AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core i5-14401E Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the Intel Core i5-14401E provides a complete set of Cinebench results, while the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no benchmark scores in the database. This asymmetry means the head-to-head comparison relies entirely on the Intel part's measured performance and the architectural specifications of both processors.

The Intel Core i5-14401E delivers a Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18161 points. Its single-core score in the same test reaches 2564 points. These results position the processor at the 60th percentile among all CPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 5253. The nearest rivals in the database confirm this performance tier: the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 scores 5259 on average, a delta of -0.1% relative to the i5-14401E. The Intel Core i7-11700B averages 5241, which is 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i9-10850K also averages 5240, again 0.2% lower. The Intel Core i5-13400T averages 5210, 0.8% lower than the i5-14401E.

In Cinebench R20, the Intel part scores 7627 multicore and 1076 single-core. In Cinebench R15, the multicore score is 1830 and the single-core score is 258. These results show a consistent scaling pattern across the three Cinebench versions, with the multicore advantage growing as the workload becomes more demanding.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no recorded benchmark scores, so its percentile ranking of 50 and average benchmark score of 0 reflect an absence of data rather than a measured performance level. The database cannot calculate head-to-head wins for either processor because the head-to-head benchmark array is empty. No direct comparison of scores is possible between these two parts at this time.

The Intel processor's percentile placement at 60 versus the AMD part's percentile at 50 suggests that, based on the database's overall distribution, the Intel part sits higher in the performance ranking. However, the AMD part's percentile is derived from no actual benchmark data, so this gap is not a measured performance difference. The Intel part's nearest rivals all fall within a narrow band from 5210 to 5259, indicating the i5-14401E occupies a dense performance cluster where small score differences separate adjacent processors.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the Intel Core i5-14401E?

A: The Intel Core i5-14401E has an average benchmark score of 5253, which places it at the 60th percentile among all CPUs in the database.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has an empty benchmarks array, an average benchmark score of 0, and a percentile of 50, meaning no measured performance data is available for this processor.

Q: How does the Intel Core i5-14401E compare to its nearest rival, the Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4?

A: The Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 has an average score of 5259, which is 0.1% higher than the Intel Core i5-14401E's average of 5253. These two processors are nearly identical in average performance.

Q: Which processor supports ECC memory?

A: Both processors support ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS and the Intel Core i5-14401E both list ECC memory as true.

Q: What is the process node for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, while the Intel Core i5-14401E uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel bus and 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Intel Core i5-14401E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory on a dual-channel bus, with no memory bandwidth figure recorded in the database.

The Verdict

The data supports distinct usage profiles for each processor, but the lack of benchmark scores for the AMD part limits direct performance conclusions. The Intel Core i5-14401E has measured Cinebench results across three versions, an average score of 5253, and a 60th percentile ranking. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no measured scores, an average of 0, and a 50th percentile.

For workloads where measured performance matters, the Intel Core i5-14401E is the only option with verified data. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18161 and single-core score of 2564 provide concrete reference points. The processor's nearest rivals all sit within 0.8% of its average score, indicating consistent performance in its tier.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS offers a different set of attributes that cannot be evaluated through benchmarks in the database. Its 8 cores and 16 threads exceed the Intel part's 6 cores and 12 threads, but without scores, the practical impact of that core advantage remains unquantified. The AMD part also features a higher boost clock of 5.10 GHz compared to 4.70 GHz on the Intel part.

The Intel Core i5-14401E is the choice for users who require documented performance data. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS is the choice for users who prioritize its architectural specifications, such as the 4 nm process node, the Radeon 780M integrated graphics, and the 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth, without needing benchmark confirmation. The database currently records zero wins for either processor in head-to-head testing because no head-to-head benchmarks exist.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every major specification category.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-14401E uses 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD part has a base clock of 3.80 GHz and a boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel part has a base clock of 2.50 GHz and a boost clock of 4.70 GHz. The AMD part has a TDP of 45 watts, while the Intel part has a TDP of 65 watts.

The AMD processor fits AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel processor fits Intel Socket 1700. The AMD part is classified as a mobile segment processor, while the Intel part is a desktop segment processor. Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports DDR5 memory only with dual-channel configuration and 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Intel Core i5-14401E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory with dual-channel configuration, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded for it. Both processors support ECC memory.

The AMD part uses PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel part uses PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The AMD processor integrates Radeon 780M graphics, while the Intel processor integrates UHD Graphics 730.

The release dates differ: the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS was released on 2024-04-01, while the Intel Core i5-14401E was released on 2024-06-30. Neither processor has a launch MSRP recorded in the database.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS belongs to the 8000 series and uses the Zen 4 architecture with the codename Hawk Point. Its generation is listed as Ryzen Embedded (Zen 4, Hawk Point). The Intel Core i5-14401E belongs to the Core 14th Gen series and uses the Raptor Lake architecture with the codename Raptor Lake-R. Its generation is listed as Core i5 (Raptor Lake Refresh).

The manufacturing processes differ substantially. The AMD part uses a 4 nm process from TSMC, with 25,000 million transistors on a die size of 178 mm². The Intel part uses a 10 nm process from Intel, with no transistor count recorded and a die size of 215 mm².

Cache layouts differ between the two processors. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i5-14401E has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1.25 MB of L2 cache per core, and 20 MB of shared L3 cache. Neither processor has a total L3 figure or 3D V-Cache listed.

The AMD part's integrated graphics, Radeon 780M, is a more capable integrated solution than the Intel UHD Graphics 730, though the database records no benchmark scores for either GPU. The AMD part's memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s is a recorded figure, while the Intel part has none. The Intel part's PCIe Gen 5 support with 16 lanes contrasts with the AMD part's PCIe Gen 4 support with 20 lanes.

The production status for both processors is listed as active. The Intel part has a part number of Q49JSRNJS, while the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Core i5-14401E wins in every category where measured data exists. Its Cinebench R23 multicore score of 18161, single-core score of 2564, R20 multicore score of 7627, single-core score of 1076, R15 multicore score of 1830, and single-core score of 258 all represent the only benchmark results in this comparison. The Intel part's average benchmark score of 5253 and 60th percentile ranking further establish it as the processor with documented performance.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS wins in specification categories that favor its design. Its 8 cores and 16 threads exceed the Intel part's 6 cores and 12 threads. Its boost clock of 5.10 GHz is higher than the Intel part's 4.70 GHz. Its TDP of 45 watts is lower than the Intel part's 65 watts, indicating a more power-efficient design. Its 4 nm process node is smaller than the Intel part's 10 nm node, and its transistor count of 25,000 million is recorded while the Intel part's transistor count is not.

The AMD part also wins on memory bandwidth with a recorded 89.6 GB/s, whereas the Intel part has no bandwidth figure. The AMD part's PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes offers more lanes than the Intel part's PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, though the Intel part supports a newer PCIe generation. The AMD part's Radeon 780M integrated graphics represents a more advanced integrated GPU than the Intel UHD Graphics 730.

For mobile or embedded deployments where power consumption and compact design matter, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS presents the stronger specification sheet. Its 45 watt TDP, mobile market segment classification, and FP8 socket align with low-power integrated systems. The Intel Core i5-14401E, with its desktop segment classification, 65 watt TDP, and Socket 1700, targets traditional desktop environments.

For users who need verified performance numbers, the Intel Core i5-14401E is the only processor with data. For users who evaluate processors on architectural merits, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS offers more cores, a higher boost clock, a smaller process node, and higher memory bandwidth. The database records no head-to-head benchmark results, so neither processor can claim a measured victory over the other.