 nm (Intel) |

| Die size | Not recorded | 215 mm² |

| L2 cache | 1 MB per core | 1.25 MB per core |

| L3 cache | 4 MB | 20 MB shared |

| Memory support | DDR5, LPDDR5X | DDR4, DDR5 |

| Memory bandwidth | 89.6 GB/s | Not recorded |

| PCIe | Gen 4, 14 lanes | Gen 5, 16 lanes |

| Integrated graphics | Radeon 840M | UHD Graphics 730 |

| Market segment | Mobile | Desktop |

| Release date | March 2026 | June 2024 |

| Part number | Unknown | Q49JSRNJS |

The process node difference is the most consequential: 4 nm versus 10 nm explains the 37 W TDP gap and likely accounts for AMD's higher PassMark scores per watt. The cache difference (4 MB L3 vs. 20 MB L3) is the second most impactful divergence, favoring Intel for cache-sensitive workloads. PCIe generation difference (Gen 4 vs. Gen 5) and lane count (14 vs. 16) favor Intel for high-bandwidth peripheral connectivity. Memory flexibility favors Intel due to DDR4 support, while AMD counters with LPDDR5X support and a recorded bandwidth advantage.