AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 vs Intel Core i5-14401TE Comparison

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 and Intel Core i5-14401TE are both 6-core, 12-thread processors, but they occupy different market segments and show very different performance profiles. The AMD part is a mobile-class embedded processor built on a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel part is a 14th Gen desktop chip on Intel's 10 nm process.

The data shows the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 sits at the 86th percentile among all CPUs, with an average benchmark score of 37804. Its nearest rivals include the Intel Core 5 211E at 37829 (0.1% higher), the AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 at 37904 (0.3% higher), and the Intel Core i9-14901E at 37911 (0.3% higher). This places the P132 in solid mid-to-upper performance territory, competitive with much larger desktop parts despite its 28 W TDP.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE has a 45 W TDP and a 50th percentile ranking, but the database contains no benchmark scores for it. The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, and the wins counters show zero for both parts. This means any direct performance comparison must rely on the AMD chip's recorded results and architectural differences, not on measured Intel data.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 is the clear choice for anyone who needs a low-power, high-efficiency part with strong measured performance. The Intel Core i5-14401TE should be selected when the platform requires an LGA 1700 socket, DDR4 or DDR5 memory support, PCIe Gen 5 connectivity, and a desktop-oriented form factor. The AMD part uses Socket FP8, supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, and offers PCIe Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes.

For users who prioritize measured performance data, the AMD part has a full benchmark suite recorded. For users who prioritize platform compatibility, the Intel part offers a larger L3 cache (20 MB shared versus 4 MB), a larger L2 cache per core (1.25 MB versus 1 MB), and a larger die size (215 mm²). The AMD part counters with a much smaller process node (4 nm versus 10 nm) and a lower TDP (28 W versus 45 W).

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: Both have identical core and thread counts: 6 cores and 12 threads each.

Q: What is the clock speed difference?

A: Both processors share the same base clock of 2.00 GHz and the same boost clock of 4.50 GHz.

Q: Which CPU supports more memory types?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X, while the Intel Core i5-14401TE supports DDR4 and DDR5. The AMD part also has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s, while the Intel part has no recorded bandwidth figure in the database.

Q: How do the integrated graphics compare?

A: The AMD part uses Radeon 840M graphics, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730.

Q: Which processor has higher benchmark scores?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has an average benchmark score of 37804 and a percentile rank of 86. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no recorded benchmark scores and an average score of 0 in the database.

Q: What is the process node difference?

A: The AMD part is built on a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel part uses Intel's 10 nm process.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is manufactured by TSMC on a 4 nm process. The Intel Core i5-14401TE uses the Raptor Lake-R codename, belongs to the Raptor Lake Refresh generation, and is manufactured by Intel on a 10 nm process.

Cache structures differ significantly. Both parts have 80 KB of L1 cache per core. The AMD part has 1 MB of L2 cache per core and 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part has 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel part's larger L3 cache is a substantial advantage for workloads that benefit from larger shared cache pools.

Memory support diverges as well. The AMD part supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory. The Intel part supports DDR4 and DDR5. Both use dual-channel memory buses. The AMD part has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s; the Intel part has no bandwidth figure in the database. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe connectivity differs. The AMD part provides PCIe Gen 4 with 14 CPU lanes. The Intel part provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The Intel part's PCIe Gen 5 support and higher lane count give it an advantage for high-throughput expansion cards and storage.

Integrated graphics also differ. The AMD part uses Radeon 840M graphics. The Intel part uses UHD Graphics 730.

The die size is listed only for the Intel part at 215 mm². The AMD die size is not recorded. Both processors have locked multipliers, meaning neither supports user overclocking.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across several specification fields.

Process node: AMD uses 4 nm TSMC; Intel uses 10 nm Intel.

Socket: AMD uses Socket FP8; Intel uses Socket 1700.

TDP: AMD is rated at 28 W; Intel is rated at 45 W.

Market segment: AMD is classified as Mobile; Intel is classified as Desktop.

Die size: Intel is 215 mm²; AMD has no recorded die size.

L2 cache per core: AMD has 1 MB; Intel has 1.25 MB.

L3 cache: AMD has 4 MB; Intel has 20 MB shared.

Memory support: AMD supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X; Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5.

Memory bandwidth: AMD has 89.6 GB/s; Intel has no recorded figure.

PCIe: AMD has Gen 4 with 14 lanes; Intel has Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

Integrated graphics: AMD uses Radeon 840M; Intel uses UHD Graphics 730.

Architecture and codename: AMD uses Gorgon Point with Zen 5 / Zen 5c; Intel uses Raptor Lake-R with Raptor Lake Refresh.

Release date: AMD was released in March 2026; Intel was released in June 2024.

Part number: Intel is listed as Q4T4SRNJP; AMD's part number is unknown.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark array is empty, meaning there are no direct paired tests recorded between these two processors in the database. The wins counters show zero for both parts.

However, the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has a full suite of individual benchmark scores recorded. The Intel Core i5-14401TE has no benchmark scores at all, so a direct numeric comparison is impossible.

The AMD part's recorded scores show a strong single-thread result of 3713 and a multithread score of 19262. Its floating point math score is 42248, integer math is 62249, and extended instructions score is 16520. Data compression scores 230437, data encryption scores 11444, and random string sorting scores 25181. The find prime numbers test records 57, and physics scores 1022.

The AMD part's average benchmark score of 37804 places it at the 86th percentile of all CPUs. Its nearest rival, the Intel Core 5 211E, scores 37829, which is 0.1% higher. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 scores 37762, which is 0.1% lower. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 scores 37904, which is 0.3% higher. The Intel Core i9-14901E scores 37911, which is 0.3% higher.

These figures indicate the AMD part is essentially neck-and-neck with its nearest rivals, with deltas of only 0.1% to 0.3% in either direction. The performance clustering is tight, and the P132 does not show a meaningful advantage or disadvantage against its closest competitors.

Since the Intel Core i5-14401TE has no recorded scores, no statement can be made about its measured performance relative to the AMD part. The database simply does not contain that data.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 wins in measured performance documentation. It has a complete benchmark suite with scores ranging from single-thread performance at 3713 to data compression at 230437. Its average score of 37804 and 86th percentile ranking confirm it performs competitively against its nearest rivals, all of which are within 0.3% of its average score.

The AMD part also wins on efficiency metrics. Its 28 W TDP is substantially lower than the Intel part's 45 W TDP. Its 4 nm process node gives it a manufacturing advantage over Intel's 10 nm process. It supports LPDDR5X memory, which the Intel part does not, and it has a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s.

The Intel Core i5-14401TE wins on platform features. It supports DDR4 memory in addition to DDR5, which can be beneficial for users with existing DDR4 systems. It offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, a generation ahead of the AMD part's PCIe Gen 4 with 14 lanes. Its 20 MB shared L3 cache is five times larger than the AMD part's 4 MB L3 cache, which can benefit cache-sensitive workloads.

The Intel part also wins on desktop integration. It uses Socket 1700, a desktop socket, and is classified in the Desktop market segment. The AMD part uses Socket FP8 and is classified as Mobile. The Intel die size of 215 mm² is recorded, while the AMD die size is not.

The Intel part has a known part number (Q4T4SRNJP), while the AMD part's part number is unknown.

For users who need measured performance data, the AMD part is the only one with recorded results. For users who need PCIe Gen 5, DDR4 compatibility, or a larger L3 cache, the Intel part offers those specific features. For users who need the lowest power draw, the AMD part's 28 W TDP is the clear advantage.

The release dates differ by roughly two years, with the Intel part released in June 2024 and the AMD part released in March 2026. Both are listed as Active in production status. Neither has a recorded launch MSRP, so no pricing information is available.

Both processors have locked multipliers, so neither offers overclocking capability. Both support ECC memory. Both have dual-channel memory buses. Both have 6 cores and 12 threads. Both have 80 KB L1 cache per core. Both have identical base clocks of 2.00 GHz and boost clocks of 4.50 GHz.

The choice between these two parts ultimately depends on platform requirements. The AMD part delivers measured performance with lower power consumption on a mobile socket. The Intel part delivers desktop socket compatibility, PCIe Gen 5, DDR4 support, and a larger L3 cache, but has no recorded performance data.