AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core i7-14701TE Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The available benchmark data records a single-sided comparison. All recorded scores belong to the Intel Core i7-14701TE, as the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no benchmark entries in this dataset. This means no direct head-to-head scores can be cited for the AMD part. However, the Intel chip’s absolute performance can be interpreted against the rivals listed in the database.

The Intel Core i7-14701TE achieves an average benchmark score of 26013, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs in the database. Its nearest recorded rival, the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, scores 25981, which is a 0.1% delta. The Intel part is essentially tied with that chip. Against the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS, which scores 26106, the Intel part trails by 0.4%. Against the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE, the Intel part leads by 0.5%, and against the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U, it trails by 0.7%. These deltas are all within a single percentage point, indicating that the Core i7-14701TE sits in a tightly contested performance band.

Looking at the Intel chip’s individual benchmark results, the Cinebench R23 multi-core score is 17035, while the single-core score is 2405. The Cinebench R20 multi-core result is 7154 with a single-core score of 1010. Cinebench R15 multi-core is 1716, and single-core is 242. The PassMark multi-thread score is 20042, with a single-thread score of 2637. For integer math, the score is 65792, and floating point math is 50219. Data compression scores 220520, data encryption scores 11699, extended instructions score 14354, and finding prime numbers scores 143. Physics processing is 1860, and random string sorting is 22760.

These figures show a processor that is strong in multi-threaded workloads, as evidenced by the Cinebench R23 multi-core result of 17035. The single-core score of 2405 in R23 also indicates respectable per-thread performance. The PassMark data compression score of 220520 is notably high, suggesting efficient handling of compressed data streams. In contrast, the prime number finding score of 143 is relatively low, indicating that the chip does not excel in that specific integer workload. The data encryption score of 11699 and extended instructions score of 14354 show moderate capability in those specialized tasks.

Because the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no recorded benchmarks, the database cannot provide a direct comparison of wins or losses between these two specific parts. The analysis must rely on the Intel chip’s standings relative to other CPUs in the database. The Intel Core i7-14701TE outperforms the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE by 0.5% and the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340 by 0.1%, while it falls behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS by 0.4% and the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U by 0.7%. These margins are minimal, so the Intel part is effectively a peer of those chips in aggregate scoring.

Architecture Differences

The two processors are built on fundamentally different architectures. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture from the Hawk Point codename, belonging to the Ryzen Embedded generation. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process node by TSMC. The Intel Core i7-14701TE uses the Raptor Lake architecture from the Raptor Lake-R codename, belonging to the Core 14th Gen series. It is manufactured on a 10 nm process node by Intel. This process difference is significant: the AMD chip uses a more advanced node, which typically allows for higher transistor density and lower power consumption per unit of performance.

The transistor counts also differ. The AMD part has 25,000 million transistors packed into a die size of 178 mm². The Intel part has no recorded transistor count, but its die size is 257 mm². The larger die size on Intel’s older node suggests a less dense design. The AMD chip’s smaller die on a 4 nm process indicates a more compact implementation.

Cache configurations diverge substantially. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 64 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 16 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel Core i7-14701TE has 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 2 MB of L2 cache per core, and 33 MB of shared L3 cache. The Intel chip has more cache at every level, which can benefit workloads that rely on data locality.

The integrated graphics differ as well. The AMD part uses the Radeon 780M, while the Intel part uses the UHD Graphics 770. Both are integrated solutions, but they come from different vendors and architectures.

Memory support is another point of divergence. The AMD chip supports DDR5 memory only, with a dual-channel bus and a recorded memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. The Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5 memory, also with a dual-channel bus, but no memory bandwidth figure is recorded in the database. Both support ECC memory, which is notable for embedded and workstation use cases.

PCIe connectivity differs. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. The Intel Core i7-14701TE offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The Intel chip has a newer PCIe generation, which provides higher per-lane bandwidth, but the AMD chip has more lanes.

The sockets are different: AMD uses Socket FP8, while Intel uses Socket 1700. The AMD chip is classified as a mobile segment processor, while the Intel chip is classified as a desktop segment processor. The AMD part has a release date of April 1, 2024, while the Intel part has a release date of June 30, 2024. Both are currently active in production.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the Intel Core i7-14701TE?

A: The Intel Core i7-14701TE has an average benchmark score of 26013, placing it in the 78th percentile of all CPUs in the database.

Q: How does the Intel Core i7-14701TE compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The Intel chip is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI 5 340, 0.5% ahead of the AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE, 0.4% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8640HS, and 0.7% behind the AMD Ryzen 5 8540U.

Q: What is the boost clock of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has a boost clock of 5.10 GHz, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE has a boost clock of 5.20 GHz.

Q: Does the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS have any recorded benchmarks?

A: No, the database contains no benchmark entries for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS, so no scores or percentile data are available for that part.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports DDR5 only, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE supports both DDR4 and DDR5.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS is manufactured on a 4 nm process by TSMC, while the Intel Core i7-14701TE is manufactured on a 10 nm process by Intel.

Specification Differences

The two processors share several core specifications: both have 8 cores, 16 threads, a 45 W TDP, and dual-channel memory buses. Both support ECC memory and both have a locked multiplier. The key differences are as follows.

The base clock differs: the AMD part has a base clock of 3.80 GHz, while the Intel part has a base clock of 2.10 GHz. The boost clock is slightly higher on the Intel part at 5.20 GHz versus 5.10 GHz on the AMD part.

The process node and foundry differ: AMD uses 4 nm from TSMC, while Intel uses 10 nm from its own foundry. The die size is 178 mm² for AMD and 257 mm² for Intel. The transistor count is 25,000 million for AMD, with no recorded value for Intel.

Cache sizes differ at all levels. AMD has 64 KB of L1 per core, 1 MB of L2 per core, and 16 MB of shared L3. Intel has 80 KB of L1 per core, 2 MB of L2 per core, and 33 MB of shared L3.

Memory support differs: AMD supports DDR5 only, while Intel supports DDR4 and DDR5. The memory bandwidth is recorded as 89.6 GB/s for AMD, with no recorded value for Intel.

PCIe configuration differs: AMD offers Gen 4 with 20 lanes, while Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 lanes.

The integrated graphics differ: AMD uses the Radeon 780M, while Intel uses the UHD Graphics 770.

The socket differs: AMD uses Socket FP8, while Intel uses Socket 1700. The market segment differs: AMD is classified as mobile, while Intel is classified as desktop.

The release dates differ: AMD was released on April 1, 2024, and Intel was released on June 30, 2024.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the recorded data, the Intel Core i7-14701TE has all the wins in terms of measurable benchmark performance, since the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has no benchmark scores. The Intel chip’s aggregate score of 26013 and its 78th percentile ranking show that it performs competitively against other CPUs in the database, particularly those in its nearest rival group.

The Intel chip’s higher boost clock of 5.20 GHz may provide an advantage in single-threaded workloads, as indicated by its Cinebench R23 single-core score of 2405 and PassMark single-thread score of 2637. The larger L3 cache of 33 MB versus 16 MB on the AMD part can also benefit workloads with large working sets that require frequent data access.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS, despite lacking benchmarks, has architectural advantages that are recorded in the specification data. Its smaller 4 nm process node versus Intel’s 10 nm node suggests better energy efficiency per transistor. The AMD chip also has a higher base clock of 3.80 GHz versus 2.10 GHz on the Intel part, which could benefit sustained workloads that do not boost heavily. The AMD chip’s 20 PCIe Gen 4 lanes provide more total I/O bandwidth than Intel’s 16 Gen 5 lanes, though the Gen 5 standard offers higher per-lane throughput.

The AMD part’s memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s, which is a specific advantage for memory-intensive tasks. The Intel part has no recorded memory bandwidth figure, so a direct comparison cannot be made. The AMD chip’s smaller die size of 178 mm² versus 257 mm² on the Intel part may also indicate a more power-efficient design.

In terms of use cases, the Intel Core i7-14701TE is best positioned for desktop workloads that benefit from high boost clocks, large caches, and the newer PCIe Gen 5 interface. Its 78th percentile ranking and strong Cinebench scores suggest it handles multi-threaded productivity tasks well. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS, as a mobile segment processor with a 4 nm process, is suited for embedded or mobile scenarios where power efficiency is prioritized, and its ECC memory support and 20 PCIe lanes make it appropriate for reliability-focused applications. The lack of benchmark data for the AMD part means its performance cannot be quantified, but its specification-level advantages in process node and base clock are clear from the recorded data.