AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS vs Intel Core i5-14501E Comparison

The Verdict

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS and Intel Core i5-14501E target different physical layouts and workload profiles. The AMD part is a mobile-class processor built on a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Intel part is a desktop-class chip on Intel's 10 nm node. Benchmark data shows no direct head-to-head scores, so the decision rests on the recorded architectural and specification differences.

For multi-threaded throughput and integrated graphics capability, the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS is the stronger pick. Its 8 cores and 16 threads outnumber the Intel part's 6 cores and 12 threads, and it carries the Radeon 780M integrated graphics. The Intel Core i5-14501E counters with a higher single-core boost clock (5.20 GHz vs 5.10 GHz) and a larger shared L3 cache (24 MB vs 16 MB), making it the better choice for lightly threaded tasks and cache-sensitive workloads.

Neither processor has an unlocked multiplier, so overclocking is not an option on either. Both support ECC memory, which is a practical consideration for embedded or server-adjacent builds. The AMD chip uses DDR5 exclusively, while the Intel chip supports both DDR4 and DDR5, giving the latter more flexibility in memory selection.

The Intel part also offers PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes, a clear upgrade path for fast storage or expansion cards. The AMD part stays with PCIe Gen 4 and 20 CPU lanes. If the workload depends on PCIe Gen 5 bandwidth, the Intel chip is the only option here. For a compact, power-conscious embedded system with strong integrated graphics, the AMD part is the logical selection.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS uses the Zen 4 architecture under the Hawk Point codename, part of the Ryzen Embedded 8000 series. It is fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC, with a transistor count of 25,000 million and a die size of 178 mm². The Intel Core i5-14501E uses the Raptor Lake architecture under the Raptor Lake-R codename, part of the Core 14th Gen series. It is built on Intel's 10 nm process with a die size of 215 mm².

The core counts differ substantially. AMD provides 8 cores and 16 threads, Intel provides 6 cores and 12 threads. This gives the AMD part a 33% lead in core count and a 33% lead in thread count. The AMD base clock is 3.80 GHz, the Intel base clock is 3.30 GHz. The Intel boost clock reaches 5.20 GHz, slightly above the AMD's 5.10 GHz.

Cache hierarchies differ in design. The AMD chip allocates 64 KB of L1 per core and 1 MB of L2 per core, with 16 MB of shared L3. The Intel chip allocates 80 KB of L1 per core and 1.25 MB of L2 per core, with 24 MB of shared L3. The Intel part has a larger L3 pool, which can help with repeated data access patterns.

Memory support diverges. AMD supports only DDR5, in a dual-channel configuration, with a memory bandwidth of 89.6 GB/s. Intel supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode, though the database does not record a specific bandwidth figure for it. Both support ECC memory. PCIe capabilities differ: AMD offers Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes, Intel offers Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes.

Integrated graphics also differ. AMD uses the Radeon 780M, Intel uses the UHD Graphics 770. The market segments are distinct: AMD is listed as Mobile, Intel as Desktop. The AMD socket is AMD Socket FP8, the Intel socket is Intel Socket 1700. The AMD release date is April 2024, the Intel release date is June 2024. Both are Active in production status.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark scores for these two processors. The wins counter shows 0 for both sides, and the nearest rivals lists are empty. As a result, direct performance comparisons must be inferred from the specification data.

The core and thread count advantage is the clearest signal. With 8 cores and 16 threads versus 6 cores and 12 threads, the AMD part should handle parallel workloads with more simultaneous tasks. For rendering, compilation, or virtual machine hosting, that extra core pair is a tangible benefit.

The clock speed profile favors Intel for single-thread response. The Intel boost clock of 5.20 GHz is 0.10 GHz higher than the AMD boost clock of 5.10 GHz. The Intel base clock of 3.30 GHz is lower than the AMD base clock of 3.80 GHz, which means the AMD part starts from a higher floor but the Intel part can reach a slightly higher ceiling.

Cache capacity gives Intel an edge in repeated data access. The 24 MB shared L3 on the Intel part is 50% larger than the 16 MB shared L3 on the AMD part. For workloads that fit within the L3 cache, this could reduce memory latency and improve throughput.

Memory bandwidth is only recorded for the AMD part at 89.6 GB/s. The Intel part has no recorded bandwidth figure, so no direct comparison is possible. However, the Intel part's support for both DDR4 and DDR5 means it can adapt to older or newer memory platforms.

PCIe generation is a clear differentiator. Intel provides PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes, AMD provides PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes. Gen 5 doubles the per-lane bandwidth compared to Gen 4, so a single Gen 5 device can achieve higher throughput than a single Gen 4 device. The AMD part has more lanes overall, which may benefit multiple simultaneous devices.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads. The Intel Core i5-14501E has 6 cores and 12 threads. The AMD part leads by 2 cores and 4 threads.

Q: Which processor has the higher boost clock?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E reaches 5.20 GHz. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS reaches 5.10 GHz. The Intel part is 0.10 GHz higher.

Q: Does either processor support ECC memory?

A: Yes. Both the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS and the Intel Core i5-14501E support ECC memory.

Q: Which processor supports PCIe Gen 5?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E supports PCIe Gen 5 with 16 CPU lanes. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports PCIe Gen 4 with 20 CPU lanes.

Q: What memory types does each processor support?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports DDR5 only, in dual-channel mode. The Intel Core i5-14501E supports both DDR4 and DDR5 in dual-channel mode.

Q: Which processor has the larger L3 cache?

A: The Intel Core i5-14501E has 24 MB of shared L3 cache. The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 16 MB of shared L3 cache.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS wins in multi-threaded workloads. Its 8 cores and 16 threads provide more parallel execution capacity than the Intel part's 6 cores and 12 threads. For database servers, virtualization hosts, or content creation tasks that scale across cores, the AMD chip is the stronger option.

The AMD part also wins in integrated graphics. The Radeon 780M is a more capable GPU than the Intel UHD Graphics 770, so systems that rely on the integrated display output or lightweight GPU compute will benefit from the AMD chip.

The AMD part has a higher base clock (3.80 GHz vs 3.30 GHz), which means it starts from a higher performance floor under sustained loads. The memory bandwidth is recorded at 89.6 GB/s, a concrete figure that the Intel part cannot match in the database.

The Intel Core i5-14501E wins in single-thread response. The boost clock of 5.20 GHz is the highest recorded between the two, so lightly threaded applications such as legacy software, single-threaded scripts, or interactive desktop use may feel snappier on the Intel chip.

The Intel part wins in cache capacity. The 24 MB shared L3 cache is larger than the AMD's 16 MB, which can reduce memory access latency for workloads that repeatedly hit the same data set.

The Intel part wins in memory flexibility. Support for both DDR4 and DDR5 allows builders to reuse existing DDR4 modules or move to newer DDR5 modules. The AMD part locks the system to DDR5.

The Intel part wins in PCIe bandwidth. PCIe Gen 5 with 16 lanes offers higher per-lane throughput than PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, which matters for high-speed NVMe storage or modern GPUs that benefit from Gen 5 connectivity.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ in nearly every major specification field. The core count is 8 for AMD versus 6 for Intel. The thread count is 16 for AMD versus 12 for Intel. The base clock is 3.80 GHz for AMD versus 3.30 GHz for Intel. The boost clock is 5.10 GHz for AMD versus 5.20 GHz for Intel.

The TDP is 45 W for AMD versus 65 W for Intel, so the AMD part draws less power under the recorded thermal design point. The socket is AMD Socket FP8 for AMD versus Intel Socket 1700 for Intel. The architecture is Zen 4 for AMD versus Raptor Lake for Intel. The codename is Hawk Point for AMD versus Raptor Lake-R for Intel.

The process node is 4 nm for AMD versus 10 nm for Intel. The foundry is TSMC for AMD versus Intel for Intel. The transistor count is 25,000 million for AMD, while no transistor count is recorded for Intel. The die size is 178 mm² for AMD versus 215 mm² for Intel.

The L1 cache is 64 KB per core for AMD versus 80 KB per core for Intel. The L2 cache is 1 MB per core for AMD versus 1.25 MB per core for Intel. The L3 cache is 16 MB shared for AMD versus 24 MB shared for Intel.

Memory support is DDR5 for AMD versus DDR4 and DDR5 for Intel. The memory bus is dual-channel for both. The memory bandwidth is 89.6 GB/s for AMD, with no recorded figure for Intel. Both support ECC memory.

PCIe is Gen 4 with 20 lanes for AMD versus Gen 5 with 16 lanes for Intel. Integrated graphics is Radeon 780M for AMD versus UHD Graphics 770 for Intel. The market segment is Mobile for AMD versus Desktop for Intel.

The production status is Active for both. The release date is April 2024 for AMD versus June 2024 for Intel. Both are locked, with no unlocked multiplier. The part number is unknown for AMD, while Intel lists Q49HSRNJM.