AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 vs Intel Core i5-110 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 and Intel Core i5-110 occupy different positions in the database, but the recorded results show a clear performance gap. The AMD part holds an 86th percentile ranking across all CPUs, while the Intel part sits at the 50th percentile. The AMD processor's average benchmark score is 37,804, whereas the Intel processor has no recorded average score, meaning the database contains no direct benchmark submissions for the Intel Core i5-110. This absence of data for the Intel chip prevents a head-to-head comparison on individual tests, but the AMD part's individual scores provide a full picture of its capabilities.

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 delivers a multi-thread score of 19,262 in PassMark, a single-thread score of 3,713, and a floating-point math score of 42,248. Its integer math result reaches 62,249, while data compression hits 230,437. Data encryption scores 11,444, extended instructions score 16,520, and prime number finding scores 57. Random string sorting produces 25,181, and physics processing yields 1,022. These numbers place the AMD chip well above the median CPU, as its 86th percentile suggests.

The Intel Core i5-110 has no benchmark entries in the database, so its performance cannot be quantified from our measurements. However, the nearest rivals for the AMD part offer context for its standing. The Intel Core 5 211E averages 37,829, which is 0.1% ahead of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132. The AMD Ryzen AI 5 PRO 435 averages 37,762, sitting 0.1% behind. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 averages 37,904, which is 0.3% ahead, and the Intel Core i9-14901E averages 37,911, also 0.3% ahead. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 therefore trades within a narrow band of less than one percent against four different rivals, indicating that its aggregate performance is highly competitive with those specific processors.

The single-thread result for the AMD part, 3,713, appears twice in the database under slightly different test names, confirming consistency in that measurement. The multi-thread score of 19,262 combined with the single-thread score of 3,713 suggests a scaling factor of roughly 5.2 across twelve threads, which is typical for a six-core, twelve-thread design with a 4.50 GHz boost clock. The floating-point and integer math scores are strong relative to the multi-thread result, indicating balanced execution units. Data compression at 230,437 is the standout score, far exceeding the other integer-heavy workloads, which suggests the processor's memory subsystem and cache hierarchy handle compression workloads particularly well.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132?

A: The average benchmark score for the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 is 37,804.

Q: Does the Intel Core i5-110 have any benchmark scores in the database?

A: No, the Intel Core i5-110 has no benchmark entries recorded. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its nearest rivals list is empty.

Q: How does the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 compare to its closest rival, the Intel Core 5 211E?

A: The Intel Core 5 211E has an average score of 37,829, which is 0.1% higher than the AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132's 37,804.

Q: What is the percentile ranking of each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 ranks in the 86th percentile of all CPUs, while the Intel Core i5-110 ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: What are the core and thread counts for both processors?

A: Both processors have 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: What is the boost clock for each processor?

A: The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 boosts to 4.50 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-110 boosts to 4.30 GHz.

Architecture Differences

The two processors come from different architectural generations and process nodes. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 uses the Gorgon Point codename and belongs to the Ryzen AI Embedded generation built on Zen 5 and Zen 5c cores. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Core i5-110 uses the Comet Lake architecture, a 14 nm design fabricated at Intel. The process node difference is substantial: 4 nm versus 14 nm, which directly affects transistor density, power efficiency, and achievable clock speeds under thermal constraints.

Cache hierarchies differ significantly. The AMD part provides 80 KB of L1 cache per core, 1 MB of L2 cache per core, and 4 MB of L3 cache. The Intel part provides 64 KB of L1 per core, 256 KB of L2 per core, and 12 MB of shared L3 cache. While the Intel chip has a larger L3 pool, the AMD chip has larger per-core L1 and L2 allocations. The AMD L3 is smaller, but the Zen 5 architecture typically relies on faster per-core caches and a more efficient memory controller. The total cache footprint favors Intel in L3, but AMD in per-core L1 and L2.

Memory support also diverges. The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 supports DDR5 and LPDDR5X memory over a dual-channel bus, delivering 89.6 GB/s of memory bandwidth. The Intel Core i5-110 supports DDR4 over a dual-channel bus, delivering 42.7 GB/s. The AMD part offers more than double the memory bandwidth, which directly impacts workloads that are sensitive to data movement, such as compression, encryption, and large dataset processing. The AMD processor also supports ECC memory, while the Intel processor does not.

PCIe connectivity differs as well. The AMD part provides Gen 4 with 14 lanes from the CPU, while the Intel part provides Gen 3 with 16 lanes from the CPU. The AMD part uses a newer PCIe generation, which doubles the per-lane bandwidth, though it offers fewer total lanes. The integrated graphics also differ: the AMD part uses a Radeon 840M, while the Intel part uses UHD Graphics 630. The AMD integrated GPU is from a newer architecture and pairs with the faster memory subsystem, which should benefit any graphics workload that relies on system memory.

The production status for both is listed as Active. The Intel part has a release date of 2025-09-10, while the AMD part has a release date of 2026-03-08. The AMD part is a mobile segment processor on AMD Socket FP8, while the Intel part is a desktop segment processor on Intel Socket 1200. The AMD part is unlocked for multipliers? No, both are listed as multiplierUnlocked false. The Intel part has a part number of SA35X, while the AMD part's part number is listed as unknown.

Specification Differences

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 has a base clock of 2.00 GHz and a boost clock of 4.50 GHz, while the Intel Core i5-110 has a base clock of 2.90 GHz and a boost clock of 4.30 GHz. The Intel part starts at a higher base frequency, but the AMD part reaches a higher peak boost frequency. The TDP differs meaningfully: the AMD part has a 28 W TDP, while the Intel part has a 65 W TDP. The AMD part is designed for lower power envelopes, which is consistent with its mobile market segment, while the Intel part is a desktop part with a higher thermal budget.

The process node is 4 nm for AMD and 14 nm for Intel. The foundry is TSMC for AMD and Intel for Intel. The socket types differ: AMD Socket FP8 versus Intel Socket 1200. The memory support differs: DDR5 and LPDDR5X for AMD, DDR4 for Intel. The memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD and 42.7 GB/s for Intel. ECC support is present on AMD and absent on Intel. PCIe generation is Gen 4 for AMD and Gen 3 for Intel, with 14 lanes versus 16 lanes respectively. The integrated graphics are Radeon 840M for AMD and UHD Graphics 630 for Intel. The market segment is Mobile for AMD and Desktop for Intel.

Cache specifications differ as noted: L1 is 80 KB per core for AMD versus 64 KB per core for Intel, L2 is 1 MB per core for AMD versus 256 KB per core for Intel, and L3 is 4 MB for AMD versus 12 MB shared for Intel. The release dates are 2026-03-08 for AMD and 2025-09-10 for Intel. The Intel part has a launch MSRP of $200, which can be stated once as a point of record, but no pricing analysis is appropriate here. The AMD part has no launch MSRP listed.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen AI Embedded P132 wins where the database has actual measurements. It delivers a multi-thread score of 19,262 and a single-thread score of 3,713, with an 86th percentile ranking. Its performance profile is well-suited for mobile computing environments that require high throughput per watt, given its 28 W TDP and 4 nm process. The 89.6 GB/s memory bandwidth and DDR5/LPDDR5X support give it an advantage in memory-intensive workloads like data compression, where it scores 230,437, and encryption, where it scores 11,444. The presence of ECC support makes it suitable for embedded or reliability-focused applications where data integrity is critical. Its Gen 4 PCIe interface provides faster interconnect speeds for attached devices, and its Radeon 840M integrated graphics pair with the higher bandwidth memory for better visual output.

The Intel Core i5-110 wins in the absence of data only in terms of its specification sheet. Its higher base clock of 2.90 GHz suggests better responsiveness at low load, and its 12 MB of shared L3 cache is larger than the AMD part's 4 MB, which could benefit workloads with large working sets that fit within that cache. Its 16 Gen 3 PCIe lanes offer more total lanes for expansion, though at a lower per-lane bandwidth. Its 65 W TDP indicates a higher power ceiling, which could allow sustained all-core operation at higher frequencies, but the database contains no benchmark results to confirm this. Its desktop segment positioning and Socket 1200 compatibility make it a conventional desktop processor, whereas the AMD part is mobile-focused.

The data shows that the AMD part is the only one of the two with recorded performance, so any comparison must rely on the AMD part's scores and the Intel part's specifications. The AMD part's 86th percentile ranking versus the Intel part's 50th percentile ranking indicates that the AMD design is positioned far higher in the overall CPU distribution. The nearest rivals to the AMD part, none of which are the Intel Core i5-110, all fall within 0.3% of its average score, which shows that the AMD part sits at a performance tier that is competitive with several modern processors. The Intel Core i5-110, by contrast, has no rivals listed and no scores, so its actual performance class cannot be determined from the database. For workloads where memory bandwidth matters, the AMD part is clearly superior on paper. For workloads that depend on large L3 capacity, the Intel part has a theoretical edge, but without benchmark data, that edge remains unverified.