AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS vs AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data positions the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS as a mid-range mobile processor with a percentile rank of 73 against all CPUs in the database. Its average benchmark score of 19,364 places it in close company with several Intel desktop and mobile parts, including the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V at 19,368 (a 0% delta), the Intel Core i5-1345U at 19,411 (0.2% ahead), and the Intel Core i7-10700F at 19,499 (0.7% ahead). The Ryzen 5 7533HS also edges past the Intel Core i7-8700K, which scores 19,238, a 0.7% deficit for the Intel part. This clustering suggests the 7533HS delivers performance comparable to a broad set of established processors, though it does not decisively outclass any of them.

The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS presents a different profile. The database shows no benchmark scores, no average score, and no nearest rivals for this part, and its percentile rank is 50. Without recorded measurements, the data cannot confirm any performance advantage. The 8845HS carries an 8-core, 16-thread configuration compared to the 6-core, 12-thread 7533HS, and it boosts higher, but the absence of benchmark entries means any performance claims remain unsupported by the database. Users choosing between these two parts should rely on the architectural and specification differences, since only one side has measurable results.

Architecture Differences

The two processors represent different generations and microarchitectures. The Ryzen 5 7533HS belongs to the 7000 series and uses the Zen 3+ architecture under the codename Rembrandt-R. The Ryzen Embedded 8845HS belongs to the 8000 series and uses Zen 4 under the codename Hawk Point. This generational gap brings a node shrink: the 7533HS is built on a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the 8845HS uses a 4 nm process, also at TSMC. The die sizes differ as well, with the 7533HS measuring 208 mm² and the 8845HS measuring 178 mm². The 8845HS lists a transistor count of 25,000 million, while the 7533HS has no recorded transistor figure.

Core counts separate the two clearly. The 7533HS offers 6 cores and 12 threads, while the 8845HS offers 8 cores and 16 threads. Clock speeds also favor the 8845HS: its base clock is 3.80 GHz versus 3.30 GHz, and its boost clock is 5.10 GHz versus 4.40 GHz. The thermal design power reflects this, with the 7533HS rated at 35 W and the 8845HS at 45 W.

Cache hierarchies share a common L1 organization of 64 KB per core and an L3 cache of 16 MB shared, but the L2 cache differs. The 7533HS has 512 KB per core, while the 8845HS doubles that to 1 MB per core. Both support DDR5 memory in a dual-channel configuration, though memory bandwidth is higher on the 8845HS at 89.6 GB/s versus 76.8 GB/s. The 8845HS also supports ECC memory, while the 7533HS does not. Both use PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes from the CPU. Integrated graphics differ: the 7533HS carries a Radeon 660M, while the 8845HS carries a Radeon 780M. Sockets diverge as well, with the 7533HS on AMD Socket FP7 and the 8845HS on AMD Socket FP8. The 7533HS has a listed part number of 100-000001632(FP7)100-000001634(FP7r2), while the 8845HS has an unknown part number. Both processors are active in production, both are locked (multiplier not unlocked), and both target the mobile market segment. Release dates differ: the 7533HS launched on 2024-08-31, while the 8845HS launched earlier on 2024-04-01.

FAQ

Q: Which processor has more cores and threads?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS has 8 cores and 16 threads, while the AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS has 6 cores and 12 threads.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare?

A: The 8845HS boosts to 5.10 GHz, which is 0.70 GHz higher than the 7533HS boost clock of 4.40 GHz.

Q: Which part supports ECC memory?

A: The AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS supports ECC memory. The AMD Ryzen 5 7533HS does not.

Q: Do the two processors use the same process node?

A: No. The 7533HS uses a 6 nm process at TSMC, while the 8845HS uses a 4 nm process, also at TSMC.

Q: Are there benchmark scores available for both?

A: No. The database lists 17 benchmark entries for the 7533HS, including Cinebench and Passmark results, but no benchmark scores for the 8845HS.

Q: Which processor has a higher memory bandwidth rating?

A: The 8845HS is rated at 89.6 GB/s, compared to 76.8 GB/s for the 7533HS.

Specification Differences

The two processors differ across nearly every core specification. Core count: 6 versus 8. Thread count: 12 versus 16. Base clock: 3.30 GHz versus 3.80 GHz. Boost clock: 4.40 GHz versus 5.10 GHz. TDP: 35 W versus 45 W. Process node: 6 nm versus 4 nm. Die size: 208 mm² versus 178 mm². Transistor count: not recorded for the 7533HS, while the 8845HS lists 25,000 million. L2 cache: 512 KB per core versus 1 MB per core. L3 cache is identical at 16 MB shared, and L1 is identical at 64 KB per core.

Memory bandwidth differs: 76.8 GB/s versus 89.6 GB/s. ECC support is absent on the 7533HS and present on the 8845HS. The integrated GPU differs, Radeon 660M versus Radeon 780M. Sockets differ, FP7 versus FP8. Architecture differs, Zen 3+ versus Zen 4. Codenames differ, Rembrandt-R versus Hawk Point. The series differ, 7000 series versus 8000 series. Generation labels differ: the 7533HS is listed as Ryzen 5 (Zen 3+ (Rembrandt)), while the 8845HS is listed as Ryzen Embedded (Zen 4 (Hawk Point)). Release dates differ: 2024-08-31 versus 2024-04-01. The 7533HS has a recorded part number, while the 8845HS part number is unknown.

Both parts share DDR5 memory support, dual-channel memory buses, PCIe Gen 4 with 20 lanes, the same foundry (TSMC), the same manufacturer (AMD), active production status, mobile market segment, and locked multipliers.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no head-to-head benchmark entries for these two processors. It also lists no benchmark scores at all for the AMD Ryzen Embedded 8845HS. Consequently, a direct comparison of measured performance is impossible from the recorded data. The Ryzen 5 7533HS, however, has a full set of 17 benchmark results that can be examined on its own.

In Cinebench R15, the 7533HS scores 1,243 in multi-core and 175 in single-core. Cinebench R20 results show 5,183 multi-core and 731 single-core. Cinebench R23 shows 12,342 multi-core and 1,742 single-core. Passmark results for the 7533HS include a multi-thread score of 14,520, a single-thread score of 2,740, integer math at 50,800, floating point math at 27,800, data compression at 168,692, data encryption at 10,718, extended instructions at 11,219, find prime numbers at 48, random string sorting at 17,669, and physics at 821.

The average benchmark score for the 7533HS is 19,364, which the nearest rival data shows is effectively tied with the Intel Core Ultra 5 226V at 19,368. The Intel Core i5-1345U leads by 0.2% at 19,411, and the Intel Core i7-10700F leads by 0.7% at 19,499. The Intel Core i7-8700K trails by 0.7% at 19,238. These deltas are small, all within 0.7 percentage points, indicating the 7533HS sits in a tightly packed performance band. The 8845HS has no comparable scores, so no head-to-head deltas can be computed.

Where Each One Wins

From the available data, the Ryzen 5 7533HS wins in the only category where both parts have recorded measurements: benchmark availability. It has 17 scores spanning rendering, math, encryption, compression, and sorting workloads. Its 73rd percentile ranking against all CPUs in the database gives it a defined position in the performance hierarchy. The nearest rival comparisons show it trading places with four Intel parts within a 0.7% band, which implies consistent, predictable performance for a 6-core Zen 3+ mobile chip.

The Ryzen Embedded 8845HS wins on paper specifications. It offers more cores, more threads, higher base and boost clocks, a larger L2 cache, higher memory bandwidth, ECC support, a newer 4 nm process, a smaller die, and a more advanced integrated GPU. These specifications suggest the 8845HS is built for heavier workloads, especially those that benefit from additional cores and threads. Its 45 W TDP and 5.10 GHz boost clock position it as the higher-performance part on paper, though the database contains no measurements to confirm this.

The data implies the 7533HS is the part for users who want a known performance profile with recorded results across many workloads. The 8845HS is the part for users who prioritize specifications such as ECC memory support, higher core counts, and higher memory bandwidth, and who are willing to accept an unmeasured performance profile. The absence of benchmark data for the 8845HS prevents any quantitative verdict on its real-world standing.